![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/20181112_184335_121118025-2_5Mj8BbH.jpg\")
<\/a>M\u00eb 22 maj 2019, Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit p\u00ebrmbysi vendimin e shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb p\u00ebr an\u00ebtarin e Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb, Edmond Islamaj dhe vendosi mbylljen e karrier\u00ebs s\u00eb tij t\u00eb gjat\u00eb n\u00eb sistemin e drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Vendimi i arsyetuar i KPA-s\u00eb del n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin se Islamaj nuk arriti nivel t\u00eb besuesh\u00ebm n\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin e pasurive t\u00eb deklaruara dhe se ka b\u00ebr\u00eb \u201cdeklarim t\u00eb paplot\u00eb, t\u00eb pasakt\u00eb dhe t\u00eb pamjaftuesh\u00ebm t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb s\u00eb tij dhe personave t\u00eb lidhur\u201d.<\/p>\n
Vendimi i Kolegjit p\u00ebr Islamajn u bazua kryesisht n\u00eb dy \u00e7\u00ebshtje; ligjshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e t\u00eb ardhurave t\u00eb bashk\u00ebjetueses, t\u00eb deklaruara m\u00eb pas si burim p\u00ebr tre pasuri t\u00eb patundshme si dhe deklarimet vit pas viti t\u00eb kursimeve cash t\u00eb familjes, t\u00eb cilat nuk p\u00ebrputheshin me deklarat\u00ebn \u201cvetting\u201d.<\/p>\n
Kolegji zhvilloi gjithashtu nj\u00eb metodologji p\u00ebr t\u00eb vler\u00ebsuar shpenzimet e udh\u00ebtimeve jasht\u00eb shtetit, rezultati i s\u00eb cil\u00ebs e p\u00ebrmbysi analiz\u00ebn financiare t\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb m\u00eb par\u00eb n\u00eb Komisionin e Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit dhe e nxorri gjyqtarin me munges\u00eb burimesh n\u00eb vler\u00ebn e 4.3 milion\u00eb lek\u00ebve.<\/p>\n
Procesi n\u00eb Kolegj p\u00ebr Edmond Islamajn zgjati 14 seanca dhe nj\u00eb seri pretendimesh t\u00eb Komisionerit Publik p\u00ebr hetime t\u00eb paplota u rr\u00ebzuan rrug\u00ebs. Trupa gjyq\u00ebsore kryesohej nga Luan Daci, me relator Sokol \u00c7omon dhe an\u00ebtar\u00eb Ina Rama, Rezarta Schuetz dhe Albana Shtylla.<\/p>\n
Sipas vendimit t\u00eb arsyetuar, ish-an\u00ebtari i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb nuk arriti t\u00eb dokumentonte ligjshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e t\u00eb ardhurave t\u00eb bashk\u00ebjetueses s\u00eb tij, t\u00eb deklaruara si burim p\u00ebr nj\u00eb apartament, nj\u00eb nj\u00ebsi tregtare si dhe nj\u00eb garazh n\u00eb Durr\u00ebs.<\/p>\n
Pasurit\u00eb e m\u00ebsip\u00ebrme jan\u00eb bler\u00eb n\u00eb vitin 2001 p\u00ebrmes nj\u00eb kontrate mes bashk\u00ebjetueses s\u00eb subjektit dhe babait t\u00eb saj n\u00eb vler\u00ebn e 1 milion lek\u00ebve. Por Kolegji arriti n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin se ajo nuk ka pasur burime t\u00eb ligjshme p\u00ebr krijimin e k\u00ebsaj shume dhe se dokumentet e dor\u00ebzuara flisnin p\u00ebr nj\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnie kontraktuale t\u00eb saj me nj\u00eb OJF n\u00eb Tiran\u00eb, por jo nj\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnie pun\u00ebsimi, \u201csikund\u00ebr ishte deklaruar n\u00eb deklarat\u00ebn veting\u201d.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb vendim shtohet gjithashtu se subjekti nuk paraqiti asnj\u00eb dokument p\u00ebr ekzistenc\u00ebn e qendr\u00ebs n\u00eb fjal\u00eb dhe nuk b\u00ebri asnj\u00eb p\u00ebrpjekje p\u00ebr t\u00eb siguruar dokumentacion n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb drejtim. Lidhur me t\u00eb ardhurat e deklaruara t\u00eb bashk\u00ebjetueses n\u00eb vler\u00ebn e 5 mij\u00eb dollar\u00ebve, Kolegji argumenton se nuk ka asnj\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebn\u00eb nga organet shtet\u00ebrore lidhur me pages\u00ebn e detyrimeve tatimore p\u00ebr to.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim t\u00eb analiz\u00ebs p\u00ebr t\u00eb tre pasurit\u00eb, Kolegji argumenton se subjekti ka kryer deklarim t\u00eb paplot\u00eb n\u00eb deklarat\u00ebn \u201cvetting\u201d, deklarim t\u00eb pasakt\u00eb t\u00eb t\u00eb ardhurave nga puna pran\u00eb nj\u00eb qendre dhe nj\u00eb organizate humanitare si dhe ndodhen n\u00eb kushtet e pamjaftueshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb burimeve t\u00eb ligjshme p\u00ebr t\u00eb justifikuar tre pasurit\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Kolegji i gjeti t\u00eb sakta deklarimet e Islamajt p\u00ebr blerjen e nj\u00eb makine n\u00eb bashk\u00ebpron\u00ebsi me baban\u00eb si dhe arriti n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin se i ati kishte t\u00eb ardhura t\u00eb ligjshme p\u00ebr blerjen e nj\u00eb sht\u00ebpie, e cila iu dhurua m\u00eb pas f\u00ebmij\u00ebve t\u00eb subjektit.<\/p>\n
