{"id":63284,"date":"2019-10-03T19:15:09","date_gmt":"2019-10-03T17:15:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/vetingu\/?p=63284"},"modified":"2019-10-03T20:03:34","modified_gmt":"2019-10-03T18:03:34","slug":"komisioneri-publik-apelon-vendimin-e-konfirmimit-te-prokurorit-petrit-cano","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/komisioneri-publik-apelon-vendimin-e-konfirmimit-te-prokurorit-petrit-cano\/2019\/10\/03\/","title":{"rendered":"Komisioneri Publik apelon vendimin e konfirmimit t\u00eb prokurorit Petrit \u00c7ano"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\u00c7mimet e dy apartamenteve t\u00eb blera n\u00eb Tiran\u00eb kan\u00eb shtyr\u00eb Komisionerit Publik t\u00eb k\u00ebrkoj n\u00eb Kolegjin e Posa\u00e7\u00ebm t\u00eb Apelimit rihetimin e \u00e7\u00ebshtjes s\u00eb prokurorit Petrit \u00c7ano i cili u konfirmua nga KPK.\u00a0Komisioneri pretendon se apartamentet jan\u00eb bler\u00eb me \u00e7mime disa her\u00eb m\u00eb lir\u00eb se ai i tregut.<!--more--><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_63995\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-63995\" style=\"width: 600px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-large wp-image-63995\" src=\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/1791F218-F277-45FA-B14D-55D1DDDB53FC-600x338.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" data-id=\"63995\"  style=\"display:none\"><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-63995\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Prokurori Petrit \u00c7ano pas konfirmimit. Foto Vladimir Karaj\/Birn<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Komisioneri Publik njoftoi t\u00eb enjten se kishte apeluar vendimin e Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit p\u00ebr konfirmimin n\u00eb detyr\u00eb t\u00eb prokurorit Petrit \u00c7ano. Komisioneri Florian Ballhysa n\u00eb ankimin drejtuar Kolegjit t\u00eb Posa\u00e7\u00ebm t\u00eb Apelimit k\u00ebrkon hetim m\u00eb t\u00eb thelluar.<\/p>\n<p>Sipas Komisionerit Publik, KPK nuk kishte hetuar mjaftuesh\u00ebm sa i p\u00ebrket \u00e7mimeve t\u00eb blerjes s\u00eb dy apartamenteve. Ballhysa thot\u00eb se apartamentet jan\u00eb bler\u00eb me \u00e7mim disa her\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb lir\u00eb se ai tregut dhe se KPK nuk kishte hetuar p\u00ebr konflikt interesi dhe as p\u00ebr fiktivitet.<\/p>\n<p>\u00c7ano u hetua nga nj\u00eb trup\u00eb gjykuese e p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00eb nga Olsi Komici n\u00eb cil\u00ebsin\u00eb e kryesuesit, Suela Zhegu relatore dhe an\u00ebtar Lulzim Hamitaj. N\u00eb cil\u00ebsin\u00eb e v\u00ebzhguesit nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtar ishte i pranish\u00ebm Theo Jacobs.<\/p>\n<p>Prokurori Petrit \u00c7ano e ushtron funksionin e tij prej m\u00eb shum\u00eb se 20 vitesh n\u00eb rolin e drejtuesit. Ai ka drejtuar Prokurorin\u00eb e Vlor\u00ebs n\u00eb vitet 2000-2008 si dhe at\u00eb t\u00eb Lushnjes n\u00eb vitet 2008-2015. Me dekret t\u00eb presidentit t\u00eb Republik\u00ebs, \u00c7ano \u00ebsht\u00eb em\u00ebruar drejtues i Prokuroris\u00eb s\u00eb Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Kruj\u00eb prej vitit 2015.<\/p>\n<p>Ndaj tij \u00a0u b\u00ebn\u00eb dy seanca d\u00ebgjimore, nj\u00eb n\u00eb qershor dhe nj\u00eb e dyt\u00eb n\u00eb korrik, pasi KPK b\u00ebri me dije se kishte marr\u00eb dokumente shtes\u00eb. N\u00eb fund Komisioni njoftoi konfirmimin n\u00eb detyr\u00eb t\u00eb \u00c7anos, duke e konsideruar at\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrshtatsh\u00ebm n\u00eb t\u00eb tre kriteret.