{"id":53479,"date":"2018-11-01T14:59:48","date_gmt":"2018-11-01T12:59:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/?p=53479"},"modified":"2019-05-06T23:26:54","modified_gmt":"2019-05-06T23:26:54","slug":"shtepia-5-kateshe-dhe-llogarite-bankare-rrezuan-ish-kreun-e-prokurorise-ne-veting","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/shtepia-5-kateshe-dhe-llogarite-bankare-rrezuan-ish-kreun-e-prokurorise-ne-veting\/2018\/11\/01\/","title":{"rendered":"Sht\u00ebpia 5-kat\u00ebshe dhe llogarit\u00eb bankare rr\u00ebzuan ish-kreun e Prokuroris\u00eb n\u00eb veting"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Vendimi i arsyetuar i KPK p\u00ebr prokurorin Dritan Rreshka e b\u00ebn at\u00eb p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebs p\u00ebr \u201cburime t\u00eb pamjaftueshme dhe deklarime t\u00eb rreme\u201d me nj\u00eb sht\u00ebpie 5-kat\u00ebshe si dhe \u201cc\u00ebnim t\u00eb besimit te drejt\u00ebsia\u201d p\u00ebrmes veprimeve fiktive p\u00ebr p\u00ebrfitimin e nj\u00eb kredie t\u00eb but\u00eb. Rreshka i kund\u00ebrshtoi gjetjet, por probleme rezultuan edhe n\u00eb pasurit\u00eb e familjar\u00ebve.\u00a0<!--more--><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_51065\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-51065\" style=\"width: 482px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/20180727_174610_270718038-3_w5sgbtg.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-image-51065 size-large\" src=\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/20180727_174610_270718038-3_w5sgbtg-482x400.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"482\" height=\"400\" data-id=\"51065\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-51065\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Prokurori i Prokuroris\u00eb s\u00eb Tiranes, Dritan Rreshka, duke dale nga nj\u00eb seanc\u00eb e Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit, KPK, | Foto nga : LSA<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Ish-kreu i komanduar i Prokuroris\u00eb s\u00eb Tiran\u00ebs, Dritan Rreshka u rr\u00ebzua n\u00eb veting m\u00eb 31 korrik p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb. Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit argumenton n\u00eb vendimin e zbardhur t\u00eb shkarkimit se Rreshka nuk ka pasur burime financiare t\u00eb mjaftueshme dhe ka kryer veprime t\u00eb fshehjes s\u00eb pasuris\u00eb, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb edhe personat e lidhur me t\u00eb kan\u00eb rezultuar me pasuri t\u00eb pajustifikuara.<\/p>\n<p>Gjat\u00eb procesit, Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit, i p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsuar nga Valbona Sanxhaktari, Xhensila Pine dhe Etleda \u00c7iftja hodhi posht\u00eb nj\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb t\u00eb prokurorit Rreshka p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrjashtuar raportin negativ t\u00eb Inspektoriatit t\u00eb Lart\u00eb t\u00eb Deklarimit dhe Kontrollit t\u00eb Pasurive, me pretendimin e konfliktit t\u00eb interesit p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb pozicionit t\u00eb tij si drejtues i nj\u00ebsis\u00eb s\u00eb posa\u00e7me kund\u00ebr korrupsionit n\u00eb Prokurorin\u00eb e Tiran\u00ebs. KPK nuk mori gjithashtu parasysh k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr vler\u00ebsimin e dy kritereve t\u00eb tjera.