Megjithat\u00eb, problemet u rikthyen me k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e Komisionerit Publik p\u00ebr t\u00eb hetuar s\u00ebrish kursimet e mbajtura jasht\u00eb sistemit bankar t\u00eb familjes dhe t\u00eb deklaruara vit pas viti n\u00eb deklaratat periodike.<\/p>\n
P\u00ebrgjat\u00eb viteve 2004-2016, Edmond Islamaj kishte deklaruar kursime familjare t\u00eb akumuluara n\u00eb cash n\u00eb vler\u00ebn e 10.4 milion\u00eb lek\u00ebve. Nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb e kursimeve n\u00eb cash jan\u00eb deklaruar si burim p\u00ebr hapjen e dy llogarive bankare n\u00eb em\u00ebr t\u00eb subjektit dhe bashk\u00ebjetueses, por Komisioneri Publik ngriti pik\u00ebpyetje mbi diferenc\u00ebn prej 4.1 milion\u00eb lek\u00ebsh, e cila nuk figuron n\u00eb deklarat\u00ebn \u201cvetting\u201d.<\/p>\n
Islamaj e kund\u00ebrshtoi ankimin dhe e shpjegoi \u201cshp\u00ebrqendrimin\u201d me kursimet n\u00eb cash me m\u00ebnyr\u00ebn se si ai i kishte deklaruar ato dhe pretendoi se kursimet ishin n\u00eb t\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00eb n\u00eb mas\u00eb shum\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb vog\u00ebl sesa mbledhja matematikore e tyre.<\/p>\n
\u201cSubjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit pretendoi se kursimet e tij jan\u00eb n\u00eb mas\u00eb shum\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb vog\u00ebl nga sa rezultojn\u00eb nga mbledhja aritmetike e deklarimeve nd\u00ebr vite dhe kjo lidhet me mosdeklarimin nga ana e tij t\u00eb shpenzimeve q\u00eb ka kryer gjat\u00eb vitit, t\u00eb cilat n\u00eb munges\u00eb t\u00eb rubrik\u00ebs p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse n\u00eb formular\u00ebt e deklarimit, nuk i ka deklaruar,\u201d thuhet n\u00eb vendimin e KPA-s\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Kolegji u investua n\u00eb hetimin e mund\u00ebsive t\u00eb Islamajt p\u00ebr t\u00eb krijuar vlerat e deklaruara n\u00eb cash si dhe n\u00eb b\u00ebrjen e nj\u00eb analize t\u00eb re financiare, ku p\u00ebrfshiheshin shpenzimet familjare si dhe ato t\u00eb kryera p\u00ebr udh\u00ebtimet jasht\u00eb shtetit \u2013t\u00eb cilat nuk ishin p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb m\u00eb par\u00eb n\u00eb hetimet e Kolegjit.<\/p>\n
P\u00ebr t\u00eb vler\u00ebsuar udh\u00ebtimet jasht\u00eb shtetit, Kolegji zhvilloi nj\u00eb metodologji t\u00eb detajuar \u2013e cila u kund\u00ebrshtua gjithashtu nga Islamaj. \u00a0Kund\u00ebrshti dhe debate pati edhe n\u00eb p\u00ebrllogaritjen e standardeve t\u00eb jetes\u00ebs, ku Islamaj e cil\u00ebsoi t\u00eb padrejt\u00eb dhe t\u00eb paarsyeshme marrjen si referenc\u00eb t\u00eb Anket\u00ebs s\u00eb Buxhetit t\u00eb Familjes s\u00eb INSTAT p\u00ebr vitet 2004, 2005 dhe 2006.<\/p>\n
Trupi gjykues i Kolegjit argumenton n\u00eb vendim se \u201carsyeja e v\u00ebrtet\u00eb\u201d pse Islamaj kund\u00ebrshtoi referencat e Anket\u00ebs p\u00ebr vet\u00ebm 3 vite dhe jo p\u00ebr vitet e tjera ishte n\u00eb funksion t\u00eb mb\u00ebshtetjes s\u00eb tez\u00ebs s\u00eb tij se kursimet n\u00eb cash ishin pak\u00ebsuar p\u00ebr efekt t\u00eb mbulimit t\u00eb shpenzimeve gjat\u00eb viteve.<\/p>\n
\u201cPra, n\u00ebse subjekti n\u00eb analiz\u00ebn e tij financiare do t\u00eb pretendonte uljen e shpenzimeve t\u00eb jetes\u00ebs p\u00ebr t\u00eb gjitha vitet, kjo gj\u00eb do t\u00eb sillte si pasoj\u00eb reduktimin e ndjesh\u00ebm t\u00eb nevoj\u00ebs s\u00eb tij p\u00ebr t\u00eb pak\u00ebsuar pasurin\u00eb e akumuluar n\u00eb form\u00ebn e cash-it dhe, si pasoj\u00eb, kjo pasuri cash duhet t\u00eb ishte deklaruar n\u00eb deklarat\u00ebn e pasuris\u00eb vetting,\u201d argumenton Kolegji.<\/p>\n