<\/p>\n<p>Por sipas Komisionerit Publik hetimi nuk ka qen\u00eb i plot\u00eb. \u201cSa m\u00eb sip\u00ebr, Komisioneri Publik \u00e7mon se procesi i hetimit, i kryer nga Komisioni p\u00ebr kriterin e vler\u00ebsimit t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb nuk ka qen\u00eb i plot\u00eb, e p\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimet e arritura nuk jan\u00eb n\u00eb pajtueshm\u00ebri me provat e administruara\u2019, thuhet n\u00eb ankim.<\/p>\n<p>Nd\u00ebr t\u00eb tjera Komisioneri Publik k\u00ebrkon rihetim t\u00eb dy pasurive t\u00eb paluajtshme. Nj\u00eb apartament 102 metra katror\u00eb bler\u00eb n\u00eb vitin 2011 p\u00ebr 7.5 milion lek\u00eb dhe nj\u00eb apartament 63 metra katror\u00eb bler\u00eb n\u00eb em\u00ebr t\u00eb vajz\u00ebs n\u00eb vitin 2014 p\u00ebr 53 mij\u00eb euro (ose 7.4 milion lek\u00eb).<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb vendimin e KPK b\u00ebhet me dije se burimi i k\u00ebtyre pasurive rezultonte i ligjsh\u00ebm. P\u00ebr apartamentin e par\u00eb kishte sh\u00ebrbyer shitje e nj\u00eb apartamenti dhe nj\u00eb shtese n\u00eb Fier. Shumat i ishin dh\u00ebn\u00eb nd\u00ebrtuesit n\u00eb foirm\u00eb huaje p\u00ebr disa vite me rradh\u00eb dhe n\u00eb vitin 2011 \u00ebsht\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb kontrata e shit-blerjes q\u00eb referohet n\u00eb k\u00ebto shuma. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb apartamenti i dyt\u00eb rezultoi i bler\u00eb nga kursimet e bashk\u00ebshort\u00ebve \u00c7ano. Kpk as n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast nuk ngriti dyshime n\u00eb fund t\u00eb hetimit.<\/p>\n<p>Komisioneri publik nga ana e tij pretendon se hetimi nuk ka qen\u00eb i plot\u00eb. Duke iu referuar vendimi t\u00eb KPK-s\u00eb Ballhysa k\u00ebrkon q\u00eb t\u00eb hetohet konflikti i mund\u00ebsh\u00ebm i interesit, veprime n\u00eb dukje fiktive dhe burim i ligjsh\u00ebm i t\u00eb ardhurave.<\/p>\n<p>P\u00ebrndryshe nga KPK q\u00eb shprehet se nuk kishte dyshime mbi \u00e7mimin e blerjes s\u00eb apartamentit 102 metra katror\u00eb, nga krahasimi i k\u00ebtij \u00e7mimi me kontratat e b\u00ebra nga i nj\u00ebjti nd\u00ebrtues n\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebtin pallat, Komisioneri thot\u00eb se apartamenti \u00ebsht\u00eb bler\u00eb 60 p\u00ebr qind m\u00eb lir\u00eb se \u00e7mimi i referenc\u00ebs.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cKontrata e shitblerjes e dat\u00ebs ***.12.2011, p\u00ebr pasurin\u00eb \u201capartament banimi 102 m2\u201d, ka nj\u00eb \u00e7mim total prej 7.500.000 lek\u00ebsh, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb \u00e7mimi i tregut t\u00eb lir\u00eb, i cili sh\u00ebrben p\u00ebr llogaritje t\u00eb tatimit sipas udh\u00ebzimit nr. 9\/2008, \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb vler\u00ebn totale prej 17.955.000 lek\u00ebsh\u201d, shprehet Ballhysa.