{"id":73617,"date":"2021-04-20T13:38:42","date_gmt":"2021-04-20T11:38:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/gjyqtarja-besjana-garxenaj-perballet-me-pikepyetje-per-pasurine-dhe-figuren\/2021\/04\/20\/"},"modified":"2023-04-06T21:49:49","modified_gmt":"2023-04-06T19:49:49","slug":"gjyqtarja-besjana-garxenaj-perballet-me-pikepyetje-per-pasurine-dhe-figuren","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/gjyqtarja-besjana-garxenaj-perballet-me-pikepyetje-per-pasurine-dhe-figuren\/2021\/04\/20\/","title":{"rendered":"Gjyqtarja Besjana Garxenaj p\u00ebrballet me pik\u00ebpyetje p\u00ebr pasurin\u00eb dhe figur\u00ebn"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Besjana Garxenaj kishte k\u00ebrkuar t\u00eb p\u00ebrjashtohej nga procesi i rivler\u00ebsimit dhe pas rr\u00ebzimit t\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs, u ballafaqua n\u00eb seanc\u00eb me munges\u00eb burimesh dhe nj\u00eb raport negativ t\u00eb DSIK- t\u00eb cilat ajo i kund\u00ebrshtoi si t\u00eb pasakta.<!--more--><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_78144\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-78144\" style=\"width: 533px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/Besjana-Garxenaj-KPK-.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-image-78144 size-large\" src=\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/Besjana-Garxenaj-KPK--533x400.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"533\" height=\"400\" data-id=\"78144\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-78144\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Gjyqtarja e Durr\u00ebsit, Besjana Garxenaj pas seanc\u00ebs s\u00eb KPK.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Gjyqtarja Besjana Garxenaj e Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Durr\u00ebsit u p\u00ebrball t\u00eb mart\u00ebn m\u00eb 20 prill me Komisionin e Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit, kur gjat\u00eb seanc\u00ebs d\u00ebgjimore u eidentuan gjetjet p\u00ebr t\u00eb tre kriteret e rivler\u00ebsimit.<\/p>\n<p>Procesi i vetingut p\u00ebr gjyqtaren Garxenaj po kryhet nga trupi gjykues i kryesuar nga Firdes Shuli, me relatore Brunilda Bekteshin dhe an\u00ebtare Pamela Qirko. N\u00eb cil\u00ebsin\u00eb e v\u00ebzhguesit nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtar ishte i pranish\u00ebm Francesco Ciardi.<\/p>\n<p>Relatorja Bekteshi tha n\u00eb fillim t\u00eb seanc\u00ebs se gjyqtarja Garxenaj kishte depozituar n\u00eb fillim t\u00eb procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit nj\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb, n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet s\u00eb cil\u00ebt pretendonte se nuk ishte subjekt rivler\u00ebsimi, me argumentin se kur ligji i vetingut kishte hyr\u00eb n\u00eb fuqi, nuk e g\u00ebzonte statusin e magjistratit.<\/p>\n<p>Por trupi gjykues ka vler\u00ebsuar se Garxenaj \u00ebsht\u00eb subjekt rivler\u00ebsimi dhe \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrfunduar hetimi administrativ n\u00eb t\u00eb tri kriteret.<\/p>\n<p>Bekteshi tha se Inspektorati i Lart\u00eb i Deklarimit dhe Kontrollit t\u00eb Pasurive dhe Konfliktit t\u00eb Interesave, ILDKPKI kishte konstatuar e deklarimi p\u00ebr pasurin\u00eb nuk ishte i sakt\u00eb dhe se subjekti nuk kishte depozituar dokumente t\u00eb mjaftueshme p\u00ebr t\u00eb ardhurat.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb seanc\u00eb u theksua se gjyqtarja Besjana Garxenaj, para fillimit t\u00eb detyr\u00ebs si gjyqtare kishte bler\u00eb dy automjeteve dhe nga vlera e p\u00ebrfituar nga shitja e nj\u00eb automjeti me \u00e7mim 15 mij\u00eb euro kishte bler\u00eb nj\u00eb automjet tjet\u00ebr t\u00eb mark\u00ebs \u201cBenz\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Si burim p\u00ebr krijimin e k\u00ebtyre pasurive, ajo ka deklaruar edhe t\u00eb ardhurat nga familja dhe nga bursa e Shkoll\u00ebs s\u00eb Magjistratur\u00ebs.