{"id":49898,"date":"2018-06-12T18:26:12","date_gmt":"2018-06-12T16:26:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/?p=49898"},"modified":"2019-05-06T23:37:10","modified_gmt":"2019-05-06T23:37:10","slug":"zbardhja-e-vendimit-te-kpk-fatmir-hoxha-fshehu-huane-per-shtepi-nga-kunati","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/zbardhja-e-vendimit-te-kpk-fatmir-hoxha-fshehu-huane-per-shtepi-nga-kunati\/2018\/06\/12\/","title":{"rendered":"Zbardhja e vendimit t\u00eb KPK, Fatmir Hoxha fshehu huan\u00eb p\u00ebr sht\u00ebpi nga kunati"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>KPK ka qen\u00eb e ndar\u00eb n\u00eb vendimin p\u00ebr shkarkimin e an\u00ebtarit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese, Fatmir Hoxh\u00ebs. Dy nga gjyqtar\u00ebt vler\u00ebsuan se ai duhej t\u00eb shkarkohej \u201cp\u00ebr deklarim t\u00eb pamjaftuesh\u00ebm t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb\u201d, nj\u00eb prej tyre thot\u00eb se ai duhej t\u00eb rikonfirmohej.\u00a0<!--more--><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_49899\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-49899\" style=\"width: 600px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/20180510_152138_100518055-5_6fC89s5.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-large wp-image-49899\" src=\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/20180510_152138_100518055-5_6fC89s5-600x388.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"388\" data-id=\"49899\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-49899\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Alma Faskaj, Xhensila Pine, Valbona Sanxhaktari, gjat\u00eb nj\u00eb seance t\u00eb Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit, KPK, i cili ka shkarkuar nga detyra, gjyqtarin Fatmir Hoxha, an\u00ebtar i Gjykates Kushtetuese. | Foto nga : LSA<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit vendosi se Fatmir Hoxha, deri s\u00ebfundmi an\u00ebtar i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese, shkarkohej \u201cp\u00ebr deklarim t\u00eb pamjaftuesh\u00ebm p\u00ebr kriterin e kontrollit t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb\u201d. Vendimi i cili u zbardh t\u00eb h\u00ebn\u00ebn [<a href=\"http:\/\/kpk.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/Vendimi-Fatmir-Hoxha.pdf\">Link Vendimi<\/a>], u mor me votat pro t\u00eb kryesueses Xhensila Pine dhe relatores Alma Faskaj, nd\u00ebrsa kund\u00ebr u shpreh Valbona Sanxhaktari e cila thot\u00eb se Hoxha duhej t\u00eb rikonfirmohej.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb vendimin e shumic\u00ebs KPK arsyeton se Hoxha ka d\u00ebshtuar t\u00eb deklaroj\u00eb p\u00ebr \u201cvetingun\u201d dhe t\u00eb justifikoj\u00eb me dokumentacion nj\u00eb hua nga kunati n\u00eb vler\u00eb 28.500 euro, nuk justifikonte me t\u00eb ardhura nj\u00eb shum\u00eb prej 1.7 milion lek\u00ebsh shpenzime n\u00eb vitin 2011 dhe nuk kishte deklaruar nj\u00eb shum\u00eb prej 330 mij\u00eb lek\u00ebsh n\u00eb llogarin\u00eb bankare t\u00eb s\u00eb shoqes n\u00eb vitin 2003.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb mendimin e pakic\u00ebs Sanxhaktari i cil\u00ebsoi arsyetimin e shumic\u00ebs t\u00eb pabazuar dhe shkroi se Hoxha duhej t\u00eb ishte rikonfirmuar pasi \u201cka krijuar nj\u00eb nivel t\u00eb besuesh\u00ebm p\u00ebr vler\u00ebsimin e pasuris\u00eb, ka krijuar nj\u00eb nivel t\u00eb besuesh\u00ebm p\u00ebr vler\u00ebsimin e figur\u00ebs, si dhe ka krijuar nj\u00eb nivel t\u00eb mjaftuesh\u00ebm profesional\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Si an\u00ebtar i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese, Fatmir Hoxha isht\u00eb pjes\u00eb e list\u00ebs prioritare t\u00eb procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit, i njohur gjer\u00ebsisht si procesi i vetingut. Lindur n\u00eb vitin 1968 n\u00eb Puk\u00eb, gjyqtari Fatmir Hoxha u diplomua n\u00eb drejt\u00ebsi n\u00eb Fakultetin Juridik t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Tiran\u00ebs n\u00eb vitin 1991. Nga viti 1993 deri n\u00eb vitin 1996 Hoxha ka punuar si