{"id":73359,"date":"2021-05-31T20:12:44","date_gmt":"2021-05-31T18:12:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/ankimi-i-ish-prokurorit-bilbil-mete-ndan-ne-qendrime-anetaret-e-kolegjit\/2021\/05\/31\/"},"modified":"2023-04-06T21:33:11","modified_gmt":"2023-04-06T19:33:11","slug":"ankimi-i-ish-prokurorit-bilbil-mete-ndan-ne-qendrime-anetaret-e-kolegjit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/ankimi-i-ish-prokurorit-bilbil-mete-ndan-ne-qendrime-anetaret-e-kolegjit\/2021\/05\/31\/","title":{"rendered":"Ankimi i ish-prokurorit Bilbil Mete ndan n\u00eb q\u00ebndrime an\u00ebtar\u00ebt e Kolegjit"},"content":{"rendered":"

Shumica e Kolegjit e vler\u00ebson procesin e vetingut t\u00eb pavarur nga proceset e gjykatave t\u00eb tjera dhe e quan t\u00eb drejt\u00eb vendimin e Komisionit p\u00ebr nd\u00ebrperjen e procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit prokurorin Bilbil Mete, si dhe sanksionin q\u00eb i ndalon rikthimin n\u00eb sistetmin e drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
Trupa e KPA-s\u00eb gjat\u00eb shpalljes s\u00eb nj\u00eb vendimi. Screenshot nga trasmetimi i KPA n\u00eb Youtube.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit u nda n\u00eb vendimarrjen lidhur me ankimin e kryer nga ish-prokurori i Prokuroris\u00eb s\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithshme, Bilbil Mete ndaj vendimit t\u00eb Komisionit t\u00eb Kualifikimit, KPK q\u00eb vendosi vendosi m\u00eb 10 dhjetor 2020 t\u00eb deklaroj\u00eb nd\u00ebprerjen e procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb dor\u00ebheqjes dhe i hoqi t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn t\u00eb em\u00ebrohet n\u00eb institucionet e drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb gjat\u00eb 15 viteve t\u00eb ardhshme.<\/p>\n

Kryesuesja e trupit gjykues, Rezarta Schuetz relatorja Natasha Mulaj dhe an\u00ebtarja Ina Rama e quajn\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00eb vendimin e KPK, nd\u00ebrsa an\u00ebtar\u00ebt n\u00eb pakic\u00eb, Ardian Hajdari dhe Sokol \u00c7omo k\u00ebrkojn\u00eb ndryshimin e vendimit.<\/p>\n

Mete ushtroi ankim n\u00eb Kolegj ku k\u00ebrkoi shfuqizimin e pik\u00ebs s\u00eb dyt\u00eb t\u00eb vendimit t\u00eb Komisionit q\u00eb sanksionon heqjes e t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr t\u2019u riem\u00ebruar, duke pretenduar se nuk e g\u00ebzonte statusin e magjistratit dhe nuk duhet t\u2019i ishte drejtuar K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Lart\u00eb t\u00eb Prokuroris\u00eb me k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr mbarimin e statusit.<\/p>\n

Por Kolegji vler\u00ebson se, nisur nga fakti q\u00eb subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit ka qen\u00eb duke ushtruar funksionin e prokurorit n\u00eb Prokurorin\u00eb e P\u00ebrgjithshme n\u00eb koh\u00ebn e hyrjes n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb ligjit \u201cP\u00ebr statusin e gjyqtar\u00ebve dhe prokuror\u00ebve n\u00eb Republik\u00ebn e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb\u201d, e ka fituar statusin e magjistratit p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb k\u00ebtij ligji.<\/p>\n

Sipas KPA-s\u00eb, ky parashikim nuk do t\u00eb thot\u00eb q\u00eb gjyqtari apo prokurori n\u00eb detyr\u00eb q\u00eb nuk i \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00ebnshtruar ende procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit, nuk g\u00ebzon statusin e magjistratit – por q\u00eb ky status do t\u00eb vijoj\u00eb t\u00eb mbahet vet\u00ebm n\u00ebse subjekti kalon me sukses procesin e rivler\u00ebsimit dhe konfirmohet n\u00eb detyr\u00eb.<\/p>\n

\u201cP\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, n\u00ebse subjekti nuk do t\u00eb ishte magjistrat, nuk do t\u00eb kishte p\u00ebrfituar pag\u00ebn e magjistratit[\u2026]\u201d, vijon argumentimin shumica.<\/p>\n

Lidhur me pretendimin tjet\u00ebr t\u00eb subjektit se \u00ebsht\u00eb larguar nga funksioni i prokurorit p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb daljes n\u00eb pension sipas ligjit p\u00ebr sigurimet shoq\u00ebrore dhe n\u00eb kushtet kur nuk g\u00ebzonte statusin e magjistratit mungonte dor\u00ebheqja, Kolegji sjell n\u00eb v\u00ebmendje ndryshimet e kryera nga Gjykata Kushtetuese n\u00eb ligjin e vitit 2016 \u201cP\u00ebr statusin e gjyqtar\u00ebve dhe prokuror\u00ebve n\u00eb Republik\u00ebn e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb\u201d.<\/p>\n

Nj\u00eb prej parashikimeve n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb ligj, sipas t\u00eb cilit statusi i magjistratit p\u00ebrfundonte me mbushjen e mosh\u00ebs s\u00eb pensionit, u z\u00ebvend\u00ebsua me p\u00ebrcaktimin se statusi p\u00ebrfundon kur \u201cmbush mosh\u00ebn 67 vje\u00e7\u201d.<\/p>\n

