{"id":63182,"date":"2019-07-27T15:04:21","date_gmt":"2019-07-27T13:04:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/vetingu\/?p=63182"},"modified":"2019-07-27T15:04:21","modified_gmt":"2019-07-27T13:04:21","slug":"vendimi-i-kpk-hetimet-e-paplota-te-shkelzen-cenes-favorizuan-te-pandehurit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/vendimi-i-kpk-hetimet-e-paplota-te-shkelzen-cenes-favorizuan-te-pandehurit\/2019\/07\/27\/","title":{"rendered":"Vendimi i KPK: Hetimet e paplota t\u00eb Shk\u00eblzen Cen\u00ebs favorizuan t\u00eb pandehurit"},"content":{"rendered":"

Vendimi i arsyetuar i Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit e penalizon prokurorin Shk\u00eblzen Cena, i cili ishte asokohe edhe kandidat p\u00ebr SPAK, n\u00eb t\u00eb tre kriteret e vler\u00ebsimit dhe arrin n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin se ai ka kryer deklarim t\u00eb pamjaftuesh\u00ebm t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb dhe ka c\u00ebnuar besimin e publikut t\u00eb drejt\u00ebsia.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
Prokurori i Dibr\u00ebs, Shk\u00eblzen Cena pas vendimit t\u00eb KPK. Foto:BIRN<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Me vendim t\u00eb dat\u00ebs 14 qershor 2019, Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit nd\u00ebrpreu karrier\u00ebn e prokurorit t\u00eb Dibr\u00ebs, Shk\u00eblzen Cena, i cili kandidonte edhe p\u00ebr Prokurorin\u00eb e Posa\u00e7me, SPAK. N\u00eb vendimin e arsyetuar, KPK argumenton se shkarkimi u bazua n\u00eb problemet e konstatuara me pasurin\u00eb si dhe p\u00ebr \u201cc\u00ebnim t\u00eb besimit t\u00eb publikut te drejt\u00ebsi\u201d, lidhur me past\u00ebrtin\u00eb e figur\u00ebs dhe profesionalizmin.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb vendim identifikohen dy raste kur jan\u00eb gjetur mang\u00ebsi t\u00eb hetimit nga ana e Cen\u00ebs e q\u00eb sipas KPK-s\u00eb nuk kan\u00eb t\u00eb b\u00ebjn\u00eb me nivelin profesional, por me veprimet e tij p\u00ebr t\u00eb favorizuar dy t\u00eb pandehur. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, Komisioni ka konkluduar se prokurori\u00a0Shk\u00eblzen<\/span>\u00a0Cena<\/span>\u00a0ka kryer deklarim t\u00eb pamjaftuesh\u00ebm dhe t\u00eb pasakt\u00eb dhe se ka pasur munges\u00eb t\u00eb ardhurash p\u00ebr krijimin e pasurive dhe shpenzimet.<\/p>\n

Shk\u00eblzen\u00a0Cena<\/span>\u00a0e ka filluar karrier\u00ebn n\u00eb sistemin e drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb vitin 2000, si prokuror n\u00eb Prokurorin\u00eb e Kuk\u00ebsit. Ai \u00ebsht\u00eb transferuar nga Kuk\u00ebsi n\u00eb Kurbin n\u00eb vitin 2012, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb prej vitit 2016 e ushtronte funksionin n\u00eb Prokurorin\u00eb e Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Dib\u00ebr.<\/p>\n

Rivler\u00ebsimi i tij u krye me prioritet p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb kandidimit p\u00ebr SPAK. Trupa gjykuese e KPK e p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00eb nga Lulzim Hamitaj kryesues, Brunilda Bekteshi relatore dhe Firdes Shuli an\u00ebtare vendosi shkarkimin bazuar n\u00eb t\u00eb tre kriteret e rivler\u00ebsimit. <\/span><\/p>\n

Dyshimet p\u00ebr favorizim <\/strong><\/p>\n

Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit deklaron se ka gjetur mang\u00ebsi t\u00eb kriterit profesional p\u00ebr prokurorin Cena, t\u00eb cilat sipas vendimit nuk lidhen me munges\u00ebn e aft\u00ebsis\u00eb por me sjelljen e subjektit n\u00eb favor t\u00eb t\u00eb pandehurve, duke i klasifikuar rastet si \u201cc\u00ebnim t\u00eb besimit t\u00eb publikut t\u00eb drejt\u00ebsia\u201d.<\/p>\n

