{"id":53483,"date":"2018-11-01T20:06:39","date_gmt":"2018-11-01T18:06:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/?p=53483"},"modified":"2019-04-23T22:01:24","modified_gmt":"2019-04-23T22:01:24","slug":"komisioneri-apelon-prokurorin-besnik-muci-probleme-me-huate-dhe-toke-bujqesore-e-padeklaruar","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/komisioneri-apelon-prokurorin-besnik-muci-probleme-me-huate-dhe-toke-bujqesore-e-padeklaruar\/2018\/11\/01\/","title":{"rendered":"Komisioneri apelon prokurorin Besnik Mu\u00e7i, probleme me huat\u00eb dhe tok\u00eb bujq\u00ebsore e padeklaruar"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Komisioneri Publik arsyeton se huat\u00eb dhe kursimet e Prokurorit t\u00eb Krimeve t\u00eb R\u00ebnda Besnik Mu\u00e7i nuk ishin t\u00eb provuara e p\u00ebr pasoj\u00eb t\u00eb ardhurat e tij duhej t\u00eb konsideroheshin t\u00eb pajustifikuara. N\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr t\u00eb ndryshuar vendimin e KPK-s\u00eb, komisioneri thot\u00eb se toka bujq\u00ebsore e p\u00ebrfituar nga e shoqja duhej t\u00eb konsiderohej \u201cmosdeklarim\u201d.<!--more--><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_51132\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-51132\" style=\"width: 533px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/Besnik-Muci1.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-large wp-image-51132\" src=\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/Besnik-Muci1-533x400.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"533\" height=\"400\" data-id=\"51132\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-51132\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Prokurori Besnik Mu\u00e7i pas seanc\u00ebs d\u00ebgjimore para Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit n\u00eb Tiran\u00eb m\u00eb 30 korrik 2018. Foto: Gent Shkullaku\/LSA<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Nd\u00ebrsa Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit e fokusoi kritik\u00ebn e tij p\u00ebr Prokurorin e Krimeve t\u00eb R\u00ebnda Besnik Mu\u00e7i n\u00eb kriterin e profesionalizmit, Komisioneri Publik q\u00eb njoftoi se do t\u00eb apelonte dosjen e tij pretendon se prokurori \u00ebsht\u00eb i shkarkuesh\u00ebm p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb kriterit t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>Ankimi p\u00ebr Kolegjin e Posa\u00e7\u00ebm t\u00eb Apelimit, nga Komisioneri Darjel Sina, kryesisht \u00ebsht\u00eb fokusuar n\u00eb mosverifikimin e plot\u00eb nga KPK t\u00eb ligjshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb t\u00eb ardhurave nga huat\u00eb e deklaruara prej Mu\u00e7it dhe n\u00eb faktin q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrdorur nj\u00eb standard i ndrysh\u00ebm n\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje t\u00eb tjera t\u00eb ngjashme.<\/p>\n<p>Komisioneri po ashtu pretendon se KPK nuk ka vler\u00ebsuar drejt sa i p\u00ebrket mosdeklarimit nga bashk\u00ebshortja e Mu\u00e7it t\u00eb tokave ar\u00eb dhe nj\u00eb pjese takuese truall n\u00eb sht\u00ebpin\u00eb e prind\u00ebrve. \u201cKomisioneri Publik, ndryshe nga p\u00ebrfundimet e Komisionit p\u00ebr vler\u00ebsimin e pasuris\u00eb s\u00eb subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit, bazuar n\u00eb aktet e administruara p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb q\u00ebllim, vler\u00ebson se subjekti nuk arrin t\u00eb justifikoj\u00eb bindsh\u00ebm burimin e ligjsh\u00ebm t\u00eb pasurive, si dhe gjendet n\u00eb kushtet e mosdeklarimit t\u00eb tyre\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb ankimin e Komisionerit Publik.<\/p>\n<p>Mu\u00e7i u konfirmua n\u00eb detyr\u00eb nga KPK n\u00eb gusht 2018, pas hetimit administrativ nga treshja e kryesuar nga Lulzim Hamitaj me relator Olsi Komicin dhe an\u00ebtare Brunilda Bekteshin, e cila arriti n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin se ai mund t\u00eb konfirmohej, megjith\u00ebse u gjet\u00ebn disa pasakt\u00ebsi n\u00eb deklarimin e pasurive. Besnik Mu\u00e7i ka nisur karrier\u00ebn n\u00eb vitin 2002 si prokuror n\u00eb Tiran\u00eb nd\u00ebrsa para se t\u00eb kalonte n\u00eb prokurorin\u00eb e krimeve t\u00eb r\u00ebnda ka punuar p\u00ebr nj\u00eb periudh\u00eb kohe n\u00eb Policin\u00eb e Shtetit si drejtor i Krimit Financiar. Ai \u00ebsht\u00eb kandidat p\u00ebr t\u00eb qen\u00eb an\u00ebtar i K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Lart\u00eb t\u00eb Prokuroris\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ankimi i Komisionerit<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Komisioneri Publik \u00ebsht\u00eb fokusuar kryesisht n\u00eb problemet e pasuris\u00eb s\u00eb prokurorit Mu\u00e7i, duke cil\u00ebsuar se ato q\u00eb KPK i kishte par\u00eb si pasakt\u00ebsi pa pasoja, ishin shkelje q\u00eb duhej t\u00eb nd\u00ebshkoheshin me shkarkim.