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cP\u00ebr shmangien e \u00e7do keqinterpretimi, ky vendim mbi p\u00ebrfundimin e procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit p\u00ebr z. Dritan Rreshka merret vet\u00ebm mbi kriterin e vler\u00ebsimit t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb dhe kjo nuk p\u00ebrb\u00ebn gj\u00eb t\u00eb gjykuar (res judicata) p\u00ebr kriterin e vler\u00ebsimit t\u00eb figur\u00ebs dhe at\u00eb t\u00eb vler\u00ebsimit profesional,\u201d thuhet n\u00eb vendimin e KPK-s\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>KPK kreu hetime dhe gjeti probleme mbi nj\u00eb godin\u00eb 5-kat\u00ebshe t\u00eb legalizuar n\u00eb em\u00ebr t\u00eb \u00a0Dritan Rreshk\u00ebs, mbi burimin e nj\u00eb llogarie bankare prej 1.9 milion\u00eb lek\u00ebsh si dhe mbi ligjshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e fondeve prej 7.9 milion\u00eb lek\u00ebsh t\u00eb investuara n\u00eb blerje obligacionesh. Komisioni hetoi gjithashtu mbi pasurit\u00eb e personave t\u00eb lidhur, respektivisht v\u00ebllez\u00ebrve dhe n\u00ebn\u00ebs s\u00eb prokurorit dhe arriti n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin se kishin munges\u00eb burimesh financiare.<\/p>\n<p>Prokurori Rreshka ka deklaruar p\u00ebr llogari t\u00eb vetingut pron\u00ebsin\u00eb mbi katin p\u00ebrdhe prej 131 metrash katror\u00eb dhe katin e dyt\u00eb me sip\u00ebrfaqe 166 metra katror\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00eb godine me vler\u00eb investimi prej 2.8 milion\u00eb lek\u00ebsh, t\u00eb fituara nga emigrimi n\u00eb Greqi, puna pran\u00eb nj\u00eb organizate n\u00eb Tiran\u00eb si dhe nj\u00eb kredi bankare prej 18 mij\u00eb eurosh.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Lexo m\u00eb tep\u00ebr:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"\/?p=51154\">Shkarkohet kreu i komanduar i Prokuroris\u00eb s\u00eb Tiran\u00ebs<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"\/?p=51067\">Prokurori Rreshka akuzon ILDKPKI p\u00ebr manipulim t\u00eb raportit t\u00eb vetingut<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"\/?p=50974\">Skeda e pasuris\u00eb s\u00eb deklaruar-Dritan Rreshka-kreu i Prokuroris\u00eb s\u00eb Tiran\u00ebs<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Por Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit ka zbuluar se kjo pron\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb pjes\u00eb p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00ebse e nj\u00eb godine 5-kat\u00ebshe t\u00eb legalizuar n\u00eb shkurt t\u00eb vitit 2012 n\u00eb em\u00ebr t\u00eb Dritan Rreshk\u00ebs, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb dy muaj pas legalizimit, prokurori i ka dhuruar t\u00eb v\u00ebllait katin e par\u00eb dhe nj\u00eb apartament brenda godin\u00ebs.<\/p>\n<p>Prokurori Dritan Rreshka shpjegoi para Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit se nd\u00ebrtimi i sht\u00ebpis\u00eb kishte filluar n\u00eb vitin 2004 dhe kishte p\u00ebrfunduar n\u00eb vitin 2009, me kontributin e p\u00ebrbashk\u00ebt financiar t\u00eb tij dhe t\u00eb v\u00ebllait. \u00a0Megjithat\u00eb, procesi i legalizimit \u00ebsht\u00eb kryer vet\u00ebm n\u00eb em\u00ebr t\u00eb tij, p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnies s\u00eb pron\u00ebsis\u00eb q\u00eb kishte mbi truallin.