gjyqtar n\u00eb vendlindjen e tij n\u00eb Puk\u00eb, ku ka ushtruar dhe funksionin e kryetarit t\u00eb gjykat\u00ebs. Nga viti 1996 deri n\u00eb vitin 1998, Hoxha ka ushtruar detyr\u00ebn n\u00eb gjykat\u00ebn e Apelit Tiran\u00eb dhe nga viti 2003 deri ne 2008 ai ka sh\u00ebrbyer si kryetar i gjykat\u00ebs n\u00eb Shkod\u00ebr. N\u00eb vitin 2011 ai em\u00ebrua an\u00ebtar i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Argumentet e shumic\u00ebs<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Nd\u00ebrsa jan\u00eb ndaluar vet\u00ebm shkurt n\u00eb kriteret e past\u00ebrtis\u00eb s\u00eb figur\u00ebs dhe profesionalizimit t\u00eb cilat Hoxha sipas vendimit i ka p\u00ebrmbushur, KPK \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrq\u00ebndruar n\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin e pasuris\u00eb s\u00eb gjykat\u00ebsit, e cila sipas shumic\u00ebs s\u00eb trup\u00ebs gjykuese ishte me probleme.<\/p>\n<p>K\u00ebshtu KPK thot\u00eb se gjeti \u201cdeklarim t\u00eb pasakt\u00eb dhe jo n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me ligjin p\u00ebr burimin e krijimit t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj pasurie\u201d, pasi n\u00eb Deklarat\u00ebn \u201cVetting\u201dnuk \u00ebsht\u00eb deklaruar si burim huaja e marr\u00eb shtetasit A.G.n\u00eb vler\u00ebn prej 28500 euro. KPK thot\u00eb se argumenti i mbrojtjes s\u00eb gjyqtarit se huaja ishte shlyer dhe se ajo ishte deklaruar n\u00eb ILDKPKI dhe p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb nuk ishte dukur i nevojsh\u00ebm p\u00ebrfshirja n\u00eb\u201cdeklart\u00ebn vetting\u201d\u00a0 ishte i \u201cpamb\u00ebshtetur n\u00eb ligj\u201d. Ajo e ka cil\u00ebsuar deklarimin n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast t\u00eb pamjaftuesh\u00ebm, nd\u00ebrsa thot\u00eb q\u00eb pavar\u00ebsisht deklarimeve t\u00eb m\u00ebparshme huaja duhej t\u00eb ishte dh\u00ebn\u00eb si burim edhe n\u00eb \u201cdeklarat\u00ebn vetting\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Po ashtu aty thuhet se kunati i gjykat\u00ebsit t\u00eb shkarkuar nga KPK nuk kishte mundur t\u00eb provonte burim t\u00eb ligjsh\u00ebm t\u00eb t\u00eb ardhurave q\u00eb i mund\u00ebsonin huadh\u00ebnien n\u00eb vler\u00ebn 28,500 euro.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNga verifikimi i dokumentacionit n\u00eb dosje, rezultoi se nga Z. A. G., nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb depozituar asnj\u00eb dokument p\u00ebr justifikimin e ligjshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb burimit t\u00eb krijimit t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb, t\u00eb cil\u00ebn ai e ka dh\u00ebn\u00eb hua\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb vendim. Aty thuhet edhe se kunati kishte pranuar n\u00eb d\u00ebshmi se \u201cnuk ka qen\u00eb i regjistruar pran\u00eb organeve tatimore, pasi nuk ka pasur ligj n\u00eb at\u00eb koh\u00eb\u201d, nd\u00ebrsa ka pranuar edhe se nuk ka paguar tatime.<\/p>\n<p>KPK thot\u00eb n\u00eb vendim se gjeti edhe se gjykat\u00ebsi nuk justifikonte nj\u00eb shum\u00eb prej 1.7 milion lek\u00ebsh shpenzime n\u00eb vitin 2011. N\u00eb analiz\u00ebn financiare t\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb nga KPK llogariteshin 640.000 lek\u00eb shpenzime jetese p\u00ebr gjith\u00eb vitin, 2.5 milion\u00eb lek\u00eb shpenzime mobilimi dhe pagesa k\u00ebstesh huaje. Sipas k\u00ebsaj analize shuma prej 1.7 milion nuk mbulohej nga t\u00eb ardhurat. Justifikimi i gjykat\u00ebsit se kjo shum\u00eb ishte v\u00ebn\u00eb nga shitja informale e mobiljeve t\u00eb sht\u00ebpis\u00eb n\u00eb Shkod\u00ebr, piktuave dhe disa sendeve t\u00eb tjera p\u00ebrfshi nj\u00eb bateri inverter, nuk r ka bindur KPK-n\u00eb. Shumica arsyetoi se p\u00ebr sa koh\u00eb p\u00ebr k\u00ebto t\u00eb ardhura nuk ishte paguar tatim ato nuk mund t\u00eb merreshin parasysh. \u201cSi t\u00eb tilla k\u00ebto t\u00eb ardhura nuk duhet t\u00eb merren n\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb&#8221;, arsyetoi KPK.