B\u00ebhet fjal\u00eb p\u00ebr nj\u00eb dosje t\u00eb hetuar nga subjekti n\u00eb vitin 2006, lidhur me nj\u00eb rast t\u00eb kontrabandimit t\u00eb vi\u00e7ave pran\u00eb pik\u00ebs doganore t\u00eb Morin\u00ebs, kur prokurori\u00a0Cena<\/span>\u00a0sh\u00ebrbente ende n\u00eb prokurorin\u00eb e Kuk\u00ebsit. Nga verifikimi i dosjes, ka rezultuar se prokurori\u00a0Cena<\/span>\u00a0ka k\u00ebrkuar mas\u00ebn m\u00eb t\u00eb ul\u00ebt t\u00eb d\u00ebnimit, at\u00eb me gjob\u00eb, pavar\u00ebsisht se n\u00eb aktet e dosjes nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb gjetur dokumenti q\u00eb v\u00ebrteton n\u00ebse i pandehuri kishte qen\u00eb ose jo i d\u00ebnuar m\u00eb par\u00eb.<\/p>\n

\u201cNga verifikimi q\u00eb ka kryer Komisioni ka rezultuar se i pandehuri n\u00eb fjal\u00eb kishte qen\u00eb i d\u00ebnuar n\u00eb vitin 2005 po p\u00ebr kontrabandim mallrash, nj\u00eb vit para se t\u00eb arrestohej e t\u00eb hetohej s\u00ebrish p\u00ebr t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn vep\u00ebr penale,\u201d thuhet n\u00eb vendimin e KPK.<\/p>\n

Komisoni konstaton se nga veprimet procedurale nuk rezulton q\u00eb prokurori\u00a0Cena<\/span>\u00a0t\u00eb kishte dh\u00ebn\u00eb argumente bind\u00ebse lidhur me propozimin p\u00ebr d\u00ebnim minimal t\u00eb t\u00eb pandehurit. P\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, edhe gjoba prej 160 mij\u00eb lek\u00ebsh nuk ishte ekzekutuar dhe n\u00eb vitin 2007 subjekti e kishte mbyllur \u00e7\u00ebshtjen duke e konsideruar t\u00eb amnistruar.<\/p>\n

\u00c7\u00ebshtja e dyt\u00eb e trajtuar nga Komisioni i p\u00ebrket nj\u00eb vendimi pushimi t\u00eb prokurorit\u00a0Cena<\/span>\u00a0t\u00eb prillit 2010 p\u00ebr shtetasin I. H., i hetuar p\u00ebr vepr\u00ebn penale \u201ctregtim dhe transportim t\u00eb mallrave q\u00eb jan\u00eb kontraband\u00eb\u201d. Komisioni konstaton se hetimi p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb rast nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb kryer i plot\u00eb dhe se nuk jan\u00eb mbledhur t\u00eb gjitha provat p\u00ebr qart\u00ebsimin e rrethanave t\u00eb akuz\u00ebs s\u00eb ngritur.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb vendim thuhet se edhe pse i proceduari ka dh\u00ebn\u00eb deklarime t\u00eb nj\u00ebpasnj\u00ebshme kontradiktore p\u00ebr faturat tatimore t\u00eb mallit q\u00eb i \u00ebsht\u00eb gjetur, prokurori\u00a0Cena<\/span>\u00a0nuk ka nd\u00ebrmarr\u00eb asnj\u00eb veprim hetimor p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb gj\u00eb. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, Komisioni v\u00ebren versione kontradiktore edhe t\u00eb vet\u00eb prokurorit\u00a0Cena<\/span>\u00a0gjat\u00eb hetimit, konkretisht n\u00eb aktet e hartuara nga vet\u00eb ai p\u00ebr vleft\u00ebsimin e arrestimit dhe caktimin e mas\u00ebs s\u00eb sigurimit e tij.<\/p>\n

