{"id":63210,"date":"2019-08-08T20:46:32","date_gmt":"2019-08-08T18:46:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/vetingu\/?p=63210"},"modified":"2019-08-08T20:46:32","modified_gmt":"2019-08-08T18:46:32","slug":"komisioneri-ankimon-kastriot-seliten-nuk-arrin-nivel-te-besueshem","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/komisioneri-ankimon-kastriot-seliten-nuk-arrin-nivel-te-besueshem\/2019\/08\/08\/","title":{"rendered":"Komisioneri ankimon Kastriot Selit\u00ebn: Nuk arrin nivel t\u00eb besuesh\u00ebm"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Komisioneri Publik, Florian Ballhysa i k\u00ebrkon KPA-s\u00eb rihetimin p\u00ebr t\u00eb tre kriteret p\u00ebr kreun e Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative t\u00eb Apelit, Kastriot Selita, duke e konsideruar t\u00eb paplot\u00eb dhe t\u00eb fragmentarizuar vendimin e Komisionit p\u00ebr konfirmimin n\u00eb detyr\u00eb.<!--more--><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_64118\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-64118\" style=\"width: 525px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/Kastriot-Selita-2.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-large wp-image-64118\" src=\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/Kastriot-Selita-2-525x400.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"525\" height=\"400\" data-id=\"64118\"  style=\"display:none\"><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-64118\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Kryetari i Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative t\u00eb Apelit, Kastriot Selita pas konfirmimit nga KPK. Foto: Malton Dibra, LSA<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Kryetari i Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative t\u00eb Apelit, Kastriot Selita do t\u00eb p\u00ebrballet s\u00ebrish me vetingun, pasi Komisioneri Publik vendosi t\u00eb enjten t\u00eb ankimoj\u00eb konfirmimin e tij t\u00eb diskutuesh\u00ebm n\u00eb detyr\u00eb. Ankimi i komisionerit Florian Ballhysa vjen pas rekomandimit t\u00eb firmosur nga nj\u00eb komision me tre v\u00ebzhgues t\u00eb ONM-s\u00eb, t\u00eb cil\u00ebt e konsideruan hetimin e kryer p\u00ebr Selit\u00ebn si \u201ct\u00eb paplot\u00eb dhe t\u00eb paqart\u00eb\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Komisioneri Publik i k\u00ebrkon Kolegjit t\u00eb Posa\u00e7\u00ebm t\u00eb Apelimit t\u00eb rihetoj\u00eb deklarimet e subjektit, t\u00eb personave t\u00eb lidhur si dhe kryerjen e nj\u00eb analize t\u00eb re financiare me q\u00ebllim justifikimin e burimit t\u00eb ligjsh\u00ebm t\u00eb k\u00ebtyre pasurive. Nd\u00ebrsa lidhur me vler\u00ebsimin e aft\u00ebsive profesionale, ku p\u00ebrfshihen edhe rastet e konfliktit t\u00eb interesit, komisioneri Ballhysa e konsideron t\u00eb c\u00ebnuesh\u00ebm vendimin e KPK-s\u00eb p\u00ebr Selit\u00ebn.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDuket se n\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin e aft\u00ebsive profesionale, Komisioni ka zgjedhur t\u00eb mbaj\u00eb nj\u00eb q\u00ebndrim t\u00eb fragmentarizuar p\u00ebr \u00e7do \u00e7\u00ebshtje t\u00eb shqyrtuar, pa marr\u00eb n\u00eb analiz\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimtare, gjith\u00ebp\u00ebrfshir\u00ebse, t\u00eb gjitha gjetjet e evidentuara n\u00eb hetimin administrativ t\u00eb dokumentacionit t\u00eb shortuar, paraqitur nga subjekti dhe denoncimet e publikut,\u201d thuhet n\u00eb ankes\u00ebn e Ballhys\u00ebs.<\/p>\n<p>Ballhysa e konsideron me mang\u00ebsi hetimin e kryer ndaj Selit\u00ebs n\u00eb KPK p\u00ebr t\u00eb tre kriteret e rivler\u00ebsimit dhe i k\u00ebrkon Kolegjit t\u00eb marr\u00eb n\u00eb shqyrtim edhe vler\u00ebsimin e figur\u00ebs p\u00ebr gjyqtarin, p\u00ebr t\u00eb dal\u00eb m\u00eb pas me vendim p\u00ebrfundimtar p\u00ebr t\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>Kastriot Selita, kryetar i Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative t\u00eb Apelit prej vitit 2013, u konfirmua me votat e Brunilda Bekteshit dhe Lulzim Hamitajt n\u00eb KPK, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb kryesuesi i trupit gjykues,\u00a0 Olsi Komici votoi pro shkarkimit.