Komisionerja Publike Irena Nino b\u00ebri ankim ndaj vendimit t\u00eb Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit, KPK, p\u00ebr konfirmimin n\u00eb detyr\u00eb t\u00eb prokurores s\u00eb Tiran\u00ebs\u00a0 Mariola M\u00ebrtiri. Nino thot\u00eb se hetimi i Komisionit dhe vler\u00ebsimi i fakteve t\u00eb b\u00ebra nga KPK\u00a0 kishte mang\u00ebsi dhe i k\u00ebrkon Kolegjit t\u00eb Posa\u00e7\u00ebm t\u00eb Apelimit t\u00eb vendos\u00eb shkarkimin e prokurores p\u00ebr shkelje n\u00eb t\u00eb tri kriteret e rivler\u00ebsimit.<\/p>\n
\u201cNdryshimin e vendimit nr. 606, dat\u00eb 21.12.2022, t\u00eb Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit, dhe shkarkimin nga detyra e subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit, zonj\u00ebs Mariola M\u00ebrtiri\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e paraqitur nga Nino.<\/p>\n
M\u00ebrtiri u konfirmua me shumic\u00eb votash m\u00eb 21 dhjetor t\u00eb vitit q\u00eb shkoi. Relatori i \u00e7\u00ebshtjes, Roland Ilia dhe an\u00ebtarja Pamela Qirko arrit\u00ebn n\u00eb konkluzionin se problemet e gjetura ishin sqaruar dhe se M\u00ebrtiri kishte arritur nivel t\u00eb besuesh\u00ebm n\u00eb t\u00eb tre kriteret e rivler\u00ebsimit.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb pakic\u00eb, kryesuesja e trup\u00ebs Etleda \u00c7iftja arsyeton se nd\u00ebrsa ve\u00e7 e ve\u00e7 problemet e gjetura n\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimin e M\u00ebrtirit nuk ishin t\u00eb mjaftueshme p\u00ebr t\u00eb sjell\u00eb shkarkimin, t\u00eb marra s\u00eb bashku ato \u00e7onin n\u00eb shkarkimin e saj dhe se \u201csubjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit d\u00ebshtoi t\u00eb kalonte testin e mosc\u00ebnimit t\u00eb besimit t\u00eb publikut\u201d.<\/p>\n
Por v\u00ebzhguesit nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtare, gjetjet e t\u00eb cil\u00ebve ishin edhe element\u00ebt ky\u00e7\u00eb n\u00eb seanc\u00ebn publike q\u00eb u zhvillua me M\u00ebrtirin n\u00eb dhjetor, k\u00ebrkuan rihetim t\u00eb dosjes, duke v\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb dukje mang\u00ebsi n\u00eb arsyetimin e shumic\u00ebs, sidomos sa i p\u00ebrket gjetjeve t\u00eb p\u00ebrcjella nga vet\u00eb Operacioni Nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtar i Monitorimit n\u00eb kriterin e figur\u00ebs.<\/p>\n
M\u00ebrtiri i kund\u00ebrshtoi k\u00ebto gjetje, q\u00eb kishin t\u00eb b\u00ebnin kryesisht me cil\u00ebsimin si kontakt t\u00eb pap\u00ebrshtatsh\u00ebm t\u00eb lidhjeve t\u00eb saj dhe bashk\u00ebshortit me personat e p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb n\u00eb af\u00ebr\u00ebn e incenerator\u00ebve. M\u00ebrtiri \u00ebsht\u00eb kunata e Stela Gugallaj dhe Mirel M\u00ebrtirit, t\u00eb shpallur n\u00eb k\u00ebrkim nga SPAK p\u00ebr akuzat e korruspionit dhe pastrimit t\u00eb parave.<\/p>\n
Bazuar n\u00eb rekomandim Komisionerja Nino i k\u00ebrkon Kolegjit t\u00eb vendos\u00eb shkarkimin e M\u00ebrtirit. Sipas ankimit vendimi i shumic\u00ebs s\u00eb KPK ishte i rr\u00ebzuesh\u00ebm n\u00eb t\u00eb tre kriteret e rivler\u00ebsimit. Duke iu referuar pasuris\u00eb dhe burimit t\u00eb ligjsh\u00ebm t\u00eb t\u00eb ardhurave t\u00eb marra hua nga M\u00ebrtiri, prej v\u00ebllait t\u00eb bashk\u00ebshortit Mirel M\u00ebrtirit, Komisionerja thot\u00eb se nuk u v\u00ebrtetua burimi i ligjsh\u00ebm. Huaja sh\u00ebrbeu p\u00ebr blerjen e nj\u00eb apartamenti.<\/p>\n