<\/p>\n<p>Po ashtu KPK thot\u00eb se Hoxha nuk kishte deklaruar 330 mij\u00eb lek\u00eb n\u00eb vitin 2003. \u201cSubjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit ka fshehur duke mos e deklaruar shum\u00ebn prej 330.000 lek\u00eb, gjendje n\u00eb llogarin\u00eb depozit\u00eb t\u00eb bashk\u00ebshortes\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb arsyetim. KPK nuk ka marr\u00eb parasysh pretendimin e avokatit t\u00eb Hoxh\u00ebs se \u201cmos deklarimi i depozit\u00ebs s\u00eb bashk\u00ebshortes n\u00eb deklarimin periodik t\u00eb vitit 2003 ka qen\u00eb lapsus, i cili \u00ebsht\u00eb korrigjuar n\u00eb deklarat\u00ebn e vitit 2004\u201d.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mendimi i pakic\u00ebs <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>An\u00ebtarja e KPK-s\u00eb Valbona Sanxhaktari nuk ka qen\u00eb dakord me arsyetimin e dy an\u00ebtareve t\u00eb tjera t\u00eb trup\u00ebs gjykuese. Sanxhaktari n\u00eb mendimin e pakic\u00ebs argumenton se Fatmir Hoxha duhej t\u00eb ishte rikonfirmuar dhe sipas saj ai p\u00ebrmbush t\u00eb treja kriteret.<\/p>\n<p>Sanxhaktari thot\u00eb se mosdeklarimi i huas\u00eb n\u00eb \u201cdeklarat\u00ebn vetting\u201d nuk ishte arsye p\u00ebr penalizim, pasi huaja ishte shlyer dhe se ajo kishte qen\u00eb e deklaruar m\u00eb par\u00eb n\u00eb deklarimet vjetore t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb. Sipas saj mungesa e saj n\u00eb deklarat\u00ebn p\u00ebr llogari t\u00eb vetingut \u201cnuk p\u00ebrb\u00ebn shkak p\u00ebr fshehje t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb apo deklarim t\u00eb pasakt\u00eb\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Ajo po ashtu thot\u00eb se kunati i Hoxh\u00ebs kishte depozituar dokumente q\u00eb v\u00ebrtetonin se parat\u00eb e dh\u00ebna hua ishin t\u00ebrhequr nga llogari bankare.\u00a0 Ajo nuk bie dakord edhe me gjetjet e shumic\u00ebs sa i p\u00ebrket t\u00eb ardhurave p\u00ebr vitet 2003 dhe 2011. Mosdeklarimin e shum\u00ebs prej 330 mij\u00eb lek\u00eb ajo e cil\u00ebson \u201cirrelevante\u201d, nd\u00ebrsa nuk bie dakord me q\u00ebndrimin e shumic\u00ebs edhe p\u00ebr mosmarrjen n\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb t\u00eb parave t\u00eb fituara nga shitja e mobiljeve e sendeve sht\u00ebpiake, nd\u00ebrsa thot\u00eb se ligji nuk k\u00ebrkon q\u00eb p\u00ebr to t\u00eb paguhet tatim.<\/p>\n<p>Sipas saj mosmbulimi i shpenzimeve nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb arsye p\u00ebr shkarkim pasi ligji \u201cparashikon si shkak kalimin e dyfishit t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb s\u00eb ligjshme\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Sanxhaktari thot\u00eb se KPK duhej t\u00eb kishte rikonfirmuar Fatmir Hoxh\u00ebn dhe vler\u00ebson se ai ka \u201cushtruar detyr\u00ebn me p\u00ebrkushtim\u201d.<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>KPK ka qen\u00eb e ndar\u00eb n\u00eb vendimin p\u00ebr shkarkimin e an\u00ebtarit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese, Fatmir Hoxh\u00ebs. Dy nga gjyqtar\u00ebt vler\u00ebsuan se ai duhej t\u00eb shkarkohej \u201cp\u00ebr deklarim t\u00eb pamjaftuesh\u00ebm t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb\u201d, nj\u00eb prej tyre thot\u00eb se ai duhej t\u00eb rikonfirmohej.\u00a0<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":97,"featured_media":69755,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[13,5],"tags":[],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/20180510_152138_100518055-5_6fC89s5-600x388.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49898"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/97"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=49898"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49898\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":62558,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49898\/revisions\/62558"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/69755"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=49898"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=49898"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=49898"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}