{"id":72316,"date":"2021-11-24T15:08:21","date_gmt":"2021-11-24T14:08:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/gjyqtari-rexhep-karaj-gjendet-me-probleme-ne-justifikimin-e-pasurise\/2021\/11\/24\/"},"modified":"2023-04-06T18:17:54","modified_gmt":"2023-04-06T16:17:54","slug":"gjyqtari-rexhep-karaj-gjendet-me-probleme-ne-justifikimin-e-pasurise","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/gjyqtari-rexhep-karaj-gjendet-me-probleme-ne-justifikimin-e-pasurise\/2021\/11\/24\/","title":{"rendered":"Gjyqtari Rexhep Karaj gjendet me probleme n\u00eb justifikimin e pasuris\u00eb"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Gjyqtari i Matit, Rexhep Karaj nuk u paraqit as n\u00eb seanc\u00ebn e dyt\u00eb d\u00ebgjimore n\u00eb Komisionin e Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit, ku u relatuan probleme t\u00eb shumta n\u00eb deklarimin e pasurive dhe balanc\u00eb negative me vler\u00eb totale prej 7.8 milion\u00eb lek\u00ebsh.<!--more--><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_81579\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-81579\" style=\"width: 533px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/Rexhep-Karaj-seanca-2.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-large wp-image-81579\" src=\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/Rexhep-Karaj-seanca-2-533x400.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"533\" height=\"400\" data-id=\"81579\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-81579\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Trupa e KPK-s\u00eb n\u00eb seanc\u00ebn d\u00ebgjimore t\u00eb gjyqtarit t\u00eb Matit, Rexhep Karaj. Foto: Edmond Hoxhaj.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Gjyqtari i Matit, Rexhep Karaj nuk u paraqit as n\u00eb seanc\u00ebn e dyt\u00eb d\u00ebgjimore t\u00eb zhvilluar t\u00eb m\u00ebrkur\u00ebn n\u00eb Komisionin e Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit, KPK n\u00eb funksion t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit t\u00eb tij. Ashtu si m\u00eb 17 n\u00ebntor, subjekti i kishte komunikuar Komisionit se e kishte t\u00eb pamundur t\u00eb ishte i pranish\u00ebm p\u00ebr arsye sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsore.<\/p>\n<p>Kryesuesja e trupit gjykues, Etleda \u00c7iftja sqaroi se Karaj nuk kishte d\u00ebrguar dokumentacion ligjor p\u00ebr t\u00eb justifikuar pretendimin e tij p\u00ebr pamund\u00ebsi sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsore dhe n\u00eb k\u00ebto kushte, Komisioni vendosi t\u00eb vijoj\u00eb me relatimin e gjetjeve t\u00eb hetimit administrativ. N\u00eb seanc\u00eb nuk kishte t\u00eb pranish\u00ebm asnj\u00eb p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsues ligjor t\u00eb Karajt.<\/p>\n<p>Rexhep Karaj e ka filluar karrier\u00ebn n\u00eb sistemin e drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb vitin 1995 dhe punon prej m\u00eb shum\u00eb se dy dekadash si gjyqtar n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn e Matit. Procesi i tij i vetingut po kryhet nga trupa e kyesuar nga Etleda \u00c7iftja, me relator Roland Ilian dhe an\u00ebtare Firdes Shulin, nd\u00ebrsa n\u00eb cil\u00ebsin\u00eb e v\u00ebzhguesit nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtar ishte i pranish\u00ebm Francesco Ciardi. Paralelisht me procesin e vetingut, gjyqtari Karaj \u00ebsht\u00eb aktualisht n\u00eb nj\u00eb hetim disiplinor nga Inspektori i Lart\u00eb i Drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb, ILD.<\/p>\n<p>Relatoria Ilia deklaroi n\u00eb fillim t\u00eb seanc\u00ebs se hetimi administrativ p\u00ebr gjyqtarin Rexhep Karaj \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrfunduar vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr kriterin e pasuris\u00eb. Gjat\u00eb relatimit, Ilia evidentoi pasakt\u00ebsi dhe mosp\u00ebrputhje n\u00eb deklarimet e pasuris\u00eb, si dhe pamund\u00ebsi financiare n\u00eb vler\u00eb t\u00eb konsiderueshme.