{"id":62829,"date":"2019-04-04T16:33:19","date_gmt":"2019-04-04T16:33:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/vetingu\/?p=62829"},"modified":"2019-06-10T18:12:20","modified_gmt":"2019-06-10T18:12:20","slug":"rovena-gashi-dhe-e-motra-perplasen-me-kpa-pretendojne-shkelje-te-te-drejtave","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/rovena-gashi-dhe-e-motra-perplasen-me-kpa-pretendojne-shkelje-te-te-drejtave\/2019\/04\/04\/","title":{"rendered":"Rovena Gashi dhe e motra p\u00ebrplasen me KPA, pretendojn\u00eb shkelje t\u00eb t\u00eb drejtave"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit rr\u00ebzoi k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e prokurores s\u00eb shkarkuar Rovena Gashi p\u00ebr t\u00eb pasur si ndihm\u00ebse ligjore t\u00eb motr\u00ebn &#8211; gjykat\u00ebsen Ema Gashi. Vendimi u kund\u00ebrshtua nga subjekti si shkelje e t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsimit. \u00c7\u00ebshtja ndaj Gashit u shty p\u00ebr n\u00eb 23 prill.<!--more--><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_61296\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-61296\" style=\"width: 600px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-large wp-image-61296\" src=\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/rovena-gashi-e-motra-dhe-dritan-gina-600x376.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"376\" data-id=\"61296\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-61296\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Prokurorja e shkarkuar Rovena Gashi,e motra gjyqtarja Ema Gashi dhe bashk\u00ebshorti prokurori Dritan Gina, gjat\u00eb seanc\u00ebs d\u00ebgjimore n\u00eb Kolegjin e Apelimit. Foto:BIRN<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit (KPA) e gjeti t\u00eb pabazuar k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e prokurores s\u00eb shkarkuar nga Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit (KPK) Rovena Gashi, p\u00ebr t\u00eb pasur ndihm\u00ebse ligjore gjyqtaren e Durr\u00ebsit, Ema Gashi, nj\u00ebkoh\u00ebsisht motra e subjektit.<\/p>\n<p>Vendim i nd\u00ebrmjet\u00ebn i KPA u mor gjat\u00eb seanc\u00ebs d\u00ebgjimore t\u00eb zhvilluar t\u00eb enjten. KPA \u00ebsht\u00eb v\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb l\u00ebvizje nga ankimi i Gashit ndaj vendimit t\u00eb KPK q\u00eb e ka shkarkuar at\u00eb, nd\u00ebrsa seanca publike u thirr p\u00ebr t\u2019i dh\u00ebn\u00eb asaj mund\u00ebsi t\u00eb d\u00ebgjohej n\u00eb lidhje me nj\u00eb gjetje t\u00eb re t\u00eb Operacionit Nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtar t\u00eb Monitorimit.<\/p>\n<p>Vendimi, sipas t\u00eb cilit Gashi duhet t\u00eb zgjedh\u00eb nj\u00eb avokat t\u00eb licensuar p\u00ebr tu p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsuar para gjykat\u00ebs, u kund\u00ebrshtua nga motrat gjat\u00eb seanc\u00ebs publike t\u00eb s\u00eb enjtes me pretendimin se subjektit po i mohohej nj\u00eb e drejt\u00eb themelore.<\/p>\n<p>P\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsuesja e subjektit, Ema Gashi tentoi fillimisht t\u00eb merrte fjal\u00ebn menj\u00ebher\u00eb pas njoftimit t\u00eb vendimit, por ajo u anashkalua nga trupa gjykuese.