{"id":62952,"date":"2019-06-18T13:39:46","date_gmt":"2019-06-18T11:39:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/vetingu\/?p=62952"},"modified":"2019-06-18T17:36:07","modified_gmt":"2019-06-18T15:36:07","slug":"aftesi-profesionale-a-mundet-kpa-te-ndertoje-metodologji-te-re-vleresimi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/aftesi-profesionale-a-mundet-kpa-te-ndertoje-metodologji-te-re-vleresimi\/2019\/06\/18\/","title":{"rendered":"Aft\u00ebsi profesionale, a mundet KPA t\u00eb nd\u00ebrtoj\u00eb “metodologji” t\u00eb re vler\u00ebsimi?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Gjyqtari Gentjan Medja i Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative Tiran\u00eb u p\u00ebrball n\u00eb Kolegjin e Posa\u00e7\u00ebm t\u00eb Apelimit me k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e Komisionerit Publik p\u00ebr “rivler\u00ebsim” t\u00eb kriterit profesional sipas nj\u00eb metodologjie t\u00eb re t\u00eb propozuar nga Komisioneri, nd\u00ebrsa Medja e konsideroi propozimin antikushtetues.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit n\u00eb seanc\u00ebn e subjektit Gentjan Medja n\u00eb Tiran\u00eb m\u00eb 17 qershor 2019. Foto: Gjergj Erebara\/BIRN<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Komisioneri publik k\u00ebrkoi para Kolegjit t\u00eb Posa\u00e7\u00ebm t\u00eb Apelimit q\u00eb t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsoj\u00eb gjyqtarin Gentjan Medja p\u00ebr kriterin e aft\u00ebsive profesionale n\u00eb baz\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00eb metodologjie t\u00eb re dhe t\u00eb detajuar t\u00eb propozuar prej atij vet\u00eb, por k\u00ebrkesa e tij u kund\u00ebrshtua si antikushtetuese dhe p\u00ebrtej detyrave t\u00eb ngarkuara nga ligji ndaj k\u00ebtij institucioni nga ana e gjyqtarit Medja.<\/p>\n

Medja u konfirmua n\u00eb detyr\u00eb n\u00eb korrik 2018 pasi doli i p\u00ebrshtatsh\u00ebm n\u00eb t\u00eb treja kriteret, por vler\u00ebsimi profesional p\u00ebr t\u00eb shkaktoi debate.<\/p>\n

Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit pati konkluduar se vendimet e Medjas t\u00eb shqyrtuara si pjes\u00eb e rivler\u00ebsimit profesional, kishin mang\u00ebsi, p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb mosrespektim t\u00eb afateve t\u00eb gjykimit, moszbardhje t\u00eb vendimeve dhe urdhrave t\u00eb gjykat\u00ebs si dhe referenca t\u00eb gabuara t\u00eb ligjeve. Por k\u00ebto probleme, t\u00eb cilat u justifikuan nga Medja si rrjedhoj\u00eb e mbingarkes\u00ebs anormale n\u00eb pun\u00eb t\u00eb gjyqtar\u00ebve t\u00eb gjykatave administrative, e ndan\u00eb KPK ku dy an\u00ebtar\u00eb votuan konfirmimin nd\u00ebrsa nj\u00eb an\u00ebtare dhe v\u00ebzhguesi i huaj ishin t\u00eb opinionit se Medja duhej t\u00eb rr\u00ebzohej.<\/p>\n

Lexo edhe:<\/p>\n

\u201cT\u00eb metat profesionale\u201d ndan\u00eb an\u00ebtar\u00ebt e KPK p\u00ebr gjyqtarin Gentian Medja<\/a><\/p>\n

Konfirmohet n\u00eb detyr\u00eb gjyqtari i Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative Gentian Medja<\/a><\/p>\n

ONM kund\u00ebr vendimit t\u00eb KPK-s\u00eb p\u00ebr gjyqtarin Gentian Medja<\/a><\/p>\n

Por Komisioneri Publik nuk k\u00ebrkoi automatikisht rr\u00ebzimin e Medjas n\u00eb seanc\u00ebn e t\u00eb h\u00ebn\u00ebs m\u00eb 17 qershor 2019, por propozoi nj\u00eb metod\u00eb t\u00eb re dhe m\u00eb t\u00eb detajuar vler\u00ebsimi, e cila, n\u00ebse do t\u00eb pranohet nga KPA, do t\u00eb mund t\u00eb sh\u00ebrbej\u00eb si shembull p\u00ebr proceset e tjera t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit kalimtar t\u00eb gjyqtar\u00ebve dhe prokuror\u00ebve n\u00eb kriterin profesional. Sipas propozimit, vendimet apo dokumentet gjyq\u00ebsore q\u00eb jan\u00eb pjes\u00eb e procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit profesional duhet t\u00eb klasifikohen n\u00eb kritere vler\u00ebsuese duke p\u00ebrcaktuar shenja pozitive apo negative p\u00ebr t\u00eb nxjerr\u00eb nj\u00eb shumatore finale q\u00eb t\u00eb tregoj\u00eb n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb m\u00eb pak subjektive n\u00ebse subjekti \u00ebsht\u00eb i aft\u00eb, “me mang\u00ebsi” apo “i pap\u00ebrshtatsh\u00ebm”. N\u00eb nj\u00eb proces t\u00eb zakonsh\u00ebm, rivler\u00ebsimi profesional bazohet duke p\u00ebrzgjedhur n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb rast\u00ebsore pes\u00eb dokumente nga lista e dokumenteve t\u00eb prodhuara nga subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit si dhe duke pranuar tre dokumente q\u00eb subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit i zgjedh vet\u00eb. N\u00eb rastin e Medjas, KPK k\u00ebrkoi edhe pes\u00eb dokumente te tjera duke shqyrtuar p\u00ebrfundimisht tremb\u00ebdhjet\u00eb vendime.<\/p>\n