<\/p>\n<p>Komisioneri arsyeton n\u00eb nj\u00eb rast duke iu referuar kursimeve prej 200 mij\u00eb lek\u00ebsh t\u00eb deklaruara nga Mu\u00e7i n\u00eb vitin 2005 si burim p\u00ebr blerje apartamenti, se ato nuk duhej t\u00eb ishin konsideruar t\u00eb ligjshme. Sipas Komisionerit argumentet e prokurorit se kishte pasur regjim t\u00eb rrept\u00eb kursimi dhe se ishte ndihmuar nga familja nuk mund t\u00eb justifikonin pasurin\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>Po ashtu Komisioneri thot\u00eb se shuma nuk duhej t\u00eb konsiderohej e ligjshme pasi provat p\u00ebr t\u00eb \u201cmbeten thjesht n\u00eb nivel deklarativ, t\u00eb paprovuara\u201d. Ai rr\u00ebzon arsyetimin e KPK-s\u00eb se diferenca \u00ebsht\u00eb e vog\u00ebl dhe e pap\u00ebrfillshme. \u201cN\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim t\u00eb hetimit, Komisioni justifikon ligjshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e shum\u00ebs s\u00eb kursimit nga subjekti\u00a0 n\u00eb vler\u00ebn 200.000 lek\u00eb, edhe pse nga analiza financiare p\u00ebr vitin 2005, e b\u00ebr\u00eb nga vet\u00eb Komisioni rezulton me nj\u00eb balanc\u00eb negative\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Qasje t\u00eb ngjashme Komisioneri ka p\u00ebr huat\u00eb e marra prej subjektit nga t\u00eb af\u00ebrm n\u00eb vitin 2006, nga babai 5 milion lek\u00eb, nga xhaxhai 3 mij\u00eb euro dhe nga motra 6 mij\u00eb euro. N\u00eb arsyetimin e tij Komisioneri shprehet se KPK nuk kishte hetuar mjaftuesh\u00ebm n\u00eb ligjshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e t\u00eb ardhurave t\u00eb personave t\u00eb lidhur. Sipas Komisionerit KPK kishte cil\u00ebsuar t\u00eb mjaftueshme dokumente pa vul\u00eb apostile dhe t\u00eb panoterizuara edhe pse vinin nga jasht\u00eb vendit.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cN\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin e Komisionerit Publik, n\u00eb lidhje me dokumentacionin e paraqitur nga subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit p\u00ebr t\u00eb provuar aft\u00ebsin\u00eb huadh\u00ebn\u00ebse t\u00eb babait dhe xhaxhait, Komisioni nuk ka hetuar mbi vlefshm\u00ebrin\u00eb ligjore dhe provueshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e tyre, por i ka marr\u00eb t\u00eb mir\u00ebqena ato\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb ankimin e Sin\u00ebs.<\/p>\n<p>Sipas Komisionerit konkluzioni i KPK\u00a0 \u00ebsht\u00eb i pabazuar, pasi ai \u201cnuk mb\u00ebshtetet n\u00eb asnj\u00eb analiz\u00eb financiare\u201d.\u00a0 Komisioneri thot\u00eb se KPK duhej t\u00eb kishte dokumentuar q\u00eb personat huadh\u00ebn\u00ebs ishin n\u00eb gjendje t\u00eb jepnin shumat e p\u00ebrmendura si hua.<\/p>\n<p>T\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin arsyetim Komisioneri ka edhe p\u00ebr nj\u00eb hua t\u00eb marr\u00eb nga Mu\u00e7i nga baxhanaku dhe motra e bashk\u00ebshortes n\u00eb vitin 2016 n\u00eb shum\u00ebn 15 mij\u00eb euro. Nd\u00ebrsa KPK ka kontrolluar se \u00e7ifti q\u00eb kishte dh\u00ebn\u00eb huan\u00eb kishte likuiditete n\u00eb llogari bankare q\u00eb ia mund\u00ebsonin k\u00ebt\u00eb hua, Komisioneri e quan jo t\u00eb plot\u00eb hetimin sa i p\u00ebrket ligjshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb k\u00ebtyre t\u00eb ardhurave.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cKomisioneri Publik \u00e7mon se pasja ose jo e likuiditeteve n\u00eb llogari bankare apo transferta bankare nuk jan\u00eb fakte q\u00eb legjitimojn\u00eb burimin e t\u00eb ardhurave\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb ankim.<\/p>\n<p>Po ashtu Komisioneri thot\u00eb se ishin disa l\u00ebvizje bankare t\u00eb cilat KPK nuk i kishte hetuar n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb shteruese. Sipas tij, nd\u00ebrsa kishte marr\u00eb hua nga motra n\u00eb vitin 2006, n\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn periudh\u00eb (2005-2007) Mu\u00e7i ka derdhur n\u00eb llogari t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj t\u00eb fundit me p\u00ebrshkrimin \u201cpages\u00eb p\u00ebr studime\u201d 11 mij\u00eb euro, nd\u00ebrsa m\u00eb von\u00eb ishin t\u00ebrhequr me prokur\u00eb 5 mij\u00eb euro.