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cM\u00eb fal nj\u00eb sekond, k\u00ebrkova leje\u201d, tha Ema Gashi nd\u00ebrsa trupa gjykuese u ngrit n\u00eb k\u00ebmb\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb l\u00ebn\u00eb sall\u00ebn. \u201cPo e nisni me shkelje proceduriale, k\u00ebrkova fjal\u00ebn. Nuk mund ta mbyllni k\u00ebshtu seanc\u00ebn\u201d, shtoi gjyqtarja, q\u00eb sipas nj\u00eb vendimi t\u00eb ish-K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Lart\u00eb t\u00eb Drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb (institucion tani i shkrir\u00eb), \u00ebsht\u00eb me leje t\u00eb papaguar p\u00ebr arsye \u201csh\u00ebndet\u00ebsore dhe familjare\u201d prej prillit t\u00eb vitit t\u00eb kaluar. Ve\u00e7 motr\u00ebs i pranish\u00ebm n\u00eb seanc\u00eb ishte edhe bashk\u00ebshorti i Gashit, prokurori Dritan Gina.<\/p>\n<p>Trupi gjykues q\u00eb po shqyrton ankes\u00ebn e Gashit kund\u00ebr vendimit t\u00eb shkarkimit prej Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit p\u00ebrb\u00ebhet nga Albana Shtylla kryesuese, Luan Daci relator, Ardian Hajdari, Rezarta Schuetz dhe Sokol \u00c7omo an\u00ebtar\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>Gashi, e cila \u00ebsht\u00eb prokurore prej vitit 2004 dhe ka qen\u00eb Drejtore e Marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnieve Juridiksionale me Jasht\u00eb n\u00eb Prokurorin\u00eb e P\u00ebrgjithshme, u shkarkua nga KPK m\u00eb 25 korrik.\u00a0 Komisioni arriti n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin se ajo kishte dh\u00ebn\u00eb \u201cp\u00ebrgjigje t\u00eb pav\u00ebrteta, t\u00eb ndryshme dhe kontradiktore me realitetin e fakteve t\u00eb v\u00ebrtetuara nga dokumentet dhe kontratat e n\u00ebnshkruara prej saj\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Q\u00ebndrimi sfidues i Gashit gjat\u00eb seanc\u00ebs n\u00eb Kolegj ishte i ngjash\u00ebm me at\u00eb para KPK-s\u00eb. Ajo nuk u paraqit n\u00eb seanc\u00ebn publike n\u00eb ver\u00eb t\u00eb vitit 2018, por depozitoi <a href=\"\/?p=52143\">sipas vendimit t\u00eb KPK<\/a> nj\u00eb mori k\u00ebrkesash proceduriale t\u00eb cilat u konsideruan nga Komisioni t\u00eb q\u00ebllimta p\u00ebr t\u00eb vonuar procesin.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Seanca n\u00eb Kolegj<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Seanca publike n\u00eb KPA e cila u caktua m\u00eb 18 mars pas nj\u00eb vendimi t\u00eb nd\u00ebrmjet\u00ebm t\u00eb Kolegjit p\u00ebr t\u00eb d\u00ebgjuar \u201csubjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit, lidhur me nj\u00eb gjetje t\u00eb Operacionit Nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtar t\u00eb Monitorimit, d\u00ebrguar Kolegjit t\u00eb Posa\u00e7\u00ebm t\u00eb Apelimit\u201d, filloi po ashtu me k\u00ebrkesa t\u00eb Gashit.<\/p>\n<p>Gjat\u00eb seanc\u00ebs s\u00eb t\u00eb enjtes ajo paraqiti dy kerk\u00ebsa, e para n\u00eb lidhje me lejimin e t\u00eb motr\u00ebs si ndihm\u00ebse ligjore dhe e dyta mbi procedur\u00ebn e z\u00ebvend\u00ebsimit t\u00eb v\u00ebzhgueses Mia Roessingh me v\u00ebzhguesin Theo Jacobs. Ky i fundit po ashtu k\u00ebrkoi koh\u00eb p\u00ebr tu njohur me gjetjet e paraqitura prej koleges s\u00eb tij, e cila sipas KPA nuk mundi\u00a0 t\u00eb paraqitej p\u00ebr arsye sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsore.<\/p>\n<p>Motra e Gashit arsyetoi se ajo mund t\u00eb ishte ndihm\u00ebse e s\u00eb motr\u00ebs n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb proces duke th\u00ebn\u00eb edhe se ajo vet\u00eb prekej nga rivler\u00ebsimi i cili kishte hetuar nd\u00ebr t\u00eb tjera edhe pasurin\u00eb e babait t\u00eb\u00a0 saj dhe t\u00eb prokurores s\u00eb shkarkuar.<\/p>\n<p>Pas paraqitjes s\u00eb k\u00ebrkesave t\u00eb Gashit dhe asaj t\u00eb v\u00ebzhguesit nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtar, KPA u t\u00ebrhoq p\u00ebr t\u00eb marr\u00eb vendim t\u00eb nd\u00ebrmjet\u00ebm. Pas nd\u00ebrprejes disa minut\u00ebshe, KPA doli me vendim i cili rr\u00ebzoi k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e Gashit dhe njoftoi shtyrjen e seanc\u00ebs m\u00eb 23 prill.<\/p>\n<p>Kryesuesja arsyetoi se Kolegji, duke qen\u00eb e vetmja trup\u00eb gjykuese n\u00eb procesin e vetingut, nuk ishte organ publik dhe p\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast nuk gjenin zbatim parashikimet e Kodit t\u00eb Procedurave Administrative, p\u00ebr lejimin e ndihm\u00ebsit.<\/p>\n<p>Kryesuesja theksoi se Gashit i jepej e drejta t\u00eb zgjidhte nj\u00eb p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsues ligjor t\u00eb licesuar. Nd\u00ebrsa p\u00ebr t\u00eb refuzuar pranimin e gjyqtares Ema Gashi si ndihm\u00ebse iu referua parashikimeve t\u00eb Kodit t\u00eb Procedur\u00ebs Civile neni 96, sipas t\u00eb cilave nj\u00eb gjyqtar ose nj\u00eb prokuror nuk mund t\u00eb jen\u00eb p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsues pal\u00ebsh. &#8220;P\u00ebr k\u00ebto arsye, trupi gjykues arriti n\u00eb konkluzionin se subjektet e rivler\u00ebsimit, p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb\u00a0edhe znj.Rovena Gashi, mund t\u00eb mbrohen dhe p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsohen p\u00ebr shqyrtimin e ankimeve t\u00eb tyre n\u00eb Kolegjin e Posa\u00e7\u00ebm t\u00eb Apelimit me p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsues ligjor, n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me rregullat e parashikuara n\u00eb nenin 96 t\u00eb Kodit t\u00eb Procedur\u00ebs Civile&#8221;, vendosi KPA.<\/p>\n<p>Pas k\u00ebsaj kryesuesja mbylli seanc\u00ebn, duke mos pranuar nd\u00ebrhyrjen e gjyqtares Ema Gashi e cila tentoi t\u00eb fliste.<\/p>\n<p>Megjithat\u00eb Ema Gashi foli p\u00ebr mediat jasht\u00eb sall\u00ebs. Duke q\u00ebndruar n\u00eb krah t\u00eb prokurores s\u00eb shkarkuar Rovena Gashi, ajo e cil\u00ebsoi vendimin e kolegjit shkelje t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00eb. \u201cKolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit e filloi pun\u00ebn e vet sot me nj\u00eb shkelje t\u00eb paprecedent\u00eb proceduriale. T\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e ndihm\u00ebsit ia hoq\u00ebn\u201d, tha Ema Gashi, nd\u00ebrsa e cil\u00ebsoi gjith\u00eb procesin e rivler\u00ebsimit si t\u00eb padrejt\u00eb dhe q\u00eb kishte c\u00ebnuar gjith\u00eb familjen e saj.<\/p>\n<p>Ajo tha se vendimi i Kolegjit se n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast nuk gjente zbatim neni 39 i Kodit t\u00eb Procedurave Administrative, binte ndesh me Ligjin 84\/2016 p\u00ebr \u201cRivler\u00ebsimin e kalimtar t\u00eb gjyqtar\u00ebve\u201d, i cili parashikonte t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsimit bazuar n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb kod.