Prej hetimit administrativ ka rezultuar se prokurori\u00a0Cena<\/span>\u00a0nuk kishte hetuar n\u00ebse mallrat e treg\u00ebtuara ishin t\u00eb zhdoganuara apo t\u00eb blera nga nj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr biznes. Komisioni ka evidentuar edhe mang\u00ebsi t\u00eb tjera n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb hetim t\u00eb kryer nga prokurori\u00a0Cena<\/span>.<\/p>\n

\u201cDukej se me veprimet dhe mosveprimet subjekti kishte favorizuar n\u00eb koh\u00eb t\u00eb akuzuarin, me q\u00ebllim marrjen e faturave, dor\u00ebzimin e tyre (megjith\u00ebse ato datojn\u00eb shum\u00eb m\u00eb her\u00ebt kapjes s\u00eb tij n\u00eb flagranc\u00eb), me pasoj\u00eb drejtimin e hetimeve drejt vendimmarrjes s\u00eb pushimit t\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjes. N\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsi p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje, dukej se subjekti nuk kishte mbajtur t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin standard hetimor\u2026,\u2019 thuhet n\u00eb vendimin e KPK-s\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Komisioni evidenton problematika t\u00eb profesionalizmit edhe n\u00eb disa dosje t\u00eb tjera t\u00eb verifikuara, si mang\u00ebsi n\u00eb arsyetimin e fakteve dhe vendimeve. N\u00eb vendim thuhet se Komisioni, sikurse edhe K\u00ebshilli i Lart\u00eb i Prokuroris\u00eb, kan\u00eb konstatuar disa problematika n\u00eb nj\u00eb prej dokumenteve t\u00eb paraqitura nga vet\u00eb subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit, si dhe n\u00eb tre dosjet, q\u00eb i p\u00ebrkasin atyre t\u00eb zgjedhura me short.<\/p>\n

Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, lidhur me nj\u00eb dosje t\u00eb vitit 2014 me t\u00eb pandehur shtetasin N.R. i akuzuar p\u00ebr \u201cKund\u00ebrshtim i punonj\u00ebsit t\u00eb policis\u00eb s\u00eb rendit publik\u201d, vet\u00eb prokurori\u00a0Cena<\/span>\u00a0ka pranuar faktin se ka arsyetuar n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb sip\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsore, duke b\u00ebr\u00eb nj\u00eb analiz\u00eb t\u00eb thjesht\u00eb t\u00eb vepr\u00ebs penale. \u201cTrupi gjykues vler\u00ebson se shpjegimet e subjektit nuk jan\u00eb argumente justifikuese, pasi ato c\u00ebnojn\u00eb arsyetimin e plot\u00eb dhe t\u00eb kuptuesh\u00ebm t\u00eb nj\u00eb akti p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsimi t\u00eb akuz\u00ebs\/konkluzionit p\u00ebrfundimtar,\u201d thuhet n\u00eb vendimin e KPK-s\u00eb.<\/p>\n

DSIK ngriti dyshime p\u00ebr korrupsion<\/strong><\/p>\n

Drejtoria e Sigurimit t\u00eb Informacionit t\u00eb Klasifikuar ka dor\u00ebzuar fillimisht n\u00eb KPK nj\u00eb raport ku konstatonte p\u00ebrshtatshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e prokurorit\u00a0Cena<\/span>\u00a0p\u00ebr vazhdimin e detyr\u00ebs. Por pasi ka siguruar informacione se dyshohej t\u00eb kishte qen\u00eb i p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb n\u00eb korrupsion n\u00eb disa \u00e7\u00ebshtje n\u00eb periudh\u00ebn 2006-2010 kur punonte n\u00eb prokurorin\u00eb e Kuk\u00ebsit, ka dor\u00ebzuar nj\u00eb raport t\u00eb dyt\u00eb ku konstatohej pap\u00ebrshtatshm\u00ebria p\u00ebr t\u00eb vazhduar detyr\u00ebn e prokurorit.<\/p>\n