<\/p>\n<p>Ilia tha n\u00eb seanc\u00eb se n\u00eb mjaft raste, gjyqtari Karaj nuk ka dh\u00ebn\u00eb shpjegime p\u00ebr pyetjet q\u00eb i jan\u00eb drejtuar gjat\u00eb procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit dhe shtoi se ky q\u00ebndrim i subjektit do t\u00eb konsiderohet gjat\u00eb vendimarrjes p\u00ebrfundimtare.<\/p>\n<p>KPK konstaton pasakt\u00ebsi n\u00eb deklarimin e nj\u00eb apartamenti me sip\u00ebrfaqe 76.17 m2 n\u00eb Mat, t\u00eb marr\u00eb n\u00eb p\u00ebrdorim prej Entit Komb\u00ebtar t\u00eb Banesave, EKB n\u00eb vitin 1995 dhe t\u00eb bler\u00eb n\u00eb vitin 2007.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb deklarat\u00ebn \u201cveting\u201d, subjekti ka deklaruar se e ka bler\u00eb p\u00ebr shum\u00ebn 524 mij\u00eb lek\u00eb dhe se e ka kryer pages\u00ebn me k\u00ebste nga t\u00eb ardhurat familjare dhe me bono privatizimi. Gjat\u00eb hetimit administrativ, Karaj ka ndryshuar q\u00ebndrim duke deklaruar se pagesa \u00ebsht\u00eb kryer me nj\u00eb k\u00ebst n\u00eb vitin 2007. Por nga verifikimi i dokumentacionit bankar ka rezultuar se pagesa \u00ebsht\u00eb kryer n\u00eb 2006-\u00ebn.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb vitin 2004, subjekti ka deklaruar sht\u00ebpin\u00eb me sip\u00ebrfaqe 90 m2, t\u00eb bler\u00eb p\u00ebr shum\u00ebn 1.3 milion\u00eb lek\u00eb. Sipas Ilias, Karaj ka sqaruar se b\u00ebhet fjal\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn pasuri dhe ka pretenduar se pasakt\u00ebsit\u00eb kan\u00eb ardhur pasi deklarata \u00ebsht\u00eb plot\u00ebsuar nga nj\u00eb koleg i tij dhe bashk\u00ebshortja, pasi gjendjej jasht\u00eb shtetit n\u00eb at\u00eb periudh\u00eb. Relatori pohoi se subjekti \u00ebsht\u00eb pyetur p\u00ebrse ka n\u00ebnshkruar nj\u00eb formular q\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb plot\u00ebsuar prej tij.<\/p>\n<p>Paqart\u00ebsi n\u00eb deklarimet e subjektit jan\u00eb konstatuar edhe p\u00ebr nj\u00eb sht\u00ebpi banimi me sip\u00ebrfaqe 108 m2 + 300 m2 truall n\u00eb Gurr\u00eb t\u00eb Madhe n\u00eb Klos. Karaj ka deklaruar se e ka trash\u00ebguar k\u00ebt\u00eb pasuri, por Zyra e Regjistrimit t\u00eb Pasurive t\u00eb Paluajtshme nuk e ka konfirmuar pron\u00ebsin\u00eb e subjektit mbi k\u00ebt\u00eb sht\u00ebpi. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, ka rezultuar se banesa ka pasur sip\u00ebrfaqe 96 m2. Relatori Ilia pohoi se subjekti nuk arriti t\u00eb provoj\u00eb deklarimet e tij p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb pasuri dhe i \u00ebsht\u00eb kaluar barra e prov\u00ebs.<\/p>\n<p>Situat\u00eb e ngjashme ka rezultuar edhe p\u00ebr nj\u00eb ngast\u00ebr toke bujq\u00ebsore me sip\u00ebrfaqe 36 mij\u00eb m2, pasuri p\u00ebr t\u00eb cil\u00ebn edhe n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast Karaj ka pretenduar se e ka p\u00ebrfituar n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet trash\u00ebgimis\u00eb. Megjith\u00ebse subjekti ka deklaruar se kjo tok\u00eb ka qen\u00eb e familjes s\u00eb tij brez pas brezi, sipas KPK nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb arritur t\u00eb provohet pron\u00ebsia mbi k\u00ebt\u00eb pasuri.<\/p>\n<p>Nga hetimi ka rezultuar se n\u00eb vitin 2016, gjyqtari Karaj i ka dh\u00ebn\u00eb hua administratorit t\u00eb nj\u00eb shoq\u00ebrie nd\u00ebrtuese vler\u00ebn 50 mij\u00eb euro. Si burim krijimi t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj shume, Karaj ka deklaruar t\u00eb ardhurat familjare.