<\/p>\n<p>Gashi po ashtu pretendoi se referimi i Kolegjit te neni 96 i Kodit t\u00eb Procedurave Civile ishte i pasakt\u00eb, pasi ajo plot\u00ebsonte kriteret p\u00ebr t\u00eb qen\u00eb ndihm\u00ebse sipas k\u00ebtij kodi, pasi ishte e motra e subjektit, por pa iu referuar pjes\u00ebs ndaluese p\u00ebr gjykat\u00ebsit dhe prokuror\u00ebt.<\/p>\n<p>Gashi tha se nuk do t\u00eb merrnin avokat dhe se ajo do t\u00eb ishte \u201cderi n\u00eb fund\u201d p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsuese e motr\u00ebs s\u00eb saj Rovena Gashi.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Shkarkimi dhe hetimi<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Komisioni i Pavarur i kualifikimit e hetoi Gashin vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr kriterin e pasuris\u00eb duke l\u00ebn\u00eb m\u00ebnjan\u00eb at\u00eb t\u00eb figur\u00ebs dhe profesionalizmit. Sipas KPK-s\u00eb, prokurorja Gashi dhe bashk\u00ebshorti i saj gjithashtu prokuror, Dritan Gina nuk kishin burime p\u00ebr t\u00eb justifikuar nj\u00eb apartament 80 mij\u00eb euro n\u00eb bregdet dhe nj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr me vler\u00eb 38 mij\u00eb euro n\u00eb Tiran\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>K\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e Gashit p\u00ebr hapje t\u00eb hetimit n\u00eb t\u00eb tre kriteret KPK e rr\u00ebzoi p\u00ebr ekonomi gjyq\u00ebsore. Megjithat\u00eb <a href=\"\/?p=61021\">BIRN gjeti n\u00eb nj\u00eb shkrim mbi raportet e deklasifikuara<\/a> t\u00eb DSIK-s\u00eb se l\u00ebnia m\u00ebnjan\u00eb prej KPK e vler\u00ebsimit n\u00eb kriteret e tjera kishte \u201cshp\u00ebtuar\u201d nj\u00eb s\u00ebr\u00eb prokuror\u00ebsh e gjykt\u00ebsisht t\u00eb shkarkuar p\u00ebr problemet me pasurin\u00eb, nga evidentimi i akuzave p\u00ebr korrupsion e lidhje me krimin e organizuar.<\/p>\n<p>Edhe ndaj Gashit kishte nj\u00eb raport negativ nga Drejtoria e Sigurimit t\u00eb Informacionit t\u00eb Klasifikuar, q\u00eb e kishte gjykuar at\u00eb t\u00eb pap\u00ebrshtatshme. DSIK, sipas raportit pjes\u00ebrisht t\u00eb deklasifikuar t\u00eb cilin BIRN e zot\u00ebron, thot\u00eb se ndaj Gashit personalisht nuk kishte t\u00eb dh\u00ebna, por kishte t\u00eb dh\u00ebna p\u00ebr bashk\u00ebshortin e saj.<\/p>\n<p>Sipas raportit p\u00ebr prokurorin Dritan Gina disponoheshin t\u00eb dh\u00ebna \u201cp\u00ebr p\u00ebrfshirje n\u00eb veprime t\u00eb kundraligjshme, shfaqur n\u00eb form\u00ebn e shp\u00ebrdorimit t\u00eb detyr\u00ebs, korrupsionit pasiv t\u00eb prokurorit\u201d. DSIK arsyeton se kjo e b\u00ebnte edhe Gashin \u201cnj\u00eb individ t\u00eb mundsh\u00ebm p\u00ebr t&#8217;u v\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00ebn presion nga strukturat kriminale\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Rovena Gashi dhe Dritan Gina mbanin poste drejtuese n\u00eb organin e akuz\u00ebs, gjat\u00eb koh\u00ebs q\u00eb ky institucion drejtohej nga ish-kryeprokurori Adriatik Llalla, por t\u00eb dy u ul\u00ebn n\u00eb detyr\u00eb menj\u00ebher\u00eb pas zgjedhjes s\u00eb Arta Markut n\u00eb krye t\u00eb Prokuroris\u00eb n\u00eb dhjetor 2017.