Komisioni shpjegon se n\u00eb raportin e DSIK-s\u00eb informohet nd\u00ebr t\u00eb tjera se; gjat\u00eb vitit 2010, prokurori\u00a0Shk\u00eblzen<\/span>\u00a0Cena<\/span>\u00a0dyshohet t\u00eb jet\u00eb p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb n\u00eb nj\u00eb rast korrupsioni n\u00eb Prokurorin\u00eb e Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Kuk\u00ebs, duke orientuar personin e pandehur p\u00ebr kryerjen e veprimeve t\u00eb caktuara, me q\u00ebllim ndryshimin ose leht\u00ebsimin e akuz\u00ebs ndaj tij.<\/p>\n

\u201cRasti i vitit 2010 e thekson edhe m\u00eb tep\u00ebr rolin n\u00eb veprimtari t\u00eb paligjshme t\u00eb prokurorit\u00a0Cena<\/span>, pasi aty shfaqet nj\u00eb form\u00eb konkrete n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet s\u00eb cil\u00ebs ky prokuror ka abuzuar me detyr\u00ebn p\u00ebr t\u00eb realizuar favorizimin e t\u00eb pandehurit, me q\u00ebllim p\u00ebrfitimin,\u201d p\u00ebrshkruhet n\u00eb vendim informacioni i DSIK.\u00a0 Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, Komisioni \u00e7mon se hetimi administrativ referuar kriterit profesional ku evidentohen dy raste t\u00eb dyshuara t\u00eb favorizimit t\u00eb t\u00eb proceduarve, mb\u00ebshtet raportin e kontrollit t\u00eb figur\u00ebs.<\/p>\n

Trupi gjykues i KPK-s\u00eb konsideron se n\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjet penale t\u00eb verifikuara lidhur me dyshimet p\u00ebr korrupsion jan\u00eb konstatuar shmangie nga kryerja e disa veprimeve hetimore t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme, p\u00ebr favorizime t\u00eb t\u00eb akuzuarve n\u00eb dh\u00ebnien e d\u00ebnimeve t\u00eb lehta apo shmangien e tyre nga d\u00ebnimi dhe p\u00ebr pasoj\u00eb, trupi gjykues i ka \u00e7muar ato n\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin t\u00ebr\u00ebsor t\u00eb c\u00ebnimit t\u00eb besueshm\u00ebris\u00eb ndaj publikut.<\/p>\n

Pas verifikimit t\u00eb informacioneve t\u00eb DSIK-s\u00eb dhe pretendimeve t\u00eb prokurorit\u00a0Cena<\/span>, KPK ka konkluduar se nuk mund t\u00eb provoheshin dyshimet e ngritura ndaj tij p\u00ebr korrupsion.<\/p>\n

Problemet me pasurit\u00eb<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Komisioni ka konstatuar mosp\u00ebrputhje e pamjaftueshm\u00ebri t\u00eb burimeve p\u00ebr blerjen e nj\u00eb apartamenti me sip\u00ebrfaqe 55.25 m2 n\u00eb Kuk\u00ebs n\u00eb dhjetor t\u00eb vitit 1999 n\u00eb shum\u00ebn e 600 mij\u00eb lek\u00ebve dhe t\u00eb vler\u00ebsuar n\u00eb vitin 2012 n\u00eb shum\u00ebn 3.5 milion\u00eb lek\u00eb. N\u00eb vendim thuhet se prokurori\u00a0Shk\u00eblzen<\/span>\u00a0Cena<\/span>, n\u00eb deklarat\u00ebn e vitit 2003 e ka pasqyruar \u00a0vler\u00ebn e blerjes 500 mij\u00eb lek\u00eb, nd\u00ebrsa n\u00eb 2017 n\u00eb shum\u00ebn 600 mij\u00eb lek\u00eb.<\/span><\/p>\n

KPK ka identifikuar gjithashtu dy kontrata noteriale t\u00eb s\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebs dat\u00eb me objekt shit-blerjen e k\u00ebtij apartamenti, ku n\u00eb nj\u00ebr\u00ebn kan\u00eb firmosur kat\u00ebr prej pes\u00eb shit\u00ebsve, nd\u00ebrsa n\u00eb tjetr\u00ebn t\u00eb pes\u00eb bashk\u00ebpronar\u00ebt t\u00eb cil\u00ebt p\u00ebrshkruhen n\u00eb kontrat\u00eb. Gjithashtu \u00ebsht\u00eb konstatuar se n\u00eb deklarat\u00ebn e vitit 2003 \u00ebsht\u00eb pasqyruar si burim krijimi \u201crroga\u201d, nd\u00ebrsa n\u00eb deklarat\u00ebn veting figuron si burim \u201ckursimet e prind\u00ebrve\u201d. <\/span><\/p>\n