<\/p>\n<p>Sipas Komisionerit, KPK \u201cnuk ka pyetur subjektin p\u00ebr shumat me t\u00eb cilat ka kredituar llogarit\u00eb e motr\u00ebs s\u00eb tij, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb kjo e fundit i ka dh\u00ebn\u00eb huan n\u00eb shum\u00ebn 6.000 euro, fakt i cili n\u00eb optik\u00ebn e Komisionerit Publik do t\u00eb duhej t\u00eb hetohej n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb shteruese\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Mosdeklarimi i tokave t\u00eb p\u00ebrfituara me ligjin 7501<\/p>\n<p>Ndryshe nga KPK q\u00eb ka pranuar arsyetimin e Besnik Mu\u00e7it, se tokat e bashk\u00ebshortes nuk ishin deklaruar pasi ajo ishte martuar dhe nuk kishte m\u00eb t\u00eb drejta mbi ato prona, Komisioneri pretendon se kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb shkelje q\u00eb duhet t\u00eb nd\u00ebshkohet me shkarkim.<\/p>\n<p>Komisioneri thot\u00eb se arsyetimi i KPK-s\u00eb q\u00eb bashk\u00ebshortja s\u2019kishte pasur t\u00eb drejt\u00eb mbi k\u00ebto prona nuk q\u00ebndronte dhe se \u201cata (Mu\u00e7i dhe e shoqja) kan\u00eb pasur detyrimin ligjor t\u2019i deklaronin k\u00ebto pasuri dhe t\u00eb drejtat reale mbi to\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Sipas Komisionerit Publik nuk ka asnj\u00eb rrethan\u00eb ligjore q\u00eb \u201csubjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit dhe personi i lidhur me t\u00eb t\u00eb mos deklarojn\u00eb sakt\u00ebsisht dhe mjaftueshm\u00ebrisht pasurit\u00eb e tyre n\u00eb pron\u00ebsi dhe bashk\u00ebpron\u00ebsi\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Sipas Komisionerit n\u00eb rastin n\u00eb fjal\u00eb, mosdeklarimi i nj\u00eb sip\u00ebrfaqe prej 2 mij\u00eb metrash tok\u00eb bujq\u00ebsore dhe nj\u00eb pjese takuese n\u00eb truallin e sht\u00ebpis\u00eb s\u00eb prind\u00ebrve t\u00eb nd\u00ebrtuar n\u00eb vitin 1985 n\u00eb nj\u00eb fshat t\u00eb Pogradecit nga bashk\u00ebshortja e Mu\u00e7it ishte \u201cmosdeklarim\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Pasi rr\u00ebzon huat\u00eb si t\u00eb ardhura t\u00eb ligjshme Komisioneri arsyeton se Mu\u00e7i nuk ka pasur t\u00eb ardhura t\u00eb mjaftueshme p\u00ebr t\u00eb jetuar n\u00eb vitet\u00a0 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 dhe 2016. Sipas tij prokurori n\u00eb k\u00ebto vite \u201cgjendet n\u00eb kushtet e deklarimit t\u00eb pamjaftuesh\u00ebm p\u00ebr kriterin e kontrollit t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb, duke rezultuar k\u00ebshtu p\u00ebr k\u00ebto vite me pasuri apo t\u00eb ardhura m\u00eb t\u00eb m\u00ebdha nga sa mund t\u00eb justifikohen ligj\u00ebrisht sipas nenit D\/3, t\u00eb aneksit t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb fund Komisioneri thot\u00eb se \u201cnuk krijon bindjen se subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit arrin nj\u00eb nivel t\u00eb besuesh\u00ebm n\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin e kriterit t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb\u201d dhe se k\u00ebrkonte ndryshimin e vendimit t\u00eb KPK-s\u00eb dhe \u201cshkarkimin\u201d e prokurorit Mu\u00e7i.<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Komisioneri Publik arsyeton se huat\u00eb dhe kursimet e Prokurorit t\u00eb Krimeve t\u00eb R\u00ebnda Besnik Mu\u00e7i nuk ishin t\u00eb provuara e p\u00ebr pasoj\u00eb t\u00eb ardhurat e tij duhej t\u00eb konsideroheshin t\u00eb pajustifikuara. N\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr t\u00eb ndryshuar vendimin e KPK-s\u00eb, komisioneri thot\u00eb se toka bujq\u00ebsore e p\u00ebrfituar nga e shoqja duhej t\u00eb konsiderohej \u201cmosdeklarim\u201d.<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":97,"featured_media":69502,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[13,7],"tags":[],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/Besnik-Muci1-533x400.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53483"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/97"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=53483"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53483\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":61778,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53483\/revisions\/61778"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/69502"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=53483"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=53483"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=53483"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}