{"id":64596,"date":"2020-12-17T18:31:32","date_gmt":"2020-12-17T16:31:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/vetingu\/?p=64596"},"modified":"2020-12-17T18:33:40","modified_gmt":"2020-12-17T16:33:40","slug":"kpa-le-ne-fuqi-vendimin-e-komisionit-per-arjana-licon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/kpa-le-ne-fuqi-vendimin-e-komisionit-per-arjana-licon\/2020\/12\/17\/","title":{"rendered":"KPA l\u00eb n\u00eb fuqi vendimin e Komisionit p\u00ebr Arjana Li\u00e7on"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit n\u00eb vijim t\u00eb nj\u00eb s\u00ebr\u00eb vendimesh t\u00eb ngjashme arsyetoi, se dor\u00ebheqja p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb mosh\u00ebs s\u00eb pensionit e gjyqtares Li\u00e7o, kishte po ashtu p\u00ebr efekt ndalimin p\u00ebr 15 vjet t\u00eb kandidimit n\u00eb sistemin e drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb.<!--more--><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_75397\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-75397\" style=\"width: 534px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-large wp-image-75397\" src=\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/Arjana-Lico-seance-534x400.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"534\" height=\"400\" data-id=\"75397\"  style=\"display:none\"><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-75397\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Gjyqtarja n\u00eb pension, Arjana Li\u00e7o dhe djali i saj avokat p\u00ebrball\u00eb Kolegjit t\u00eb Posa\u00e7\u00ebm t\u00eb Apelimit. Foto: KPA<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit vendosi t\u00eb l\u00ebr\u00eb n\u00eb fuqi vendimin e Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit p\u00ebr t\u00eb ndaluar me 15 vjet p\u00ebrfshirjen n\u00eb sistemin e drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb ish-gjyqtares s\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Tiran\u00ebs Arjana Li\u00e7o. Trupa gjykuese q\u00eb shqyrtoi rastin drejtohej nga Rezarta Schuetz, me relatore Albana Shtylla dhe an\u00ebtar\u00eb Ardian Hajdari, Ina Rama, Natasha Mulaj.<\/p>\n<p>Li\u00e7o kishte apeluar vendimin e Komisionit q\u00eb e kishte konsideruar dor\u00ebheqjen e saj si largim nga procesi i vetingut, duke pretenduar se ajo kishte dal\u00eb n\u00eb pension dhe se ndaj saj nuk mund t\u00eb aplikohej ndalimi. N\u00eb seanc\u00ebn d\u00ebgjimore n\u00eb Kolegj, Li\u00e7o 65 vje\u00e7 pretendoi se ankimi i saj ishte p\u00ebr dinjitet, pasi ajo nuk kishte nd\u00ebrmend t\u00eb kthehej n\u00eb sistemin e drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb p\u00ebr dy vjet q\u00eb mbeteshin deri n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin e statusit.<\/p>\n<p>Por Kolegji shkoi me precedent\u00ebt e vendosur n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb drejtim. KPA arsyetoi se Li\u00e7o ka paraqitur n\u00eb K\u00ebshillin e Lart\u00eb Gjyq\u00ebsor k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr dor\u00ebheqje \u201cduke u shprehur vullnetin e saj p\u00ebr mosvazhdimin e g\u00ebzimit t\u00eb statusit t\u00eb magjistratit deri n\u00eb mbushjen e mosh\u00ebs 67 vje\u00e7\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Duke u nisur prej k\u00ebtij fakti dhe se automatikisht pas k\u00ebsaj ishte nd\u00ebrprer\u00eb procesi i rivler\u00ebsimit Li\u00e7os sipas KPA i ndalohej p\u00ebrfshirja n\u00eb sistem p\u00ebr 15 vjet. \u201cP\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb, sipas parashikimeve t\u00eb pik\u00ebs 2 t\u00eb k\u00ebtij neni, subjekti humbet t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr tu em\u00ebruar n\u00eb sistemin e drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb p\u00ebr nj\u00eb periudh\u00eb 15-vje\u00e7are\u201d, u shpreh Kolegji.<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit n\u00eb vijim t\u00eb nj\u00eb s\u00ebr\u00eb vendimesh t\u00eb ngjashme arsyetoi, se dor\u00ebheqja p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb mosh\u00ebs s\u00eb pensionit e gjyqtares Li\u00e7o, kishte po ashtu p\u00ebr efekt ndalimin p\u00ebr 15 vjet t\u00eb kandidimit n\u00eb sistemin e drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb.<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":637,"featured_media":64599,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[2],"tags":[],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/Arjana-Lico-seance-534x400.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"KPA l\u00eb n\u00eb fuqi vendimin e Komisionit p\u00ebr Arjana Li\u00e7on","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64596"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/637"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=64596"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64596\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/64599"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=64596"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=64596"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=64596"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}