{"id":60787,"date":"2019-03-18T20:44:02","date_gmt":"2019-03-18T18:44:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/?p=60787"},"modified":"2019-05-06T23:17:30","modified_gmt":"2019-05-06T23:17:30","slug":"keshilltarja-ligjore-ana-golloshi-u-gjet-me-dyfishin-e-pasurise-se-ligjshme-nga-kpk","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/keshilltarja-ligjore-ana-golloshi-u-gjet-me-dyfishin-e-pasurise-se-ligjshme-nga-kpk\/2019\/03\/18\/","title":{"rendered":"K\u00ebshilltarja ligjore Ana Golloshi u gjet me dyfishin e pasuris\u00eb s\u00eb ligjshme nga KPK"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Disa apartamente n\u00eb bashk\u00ebpron\u00ebsi apo n\u00eb pron\u00ebsi t\u00eb bashk\u00ebshortit dhe disa llogari bankare q\u00eb rezultuan t\u00eb ishin m\u00eb shum\u00eb se dyfishi i pasuris\u00eb s\u00eb ligjshme soll\u00ebn shkarkimin e k\u00ebshilltares ligjore Ana Golloshi.<!--more--><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_56194\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-56194\" style=\"width: 534px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-large wp-image-56194\" src=\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/Ana-Golloshi-KPK-534x400.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"534\" height=\"400\" data-id=\"56194\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-56194\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">K\u00ebshilltarja ligjore Ana Golloshi gjat\u00eb seanc\u00ebs d\u00ebgjimore n\u00eb Komisionin e Pavarur t\u00eb kualifikimit, KPK, n\u00eb 12.02.2019 | Foto : LSA<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>K\u00ebshilltarja ligjore e Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative t\u00eb Apelit Ana Golloshi u gjet nga Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit (KPK) n\u00eb pamund\u00ebsi p\u00ebr t\u00eb justifikuar ligj\u00ebrisht pasurin\u00eb e saj dhe t\u00eb af\u00ebrmve q\u00eb bazuar n\u00eb analiz\u00ebn financiare rezultoi 2.3 her\u00eb m\u00eb e madhe se sa pasuria q\u00eb ajo mund t\u00eb dokumentonte.<\/p>\n<p>Treshja gjykuese e Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit e p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00eb nga Etleda \u00c7iftja, Firdes Shuli dhe Pamela Qirko, sipas vendimit t\u00eb zbardhur arsyetoi se ndihm\u00ebsja ligjore pran\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative t\u00eb Apelit, nd\u00ebrsa ka marr\u00eb vler\u00ebsim pozitiv p\u00ebr past\u00ebrtin\u00eb e figur\u00ebs dhe aspektin profesional, nuk paraqiti dokumentacion t\u00eb mjaftuesh\u00ebm p\u00ebr t\u00eb provuar pasurin\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>Problemet e Golloshit, ashtu si edhe p\u00ebr mjaft subjekte t\u00eb tjera t\u00eb vettingut, rezultuan nga t\u00eb ardhurat e pretenduara si t\u00eb fituara n\u00eb emigracion. Golloshi pretendoi se s\u00ebbashku me bashk\u00ebshortin kishte sjell\u00eb n\u00eb Shqip\u00ebri n\u00eb sasi t\u00eb vogla parat\u00eb e fituara n\u00eb Greqi, por KPK nuk pranoi si t\u00eb ligjshme t\u00eb gjitha t\u00eb ardhurat e pretenduara prej saj.<\/p>\n<p>Golloshi sipas KPK-s nuk qe bashk\u00ebpunuese mjaftuesh\u00ebm, pasi vonoi p\u00ebrgjigjet p\u00ebr Komisionin duke vonuar procesin. Problemet n\u00eb pasurin\u00eb e saj ishin evidentuar edhe nga ILDKPKI. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb dy kall\u00ebzime ndaj t\u00eb shoqit p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilat ishin pushuar hetimet, nuk u mor\u00ebn parasysh si penalizuese n\u00eb kriterin e past\u00ebrtis\u00eb s\u00eb figur\u00ebs.<\/p>\n<p>Komisioni v\u00eb n\u00eb dukje n\u00eb vendimin e zbardhur \u201cSubjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit ka deklaruar m\u00eb shum\u00eb se dyfishi i pasuris\u00eb s\u00eb ligjshme duke p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb dhe personat e lidhur\u201d dhe se \u201cka b\u00ebr\u00eb deklarim t\u00eb pamjaftuesh\u00ebm p\u00ebr kriterin e pasuris\u00eb\u201d, \u201cka b\u00ebr\u00eb deklarim t\u00eb pasakt\u00eb\u201d dhe \u201cka munges\u00eb t\u00eb burimeve financiare t\u00eb ligjshme p\u00ebr t\u00eb justifikuar plot\u00ebsisht krijimin e pasurive n\u00eb emrin e saj dhe personit t\u00eb lidhur me t\u00eb\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Sipas KPK-s\u00eb nd\u00ebrsa nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb e mir\u00eb e deklarimeve t\u00eb Golloshit p\u00ebrputhshin me gjetjet e KPK-s\u00eb gjat\u00eb hetimit administrativ, kjo e fundit nuk qe e aft\u00eb t\u00eb sillte dokumente q\u00eb mund t\u00eb provonin burimin e ligjsh\u00ebm t\u00eb t\u00eb ardhurave.