<\/p>\n<p>Sipas relatorit Ilia, subjekti ka shpjeguar se huaja \u00ebsht\u00eb dh\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb k\u00ebmbim t\u00eb nj\u00eb apartamenti n\u00eb Tiran\u00eb dhe ka pretenduar se nd\u00ebrtuesi i ka ofruar nj\u00eb apartament me sip\u00ebrfaqe 93 m2. Nga hetimi ka rezultuar se kontrata e huadh\u00ebnies nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb e bazuar n\u00eb ligj.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSubjekti duket se \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrpjekur t\u00eb fsheh\u00eb q\u00ebllimin e v\u00ebrtet\u00eb, q\u00eb duket se ka qen\u00eb porositja e apartamentit dhe jo dh\u00ebnia e huas\u00eb,\u201d deklaroi relatori Ilia dhe vijoi se subjekti ka kryer deklarim t\u00eb pamjaftuesh\u00ebm p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb transaksion.<\/p>\n<p>Nga analiza financiare ka rezultuar se subjekti dhe familjar\u00ebt e tij kan\u00eb qen\u00eb n\u00eb pamund\u00ebsi n\u00eb shum\u00ebn 4.5 milion\u00eb lek\u00eb p\u00ebr dh\u00ebnien e huas\u00eb 50 mij\u00eb euro.<\/p>\n<p>Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, Karaj nuk ka arritur t\u00eb provoj\u00eb me dokumentacion ligjor mund\u00ebsin\u00eb e nipit t\u00eb tij p\u00ebr dh\u00ebnien e nj\u00eb huaje n\u00eb shum\u00ebn 4000 euro n\u00eb favor t\u00eb subjektit n\u00eb vitin 2004.<\/p>\n<p>Komisioni ngriti gjithashtu dyshime se tre automjete nuk jan\u00eb deklaruar n\u00eb vler\u00ebn reale t\u00eb blerjes, nd\u00ebrsa n\u00eb k\u00ebto transaksione kan\u00eb rezultuar edhe pamund\u00ebsi financiare.<\/p>\n<p>KPK ka verifikuar 9 llogari bankare n\u00eb em\u00ebr t\u00eb subjektit, bashk\u00ebshortes dhe f\u00ebmij\u00ebve t\u00eb tyre ku nuk jan\u00eb gjetur probleme dometh\u00ebn\u00ebse. N\u00eb nj\u00eb rast, Karaj nuk ka deklaruar krijimin e nj\u00eb depozite n\u00eb shum\u00ebn 760 mij\u00eb lek\u00eb dhe p\u00ebrdorimin e k\u00ebsaj vlere t\u00eb t\u00ebrhequr.<\/p>\n<p>Komisioni konstaton mosp\u00ebrputhje t\u00eb gjendjes cash t\u00eb pasyqruar n\u00eb deklarat\u00ebn \u2018veting\u2019 me gjendjen progresive t\u00eb deklarimeve vjetore t\u00eb likujditeteve cash. Nga analiza financiare e p\u00ebrgjithshme p\u00ebr periudh\u00ebn nga fillimi i detyr\u00ebs s\u00eb subjektit deri n\u00eb vitin 2016, KPK ka konkluduar balanc\u00eb negative n\u00eb vler\u00ebn totale 7.8 milion\u00eb lek\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>KPK njoftoi se seanca p\u00ebr shpalljen e vendimit do t\u00eb zhvillohet m\u00eb dat\u00eb 25 n\u00ebntor, ora 09:45.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gjyqtari i Matit, Rexhep Karaj nuk u paraqit as n\u00eb seanc\u00ebn e dyt\u00eb d\u00ebgjimore n\u00eb Komisionin e Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit, ku u relatuan probleme t\u00eb shumta n\u00eb deklarimin e pasurive dhe balanc\u00eb negative me vler\u00eb totale prej 7.8 milion\u00eb lek\u00ebsh.<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":637,"featured_media":72317,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[415,117,2,362],"tags":[135,103,118],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/Rexhep-Karaj-seanca-2.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"Trupa e KPK-s\u00eb n\u00eb seanc\u00ebn d\u00ebgjimore t\u00eb gjyqtarit t\u00eb Matit, Rexhep Karaj. Foto: Edmond Hoxhaj. ","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72316"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/637"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72316"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72316\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":72318,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72316\/revisions\/72318"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/72317"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72316"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72316"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72316"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}