{"id":55122,"date":"2019-01-04T20:31:59","date_gmt":"2019-01-04T18:31:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/?p=55122"},"modified":"2019-04-23T22:01:22","modified_gmt":"2019-04-23T22:01:22","slug":"kolegji-rrezoi-pretendimet-e-tom-ndreces-per-veting-te-padrejte","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/kolegji-rrezoi-pretendimet-e-tom-ndreces-per-veting-te-padrejte\/2019\/01\/04\/","title":{"rendered":"Kolegji rr\u00ebzoi pretendimet e Tom Ndrec\u00ebs p\u00ebr veting t\u00eb padrejt\u00eb"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>N\u00eb vendimin e arsyetuar t\u00eb Kolegjit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Apelimit, pretendimet e ish-gjyqtarit t\u00eb lart\u00eb Tom Ndreca p\u00ebr c\u00ebnim t\u00eb t\u00eb drejtave u konsideruan si t\u00eb pabaza nd\u00ebrsa vendimi i KPK u kritikua p\u00ebr disa pasakt\u00ebsi n\u00eb gjykim.<!--more--><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_50687\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-50687\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/20180713_182238_IMG_6516-5_uTRP24k.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-50687\" src=\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/20180713_182238_IMG_6516-5_uTRP24k-300x234.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"234\" data-id=\"50687\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-50687\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Gjyqtari i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb Tom Ndreca, gjat\u00eb nj\u00eb seance t\u00eb Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit, KPK, | Foto : LSA<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit u kritikua p\u00ebr disa aspekte dyt\u00ebsore n\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjen e subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit Tom Ndreca nd\u00ebrsa iu dha t\u00eb drejt\u00eb n\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsi p\u00ebr vendimin e shkarkimit t\u00eb tij nga detyra p\u00ebr dy nga tre kriteret e rivler\u00ebsimit kalimtar t\u00eb gjyqtar\u00ebve dhe prokuror\u00ebve.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb vendimin e zbardhur nga Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit, [<a href=\"http:\/\/www.kpa.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Vendimi-i-Anonimizuar-subjekti-T.-Ndreca.pdf\">link vendimi<\/a>] vler\u00ebsoi se shpenzimet e pambuluara me t\u00eb ardhura t\u00eb ligjshme nga Ndreca, t\u00eb vler\u00ebsuara nga KPK n\u00eb mas\u00ebn prej afro 1.4 milion\u00eb lek\u00eb p\u00ebr periudh\u00ebn 2003-2016, n\u00eb fakt sipas nj\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimi t\u00eb KPA jan\u00eb n\u00eb mas\u00ebn 2 milion\u00eb lek\u00eb. Ndreca pretendonte se diferenca duhej t\u00eb dilte m\u00eb e ul\u00ebt, mb\u00ebshtetur kjo n\u00eb disa supozime mbi konsumin minimal t\u00eb domosdosh\u00ebm p\u00ebr familjen e tij. Por Apeli pranon si t\u00eb mir\u00ebqen\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin e KPK bazuar n\u00eb parimin <em>no reformatio in peius<\/em> q\u00eb do t\u00eb thot\u00eb se apelimi nuk mundet ta r\u00ebndoj\u00eb m\u00eb tej figur\u00ebn e subjektit rivler\u00ebsues.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Rivler\u00ebsimi n\u00eb dy kritere<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Ndreca, ashtu si edhe disa subjekte t\u00eb tjera rivler\u00ebsimi, jan\u00eb ankuar n\u00eb apel me argumentin se KPK nuk i ka rivler\u00ebsuar n\u00eb t\u00eb trija kriteret, por ka nd\u00ebrprer\u00eb hetimin administrativ pasi ka krijuar bindje t\u00eb brendshme p\u00ebr rr\u00ebzimin e tij n\u00eb dy kritere, rivler\u00ebsimi i pasuris\u00eb dhe past\u00ebrtia e figur\u00ebs. Vendimin e nd\u00ebrprerjes s\u00eb hetimit pa kaluar te kriteri i tret\u00eb, ai i aft\u00ebsive profesionale, Ndreca e konsideron si prezumim faj\u00ebsie, dhe si t\u00eb till\u00eb, mendon se kjo p\u00ebrb\u00ebn shkelje t\u00eb t\u00eb drejtave t\u00eb tij kushtetuese p\u00ebr gjykim t\u00eb drejt\u00eb. Kolegji i Apelimit e rr\u00ebzoi pretendimin duke argumentuar se KPK ka t\u00eb drejt\u00eb t\u00eb nd\u00ebrpres\u00eb hetimin administrativ pasi krijon bindjen se subjekti nuk kalon n\u00eb nj\u00eb apo dy prej tre fushave t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit. Sipas KPK, ky krijim bindjeje nuk p\u00ebrb\u00ebn prezumim fajtor p\u00ebr shkak se KPK ka t\u00eb drejt\u00eb t\u00eb rihap\u00eb hetimin n\u00eb rast se nga seanca d\u00ebgjimore m\u00ebsohen fakte q\u00eb ndryshojn\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin fillestar. Kolegji thekson se rivler\u00ebsimi p\u00ebr t\u00eb trija kriteret \u00ebsht\u00eb i domosdosh\u00ebm n\u00eb rastet kur subjekti \u00ebsht\u00eb i p\u00ebrshtatsh\u00ebm, nd\u00ebrsa e drejta e KPK p\u00ebr nd\u00ebrprerjen e hetimit administrativ pas vler\u00ebsimit n\u00eb nj\u00eb apo dy kritere \u00ebsht\u00eb e arsyeshme p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb parimit t\u00eb eficiens\u00ebs gjyq\u00ebsore.