{"id":73683,"date":"2021-04-12T12:49:57","date_gmt":"2021-04-12T10:49:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/kpa-prish-vendimin-e-komisionit-ish-inspektori-i-kld-piro-samara-ishte-subjekt-rivleresimi\/2021\/04\/12\/"},"modified":"2023-04-06T21:52:53","modified_gmt":"2023-04-06T19:52:53","slug":"kpa-prish-vendimin-e-komisionit-ish-inspektori-i-kld-piro-samara-ishte-subjekt-rivleresimi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/kpa-prish-vendimin-e-komisionit-ish-inspektori-i-kld-piro-samara-ishte-subjekt-rivleresimi\/2021\/04\/12\/","title":{"rendered":"KPA prish vendimin e Komisionit, ish-inspektori i KLD, Piro Samara ishte subjekt rivler\u00ebsimi"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit e vler\u00ebsoi t\u00eb gabuar konkluzionin e Komisionit se, ish-inspektori i KLD-s\u00eb Piro Samara nuk mund t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsohej pasi\u00a0 nuk g\u00ebzonte statusin e magjistratit, nd\u00ebrsa \u00e7moi se ai ishte subjekt i rivler\u00ebsimit ex officio.\u00a0<!--more--><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_76015\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-76015\" style=\"width: 549px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-large wp-image-76015\" src=\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/Kpa-live-stream-549x400.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"549\" height=\"400\" data-id=\"76015\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-76015\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Trupa e KPA gjat\u00eb vendimit p\u00ebr ish-inspektorin Pirro Samara. Screenshot nga trasmetimi i KPA n\u00eb Youtube.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit, KPA vendosi m\u00eb 13 janar 2021 t\u00eb ndryshoj\u00eb vendimin e Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit, KPK p\u00ebr mosnisjen e procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit ndaj inspektorit pran\u00eb ish-K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Lart\u00eb t\u00eb Drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb, KLD, Piro Samara.<\/p>\n<p>KPA arsyetoi se edhe pse nuk kishte pasur status, Samara duhej t\u2019i n\u00ebnshtrohej procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit ex officio.<\/p>\n<p>Komisioni e mb\u00ebshteti konkluzionin n\u00eb vendimin e K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Lart\u00eb Gjyq\u00ebsor, KLGj t\u00eb dat\u00ebs 22 tetor 2019 q\u00eb kishte deklaruar mospatjen e statusit t\u00eb magjistratit nga Piro Samara. Sipas KPK, p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb munges\u00ebs s\u00eb statusit t\u00eb magjistratit, Smara nuk mund t\u00eb jet\u00eb subjekt i procesit t\u00eb vetingut p\u00ebr gjyqtar\u00ebt dhe prokuror\u00ebt dhe p\u00ebr pasoj\u00eb objekti i procedur\u00ebs s\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit ishte b\u00ebr\u00eb i pamundur.<\/p>\n<p>Vendimi i Komisionit u ankua nga Komisioneri Publik, Darjel Sina duke pretenduar se n\u00eb momentin e hyrjes n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb legjislacionit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit, Samara ishte subjekt rivler\u00ebsimi ex officio p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb ushtrimit t\u00eb funksionit t\u00eb inspektorit n\u00eb ish-KLD.<\/p>\n<p>Sipas Sin\u00ebs, Komisioni nuk kishte identifikuar dhe vler\u00ebsuar drejt faktet dhe rrethanat ligjore mbi t\u00eb cilat ka pushuar procesin e rivler\u00ebsimit. Komisioneri shton se n\u00ebse do t\u00eb kishte dor\u00ebheqje nga detyra t\u00eb Samar\u00ebs, at\u00ebher\u00eb do t\u00eb duhej t\u00eb caktohej edhe sanksioni q\u00eb ndalon em\u00ebrimin e subjektit n\u00eb institucionet e drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb gjat\u00eb 15-viteve t\u00eb ardhshme.<\/p>\n<p>Kolegji v\u00ebren se, bazuar n\u00eb ligjin e vitit 2016 \u201cP\u00ebr rivler\u00ebsimin kalimtar t\u00eb gjyqtar\u00ebve dhe prokuror\u00ebve n\u00eb Republik\u00ebn e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb\u201d, procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit ex officio i n\u00ebnshtrohen t\u00eb gjith\u00eb gjyqtar\u00ebt, duke p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb gjyqtar\u00ebt e Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese dhe t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb, t\u00eb gjith\u00eb prokuror\u00ebt, duke p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb Prokurorin e P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm, kryeinspektorin dhe inspektor\u00ebt e tjer\u00eb pran\u00eb K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Lart\u00eb t\u00eb Drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cN\u00eb k\u00ebto kushte, Kolegji vler\u00ebson se subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit e ka fituar k\u00ebt\u00eb status ligjor q\u00eb n\u00eb momentin e hyrjes n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb ndryshimeve Kushtetuese e, p\u00ebr pasoj\u00eb, do t\u00eb duhej t\u2019i n\u00ebnshtrohej ex officio procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit kalimtar\u201d, shprehet trupi gjykues i KPA i kryesuar nga rezarta Schuetz, me relatore Ina Ram\u00ebn dhe an\u00ebtar\u00eb Albana shtyll\u00ebn, Natasha Mulajn e Ardian Hajdarin.