Shpjegimet e prokurorit\u00a0Cena<\/span>\u00a0se deklarimi i vitit 2003 ka qen\u00eb lapsus ose i paplot\u00eb pasi duhej t\u00eb shtonte edhe fjal\u00ebn e \u201cprind\u00ebrve\u201d, nuk ka qen\u00eb bind\u00ebs p\u00ebr Komisionin q\u00eb ka kryer analiz\u00eb financiare edhe lidhur me k\u00ebt\u00eb pretendim. Ndon\u00ebse\u00a0Cena<\/span>\u00a0ka depozituar dokumentacionin q\u00eb pasqyronte pun\u00ebsimin e prind\u00ebrve t\u00eb tij prej vitit 1961, Komisioni ka vler\u00ebsuar t\u00eb p\u00ebrfshij\u00eb n\u00eb analiz\u00ebn financiare t\u00eb ardhurat nga viti 1991 deri n\u00eb vitin 1999, duke argumentuar se p\u00ebr periudh\u00ebn e m\u00ebparshme nuk rezulton t\u00eb ket\u00eb referenca mbi raportin t\u00eb ardhura\/shpenzimeve dhe se ato neutralizojn\u00eb nj\u00ebra-tjetr\u00ebn.<\/span><\/p>\n

Prej analiz\u00ebs financiare \u00ebsht\u00eb konkluduar se\u00a0Cena<\/span>\u00a0nuk kishte pasur burime financiare n\u00eb shum\u00ebn 437.069 lek\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb justifikuar blerjen e k\u00ebsaj pasurie. Komisioni ka gjetur probleme edhe n\u00eb deklarimin e rikonstruksionit t\u00eb apartamentit n\u00eb Kuk\u00ebs n\u00eb vitin 2007, n\u00eb shum\u00ebn 800 mij\u00eb lek\u00eb nga kredia e marr\u00eb n\u00eb \u201cBKT\u201d n\u00eb gusht t\u00eb vitit 2006 n\u00eb vler\u00ebn 1 milion lek\u00eb. Nga hetimi ka rezultuar se kredia ishte marr\u00eb p\u00ebr blerjen e nj\u00eb apartamenti. Komisioni ka konkluduar se n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast\u00a0Cena<\/span>\u00a0kishte vepruar n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me kushtin e parashikuar n\u00eb kontrat\u00ebn p\u00ebr p\u00ebrfitimin e k\u00ebsaj kredie, duke ndryshuar destinacionin e saj.<\/span><\/p>\n

Komisioni ka konstatuar se sipas nj\u00eb akt-marr\u00ebveshjeje t\u00eb vitit 2006,\u00a0Cena<\/span>\u00a0i kishte paguar shtetasit D. B. shum\u00ebn 28.000 euro. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, n\u00eb deklarat\u00ebn vjetore 2006\u00a0Cena<\/span>\u00a0ka p\u00ebrshkruar se nga kjo kredi ka gjendjen cash 1 milion lek\u00eb, pasi apartamenti nuk ishte bler\u00eb se nuk kishin r\u00ebnd\u00eb dakort p\u00ebr \u00e7mimin. N\u00eb vendim thuhet se\u00a0Cena<\/span>\u00a0nuk e kishte deklaruar k\u00ebt\u00eb akt-marr\u00ebveshje, as n\u00eb deklarat\u00ebn \u201cveting\u201d dhe n\u00eb asnj\u00eb prej deklaratave t\u00eb interesave periodike private dhe se nuk e kishte revokuar at\u00eb.<\/span><\/p>\n

