{"id":73803,"date":"2021-03-18T11:56:52","date_gmt":"2021-03-18T10:56:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/kpa-pretendimet-e-gjyqtarit-te-el-classico-ndaj-kpk-se-te-paverteta-dhe-te-papabazuara\/2021\/03\/18\/"},"modified":"2023-04-06T22:00:31","modified_gmt":"2023-04-06T20:00:31","slug":"kpa-pretendimet-e-gjyqtarit-te-el-classico-ndaj-kpk-se-te-paverteta-dhe-te-papabazuara","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/kpa-pretendimet-e-gjyqtarit-te-el-classico-ndaj-kpk-se-te-paverteta-dhe-te-papabazuara\/2021\/03\/18\/","title":{"rendered":"KPA: Pretendimet e gjyqtarit t\u00eb \u2018El Classico\u2019 ndaj KPK-s\u00eb, t\u00eb pav\u00ebrteta dhe t\u00eb papabazuara"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit v\u00ebren se sjellja e ish-gjyqtarit t\u00eb Apelit Durr\u00ebs, Petraq Dhimitri duket se demonstron nj\u00eb p\u00ebrpjekje t\u00eb tij\u00ebn p\u00ebr t\u2019iu shmangur p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsive n\u00eb raport me procesin e vetingut, duke v\u00ebshtir\u00ebsuar komunikimin e Komisionit me t\u00eb, n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me detyrimin ligjor p\u00ebr bashk\u00ebpunim.<!--more--><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_52571\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-52571\" style=\"width: 600px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/20180910_125649_100918008-3_5ip2h61.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-large wp-image-52571\" src=\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/20180910_125649_100918008-3_5ip2h61-600x355.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"355\" data-id=\"52571\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-52571\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit | Foto : LSA<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit, KPA i rr\u00ebzoi m\u00eb 23 n\u00ebntor 2020 si t\u00eb pav\u00ebrteta dhe t\u00eb pabazuara pretendimet e Ish-gjyqtarit t\u00eb Apelit Durr\u00ebs, Petraq Dhimitri, ndaj vendimit t\u00eb Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit, KPK q\u00eb nd\u00ebpreu procesin e rivler\u00ebsimit ndaj tij p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb dor\u00ebheqjes dhe i hoqi t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr t&#8217;u rikthyer n\u00eb sistemin e drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb gjat\u00eb 15 viteve t\u00eb ardhshme.<\/p>\n<p>Ish-gjyqtari Petraq Dhimitri dhe dy koleg\u00ebt e tij\u00a0Kliton Spahiu e Petrit \u00c7eno u shpall\u00ebn fajtor\u00eb nga ish-Gjykata e Krimeve t\u00eb R\u00ebnda n\u00eb tetor t\u00eb vitit 2019 dhe u d\u00ebnuan me nga 2 vjet burg secili p\u00ebr vepr\u00ebn penale t\u00eb korrupsionit. Fajtor u shpall edhe biznesmeni Namik Sadiku, q\u00eb u akuzua se u ka paguar atyre udh\u00ebtimin dhe q\u00ebndrimin n\u00eb Madrid p\u00ebr t\u00eb par\u00eb nj\u00eb ndeshje futbolli midis Real Madrid dhe Barcelon\u00ebs, i njohur si derbi &#8220;El Classico&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Por, ndryshe nga Shkalla e Par\u00eb q\u00eb i d\u00ebnoi tre gjyqtar\u00ebt me nga 2 vjet burg secilin dhe biznesmenin Sadiku me nj\u00eb vit heqje lirie, Gjykata e Posa\u00e7me e Apelit, me shumic\u00eb votash, vendosi pezullimin e ekzekutimit t\u00eb vendimit me burg p\u00ebr t\u00eb kat\u00ebr t\u00eb pandehurit duke i vendosur n\u00eb afat prove, me kusht q\u00eb t\u00eb mos kryejn\u00eb vep\u00ebr tjet\u00ebr penale.<\/p>\n<p>Dhimitri u shortua si subjekt rivler\u00ebsimi nga KPK n\u00eb n\u00ebntor t\u00eb 2019-\u00ebs, nd\u00ebrsa m\u00eb 23 janar 2020 K\u00ebshilli i Lart\u00eb Gjyq\u00ebsor vendosi t\u00eb deklaroj\u00eb mbarimin e statusit t\u00eb magjistratit p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb subjekt rivler\u00ebsimi, p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb dor\u00ebheqjes s\u00eb tij.