Komisioneri p\u00ebrmendi nj\u00eb list\u00eb t\u00eb gjat\u00eb me probleme n\u00eb k\u00ebto vendime nd\u00ebrsa Medja i rr\u00ebzoi pretendimet si t\u00eb pabaza ose i argumentoi me ngarkes\u00ebn e lart\u00eb n\u00eb pun\u00eb.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb lidhje me mosmbajtjen e rregullt t\u00eb procesverbaleve gjyq\u00ebsore, Medja tha se nuk jan\u00eb gjetur pasoja negative nga k\u00ebto probleme nd\u00ebrsa p\u00ebr “mosrespektimin e afatave” shpjegoi rast pas rasti se b\u00ebhej fjal\u00eb p\u00ebr shkelje me nj\u00eb apo dy dit\u00eb dhe se k\u00ebto ishin shkaktuar p\u00ebr shkaqe objektive. Medja argumentoi se gjat\u00eb periudh\u00ebs n\u00eb proces shqyrtimi, atij i ishte dashur t\u00eb kryente 7 deri n\u00eb 18 seanca gjyq\u00ebsore n\u00eb dit\u00eb p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb transferimit t\u00eb menj\u00ebhersh\u00ebm t\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha \u00e7\u00ebshtjeve t\u00eb karakterit administrativ nga gjykatat e zakonshme n\u00eb gjykatat administrative kur k\u00ebto t\u00eb fundit u krijuan n\u00eb vitin 2012. Duke qen\u00eb se gjykatat administrative jan\u00eb shum\u00eb m\u00eb pak n\u00eb num\u00ebr dhe n\u00eb staf se gjykatat e zakonshme, secilit gjyqtar iu ngarkuan nj\u00ebher\u00ebsh qindra \u00e7\u00ebshtje.<\/p>\n

Medja argumentoi m\u00eb tej se afatet n\u00eb shqyrtimin e \u00e7\u00ebshtjeve gjyq\u00ebsore jan\u00eb sugjeruese dhe jo detyruese, p\u00ebr shkak se koh\u00ebzgjatja e nj\u00eb procesi\u00a0 varet shum\u00eb nga faktor\u00eb t\u00eb tjer\u00eb, si infrastruktura e gjykat\u00ebs, disponibiliteti i gjyqtar\u00ebve n\u00eb rastet e gjykimeve me trup\u00eb, apo kompleksiteti i \u00e7\u00ebshtjes gjyq\u00ebsore.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb lidhje me k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr t\u00eb zhvilluar nj\u00eb metodologji m\u00eb t\u00eb detajuar vler\u00ebsimi nga ajo aktuale, Medja argumentoi se nj\u00eb nism\u00eb e till\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb antikushtetuese, p\u00ebr shkak se ligji p\u00ebr rivler\u00ebsimin kalimtar t\u00eb gjyqtar\u00ebve dhe prokuror\u00ebve sanksionon se rivler\u00ebsimi kryhet nga “Organi p\u00ebrkat\u00ebs i vler\u00ebsimit t\u00eb aft\u00ebsive profesionale” dhe jo nga vet\u00eb KPK dhe se miratimi i nj\u00eb metodologjie t\u00eb till\u00eb nga ana e KPK mund t\u00eb c\u00ebnoj\u00eb parimin kushtetues q\u00eb thot\u00eb se institucionet zbatojn\u00eb detyrat e l\u00ebna nga ligji dhe nuk e b\u00ebjn\u00eb ligjin vet\u00eb. Ai argumentoi m\u00eb tutje se miratimi i nj\u00eb metodologjie t\u00eb ndryshme nga ajo q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktuar n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb detajuar n\u00eb ligjin aktual shkel parimin e siguris\u00eb juridike p\u00ebr subjektet e rivler\u00ebsimit.<\/p>\n

Komisioneri publik fal\u00ebnderoi Medjan p\u00ebr argumentimin dhe nuk pati kund\u00ebrshtime t\u00eb m\u00ebtejshme. Gjykata e nd\u00ebrpreu seanc\u00ebn p\u00ebr ta vijuar at\u00eb m\u00eb 9 korrik 2019. Seanca ishte n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb pazakont\u00eb e gjat\u00eb, ku argumentimi me goj\u00eb i Medjas zgjati m\u00eb shum\u00eb se dy or\u00eb.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Gjyqtari Gentjan Medja i Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative Tiran\u00eb u p\u00ebrball n\u00eb Kolegjin e Posa\u00e7\u00ebm t\u00eb Apelimit me k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e Komisionerit Publik p\u00ebr “rivler\u00ebsim” t\u00eb kriterit profesional sipas nj\u00eb metodologjie t\u00eb re t\u00eb propozuar nga Komisioneri, nd\u00ebrsa Medja e konsideroi propozimin antikushtetues.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":62979,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[2],"tags":[],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/KPA-Medja-600x353.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"Aft\u00ebsi profesionale, a mundet KPA t\u00eb nd\u00ebrtoj\u00eb “metodologji” t\u00eb re vler\u00ebsimi?","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62952"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=62952"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62952\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/62979"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=62952"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=62952"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=62952"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}