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Kolegji gjen me vend t\u00eb n\u00ebnvizoj\u00eb nj\u00eb q\u00ebndrim tashm\u00eb t\u00eb mbajtur edhe n\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje t\u00eb tjera t\u00eb ngjashme t\u00eb shqyrtuara prej tij, i cili mbetet i nj\u00ebjt\u00eb n\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin edhe t\u00eb trupit gjykues q\u00eb gjykon k\u00ebt\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje dhe mb\u00ebshtet q\u00ebndrimin e mbajtur prej Komisionit p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb aspekt duke e konsideruar si t\u00eb rregullt procesin e rivler\u00ebsimit t\u00eb mb\u00ebshtetur edhe n\u00eb m\u00eb pak se tre komponent\u00eb,&#8221; thuhet n\u00eb vendimin e KPA.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Problemi me kunatin<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Ndreca u gjet i pap\u00ebrshtatsh\u00ebm p\u00ebr t\u00eb mbajtur postin e gjyqtarit p\u00ebr shkak se kunati i tij ishte hetuar \u201cprodhim dhe shitje narkotik\u00ebsh\u201d. Ndreca pretendoi se nuk e kishte kuptuar p\u00ebrkufizimin e dh\u00ebn\u00eb nga ligji i vetingut p\u00ebr &#8220;lidhje me krim t\u00eb organizuar&#8221;, pasi kunati i tij ishte arrestuar por hetimet ndaj tij ishin pushuar nga prokuroria e Shkodr\u00ebs. P\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb, ai nuk e kishte par\u00eb t\u00eb arsyeshme t\u00eb deklaronte hetimin e kunatit n\u00eb deklarat\u00ebn e past\u00ebrtis\u00eb s\u00eb figur\u00ebs.<\/p>\n<p>KPA argumentoi se p\u00ebr sa koh\u00eb ndaj personit t\u00eb hetuar nuk ka nj\u00eb vendim gjyq\u00ebsor t\u00eb form\u00ebs s\u00eb prer\u00eb p\u00ebr ta nxjerr\u00eb t\u00eb pafajsh\u00ebm, detyrimi i Ndrec\u00ebs ishte q\u00eb ta deklaronte ngjarjen.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Pretendimi i subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit se ai nuk e ka deklaruar k\u00ebt\u00eb kontakt sepse nuk ka pasur t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin kuptim p\u00ebr zbatimin e dispozitave t\u00eb cituara m\u00eb lart, n\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin e trupit gjykues gjendet i pajustifikuar si nj\u00eb pretendim ligjor, pasi mbrojtja p\u00ebr mosnjohje t\u00eb ligjit nuk i ofrohet asnj\u00ebshtetasi n\u00eb Republik\u00ebn e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb, aq m\u00eb pak nj\u00eb shtetasi me njohuri t\u00eb posa\u00e7me n\u00eb fush\u00ebn p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse, si\u00e7 \u00ebsht\u00eb gjyqtari i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb,&#8221; shkruhet n\u00eb vendimin e KPA.<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>N\u00eb vendimin e arsyetuar t\u00eb Kolegjit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Apelimit, pretendimet e ish-gjyqtarit t\u00eb lart\u00eb Tom Ndreca p\u00ebr c\u00ebnim t\u00eb t\u00eb drejtave u konsideruan si t\u00eb pabaza nd\u00ebrsa vendimi i KPK u kritikua p\u00ebr disa pasakt\u00ebsi n\u00eb gjykim.<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":69470,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[13,6],"tags":[],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/20180713_182238_IMG_6516-5_uTRP24k-300x234.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55122"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=55122"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55122\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":61662,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55122\/revisions\/61662"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/69470"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=55122"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=55122"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=55122"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}