<\/p>\n<p>Sipas Bekteshit, subjekti ka shpjeguar se nj\u00ebrin prej automjeteve e ka bler\u00eb nga nj\u00eb person i njohur, nd\u00ebrsa mjetin tjet\u00ebr e ka bler\u00eb me \u00e7mim m\u00eb t\u00eb ul\u00ebt nga ai q\u00eb e ka shitur, pasi ka dh\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb k\u00ebmbim edhe nj\u00eb makin\u00eb q\u00eb zot\u00ebronte.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSubjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit ka deklaruar se k\u00ebto transaksione jan\u00eb kryer para fillimit t\u00eb detyr\u00ebs dhe se nuk ka pasur q\u00ebllim p\u00ebr kryerjen e veprimeve fiktive,\u201d pohoi Bekteshi.<\/p>\n<p>Relatorja shtoi se nga analiza financiare e kryer gjat\u00eb periudh\u00ebs para detyr\u00ebs kur jan\u00eb kryer blerjet dhe shitjet e k\u00ebtyre mjeteve ka rezultuar me balanc\u00eb negative n\u00eb shum\u00ebn 2.7 milion\u00eb lek\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb deklarat\u00ebn para fillimit t\u00eb detyr\u00ebs, Garxenaj ka deklaruar edhe nj\u00eb gjendje cash n\u00eb shum\u00ebn 6 mij\u00eb euro q\u00eb, s\u00eb bashku me shtesat n\u00eb vite, \u00ebsht\u00eb pasqyruar n\u00eb shum\u00ebn 9 mij\u00eb euro n\u00eb deklarat\u00ebn veting.<\/p>\n<p>Relatorja tha se nga analiza financiare \u00ebsht\u00eb konstatuar munges\u00eb burimesh p\u00ebr krijimin e gjendjes cash dhe shtesave deri n\u00eb momentin e deklarat\u00ebs veting n\u00eb shum\u00ebn 555 mij\u00eb lek\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>Sipas Bekteshit, Garxenaj ka deklaruar se ajo ka jetuar me prind\u00ebrit, t\u00eb cil\u00ebt e kan\u00eb ndihmuar jo vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr shpenzimet e jetes\u00ebs, por edhe p\u00ebr blerjen e automjeteve. Ajo shtoi se subjekti ka dor\u00ebzuar dokumentacion p\u00ebr t\u00eb ardhurat e prind\u00ebrve nga pagat dhe pronat q\u00eb ata zot\u00ebrojn\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>Gjyqtarja Garxenaj deklaroi n\u00eb seanc\u00eb se kishte dor\u00ebzuar t\u00eb gjitha provat e domosdoshme q\u00eb bindin se t\u00eb ardhurat e prind\u00ebrve dhe t\u00eb saj jan\u00eb t\u00eb mjaftueshme p\u00ebr krijimin e pasurive dhe shpenzimet e kryera.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cPrind\u00ebrit kan\u00eb burime t\u00eb ligjshme nga dyqanet dhe pagat, kan\u00eb mundur t\u00eb kursejn\u00eb p\u00ebr mua, q\u00eb jam f\u00ebmija e tyre i vetme,\u201d pohoi ajo.<\/p>\n<p>Drejtoria e Sigurimit t\u00eb Informacionit t\u00eb Klasifikuar, DSIK ka dor\u00ebzuar dy raporte t\u00eb ndryshme n\u00eb Komision. N\u00eb t\u00eb parin ka konstatuar se gjyqtarja Garxenaj duhej t\u00eb vazhdonte detyr\u00ebn, nd\u00ebrsa n\u00eb t\u00eb dytin ka vler\u00ebsuar se \u00ebsht\u00eb e pap\u00ebrshtatshme. Sipas DSIK, Garxenaj gjat\u00eb kryerjes s\u00eb stazhit kishte kryer veprime t\u00eb kund\u00ebrligjshme n\u00eb shqyrtimin e dy \u00e7\u00ebshtjeve.<\/p>\n<p>Bekteshi tha se dy \u00e7\u00ebshtjet n\u00eb fjal\u00eb jan\u00eb t\u00eb viteve 2017 dhe 2018. Ajo shtoi se subjekti e ka quajtur t\u00eb pabazuar dhe t\u00eb pasakt\u00eb informacionin e DSIK, pasi gjat\u00eb k\u00ebtyre viteve ajo nuk ka qen\u00eb n\u00eb periudh\u00ebn e stazhit dhe se n\u00eb vitin 2018 nuk shqyrtonte \u00e7\u00ebshtje penale.<\/p>\n<p>Garxenaj deklaroi se nuk ishte dakord me raportin e DSIK. \u201cNuk p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebson personin tim,\u201d tha ajo.<\/p>\n<p>Gjyqtarja Garxenaj ka marr\u00eb vler\u00ebsim pozitiv nga K\u00ebshilli i Lart\u00eb Gjyq\u00ebsor, KLGj lidhur me gjykimin e \u00e7\u00ebshtjeve, arsyetimin e vendimeve dhe etik\u00ebn.