<\/p>\n<p>KPK vendosi gjithashtu ta referoj\u00eb Selit\u00ebn n\u00eb KLGJ lidhur me vendimin e dh\u00ebn\u00eb prej tij n\u00eb favor t\u00eb bashk\u00ebshortit t\u00eb deputetes Ermonela Felaj, i konsideruar me mang\u00ebsi profesionale p\u00ebr shkak se gjyqtari kishte disponuar me urdh\u00ebrimin e KLP-s\u00eb p\u00ebr em\u00ebrimin e tij si prokuror, edhe pse kjo gj\u00eb nuk i ishte k\u00ebrkuar nga pala.<\/p>\n<p>Ankimi i Komisionerit Publik p\u00ebr kriterin e pasuris\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb i ngjash\u00ebm me rekomandimin e ONM-s\u00eb dhe p\u00ebrfshin disa vlera monetare t\u00eb bashk\u00ebshortes s\u00eb Selit\u00ebs me burim shitjen e nj\u00eb vile 2-kat\u00ebshe t\u00eb prind\u00ebrve n\u00eb Linz\u00eb; konkretisht 30 mij\u00eb euro, 61 758 euro, 20 mij\u00eb euro dhe 4365 euro. Ankimi p\u00ebrfshin gjithashtu paqart\u00ebsit\u00eb mbi burimin e shum\u00ebs prej 2.9 milion\u00eb lek\u00ebsh t\u00eb p\u00ebrfituara nga nj\u00eb vendim divorci, ligjshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e t\u00eb ardhurave t\u00eb personit t\u00eb lidhur nga pun\u00ebsimi n\u00eb nj\u00eb organizat\u00eb n\u00eb vitet 1999-2004 si dhe deklarimet kontradiktore mbi koston e vil\u00ebs n\u00eb Linz\u00eb; q\u00eb sipas Komisionerit Publik mund t\u00eb sjellin efekte n\u00eb analiz\u00ebn financiare t\u00eb subjektit.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb kriterin e aft\u00ebsive profesionale, Komisioneri Publik i sheh problemet e konfliktit faktit apo n\u00eb dukje t\u00eb interesit n\u00eb drit\u00ebn e besimit t\u00eb publikut te drejt\u00ebsia dhe kritikon KPK-n\u00eb se nuk i ka analizuar k\u00ebto gjetje n\u00eb harmoni me problematikat dhe mang\u00ebsit\u00eb e tjera t\u00eb konstatuara.<\/p>\n<p>Komisioneri analizon nj\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje gjyq\u00ebsore t\u00eb vitit 2017 me relator gjyqtarin Selita dhe me pal\u00eb nj\u00eb kompani private, administratori i s\u00eb cil\u00ebs kishte bler\u00eb n\u00eb vitin 2015 apartamentin e bashk\u00ebshortes s\u00eb tij n\u00eb vler\u00ebn e 110 mij\u00eb eurove. P\u00ebrmes nj\u00eb korrespondence me KPK-n\u00eb, ILDKPI ka konstatuar se \u201crezulton e provuar q\u00eb subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit, K.Selita n\u00eb lidhje me gjykimin dhe vendimarrjen e k\u00ebsaj \u00e7\u00ebshtjeje ka vepruar n\u00eb kushtet e konfliktit t\u00eb interesave dhe papajtueshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb funksionit publik\u201d, por duket se shumica n\u00eb Komision ka b\u00ebr\u00eb nj\u00eb vesh shurdh.<\/p>\n<p>Rasti i m\u00ebsip\u00ebrm nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb i vetmi, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb Kolegjit i k\u00ebrkohet t\u00eb marr\u00eb n\u00eb shqyrtim edhe nj\u00eb rast tjet\u00ebr t\u00eb gjykuar nga Selita, me pal\u00eb nj\u00eb kompani prej s\u00eb cil\u00ebs ai dhe bashk\u00ebshortja e tij kishin bler\u00eb apartamente n\u00eb Lezh\u00eb dhe n\u00eb Tiran\u00eb; duke i cil\u00ebsuar ato me r\u00ebnd\u00ebsi jo vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr kriterin e aft\u00ebsive profesionale, por n\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin e p\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm t\u00eb t\u00eb tre kritereve.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNj\u00eb situat\u00eb e till\u00eb, eventualisht mund t\u00eb minoj\u00eb besimin q\u00eb gjykatat duhet t\u00eb frym\u00ebzoj\u00eb te shoq\u00ebria dhe publiku,\u201d thuhet n\u00eb ankimin e Ballhys\u00ebs.