\u201cDuke p\u00ebrfunduar, Komisioneri Publik vler\u00ebson se subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit nuk arrin t\u00eb provoj\u00eb dhe justifikoj\u00eb bindsh\u00ebm burimet e ligjshme t\u00eb t\u00eb ardhurave t\u00eb personave t\u00eb tjer\u00eb t\u00eb lidhur\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb ankim.<\/p>\n
Po ashtu Komisionerja Publike, gjen me probleme p\u00ebrfitimin nga M\u00ebrtiri t\u00eb nj\u00eb huaje p\u00ebr strehim social, duke v\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb dukje se ajo nuk plot\u00ebsonte kriteret p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrfituar huan\u00eb q\u00eb po ashtu kishte sh\u00ebrbyer n\u00eb blerjen e apartamentit. Nino thot\u00eb se kredia e p\u00ebrfituar nga prokurorja ishte e destinuar p\u00ebr shtresat n\u00eb nevoj\u00eb me t\u00eb ardhura t\u00eb pakta dhe se prokurorja nuk binte n\u00eb at\u00eb kategori.<\/p>\n
\u201cDuke vler\u00ebsuar rastin n\u00eb raport me kushtet financiare faktike t\u00eb subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit n\u00eb momentin e aplikimit, rezulton se kjo normativ\u00eb ligjore, nuk plot\u00ebsohej nga ana e subjektit, pasi t\u00eb ardhurat familjare t\u00eb tij kan\u00eb qen\u00eb t\u00eb larta\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb ankim.<\/p>\n
Q\u00ebndrim t\u00eb ngjash\u00ebm mban Nino sa i p\u00ebrket rivler\u00ebsimit n\u00eb kriterin e figur\u00ebs. Komisionerja duke u nisur nga rekomandimi i ONM, v\u00eb n\u00eb dukje se prokurorja kishte detyrim deklarimin e kontakteve dhe lidhjeve me personat e p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb n\u00eb afer\u00ebnne incenerator\u00ebve edhe pas periudh\u00ebs s\u00eb deklarimit por t\u00eb pakt\u00ebn nisur prej vitut 2018 kur afera u denoncua publikisht.<\/p>\n
Po ashtu fakti q\u00eb bashk\u00ebshorti i saj ka punuar p\u00ebr kompanin\u00eb e incenerator\u00ebve dhe fakti q\u00eb prokurorja dhe bashk\u00ebshorti kan\u00eb p\u00ebrdorur automjete t\u00eb personave t\u00eb tjer\u00eb t\u00eb shpallur n\u00eb k\u00ebrkim apo t\u00eb arrestuar p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb afer\u00eb, \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb n\u00eb ankim.<\/p>\n
Komisionerja e cil\u00ebson t\u00eb mang\u00ebt vler\u00ebsimin e KPK n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb pik\u00eb. \u201cKomisioneri Publik, mb\u00ebshtetur n\u00eb Rekomandimin p\u00ebr paraqitje ankimi t\u00eb ONM-s\u00eb dhe p\u00ebrmbajtjes s\u00eb gjetjeve t\u00eb v\u00ebzhguesit nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtar, \u00e7mon se p\u00ebrfundimi i Komisionit nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb rrjedhoj\u00eb e nj\u00eb vler\u00ebsimi t\u00ebr\u00ebsor t\u00eb fakteve dhe interpretimit t\u00eb drejt\u00eb t\u00eb ligjit t\u00eb posa\u00e7\u00ebm. Duket se Komisioni, n\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin e kriterit t\u00eb figur\u00ebs, mb\u00ebshtetet n\u00eb nj\u00eb interpretim t\u00eb ngusht\u00eb dhe formal t\u00eb dispozitave ligjore t\u00eb zbatueshme\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb ankim.<\/p>\n
