{"id":55225,"date":"2019-01-09T20:29:41","date_gmt":"2019-01-09T18:29:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/?p=55225"},"modified":"2019-04-23T22:01:22","modified_gmt":"2019-04-23T22:01:22","slug":"kolegji-vendos-gjykim-ne-seance-publike-per-ankimin-e-artan-lazajt-ndaj-kpk","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/kolegji-vendos-gjykim-ne-seance-publike-per-ankimin-e-artan-lazajt-ndaj-kpk\/2019\/01\/09\/","title":{"rendered":"Kolegji vendos gjykim n\u00eb seanc\u00eb publike p\u00ebr ankimin e Artan Lazajt ndaj KPK"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit pranoi kalimin p\u00ebr shqyrtim n\u00eb seanc\u00eb publike t\u00eb ankimit t\u00eb Artan Lazajt kund\u00ebr vendimit t\u00eb KPK-s\u00eb e cila vendosi shkarkimin e tij n\u00eb korrik t\u00eb vitit t\u00eb kaluar. Lazaj pretendon shkelje t\u00eb procedur\u00ebs.<!--more--><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_50290\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-50290\" style=\"width: 519px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-large wp-image-50290\" src=\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/Artan-Lazaj-1-519x400.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"519\" height=\"400\" data-id=\"50290\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-50290\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Gjyqtari i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Tiran\u00ebs, Artan Lazaj dhe avokati i tij n\u00eb seanc\u00eb d\u00ebgjimore p\u00ebrball\u00eb Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit. Foto:LSA<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit pranoi t\u00eb m\u00ebrkur\u00ebn kalimin p\u00ebr shqyrtim n\u00eb seanc\u00eb publike t\u00eb ankimit t\u00eb Artan Lazaj kund\u00ebr vendimit t\u00eb KPK-s\u00eb e cila vendosi shkarkimin e tij n\u00eb korrik t\u00eb vitit t\u00eb kaluar. Ankimi i Lazajt, i cili para shkarkimit nga Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit ishte gjyqtar n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn e Tiran\u00ebs, \u00ebsht\u00eb i pari p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilin KPA vendos kalimin n\u00eb seanc\u00eb publike.<\/p>\n<p>KPA njoftoi se vendimi p\u00ebr t\u00eb kaluar \u00e7\u00ebshtjen n\u00eb seanc\u00eb publike u mor p\u00ebr shqyrtimin e procedur\u00ebs s\u00eb ndjekur nga Komisioni p\u00ebr t\u00eb rr\u00ebzuar nj\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb t\u00eb Lazajt p\u00ebr p\u00ebrjashtim t\u00eb Komisioneres Brunilda Bekteshi.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cGjykimi n\u00eb seanc\u00eb publike u vendos p\u00ebr t\u00eb debatuar, n\u00ebse shkelja e r\u00ebnd\u00eb procedurale e pretenduar nga subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit n\u00eb ankim, p\u00ebr mosshqyrtimin e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs s\u00eb tij p\u00ebr p\u00ebrjashtimin e Komisioneres Brunilda Bekteshi nga shqyrtimi i \u00e7\u00ebshtjes, nga nj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr trup gjykues i Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikuar, i ndrysh\u00ebm nga trupi gjykues q\u00eb ka dh\u00ebn\u00eb vendimin nr. 34, dat\u00eb 11.07.2018, ka ndikuar ose jo n\u00eb bazueshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e k\u00ebtij vendimi\u201d, \u00a0thuhet n\u00eb njoftimin e KPA.<\/p>\n<p>KPA caktoi dat\u00ebn 23 Janar p\u00ebr gjykimi i k\u00ebsaj \u00e7\u00ebshtje n\u00eb seanc\u00eb publike me pranin\u00eb e pal\u00ebve.<\/p>\n<p>Lazaj u shkarkua nga KPK n\u00eb korrik t\u00eb k\u00ebtij viti n\u00eb nj\u00eb proces q\u00eb u shty pas nj\u00eb s\u00ebr\u00eb k\u00ebrkesash proceduriale prej tij dhe avokatit t\u00eb tij. N\u00eb vendimin e zbardhur Komisioni u shpreh se k\u00ebrkesat p\u00ebr zgjerim t\u00eb hetimit, p\u00ebrjashtim t\u00eb trupit gjykues dhe m\u00eb pas p\u00ebrjashtim t\u00eb Komisioneres Bekteshi ishin p\u00ebrpjekje p\u00ebr zvarritjen e procesit.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cU konstatua nj\u00eb tentativ\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb zvarritur procesin, n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet nj\u00eb s\u00ebr\u00eb k\u00ebrkesash strategjikisht t\u00eb paramenduara dhe t\u00eb parap\u00ebrgatitura\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb vendimin <a href=\"http:\/\/kpk.