<\/p>\n<p>Nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb e mir\u00eb e analiz\u00ebs financiare mbi Golloshin ka t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb me koh\u00ebn kur as ajo as bashk\u00ebshorti nuk ishin subjekte t\u00eb vet\u00ebdeklarimit t\u00eb pasurive apo me funksione n\u00eb sistemin e drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb. KPK thot\u00eb se nga analiza financiare rezultoi se nga viti 1996 deri n\u00eb vitin 2017 Golloshi kishte pasur t\u00eb ardhura neto n\u00eb shum\u00ebn 14.1 milion lek\u00eb. Analiza financiare e KPK gjeti se ajo kishte b\u00ebr\u00eb 18.8 milion lek\u00eb shpenzime jetese, arsimim e t\u00eb tjera gjat\u00eb k\u00ebsaj kohe dhe kishte shpenzuar 32.9 milion p\u00ebr t\u00eb bler\u00eb pasuri t\u00eb paluajtshme apo makina.<\/p>\n<p>KPK arsyetoi se pasuria neto ishte 2.3 her\u00eb m\u00eb e madhe se t\u00eb ardhurat neto. Pretendimet e Golloshit p\u00ebr t\u00eb llogaritur n\u00eb analiz\u00eb finaciare t\u00eb ardhurat nga pensionet e vjehrr\u00ebs dhe vjehrrit me t\u00eb cil\u00ebt ajo kishte jetuar, u rr\u00ebzuan nga Komisioni, q\u00eb arsyetoi se ato nuk ndryshonin vendimin. Megjithat\u00eb KPK korigjoi disa pjes\u00eb t\u00eb analiz\u00ebs finaciare duke pranuar disa prej pretendimeve t\u00eb Golloshit, t\u00eb tjera pretendime p\u00ebrfshi p\u00ebrfitimin e nj\u00eb asistence prej 350 euro n\u00eb muaj n\u00eb Greqi u rr\u00ebzuan si deklarative.<\/p>\n<p>Komisioni nga ana tjet\u00ebr p\u00ebrdori kund\u00ebr Golloshit edhe nj\u00eb analiz\u00eb finaciare q\u00eb kjo e fundit b\u00ebri p\u00ebrmes nj\u00eb eksperti privat. N\u00eb vendimin e zbardhur rezulton se eksperti arriti n\u00eb rezultate t\u00eb ndryshme nga KPK, por sipas tij pasuria e pajustifikuar ishte 1.78 her\u00eb m\u00eb e madhe se pasuria e provuar ligj\u00ebrisht.<\/p>\n<p>KPK shprehet se kjo analiz\u00eb evidentoi \u201cn\u00eb fakt se (Golloshi) nuk justifikon plot\u00ebsisht me burime t\u00eb ligjshme krijimin e pasurive apo kryerjen e shpenzimeve p\u00ebrgjat\u00eb k\u00ebsaj periudhe\u201d por me pretendimin se ajo nuk ishte sa \u201cdyfishi i pasuris\u00eb s\u00eb ligjshme\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Komisioni shprehet n\u00eb vendimin e zbardhur se \u201cdisa pasuri jan\u00eb evidentuar p\u00ebr her\u00eb t\u00eb par\u00eb duke u depozituar n\u00eb llogari bankare, gjat\u00eb koh\u00ebs q\u00eb subjekti ka qen\u00eb n\u00eb funksionin e ndihm\u00ebses ligjore pran\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative t\u00eb Apelit Tiran\u00eb\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Nj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr pretendim i Golloshit se nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb e pasuris\u00eb ishte mbajtur cash n\u00eb sht\u00ebpi, pasi kjo nuk ishte e ndaluar nga ligji, u cil\u00ebsua kontradiktor\u00eb nga KPK. \u201cKomisioni, v\u00ebren se subjekti ka kryer deklarim kontradiktor lidhur me faktin se pse ka mbajtur shuma t\u00eb konsiderueshme cash p\u00ebr nj\u00eb periudh\u00eb t\u00eb gjat\u00eb kohe, \u00e7ka na krijon bindjen se k\u00ebto t\u00eb ardhura nuk jan\u00eb t\u00eb ardhura t\u00eb krijuara nga puna n\u00eb emigracion\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb vendim.<\/p>\n<p>Sipas KPK-s\u00eb Golloshi kishte pretenduar mosbesim n\u00eb banka, por n\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn koh\u00eb ajo dhe bashk\u00ebshorti kishin nj\u00eb num\u00ebr llogarisht t\u00eb hapura. \u00a0\u201cSi p\u00ebrfundim Komisioni \u00e7mon se, subjekti nuk arriti t\u00eb provoj\u00eb me dokumentacion justifikues ligjor, qoft\u00eb dhe me indice indirekte, se t\u00eb ardhurat e p\u00ebrfituar nga emigracioni jan\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb larta nga ato t\u00eb evidentuara me dokumentacion justifikues ligjor\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb vendimin e zbardhur.<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Disa apartamente n\u00eb bashk\u00ebpron\u00ebsi apo n\u00eb pron\u00ebsi t\u00eb bashk\u00ebshortit dhe disa llogari bankare q\u00eb rezultuan t\u00eb ishin m\u00eb shum\u00eb se dyfishi i pasuris\u00eb s\u00eb ligjshme soll\u00ebn shkarkimin e k\u00ebshilltares ligjore Ana Golloshi.<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":97,"featured_media":69579,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[5,2],"tags":[],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/Ana-Golloshi-KPK-534x400.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60787"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/97"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60787"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60787\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":62228,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60787\/revisions\/62228"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/69579"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60787"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60787"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60787"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}