<\/p>\n<p>\u201c\u2026De jure ka qen\u00eb ai pronar i t\u00eb gjith\u00eb godin\u00ebs, kurse de facto ka qen\u00eb v\u00ebllai i tij (g\u00ebzues dhe posedues) i katit t\u00eb par\u00eb t\u00eb banes\u00ebs q\u00eb prej gjysm\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb t\u00eb vitit 2004, si edhe i katit t\u00eb kat\u00ebrt q\u00eb prej gjasht\u00ebmujorit t\u00eb par\u00eb t\u00eb vitit 2009,\u201d citohet t\u00eb ket\u00eb pretenduar Rreshka n\u00eb vendimin e KPK-s\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>Pavar\u00ebsisht shpjegimeve, Komisioni arrin n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin se subjekti ka fshehur fillimin e nd\u00ebrtimit t\u00eb sht\u00ebpis\u00eb n\u00eb deklarat\u00ebn e vitit 2003 si dhe ka fshehur 2 kate t\u00eb pron\u00ebs n\u00eb deklarimin e tij t\u00eb vitit 2012, kur fitoi lejen e legalizimit.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSipas dokumentacionit t\u00eb administruar nga ZVRPP dhe ALUIZNI, deri n\u00eb vitin 2012 ai ka qen\u00eb pronar dhe posedues i vet\u00ebm i godin\u00ebs 5-kat\u00ebshe\u2026ka pasur detyrimin ligjor t\u00eb deklaronte t\u00eb 5-ta katet e banes\u00ebs\u2026,\u201d shtohet n\u00eb vendim.<\/p>\n<p>P\u00ebrve\u00e7 akuzave p\u00ebr deklarim t\u00eb rrem\u00eb dhe fshehje pasurie, Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit argumenton se prokurori Dritan Rreshka ka b\u00ebr\u00eb deklarim t\u00eb rrem\u00eb edhe p\u00ebr vler\u00ebn e nd\u00ebrtimit t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj godine si dhe nuk justifikon me burime t\u00eb ligjshme parat\u00eb e investuara. P\u00ebr efekt t\u00eb vetingut, prokurori ka deklaruar nj\u00eb investim total prej 5.9 milion\u00eb lek\u00ebsh p\u00ebr nd\u00ebrtimin e vil\u00ebs, por KPK, e cila i referohet kostove mesatare t\u00eb nd\u00ebrtimit t\u00eb Entit Komb\u00ebtar t\u00eb Banesave, thot\u00eb se ajo ka kushtuar rreth 18.1 milion\u00eb lek\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSubjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit nuk shpjegoi bindsh\u00ebm burimin e ligjsh\u00ebm t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj pasurie t\u00eb legalizuar m\u00eb dat\u00eb 20.02.2012, regjistruar n\u00eb ZVRPP-n\u00eb Tiran\u00eb n\u00eb mars 2012; nuk provoi burimin e t\u00eb ardhurave nga emigracioni dhe qiraja e katit p\u00ebrdhes t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj prone dhe nuk provoi me dokumentacion ligjshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e k\u00ebtyre t\u00eb ardhurave,\u201d thuhet n\u00eb vendimin e KPK-s\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>Problemet me k\u00ebt\u00eb pron\u00eb nuk jan\u00eb t\u00eb vetmet. Sipas Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit, Rreshka ka kryer deklarim t\u00eb rrem\u00eb edhe me blerjen dhe m\u00eb pas shitjen e nj\u00eb apartamenti n\u00eb Tiran\u00eb, prej nga buron edhe nj\u00eb depozit\u00eb bankare prej 1.9 milion\u00eb lek\u00ebsh. P\u00ebr blerjen e k\u00ebtij apartamenti, subjekti kishte aplikuar p\u00ebr nj\u00eb kredi me kushte leht\u00ebsuese, veprime t\u00eb cilat jan\u00eb cil\u00ebsuar fiktive dhe n\u00eb shkelje t\u00eb ligjit nga KPK, n\u00eb kushtet kur ai zot\u00ebronte sht\u00ebpi banimi pran\u00eb vendit t\u00eb kryerjes s\u00eb detyr\u00ebs n\u00eb Tiran\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cK\u00ebto veprime nuk jan\u00eb n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me figur\u00ebn e nj\u00eb prokurori n\u00eb detyr\u00eb, duke cenuar besimin e publikut te sistemi i drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb,\u201d thuhet n\u00eb vendim.