<\/p>\n<p>Pas uljes n\u00eb detyr\u00eb, Gashi dhe Gina i kund\u00ebrshtuan vendimet e Markut n\u00eb gjykat\u00eb, duke i cil\u00ebsuar ato t\u00eb kundraligjshme. Pretendimet e tyre u rr\u00ebzuan respektivisht nga Gjykata e Durr\u00ebsit dhe Gjykata Administrative e Tiran\u00ebs, duke l\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb fuqi vendimet e kryeprokurores. Po ashtu Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit,\u00a0<a href=\"\/?p=50374\">rr\u00ebzoi nj\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb t\u00eb \u00e7iftit kund\u00ebr vendimit<\/a>\u00a0p\u00ebr pezullimin e tyre. Megjithat\u00eb pasi Gashi ishte shkarkuar nga KPK Gjykata Administrative e Apelit rr\u00ebzoi vendimin e markut p\u00ebr pezullimin e tyre nga detyra.<\/p>\n<p>Gashi dhe Gina po ashtu ishin n\u00ebn hetim p\u00ebr\u00a0 \u201cfshehje t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb\u201d dhe ishin pezulluar me urdh\u00ebr t\u00eb Prokurores s\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithshme t\u00eb P\u00ebrkohshme, Arta Marku. \u00c7ifti i cil\u00ebsoi akuzat si hakmarrje personale t\u00eb Markut, pas padive q\u00eb ata b\u00ebn\u00eb m\u00eb her\u00ebt kund\u00ebr saj.<\/p>\n<p>BIRN m\u00ebsoi se m\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb t\u00eb Prokuroris\u00eb s\u00eb Fierit dhe me miratimin e Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Fier, \u00e7\u00ebshtja penale ndaj bashk\u00ebshort\u00ebve Gina-Gashi \u00ebsht\u00eb pushuar.<\/p>\n<p>Caktimi i Gashit si p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsuesja e Prokuroris\u00eb s\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithshme n\u00eb K\u00ebshillin e Em\u00ebrimeve n\u00eb Drejt\u00ebsi n\u00eb fillim t\u00eb vitit 2017, sh\u00ebrbeu si shk\u00ebndinj\u00eb e p\u00ebrplasjes publike mes ish-Prokurorit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm Adriatik Llalla dhe ambasadorit t\u00eb SHBA n\u00eb Tiran\u00eb Donald Lu.\u00a0 Gashi ashtu si Llalla dhe nj\u00eb s\u00ebr\u00eb funksionar\u00ebsh t\u00eb tjer\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb, ishin mes atyre t\u00eb cil\u00ebve ambasada e SHBA-ve u njoftoi\u00a0<a href=\"\/?p=39220\">heqjen e vizave<\/a>. Ish- prokurorja madje u ankua p\u00ebr heqjen e\u00a0 viz\u00ebs n\u00eb nj\u00eb let\u00ebr publike.<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit rr\u00ebzoi k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e prokurores s\u00eb shkarkuar Rovena Gashi p\u00ebr t\u00eb pasur si ndihm\u00ebse ligjore t\u00eb motr\u00ebn &#8211; gjykat\u00ebsen Ema Gashi. Vendimi u kund\u00ebrshtua nga subjekti si shkelje e t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsimit. \u00c7\u00ebshtja ndaj Gashit u shty p\u00ebr n\u00eb 23 prill.<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":97,"featured_media":69835,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[6,2],"tags":[],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/rovena-gashi-e-motra-dhe-dritan-gina-600x376.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62829"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/97"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=62829"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62829\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":62840,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62829\/revisions\/62840"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/69835"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=62829"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=62829"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=62829"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}