<\/p>\n<p>Ai thot\u00eb se Komisioni duhej t\u00eb kishte hetuar n\u00eb drejtim t\u00eb konfliktit interesit dhe verifikuar n\u00ebse nd\u00ebrtuesi kishte pasur apo jo \u00e7\u00ebshtje me prokurorin gjat\u00eb gjith\u00eb karrier\u00ebs s\u00eb tij dhe jo vet\u00ebm n\u00eb periudh\u00ebn kur ndodhi shit-blerja. Komisioneri thot\u00eb se duhet verifikuar n\u00ebse kemi t\u00eb b\u00ebjm\u00eb me trajtim preferencial p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb pun\u00ebs \u201cp\u00ebrkundrejt pretendimeve t\u00eb parashtruara nga subjekti se me z. ***. *** e lidhte vet\u00ebm nj\u00eb miq\u00ebsi e vjet\u00ebr\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Po ashtu Komisioneri ngre dyshime p\u00ebr veprime fiktive. Ai thot\u00eb se pasuria ishte rivler\u00ebsuar para shitjes n\u00eb shum\u00ebn 17.9 milion lek\u00eb dhe taksa p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb ishte paguar prej shit\u00ebsit. \u201cKjo diferenc\u00eb e konsiderueshme rreth 60% m\u00eb lir\u00eb, duhej t\u00eb sh\u00ebrbente si indicie p\u00ebr Komisionin p\u00ebr t\u00eb hetuar n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb plot\u00eb n\u00eb drejtim t\u00eb veprimeve fiktive n\u00eb dukje\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb ankim. Sipas ballhys\u00ebs ky veprim mund t\u00eb jet\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb \u201cmbuluar pamund\u00ebsin\u00eb financiare\u201d t\u00eb subjektit.<\/p>\n<p>Po ashtu lidhur me k\u00ebt\u00eb pasuri Komisioneri k\u00ebrkon hetim m\u00eb t\u00eb thelluar t\u00eb t\u00eb ardhurave t\u00eb bashk\u00ebshortes si pronare e nj\u00eb kopshti privat. Ballhysa thot\u00eb se k\u00ebto nuk ishin b\u00ebr\u00eb t\u00eb qarta nga Komisioni.<\/p>\n<p>Komisioneri ka k\u00ebrkuar hetim t\u00eb ngjash\u00ebm edhe p\u00ebr pasurin\u00eb e vajz\u00ebs s\u00eb \u00c7anos. Sipas Komisionerit Ballhysa apartamenti i bler\u00eb n\u00eb vitin 2014, p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilin KPK ka konkluduar \u201cse [&#8230;] subjekti ka pasur burime financiare t\u00eb ligjshme p\u00ebr ta bler\u00eb\u201d, \u00ebsht\u00eb bler\u00eb po ashtu me \u00e7mim m\u00eb t\u00eb ul\u00ebt.<\/p>\n<p>Komisioneri v\u00eb n\u00eb dukje se kjo situat\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb konstatuar \u201cgjat\u00eb hetimit p\u00ebrkat\u00ebs\u201d dhe p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb nuk ishin k\u00ebrkuar shpjegime nga \u00c7ano. Megjithat\u00eb Komisioneri vet\u00eb v\u00eb n\u00eb dukje se \u00e7mimi \u00ebsht\u00eb \u201cndjesh\u00ebm m\u00eb i ul\u00ebt se \u00e7mimi i referenc\u00ebs\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cKomisioneri Publik vler\u00ebson se Komisioni nuk ka kryer nj\u00eb hetim administrativ t\u00eb gjithansh\u00ebm e shterues, n\u00eb k\u00ebto drejtime kryesore: (i) konfliktit t\u00eb interesit; (ii) pagesa n\u00eb vler\u00ebn prej 1.023.335 lek\u00eb n\u00eb aplikimin pran\u00eb ZVRPP-s\u00eb Tiran\u00eb; (iii) veprimeve n\u00eb dukje fiktive; (iv) burimit t\u00eb ligjsh\u00ebm t\u00eb t\u00eb ardhurave t\u00eb deklaruara nga kontrata e shitjes n\u00eb shum\u00ebn 1.400.000 lek\u00eb, t\u00eb cilat i trajtojm\u00eb n\u00eb vijim\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb ankim.<\/p>\n<p>Komisioneri thot\u00eb se apartamenti \u00ebsht\u00eb bler\u00eb p\u00ebr 7.4 milion lek\u00eb, por kishte vler\u00ebn 12 milion lek\u00eb dhe se nisur nga kjo KPK duhej t\u00eb kishte hetuar \u201cn\u00eb drejtim t\u00eb konfliktit interesit\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Po ashtu n\u00eb lidhhe me k\u00ebt\u00eb pasuri k\u00ebrkohet t\u00eb hetohet pagesa prej 1 milion lek\u00eb pran\u00eb ZVRPP-s\u00eb Tiran\u00eb p\u00ebr rregjistimin e pasuris\u00eb. Ballhysa thot\u00eb se kjo shum\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb marr\u00eb n\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb n\u00eb analiz\u00ebn finaciare n\u00eb vitin 2014.