<\/p>\n<p>Hetimet e KPK-s\u00eb konsiderohen t\u00eb mang\u00ebta edhe n\u00eb drejtim t\u00eb denoncimeve nga publiku, ve\u00e7an\u00ebrisht nga t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat e denoncimeve t\u00eb dy shtetasve dhe nj\u00eb grupi gjyqtar\u00ebsh p\u00ebr \u00e7\u00ebshtjen \u201cValikaj\u201d, q\u00eb sipas Komisionerit nuk jan\u00eb hetuar plot\u00ebsisht.<\/p>\n<p>Komisioneri i rikthehet vendimit p\u00ebr em\u00ebrimin si prokuror t\u00eb Bledar Valikajt n\u00eb ankimim, duke argumentuar se Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit nuk ka arsyetuar n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb shteruese n\u00ebse mang\u00ebsit\u00eb profesionale t\u00eb konstatuara duheshin ve\u00e7uar dhe d\u00ebrguar p\u00ebr inspektim, apo duhej t\u2019i n\u00ebnshtroheshin procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit bashk\u00eb me problemet e tjera.<\/p>\n<p>Duke marr\u00eb shkas nga p\u00ebrgjigjet e subjektit p\u00ebr rastin n\u00eb fjal\u00eb, t\u00eb cilat nuk i konsideron bind\u00ebse, Komisioneri ngre gjithashtu pik\u00ebpyetje mbi njohurit\u00eb dhe aft\u00ebsit\u00eb e p\u00ebrgjithshme t\u00eb tij p\u00ebr t\u00eb interpretuar ligjin si dhe analizuar jurisprudenc\u00ebn e aplikueshme-element\u00eb k\u00ebto t\u00eb vler\u00ebsimit t\u00eb aft\u00ebsive profesionale.<\/p>\n<p>Lidhur me rastin n\u00eb fjal\u00eb, Selita ka sqaruar n\u00eb KPK se ndryshimi i pal\u00ebs Presidenti i Republik\u00ebs me K\u00ebshillin e Lart\u00eb t\u00eb Prokuroris\u00eb ishte diktuar nga ndryshimet kushtetuese dhe ligjore q\u00eb ndodh\u00ebn pas procesit t\u00eb Valikajt n\u00eb shkall\u00eb t\u00eb par\u00eb. Por komisioneri Ballhysa argumenton se referenca ligjore e b\u00ebr\u00eb nga subjekti [neni 159\/2 g\u00ebrma c] \u00ebsht\u00eb i gabuar, pasi kjo dispozit\u00eb ishte shfuqizuar nga Gjykata Kushtetuese q\u00eb n\u00eb vitin 2017, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb vendimi p\u00ebr Valikajn u dha n\u00eb shkurt t\u00eb vitit 2017.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cKomisioneri Publik, n\u00eb analiz\u00eb t\u00eb provave dhe akteve t\u00eb administruara, vler\u00ebson se p\u00ebrfundimi i Komisionit \u00ebsht\u00eb i cenuesh\u00ebm, pasi bazohet n\u00eb nj\u00eb hetim t\u00eb pamjaftuesh\u00ebm dhe interpretim jo t\u00eb drejt\u00eb ligjor t\u00eb fakteve,\u201d argumenton Komisioneri Publik.<\/p>\n<p>\u201c\u2026 ndryshe nga sa ka disponuar Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit, referuar gjendjes s\u00eb fakteve dhe provave n\u00eb rastin konkret, Komisioneri Publik ndan gjykim t\u00eb kund\u00ebrt, pasi vler\u00ebson se subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit nuk arrin nivel t\u00eb besuesh\u00ebm p\u00ebr konfirmimin e tij n\u00eb detyr\u00eb,\u201d p\u00ebrfundon ankimi.<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Komisioneri Publik, Florian Ballhysa i k\u00ebrkon KPA-s\u00eb rihetimin p\u00ebr t\u00eb tre kriteret p\u00ebr kreun e Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative t\u00eb Apelit, Kastriot Selita, duke e konsideruar t\u00eb paplot\u00eb dhe t\u00eb fragmentarizuar vendimin e Komisionit p\u00ebr konfirmimin n\u00eb detyr\u00eb.<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":63211,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[2],"tags":[],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/Kastriot-Selita-2-525x400.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"Komisioneri ankimon Kastriot Selit\u00ebn: Nuk arrin nivel t\u00eb besuesh\u00ebm","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63210"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=63210"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63210\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/63211"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=63210"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=63210"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=63210"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}