<\/p>\n<p>Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, Kolegji konstaton se Piro Samara ka qen\u00eb i em\u00ebruar n\u00eb pozicionin e inspektorit t\u00eb ish-KLD-s\u00eb nga kategoria e inspektor\u00ebve jomagjistrat\u00eb. \u00a0Bazuar n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb ve\u00e7ori, Komisioni ka arsyetuar se ai nuk ishte subjekt i rivler\u00ebsimit dhe se procesi i rivler\u00ebsimit p\u00ebr t\u00eb nuk duhet t\u00eb nis\u00eb ose duhet t\u00eb pushohet. Kolegji e konsideron k\u00ebt\u00eb konkluzion t\u00eb Komisionit n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me ligjin.<\/p>\n<p>Kolegji e analizoi vendimin e KLGj-s\u00eb n\u00eb raport me parashikimet e parashikuara n\u00eb nenin 179\/b t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, q\u00eb i japin statusin e subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit, inspektorit t\u00eb KLD-s\u00eb q\u00eb gjendet n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb detyr\u00eb n\u00eb momentin e hyrjes n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb ndryshimeve kushtetuese.<\/p>\n<p>Sipas vler\u00ebsimit t\u00eb trupit gjykues, pavar\u00ebsisht se subjekti nuk g\u00ebzonte statusin e magjistratit sipas vendimmarrjes s\u00eb KLGj-s\u00eb, ai vazhdonte t\u00eb ruante statusin e subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit dhe Komisioni duhej t\u00eb kishte verifikuar vullnetin e Samar\u00ebs n\u00ebse do t\u00eb q\u00ebndronte ose jo n\u00eb detyr\u00ebn e inspektorit t\u00eb KLGj-s\u00eb n\u00eb periudh\u00ebn transitore, deri n\u00eb krijimin e Inspektorit t\u00eb Lart\u00eb t\u00eb Drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb ku ai mund t\u00eb transferohej.<\/p>\n<p>Kolegji konstaton se Komisioni ka p\u00ebrdorur si argument n\u00eb vendimmarrjen e tij edhe mbushjen e mosh\u00ebs s\u00eb pensionit. Gjat\u00eb shqyrtimit t\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjes n\u00eb KPA \u00ebsht\u00eb administruar si prov\u00eb nga KLGj, k\u00ebrkesa p\u00ebr dor\u00ebheqje t\u00eb parevokueshme nga detyra e Samar\u00ebs, p\u00ebr arsye sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsore.<\/p>\n<p>Kolegji evidenton se, p\u00ebr t\u00eb zgjidhur \u00e7\u00ebshtjen, Komisioni duhej t\u00eb kishte konsideruar faktin se Samara n\u00eb momentin e hyrjes n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb ndryshimeve kushtetuese, n\u00eb korrik 2016, ka ushtruar funksionin e inspektorit pran\u00eb KLGj-s\u00eb, duke u klasifikuar si subjekt rivler\u00ebsimi ex officio.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim, KPA vler\u00ebson se Komisioni duhej t\u00eb kishte vendosur t\u00eb nd\u00ebrpriste procesin e rivler\u00ebsimit t\u00eb Samar\u00ebs p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb dor\u00ebheqjes s\u00eb tij dhe t\u00eb aplikonte nenin G, t\u00eb pik\u00ebs 2 t\u00eb\u00a0 Aneksit t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, e cila parashikon ndalimin e em\u00ebrimit t\u00eb subjektit n\u00eb institucionet e drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb gjat\u00eb 15 viteve t\u00eb ardhshme.<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit e vler\u00ebsoi t\u00eb gabuar konkluzionin e Komisionit se, ish-inspektori i KLD-s\u00eb Piro Samara nuk mund t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsohej pasi\u00a0 nuk g\u00ebzonte statusin e magjistratit, nd\u00ebrsa \u00e7moi se ai ishte subjekt i rivler\u00ebsimit ex officio.\u00a0<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":637,"featured_media":73684,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[13,114,362],"tags":[405,497,112,606],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/Kpa-live-stream.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"Trupa e KPA gjat\u00eb vendimit p\u00ebr ish-inspektorin Pirro Samara. Screenshot nga trasmetimi i KPA n\u00eb Youtube. ","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73683"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/637"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73683"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73683\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":73685,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73683\/revisions\/73685"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/73684"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73683"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73683"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73683"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}