Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit i \u00e7mon t\u00eb pabazuara shkaqet e ngritura nga ish-gjyqtari i Apelit t\u00eb Vlor\u00ebs, Sk\u00ebnder Damini n\u00eb ankimin e tij kund\u00ebr vendimit t\u00eb Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit, KPK q\u00eb nd\u00ebpreu vetingun e k\u00ebtij subjekti rivler\u00ebsimi pas dor\u00ebheqjes s\u00eb tij, si dhe i hoqi t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e rikthimit n\u00eb sistemin e drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb p\u00ebr 15 vitet e ardhshme.<\/p>\n
Gjyqtari Sk\u00ebnder Damini k\u00ebrkoi m\u00eb 17 n\u00ebntor 2021 dor\u00ebheqjen nga detyra, vet\u00ebm pasi Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit, KPK i kishte kaluar barr\u00ebn e prov\u00ebs p\u00ebr pasurin\u00eb, kriterin vet\u00ebm t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilin ishte p\u00ebrmbyllur hetimi administrativ ndaj tij. N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim, Damini k\u00ebrkoi q\u00eb procesi i vetingut ndaj tij t\u00eb mos filloj\u00eb ose t\u00eb pushohet, me q\u00ebllim shmangien e sanksionit q\u00eb i ndalon rikthimin n\u00eb drejt\u00ebsi, megjith\u00ebse KPK ishte investuar p\u00ebr afro tre vjet.<\/p>\n
Kjo k\u00ebrkes\u00eb e Daminit nuk u pranua nga KPK q\u00eb vendosi m\u00eb 14 dhjetor t\u00eb nd\u00ebpres\u00eb procesin e rivler\u00ebsimit p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb subjekt dhe ti ndaloj\u00eb riem\u00ebrimin n\u00eb institucionet e drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb pozicione q\u00eb k\u00ebrkojn\u00eb g\u00ebzimin e statusit t\u00eb magjistratit, p\u00ebr nj\u00eb periudh\u00eb 15-vje\u00e7are.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb vendimin e arsyetuar t\u00eb Kolegjit sqarohet se Damini pretendoi n\u00eb ankimin e tij se KPK ka dh\u00ebn\u00eb nj\u00eb vendim n\u00eb mosrespektim t\u00eb ligjit, duke trajtuar gabim t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e fituar me ligj t\u00eb magjistratit p\u00ebr dor\u00ebheqje. Ai k\u00ebrkoi shfuqizimin e pik\u00ebs s\u00eb dyt\u00eb q\u00eb i ndalon rikthimin n\u00eb sistemin e drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb p\u00ebr 15 vite, duke pretenduar se ishte n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me parimin e proporcionalitetit, me garancit\u00eb juridike mbi t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr privat\u00ebsi q\u00eb ofron neni 8 i Konvent\u00ebs Evropiane p\u00ebr t\u00eb Drejtat e Njeriut, si dhe se ishte marr\u00eb n\u00eb shkelje t\u00eb s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr nj\u00eb proces t\u00eb rregullt ligjor pasi nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb d\u00ebgjuar nga Komisioni lidhur me dor\u00ebheqjen.<\/p>\n
KPA v\u00ebren se n\u00eb vendimin e Komisionit nuk jan\u00eb konstatuar shkelje procedurale t\u00eb tilla, q\u00eb t\u00eb k\u00ebrkonin korrigjimin e tyre, duke e kaluar gjykimin e \u00e7\u00ebshtjes n\u00eb seanc\u00eb gjyq\u00ebsore publike. P\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb, shqyrtimi i \u00e7\u00ebshtjes ka vijuar n\u00eb dhom\u00eb k\u00ebshillimi.<\/p>\n
Pretendimi i Daminit se e ka dh\u00ebn\u00eb dor\u00ebheqjen n\u00eb kuad\u00ebr t\u00eb ligjit p\u00ebr \u201cP\u00ebr statusin e gjyqtar\u00ebve dhe prokuror\u00ebve n\u00eb Republik\u00ebn e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb\u201d, i ndryshuar dhe Komisioni e ka vler\u00ebsuar n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb gabuar n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb nenit G t\u00eb Aneksit t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs q\u00eb lidhet me procesin e vetingut, \u00ebsht\u00eb vler\u00ebsuar i pabazuar nga KPA.<\/p>\n
\u201cVullneti p\u00ebr t\u00eb mos iu shmangur procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit, sipas p\u00ebrcaktimit t\u00eb tij n\u00eb dispozitat kushtetuese dhe n\u00eb ligjin nr. 84\/2016, shprehet vet\u00ebm n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet q\u00ebndrimit n\u00eb detyr\u00eb dhe p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit. N\u00eb momentin q\u00eb subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit, me vullnetin e tij t\u00eb lir\u00eb nd\u00ebrpret detyr\u00ebn funksionale q\u00eb e b\u00ebn at\u00eb subjekt t\u00eb procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit ex officio, duhet t\u00eb marr\u00eb parasysh edhe pasoj\u00ebn ligjore q\u00eb sjell dor\u00ebheqja nga detyra n\u00eb ecurin\u00eb e procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit sipas nenit G t\u00eb Aneksit t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs\u201d, arsyeton Kolegji dhe sjell n\u00eb v\u00ebmendje edhe jurisupdenc\u00ebn e Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese lidhur me k\u00ebt\u00eb situat\u00eb.<\/p>\n