<\/p>\n<p>Sipas vendimit t\u00eb zbardhur, prokurori Rreshka nuk justifikon me burime t\u00eb ligjshme rreth 2 milion\u00eb lek\u00eb nga 7.9 milion\u00ebt e investuara n\u00eb blerje obligacionesh. P\u00ebr t\u00eb arritur n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim, KPK ka gjetur se subjekti nuk ka paguar n\u00eb koh\u00eb tatimin mbi qirat\u00eb p\u00ebr vitet 2009, 2010 dhe 2012-detyrime q\u00eb sipas Komisionit jan\u00eb shlyer pas plot\u00ebsimit t\u00eb deklarat\u00ebs \u201cVeting\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit ka hetuar gjithashtu mbi kompanin\u00eb e pajisjeve dentare \u201cIl Bano\u201d, aksionet e s\u00eb cil\u00ebs jan\u00eb bler\u00eb nga v\u00ebllai i prokurit Rreshka dhe kunata e tij p\u00ebr 100 mij\u00eb lek\u00eb n\u00eb vitin 2014 si dhe mbi nj\u00eb depozit\u00eb bankare n\u00eb em\u00ebr t\u00eb n\u00ebn\u00ebs s\u00eb tij.\u00a0 Duke iu referuar pasqyrave financiare t\u00eb vitit 2016, KPK arsyetoi se familjar\u00ebt e prokurorit Rreshka i kishin dh\u00ebn\u00eb hua kompanis\u00eb 46.9 milion\u00eb lek\u00eb, shum\u00eb e cila u konsiderua si e pajustifikuar prej tyre.<\/p>\n<p>Rreshka dha nj\u00eb version tjet\u00ebr nga ai i Komisionit p\u00ebr shum\u00ebn 46.9 milion\u00eb lek\u00eb t\u00eb sh\u00ebnuara n\u00eb z\u00ebrin \u201cdetyrime ortaku\u201d. Ai pretendoi se v\u00ebllai dhe kunata e tij nuk i kan\u00eb dh\u00ebn\u00eb borxh kompanis\u00eb, nd\u00ebrsa ky z\u00eb sipas tij p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsonte detyrimet e mbartura dhe ato t\u00eb krijuara m\u00eb pas t\u00eb kompanis\u00eb ndaj kreditor\u00ebve. Por Komisioni argumentoi se ky shpjegim nuk gjen baz\u00eb n\u00eb dokumentet e administruara dhe se personat e lidhur me subjektin nuk \u201cjustifikojn\u00eb ligjshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e burimit p\u00ebr nj\u00eb vler\u00eb prej 32.9 milion\u00eb lek\u00ebsh\u201d. Edhe p\u00ebr depozit\u00ebn n\u00eb em\u00ebr t\u00eb n\u00ebn\u00ebs, Komisioni arrin n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin se subjekti nuk shpjegoi bindsh\u00ebm burimin e k\u00ebtyre parave-duke vendosur n\u00eb unanimitet mas\u00ebn disiplinore t\u00eb shkarkimit nga detyra.<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Vendimi i arsyetuar i KPK p\u00ebr prokurorin Dritan Rreshka e b\u00ebn at\u00eb p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebs p\u00ebr \u201cburime t\u00eb pamjaftueshme dhe deklarime t\u00eb rreme\u201d me nj\u00eb sht\u00ebpie 5-kat\u00ebshe si dhe \u201cc\u00ebnim t\u00eb besimit te drejt\u00ebsia\u201d p\u00ebrmes veprimeve fiktive p\u00ebr p\u00ebrfitimin e nj\u00eb kredie t\u00eb but\u00eb. Rreshka i kund\u00ebrshtoi gjetjet, por probleme rezultuan edhe n\u00eb pasurit\u00eb e familjar\u00ebve.\u00a0<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":21,"featured_media":69666,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[5,2],"tags":[],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/20180727_174610_270718038-3_w5sgbtg-482x400.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53479"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/21"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=53479"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53479\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":62392,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53479\/revisions\/62392"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/69666"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=53479"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=53479"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=53479"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}