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Vendim-Artan-Lazaj.pdf\">e zbardhur t\u00eb KPK-s\u00eb<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Lexo edhe:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"\/vetingu\/?p=50288\">KPK e akuzon p\u00ebr deklarim t\u00eb rrem\u00eb, por Lazaj vazhdon luft\u00ebn p\u00ebr konfirmim<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"\/vetingu\/?p=50208\">Skeda e pasuris\u00eb s\u00eb deklaruar-Artan Lazaj-gjyqtar i Gjykat\u00ebs Tiran\u00eb<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"\/vetingu\/?p=51963\">Shkarkimi i Artan Lazaj, KPK gjeti \u201cfshehje pasurie dhe deklarime t\u00eb rreme\u201d<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Sipas vendimit t\u00eb zbardhur t\u00eb KPK-s\u00eb Lazaj kishte k\u00ebrkuar p\u00ebrjashtimin e Bekteshit duke pretenduar se n\u00eb koh\u00ebn kur ajo kishte qen\u00eb avokate kishte k\u00ebrkuar p\u00ebrjashtimin e tij nga trupi gjykues. Kjo k\u00ebrkes\u00eb u refuzua at\u00ebher\u00eb nga KPK. Por bazuar mbi k\u00ebt\u00eb refuzim Lazaj \u00ebsht\u00eb ankuar n\u00eb KPA duke pretenduar \u201cshkelje t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00eb proceduriale\u201d, p\u00ebr t\u00eb cil\u00ebn Kolegji vendosi shqyrtim n\u00eb seanc\u00eb publike.<\/p>\n<p>Nga vendimi i zbardhur i KPK-s\u00eb [<a href=\"http:\/\/kpk.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Vendim-Artan-Lazaj.pdf\">Shiko k\u00ebtu<\/a>] rezulton se kjo e fundit vendosi t\u00eb prap\u00ebsonte \u00a0k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e tret\u00eb duke arsyetuar se ajo ishte thjesht\u00eb nj\u00eb p\u00ebrpjekje p\u00ebr t\u00eb zvarritur procesin. N\u00eb vendimin e arsyetuar KPK thot\u00eb se vendosi t\u00eb mos e kalonte k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr shqyrtim n\u00eb nj\u00eb trup tjet\u00ebr gjykues pasi k\u00ebrkesa p\u00ebr p\u00ebrjashtim t\u00eb Bekteshit \u201cRezultonte qartazi e vonuar dhe n\u00eb mosrespektim t\u00eb pik\u00ebs 3 t\u00eb nenit 27 t\u00eb ligjit nr. 84\/2016, si dhe e papranueshme, pasi nuk bazohej mbi fakte t\u00eb reja. Gjithashtu, kjo k\u00ebrkes\u00eb rezultonte me tendenca p\u00ebr zvarritjen e procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>KPK arsyetoi se ngjarja p\u00ebr t\u00eb cil\u00ebn Lazaj ankohej kishte ndodhur n\u00eb vitin 2016 dhe ai kishte pasur koh\u00eb ta ngrinte k\u00ebt\u00eb pretendim m\u00eb her\u00ebt.<\/p>\n<p>KPK e shkarkoi Lazaj p\u00ebr nj\u00eb s\u00ebr\u00eb problemesh n\u00eb kriterin e deklarimit t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb. N\u00eb vendimin e arsyetuar thuhet se Lazaj kishte b\u00ebr\u00eb deklarime t\u00eb rreme, kontrata fiktive, kishte pamjaftueshm\u00ebri burimesh t\u00eb ligjshme dhe kishte deklaruar pasuri q\u00eb i kishte shitur, nd\u00ebrsa thuhet se dha \u201cp\u00ebrgjigje t\u00eb pav\u00ebrteta\u201d edhe gjat\u00eb seanc\u00ebs d\u00ebgjimore.<\/p>\n<p>Lazaj u mbrojt gjat\u00eb seanc\u00ebs d\u00ebgjimore dhe n\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigjet p\u00ebr KPK kryesisht duke pranuar \u00a0\u201cka b\u00ebr\u00eb gabime t\u00eb shumta, por q\u00eb ato jan\u00eb harresa, neglizhenca ose pasakt\u00ebsi, nuk jan\u00eb veprime t\u00eb q\u00ebllimshme dhe nuk kan\u00eb pasur si objektiv apo pasoj\u00eb fshehjen e pasuris\u00eb\u201d. N\u00eb nj\u00eb rast ai tha se arsyet e mosdeklarimit t\u00eb nj\u00eb pasurie q\u00eb i takonte bashk\u00ebshortes kishte qen\u00eb e drejta zakonore sipas t\u00eb cil\u00ebs \u201cgruaja e martuar nuk kishte pjes\u00eb takuese n\u00eb sht\u00ebpin\u00eb e prind\u00ebrve\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit pranoi kalimin p\u00ebr shqyrtim n\u00eb seanc\u00eb publike t\u00eb ankimit t\u00eb Artan Lazajt kund\u00ebr vendimit t\u00eb KPK-s\u00eb e cila vendosi shkarkimin e tij n\u00eb korrik t\u00eb vitit t\u00eb kaluar. Lazaj pretendon shkelje t\u00eb procedur\u00ebs.<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":97,"featured_media":69468,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[6,2],"tags":[],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/Artan-Lazaj-1-519x400.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55225"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/97"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=55225"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55225\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":61650,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55225\/revisions\/61650"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/69468"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=55225"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=55225"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=55225"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}