<\/p>\n<p>Ballhysa po ashtu k\u00ebrkon t\u00eb hetohet mund\u00ebsia e veprimeve fiktive, pasi sipas tij \u00e7mimi i lart\u00eb real dhe \u00e7mimi i ndrysh\u00ebm i paguar mund t\u00eb ken\u00eb sh\u00ebrbyer \u201cp\u00ebr t\u00eb mbuluar pamund\u00ebsin\u00eb financiare nga burime t\u00eb ligjshme t\u00eb subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit, p\u00ebr t\u00eb bler\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb pasuri me \u00e7mimin real t\u00eb saj\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Komisioneri po ashtu k\u00ebrkon q\u00eb Kolegji t\u00eb rihetoj\u00eb nj\u00eb prej argumenteve q\u00eb u diskutua gjat\u00eb edhe n\u00eb KPK. Sipas ankimit nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb sqaruar p\u00ebrfundimisht burimi i ligjsh\u00ebm i 1.4 milion lek\u00ebve t\u00eb deklaruara si t\u00eb ardhura nga shitja e mobiljeve t\u00eb nj\u00eb kopshti privat f\u00ebmij\u00ebsh n\u00eb pron\u00ebsi t\u00eb bashk\u00ebshortes s\u00eb \u00c7anos.<\/p>\n<p>KPK arriti n\u00eb \u00a0p\u00ebrfundimin se megjith\u00ebse p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb shitje ishte paguar tatimi n\u00eb burim, bashk\u00ebshortja e subjektit nuk kishte qen\u00eb e detyruar ta paguante. Komisioneri megjithat\u00eb shprehet se KPK nuk ka par\u00eb mir\u00eb shkresat e Drejtoris\u00eb s\u00eb Tatimeve sipas t\u00eb cilave bashk\u00ebshortja e \u00c7anos nuk kishte t\u00eb drejt\u00eb t\u2019i shiste k\u00ebto moblije dhe se ato duhej t\u2019i shiste likujduesi q\u00eb ishte caktuar p\u00ebr biznesin e saj pas mbylljes.<\/p>\n<p>Komisioneri po ashtu ngre dyshime edhe mbi mund\u00ebsit\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb kursyer t\u00eb prokurorit p\u00ebr dy vite. N\u00eb fund Ballhysa k\u00ebrkon nga KPA rihetimin e element\u00ebve t\u00eb m\u00ebsip\u00ebrm dhe n\u00eb var\u00ebsi t\u00eb rezultateve l\u00ebnien n\u00eb fuqi ose ndryshimin e vendimit t\u00eb KPK.<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00c7mimet e dy apartamenteve t\u00eb blera n\u00eb Tiran\u00eb kan\u00eb shtyr\u00eb Komisionerit Publik t\u00eb k\u00ebrkoj n\u00eb Kolegjin e Posa\u00e7\u00ebm t\u00eb Apelimit rihetimin e \u00e7\u00ebshtjes s\u00eb prokurorit Petrit \u00c7ano i cili u konfirmua nga KPK.\u00a0Komisioneri pretendon se apartamentet jan\u00eb bler\u00eb me \u00e7mime disa her\u00eb m\u00eb lir\u00eb se ai i tregut.<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":97,"featured_media":63291,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[2],"tags":[],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/1791F218-F277-45FA-B14D-55D1DDDB53FC-600x338.jpeg","fifu_image_alt":"Komisioneri Publik apelon vendimin e konfirmimit t\u00eb prokurorit Petrit \u00c7ano","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63284"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/97"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=63284"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63284\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/63291"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=63284"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=63284"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=63284"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}