Komisionerja po ashtu cil\u00ebson si problematike mosdeklarimin e kontaktit me nj\u00eb person t\u00eb p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb n\u00eb krimin e organizuar. Sipas Komisioneres dor\u00ebheqja e m\u00ebvonshme e subjektit nga nj\u00eb hetim mbi k\u00ebt\u00eb person, tregon se ajo ishte n\u00eb dijeni t\u00eb situat\u00ebs dhe se duhej t\u00eb kishte deklaruar k\u00ebt\u00eb kontakt aq m\u00eb shum\u00eb q\u00eb personi n\u00eb fjal\u00eb ishte ai me t\u00eb cilin ishte kryer marr\u00ebveshja e shit-blerjes s\u00eb apartamentit.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb vijim Komisionerja e cil\u00ebson M\u00ebrtirin t\u00eb pap\u00ebrshtatshme sa i p\u00ebrket kriterit t\u00eb figur\u00ebs. \u201cKy vler\u00ebsim negativ q\u00ebndron edhe nga nj\u00eb vler\u00ebsim t\u00ebr\u00ebsor i \u00e7\u00ebshtjes, pasi gjenden nj\u00eb s\u00ebr\u00eb rrethanash, t\u00eb vlefshme p\u00ebr t\u00eb konkluduar se subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit ka cenuar besimin e publikut, sipas parashikimeve t\u00eb nenit 61, pika 5 e ligjit nr. 84\/2016\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb ankim.<\/p>\n
Ankimi gjen probleme edhe sa i p\u00ebrket kriterit t\u00eb profesionalizmit, duke analizuar se par\u00eb n\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsi me pjes\u00ebn tjet\u00ebr t\u00eb dosjes edhe k\u00ebto element\u00eb duhej t\u00eb konsideroheshin shkarkues. Sipas ankimit vendimet e mosfillimit apo pushimit t\u00eb nd\u00ebrmarra nga M\u00ebrtiri kishin \u201ct\u00eb meta t\u00eb dukshme dhe munges\u00eb arsyetimi\u201d.<\/p>\n
\u201cDuke p\u00ebrfunduar p\u00ebr sa u parashtrua p\u00ebr kontrollin e kriterit t\u00eb aft\u00ebsive profesionale, mb\u00ebshtetur n\u00eb Rekomandimin p\u00ebr paraqitje ankimi t\u00eb ONM-s\u00eb, dhe p\u00ebrmbajtjes s\u00eb gjetjeve t\u00eb v\u00ebzhguesit nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtar, vler\u00ebson se subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit nuk arriti t\u00eb provoj\u00eb t\u00eb kund\u00ebrt\u00ebn e barr\u00ebs e prov\u00ebs\u201d, thuhet m\u00eb tej n\u00eb ankim.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Komisionerja Publike Irena Nino b\u00ebri ankim ndaj vendimit t\u00eb Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit, KPK, p\u00ebr konfirmimin n\u00eb detyr\u00eb t\u00eb prokurores s\u00eb Tiran\u00ebs\u00a0 Mariola M\u00ebrtiri. Nino thot\u00eb se hetimi i Komisionit dhe vler\u00ebsimi i fakteve t\u00eb b\u00ebra nga KPK\u00a0 kishte mang\u00ebsi dhe i k\u00ebrkon Kolegjit t\u00eb Posa\u00e7\u00ebm t\u00eb Apelimit t\u00eb vendos\u00eb shkarkimin e prokurores p\u00ebr […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":97,"featured_media":70178,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[121,2,115],"tags":[101,119,122],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/WhatsApp-Image-2022-12-05-at-6.49.10-PM.jpeg","fifu_image_alt":"Prokurorja Mariola M\u00ebrtiri pas seanc\u00ebs n\u00eb KPK. Foto:BIRN","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70177"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/97"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70177"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70177\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":70179,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70177\/revisions\/70179"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/70178"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70177"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70177"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70177"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}