Shumica n\u00eb Kolegj ka rr\u00ebzuar edhe pretendimin e fundit t\u00eb subjektit se analiza financiare duhej t\u00eb bazohej n\u00eb metodologjin\u00eb e ILDKPKI-s\u00eb p\u00ebr shpenzimet, duke e cil\u00ebsuar k\u00ebt\u00eb pretendim haptazi n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me mbrojtjen e subjektit gjat\u00eb gjith\u00eb procesit. Por n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb pik\u00eb, pretendimi i Islamajt u mb\u00ebshtet nga an\u00ebtarja e trup\u00ebs, Rezarta Schuetz, e cila argumentoi n\u00eb nj\u00eb mendim paralel se nuk ishte dakord me metodologjin\u00eb e shumic\u00ebs p\u00ebr t\u00eb llogaritur standardet e jetes\u00ebs.<\/p>\n
\u201cMetodologjia e zgjedhur nga shumica e trupit gjykues… dhe shtrirja e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave t\u00eb marra nga publikimi n\u00eb faqen e internetit p\u00ebr nj\u00eb vit t\u00eb caktuar (2007) n\u00eb vitet e tjera, n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me vet\u00eb korrespondenc\u00ebn e INSTAT-it, bie ndesh me parimet e siguris\u00eb juridike dhe kap\u00ebrcen tagrat e nj\u00eb gjykate,\u201d argumenton Schuetz. \u201c Si rrjedhoj\u00eb p\u00ebrftohet nj\u00eb analiz\u00eb financiare e pabazuar n\u00eb aktet ligjore n\u00eb fuqi dhe n\u00eb pritshm\u00ebrit\u00eb q\u00eb qytetar\u00ebt kan\u00eb ndaj nj\u00eb organi shtet\u00ebror,\u201d shton ajo n\u00eb mendimin paralel.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb fund t\u00eb shqyrtimit gjyq\u00ebsor, Kolegji argumenton se diferenca e kursimeve cash prej 4.1 milion\u00eb lek\u00ebsh nuk rezulton t\u00eb jet\u00eb deklaruar n\u00eb deklarat\u00ebn e pasuris\u00eb vetting n\u00eb asnj\u00eb lloj forme. Gjithashtu, subjekti rezultoi sipas Kolegjit me pamjaftueshm\u00ebri t\u00eb burimeve t\u00eb ligjshme n\u00eb vler\u00ebn e 4.3 milion\u00eb lek\u00ebve.<\/p>\n
\u201c…trupi gjykues arrin n\u00eb konkluzionin se subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit ka kryer deklarim t\u00eb paplot\u00eb dhe t\u00eb pasakt\u00eb t\u00eb pasurive t\u00eb tij n\u00eb deklarat\u00ebn e pasuris\u00eb (vetting) n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb nenit D, pikat 1dhe 5 t\u00eb Aneksit t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, me q\u00ebllim shmangien nga kontrolli, n\u00eb kuad\u00ebr t\u00eb procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit, t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb s\u00eb tij n\u00eb form\u00ebn e likuiditetit cash (jasht\u00eb sistemit bankar), p\u00ebr shkak se rezultoi me pamund\u00ebsi t\u00eb burimeve t\u00eb ligjshme p\u00ebr t\u00eb justifikuar krijimin e saj,\u201d thuhet n\u00eb vendimin e Kolegjit.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb fund, Kolegji vendosi ndryshimin e vendimit nr.22, dat\u00eb 7 qershor 2018 t\u00eb Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit dhe shkarkimin nga detyra t\u00eb Edmond Islamajt.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit p\u00ebrmbysi konfirmimin n\u00eb detyr\u00eb t\u00eb an\u00ebtarit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb, Edmond Islamaj, duke mos pranuar pretendimet se kursimet e deklaruara n\u00eb cash kishin sh\u00ebrbyer p\u00ebr t\u00eb mbuluar shpenzimet nd\u00ebr vite. Sipas Kolegjit, Islamaj nuk deklaroi 4.1 milion\u00eb lek\u00eb kursime n\u00eb \u201cvetting\u201d p\u00ebr t\u00eb shmangur kontrollin mbi burimin e tyre.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":63209,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[13],"tags":[],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/20181112_184335_121118025-2_5Mj8BbH-545x400.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"Argumentet e Kolegjit t\u00eb Apelimit n\u00eb shkarkimin e gjyqtarit Edmond Islamaj","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63208"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=63208"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63208\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/63209"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=63208"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=63208"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=63208"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}