![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/trezhnjeva-vettingu--533x400.jpg\")
Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit n\u00eb raportin paraprak t\u00eb lexuar n\u00eb seanc\u00ebn d\u00ebgjimore t\u00eb s\u00eb m\u00ebrkur\u00ebs akuzoi \u00a0Gjyqtarin e Apelit Durr\u00ebs, nj\u00ebkoh\u00ebsisht kandidat p\u00ebr K\u00ebshillin e Lart\u00eb Gjyq\u00ebsor (KLGJ), Besim Trezhnjeva, se kishte b\u00ebr\u00eb deklarim t\u00eb rrem\u00eb t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb, se ai nuk e justifikonte at\u00eb me t\u00eb ardhurat dhe se kishte fshehur pasurin\u00eb. N\u00eb raportin e lexuar nga relatorja Firdes Shuli theksohej po ashtu se KPK e cil\u00ebsonte t\u00eb mjafuesh\u00ebm vler\u00ebsimin e gjykat\u00ebsit p\u00ebrmes kriterit t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb, nd\u00ebrsa nuk kishte p\u00ebrfunduar hetimi sa i p\u00ebrket past\u00ebrtis\u00eb s\u00eb figur\u00ebs dhe vler\u00ebsimin profesional.<\/p>\n
Gjykat\u00ebsi Trezhnjeva i pranish\u00ebm n\u00eb seanc\u00eb, p\u00ebrmes avoaktit Fatmir Braka, kund\u00ebrshtoi gjetjet. Braka tha se \u201craporti paraprak i KPK ka anomali dhe pasakt\u00ebsi\u201d, nd\u00ebrsa pretendoi se nuk ishin marr\u00eb n\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha burimet e t\u00eb ardhurave.<\/p>\n
Trezhnjeva \u00ebsht\u00eb gjykat\u00ebsi i tret\u00eb q\u00eb kalon procesin e vler\u00ebsimit t\u00eb figur\u00ebs n\u00eb Komisionin e Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit, pas Fatos Lulos q\u00eb u shkarkua nga detyra p\u00ebr pasuri t\u00eb pajustifikuar dhe Vitore Tush\u00ebs, e cila u rikonfirmua n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Kushtetuese. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb prej fillimit t\u00eb pun\u00ebs s\u00eb KPK 11 subjekte, p\u00ebrfshi ish-Prokurorin e P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm dhe nj\u00eb ish an\u00ebtar\u00eb t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese dhan\u00eb dor\u00ebheqjen duke iu shmangur procesit.<\/p>\n
Seanca ndaj Trezhnjev\u00ebs filloi me leximin e raportit paraprak nga relatorja Shuli. Ajo theksoi q\u00eb n\u00eb fillim se nd\u00ebrsa gjat\u00eb gjith\u00eb periudh\u00ebs s\u00eb hetimit administrativ gjykat\u00ebsit – i cili ka edhe barr\u00ebn e prov\u00ebs n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb proces – ishte dh\u00ebn\u00eb mund\u00ebsia t\u00eb dokumentonte pasurin\u00eb ai nuk kishte qen\u00eb bashk\u00ebpunues.<\/p>\n
\u201cGjat\u00eb k\u00ebtij komunikimi u konstatua se nuk ka qen\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsisht bashk\u00ebpunues\u201d, tha Shuli. KPK iu referua ILDKPKI, e cila ka b\u00ebr\u00eb edhe vler\u00ebsimin e pasuris\u00eb s\u00eb gjyqtarit dhe \u00ebsht\u00eb shprehur se \u201cDeklarimi i pasuris\u00eb nga gjykat\u00ebsi, nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb i sakt\u00eb dhe n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me ligjin\u201d.<\/p>\n
Konkretisht sipas raportit paraprak gjykat\u00ebsi akuzohet p\u00ebr fshehje pasurie dhe deklarim t\u00eb rrem\u00eb. \u201cNga analiza e thell\u00eb financiare kan\u00eb rezultuar deklarime t\u00eb pasakta lidhur me t\u00eb ardhurat e bashk\u00ebshortes. Munges\u00eb burimesh financiare p\u00ebr t\u00eb justifikuar pasurin\u00eb. Deklarime t\u00eb rreme n\u00eb t\u00eb ardhurat e bashk\u00ebshortes\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb raportin parpak t\u00eb KPK-s\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Konkretisht KPK pretendon se nj\u00eb kredi 50 mij\u00eb euro e deklaruar si pages\u00eb p\u00ebr nj\u00eb \u00a0apartament 120 metra katror\u00eb n\u00eb Tiran\u00eb, rezulton se nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb paguar p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb apartament, por \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrdorur p\u00ebr nj\u00eb apartament n\u00eb Durr\u00ebs. \u00a0Po ashtu gjat\u00eb seanc\u00ebs doli se sipas KPK t\u00eb ardhurat e gjyqtarit nuk justifikonin nj\u00eb shif\u00ebr prej 20 milion\u00eb lek\u00ebsh dhe se ai nuk kishte deklaruar nj\u00eb llogari bankare t\u00eb vajz\u00ebs s\u00eb tij me vler\u00eb 148 mij\u00eb lek\u00eb.<\/p>\n