<\/p>\n<p>P\u00ebr nj\u00eb konstatim t\u00eb KPK se, gjat\u00eb periudh\u00ebs s\u00eb stazhit seancat ishin zhvilluar pa regjistrim audio, subjekti ka shpjeguar se kjo kishte ndodhur pasi nuk kishte mjaftuesh\u00ebm salla gjyq\u00ebsore dhe se nuk ishin p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb n\u00eb kalendarin e seancave q\u00eb do t\u00eb zhvilloheshin n\u00eb sallat ku mund\u00ebsohej regjistrimi audio.<\/p>\n<p>Ndaj subjektit jan\u00eb depozituar gjithsej 4 denoncime nga publiku. Bekteshi tha se dy nga \u00e7\u00ebshtjet e verifikuara ka rezultuar se jan\u00eb l\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb fuqi nga Apeli, nj\u00ebra \u00ebsht\u00eb ende n\u00eb proces dhe nj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr kishte t\u00eb b\u00ebnte me themelin.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb fund t\u00eb seanc\u00ebs, Garxenaj u pyet nga an\u00ebtarja e trupit gjykues, Pamela Qirko se p\u00ebrse kishte qen\u00eb kund\u00ebr kryerjes s\u00eb procedur\u00ebs s\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit.<\/p>\n<p>Garxenaj argumentoi se t\u00eb gjith\u00eb kandidat\u00ebt p\u00ebr magjistrat\u00eb t\u00eb brezit t\u00eb Shkoll\u00ebs s\u00eb Magjistratur\u00ebs ku ajo kishte b\u00ebr\u00eb pjes\u00eb, kishin vler\u00ebsuar se nuk ishin subjekte rivler\u00ebsimi. Ajo deklaroi se nuk mund t\u00eb ishin subjekte t\u00eb dy ligjeve t\u00eb ndryshme, t\u00eb atij p\u00ebr procesin e rivler\u00ebsimit dhe t\u00eb ligjit \u201cP\u00ebr statusin e gjyqtar\u00ebve dhe prokuror\u00ebve n\u00eb Republik\u00ebn e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Pyetjet se p\u00ebrse kishte dor\u00ebzuar deklarat\u00ebn \u201cveting\u201d kur nuk \u00e7monte se ishte subjekt rivler\u00ebsimi, Garxenaj ju p\u00ebrgjigj se ajo dhe koleg\u00ebt e saj kishin menduar ta linin n\u00eb dor\u00eb t\u00eb institucioneve m\u00eb t\u00eb larta p\u00ebr ta vler\u00ebsuar.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim t\u00eb fjal\u00ebs s\u00eb saj, Garxenaj theksoi se provat q\u00eb kishte dor\u00ebzuar kishin provueshm\u00ebri maksimale dhe k\u00ebrkoi konfirmimin n\u00eb detyr\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>KPK do t\u00eb shpall\u00eb vendimin m\u00eb dat\u00eb 22 prill, ora 09:30.<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Besjana Garxenaj kishte k\u00ebrkuar t\u00eb p\u00ebrjashtohej nga procesi i rivler\u00ebsimit dhe pas rr\u00ebzimit t\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs, u ballafaqua n\u00eb seanc\u00eb me munges\u00eb burimesh dhe nj\u00eb raport negativ t\u00eb DSIK- t\u00eb cilat ajo i kund\u00ebrshtoi si t\u00eb pasakta.<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":637,"featured_media":73618,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[415,117,2,362],"tags":[180,103,118],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/Besjana-Garxenaj-KPK-.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"Gjyqtarja e Durr\u00ebsit, Besjana Garxenaj pas seanc\u00ebs s\u00eb KPK. ","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73617"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/637"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73617"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73617\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":73619,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73617\/revisions\/73619"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/73618"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73617"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73617"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73617"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}