KPA arrin n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin se, p\u00ebr sa koh\u00eb dor\u00ebheqja e subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit p\u00ebrmbush kriteret e p\u00ebrcaktuara n\u00eb nenin G t\u00eb Aneksit t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, at\u00ebher\u00eb pasoja juridike e parashikuar n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb nen do t\u00eb duhet t\u00eb zbatohet n\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsin\u00eb e saj, duke i kufizuar dhe t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr t\u2019u em\u00ebruar gjyqtar ose prokuror i \u00e7do niveli, an\u00ebtar i K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Lart\u00eb Gjyq\u00ebsor ose i K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Lart\u00eb t\u00eb Prokuroris\u00eb, Inspektor i Lart\u00eb i Drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb ose Prokuror i P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm, p\u00ebr nj\u00eb periudh\u00eb 15-vje\u00e7are.<\/p>\n
I pabazuar \u00ebsht\u00eb gjetur edhe shkaku i ngritur n\u00eb ankim p\u00ebr c\u00ebnim t\u00eb s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr proces t\u00eb rregullt ligjor, me pretendimin se nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb d\u00ebgjuar n\u00eb seanc\u00eb publike. Kolegji ka verifikuar dokumentacionin e fashikullit t\u00eb Komisionit p\u00ebr procesin e rivler\u00ebsimit t\u00eb Daminit, nga ka rezultuar se Komisioni i ka k\u00ebrkuar subjektit q\u00eb t\u00eb shpreh\u00eb vullnetin e tij n\u00ebse d\u00ebshiron ose jo t\u00eb marr\u00eb pjes\u00eb n\u00eb seanc\u00eb d\u00ebgjimore ku do t\u00eb trajtohej nd\u00ebrprerja e procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit n\u00eb zbatim t\u00eb nenit G t\u00eb Aneksit t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, ku parashikohet edhe sanksioni.<\/p>\n
Nga verifikimi ka rezultuar se Damini \u00ebsht\u00eb shpehur se nuk ka dashur t\u00eb marr\u00eb pjes\u00eb n\u00eb seanc\u00ebn d\u00ebgjimore. \u201cN\u00eb shqyrtim t\u00eb fakteve t\u00eb konstatuara si m\u00eb sip\u00ebr, trupi gjykues vler\u00ebsoi se mosd\u00ebgjimi i subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit n\u00eb seanc\u00eb d\u00ebgjimore n\u00eb Komision, ka ardhur si pasoj\u00eb e vullnetit t\u00eb vet\u00eb atij\u201d, konstaton KPA.<\/p>\n
Po ashtu, \u00ebsht\u00eb rr\u00ebzuar edhe shkaku lidhur me pik\u00ebn 2 t\u00eb vendimit t\u00eb Komisionit, me pretendimin se heqja e t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr rikthimin n\u00eb sistemin e drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb p\u00ebr nj\u00eb periudh\u00eb 15-vje\u00e7are, \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me parimin e proporcionalitetit.<\/p>\n
Trupi gjykues i KPA v\u00ebren se ky pretendim i Daminit lidhet lidhet me \u00e7\u00ebshtje ligjore t\u00eb interpretimit t\u00eb paragrafit 2 t\u00eb nenit G t\u00eb Aneksit t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs dhe se nuk mund t\u00eb jet\u00eb objekt i gjykimit n\u00eb Kolegj, p\u00ebr sa koh\u00eb q\u00eb ai \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb parashikim kushtetues.<\/p>\n
\u201cMasa e kufizimit p\u00ebr t\u00eb q\u00ebndruar 15 vite jasht\u00eb sistemit t\u00eb drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb, \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktuar nga kjo dispozit\u00eb kushtetuese, si nj\u00eb periudh\u00eb e caktuar, fikse, dhe jo e vendosur n\u00eb marzhe, rast n\u00eb t\u00eb cilin vler\u00ebsimi i institucioneve t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit p\u00ebr efekt t\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktimit t\u00eb periudh\u00ebs s\u00eb kufizimit, do t\u2019i n\u00ebnshtrohej parimit t\u00eb proporcionalitetit,\u201d argumenton Kolegji duke iu referuar edhe jurispudenc\u00ebs s\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese.<\/p>\n
Po ashtu, jan\u00eb vler\u00ebsuar t\u00eb pabazuara dhe pretendimet se ky sanksion ka ashp\u00ebrsi me natyr\u00eb penale dhe se \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me KEDNJ-n\u00eb. N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim, KPA ka vendosur t\u00eb l\u00ebr\u00eb n\u00eb fuqi vendimin e Komisionit p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb subjekt rivler\u00ebsimi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit i \u00e7mon t\u00eb pabazuara shkaqet e ngritura nga ish-gjyqtari i Apelit t\u00eb Vlor\u00ebs, Sk\u00ebnder Damini n\u00eb ankimin e tij kund\u00ebr vendimit t\u00eb Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit, KPK q\u00eb nd\u00ebpreu vetingun e k\u00ebtij subjekti rivler\u00ebsimi pas dor\u00ebheqjes s\u00eb tij, si dhe i hoqi t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e rikthimit n\u00eb sistemin e […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":637,"featured_media":71471,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[114,2,115],"tags":[191,103,112],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/KPA-shpall-vendimin-per-Eugen-Becin.png","fifu_image_alt":"Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit gjat\u00eb nj\u00eb seance. ","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71470"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/637"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=71470"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71470\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":71472,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71470\/revisions\/71472"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/71471"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=71470"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=71470"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=71470"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}