Prokurori\u00a0Cena<\/span>\u00a0ka deklaruar para Komisionit se nuk e kishte paguar shum\u00ebn 28 mij\u00eb euro, duke e justifikuar pasyqrimin e k\u00ebsaj vlere n\u00eb akt-marr\u00ebveshje si nj\u00eb lapsus t\u00eb noterit. Por, nga hetimi jan\u00eb konstatuar mosp\u00ebrputhje mes deklarimeve t\u00eb Cen\u00ebs dhe D.B. dhe t\u00eb noterit, i cili ka th\u00ebn\u00eb se vlera 28 mij\u00eb euro \u00ebsht\u00eb pasqyruar me vullnetin e pal\u00ebve.<\/span><\/p>\n

N\u00eb vendim thuhet se edhe D.B., nuk e kishte bler\u00eb apartamentin n\u00eb fjal\u00eb, pasi ka marr\u00eb nj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr me sip\u00ebrfaqe m\u00eb t\u00eb madhe, 2+1 po n\u00eb Tiran\u00eb, ku prej disa vitesh rezulton se prokurori\u00a0Cena<\/span>\u00a0jeton me qira.<\/span><\/p>\n

Nga hetimi administrativ ka rezultuar se prokurori\u00a0Cena<\/span>\u00a0ka dh\u00ebn\u00eb si adres\u00eb s\u00eb tij q\u00eb prej vitit 2010 apartamentin n\u00eb Tiran\u00eb n\u00eb pron\u00ebsi t\u00eb shokut t\u00eb tij D.B. N\u00eb shpjegimet e dh\u00ebna p\u00ebr Komisionin,\u00a0Cena<\/span>\u00a0ka deklaruar se nga viti 2011 e n\u00eb vijim ka jetuar n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb apartament, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb nga v\u00ebrtetimi hipotekor i k\u00ebtij k\u00ebsaj banese, rezulton se ajo ka kaluar n\u00eb pron\u00ebsin\u00eb e D.B rreth nj\u00eb vit m\u00eb von\u00eb. Cena\u00a0ka deklaruar pages\u00ebn e qiras\u00eb nga viti 2013 e n\u00eb vazhdim.<\/span><\/p>\n

P\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnies mes prokurorit\u00a0Cena<\/span>\u00a0dhe pronarit t\u00eb k\u00ebtij apartamenti, Komisioni e ka vler\u00ebsuar shteasin D.B, si person tjet\u00ebr t\u00eb lidhur dhe ka kryer verifikimin e mund\u00ebsis\u00eb financiare t\u00eb tij p\u00ebr blerjen e apartamentit me sip\u00ebrfaqe 87.2 m2 n\u00eb dat\u00ebn 17 shkurt 2012 p\u00ebr shum\u00ebn 58.500 euro. Pas kryerjes s\u00eb analiz\u00ebs financiare, trupi gjykues ka arritur n\u00eb konluzionin, se prokurori\u00a0Cena <\/span>nuk arriti t\u00eb shpjegoj\u00eb dhe provoj\u00eb bindsh\u00ebm burimin e ligjsh\u00ebm t\u00eb t\u00eb ardhurave t\u00eb mikut t\u00eb ti. <\/span><\/p>\n

Trupa gjykuese e KPK-s\u00eb identifikoi problematika edhe n\u00eb blerjen e dy automjeteve dhe se analiza financiare e ka nxjerr\u00eb at\u00eb me munges\u00eb burimesh p\u00ebr justifikimin e pasuris\u00eb n\u00eb vler\u00ebn 3.8 milion\u00eb lek\u00eb.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Vendimi i arsyetuar i Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit e penalizon prokurorin Shk\u00eblzen Cena, i cili ishte asokohe edhe kandidat p\u00ebr SPAK, n\u00eb t\u00eb tre kriteret e vler\u00ebsimit dhe arrin n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin se ai ka kryer deklarim t\u00eb pamjaftuesh\u00ebm t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb dhe ka c\u00ebnuar besimin e publikut t\u00eb drejt\u00ebsia.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":637,"featured_media":63183,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[13],"tags":[],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/IMG-5295_Moment-600x338.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"Vendimi i KPK: Hetimet e paplota t\u00eb Shk\u00eblzen Cen\u00ebs favorizuan t\u00eb pandehurit","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63182"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/637"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=63182"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63182\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/63183"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=63182"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=63182"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=63182"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}