\u201cP\u00ebr sa m\u00eb sip\u00ebr, subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit mund t\u2019i referohej ligjit nr. 7703, dat\u00eb 11.5.1993, \u2018P\u00ebr sigurimet shoq\u00ebrore n\u00eb Republik\u00ebn e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb\u2019, i ndryshuar n\u00eb ato raste kur do t\u00eb mungonte parashikimi ligjor n\u00eb ligjin nr. 96\/2016, p\u00ebr q\u00ebndrimin n\u00eb detyr\u00eb t\u00eb magjistratit\u201d, citohet n\u00eb vendim.<\/p>\n

Sipas KPA, n\u00eb kushtet kur Mete me veprime konkrete ka hequr dor\u00eb nga ushtrimi i detyr\u00ebs s\u00eb prokurorit nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb ende nuk kishte mbushur mosh\u00ebn 67 vje\u00e7, ai e ka l\u00ebn\u00eb detyr\u00ebn me vullnetin e tij.<\/p>\n

Bazuar n\u00eb k\u00ebto argumente, shumica e vler\u00ebson t\u00eb drejt\u00eb vendimin e KPK-s\u00eb se procesi i vler\u00ebsimit duhet nd\u00ebprer\u00eb p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb dor\u00ebheqjes nga statusi i magjistratit dhe se duhet vendosur sanksioni q\u00eb e ndalon prokurorin Mete t\u00eb kthehet n\u00eb sistemin e drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb gjat\u00eb 15 viteve t\u00eb ardhshme.<\/p>\n

Vler\u00ebsimi ndryshe <\/strong><\/p>\n

An\u00ebtar\u00ebt e Kolegjit kan\u00eb pasur q\u00ebndrime t\u00eb ndryshme edhe mbi pretendimin e subjektit se ka ngritur padi p\u00ebrpara Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit Administrativ.<\/p>\n

Shumica vler\u00ebson se procesi i rivler\u00ebsimit \u00ebsht\u00eb i pavarur nga proceset e tjera gjyq\u00ebsore administrative dhe civile, q\u00eb subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit mund t\u00eb ket\u00eb ngritur p\u00ebr t\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtuar aktin administrativ t\u00eb K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Lart\u00eb t\u00eb Prokuroris\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Gjithashtu, shumica konstaton se subjekti edhe gjat\u00eb seanc\u00ebs gjyq\u00ebsore publike n\u00eb Kolegj u shpreh se, kjo \u00e7\u00ebshtje mund t\u00eb zgjidhet pa u shqyrtuar n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn e Lart\u00eb vendimi i Apelit Administrativ lidhur me ankimin e kryer prej tij ndaj vendimit t\u00eb KLP-s\u00eb p\u00ebr p\u00ebrfundimin e statusit t\u00eb magjistratit.<\/p>\n

Gjyqtar\u00ebt Ardian Hajdari dhe Sokol \u00c7omo n\u00eb pakic\u00eb, shprehen se nuk jan\u00eb dakord me vler\u00ebsimin e shumic\u00ebs lidhur me procesin p\u00ebr padin\u00eb e kryer nga Mete ndaj vendimit t\u00eb KLP-s\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Ata sjellin n\u00eb v\u00ebmendje se Gjykata e Apelit Administrativ ka vendosur n\u00eb dhjetor t\u00eb 2020-\u00ebs t\u00eb rr\u00ebzoj\u00eb padin\u00eb e subjektit dhe se ky i fundit ka paraqitur rekurs n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn e Lart\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Duke ju referuar parashikimit ligjor se Gjykata e Lart\u00eb i shqyrton \u00e7\u00ebshtjet administrative brenda 90 dit\u00ebve nga data e ardhjes s\u00eb rekursit, Hajdari dhe \u00c7omo shprehen se i kan\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar shumic\u00ebs pezullimin \u2018ex officio\u2019 t\u00eb gjykimit t\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjes, deri n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin e kontrollit gjyq\u00ebsor edhe nga Kolegji Administrativ i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Hajdari dhe \u00c7omo theksojn\u00eb se vler\u00ebsimi i tyre p\u00ebr m\u00ebnyr\u00ebn e zgjidhjes s\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjes mund t\u00eb ishte krejt i ndrysh\u00ebm, n\u00eb rast se gjykimi n\u00eb KPA do t\u00eb pezullohej deri n\u00eb pritjen e vendimit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb lidhur me vler\u00ebsimin e vlefshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb aktit administrativ t\u00eb KLP-s\u00eb.<\/p>\n

\u201c[\u2026]ekziston mund\u00ebsia q\u00eb Gjykata e Lart\u00eb t\u00eb konstatoj\u00eb pavlefshm\u00ebrin\u00eb absolute t\u00eb aktit administrativ t\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtuar\u201d, v\u00ebren pakica.<\/p>\n

Ata p\u00ebrfundojn\u00eb se n\u00eb kushtet q\u00eb shumica mori vendim pa pritur vendimarrjen e Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb, e vetmja zgjidhje e drejt\u00eb mbetet prishja e vendimit t\u00eb KPK-s\u00eb.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Shumica e Kolegjit e vler\u00ebson procesin e vetingut t\u00eb pavarur nga proceset e gjykatave t\u00eb tjera dhe e quan t\u00eb drejt\u00eb vendimin e Komisionit p\u00ebr nd\u00ebrperjen e procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit prokurorin Bilbil Mete, si dhe sanksionin q\u00eb i ndalon rikthimin n\u00eb sistetmin e drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":637,"featured_media":73360,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[415,114,2,362],"tags":[112,119,175],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/Kpa-live-stream.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"Trupa e KPA gjat\u00eb vendimit p\u00ebr ish-inspektorin Pirro Samara. Screenshot nga trasmetimi i KPA n\u00eb Youtube. ","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73359"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/637"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73359"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73359\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":73361,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73359\/revisions\/73361"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/73360"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73359"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73359"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73359"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}