<\/p>\n<p>Komisioni, ka njoftuar m\u00eb 30 qershor 2020 subjektin e rivler\u00ebsimit se g\u00ebzon t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr t&#8217;u d\u00ebgjuar n\u00eb seanc\u00eb d\u00ebgjimore publike. Po at\u00eb dit\u00eb Dhimitri i \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigjur Komisionit duke v\u00ebrejtur se\u00a0nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb v\u00ebn\u00eb asnj\u00ebher\u00eb n\u00eb dijeni p\u00ebr p\u00ebrb\u00ebrjen e trupit gjykues t\u00eb Komisionit, i cili ka filluar procedur\u00ebn e tij t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb ai ka shprehur vullnetin p\u00ebr t\u00eb mos ushtruar t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr t&#8217;u d\u00ebgjuar n\u00eb seanc\u00eb d\u00ebgjimore.<\/p>\n<p>M\u00eb 6 korrik 2020, KPK vendosi t\u00eb deklaroj\u00eb nd\u00ebrprerjen e vetingut p\u00ebr Dhimitrin dhe humbjen e t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb tij p\u00ebr\u00a0t\u2019u em\u00ebruar gjyqtar ose prokuror i \u00e7do niveli, an\u00ebtar i K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Lart\u00eb Gjyq\u00ebsor ose i K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Lart\u00eb t\u00eb Prokuroris\u00eb, Inspektor i Lart\u00eb i Drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb ose Prokuror i P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm, p\u00ebr nj\u00eb periudh\u00eb 15-vje\u00e7are.<\/p>\n<p>Nj\u00eb muaj m\u00eb von\u00eb, Dhimitri ka ushtruar ankim duke pretenduar se i \u00ebsht\u00eb cenuar e drejta p\u00ebr nj\u00eb proces t\u00eb rregullt ligjor, pasi\u00a0Komisioni ka d\u00ebshtuar n\u00eb lidhje me njoftimin e tij p\u00ebr fillimin e procedur\u00ebs s\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit dhe veprimet e nd\u00ebrmarra p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb q\u00ebllim.<\/p>\n<p>Ai ka pretenduar n\u00eb ankim se KPK, n\u00eb shkelje t\u00eb Kodit t\u00eb Procedur\u00ebs Administrative,\u00a0nuk i ka dh\u00ebn\u00eb mund\u00ebsin\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u2019u shprehur n\u00eb lidhje me aspekte ligjore t\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjes s\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit. Sipas Dhimitrit, kjo lidhej kryesisht me pezullimin e k\u00ebsaj procedure deri n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin e \u00e7\u00ebshtjes penale n\u00eb gjykim t\u00eb nisur ndaj tij, duke argumentuar se rezultati i atij procesi kusht\u00ebzonte qartazi rezultatin e rivler\u00ebsimit ex-officio nga ana e Komisionit.<\/p>\n<p>Lidhur me themelin e \u00e7\u00ebshtjes, subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit ka pretenduar se nga ana e Komisionit \u00ebsht\u00eb zbatuar n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb ngurt\u00eb parashikimi kushtetues i pik\u00ebs 2 t\u00eb nenit G t\u00eb Aneksit t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, q\u00eb ka t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb me ndalimin e magjistrat\u00ebve t\u00eb dor\u00ebhequr p\u00ebr t&#8217;u rikthyer n\u00eb sistemin e drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb p\u00ebr nj\u00eb periudh\u00eb 15-vje\u00e7are.<\/p>\n<p>P\u00ebr shkakun e ankimit p\u00ebr cenim t\u00eb s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr nj\u00eb proces t\u00eb rregullt ligjor, Kolegji v\u00ebren\u00a0se Komisioni ka komunikuar me subjektin e rivler\u00ebsimit<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Me e-mail-in e dat\u00ebs 25.06.2020, d\u00ebrguar nga nj\u00eb prej adresave elektronike t\u00eb Komisionit, {***}, n\u00eb adres\u00ebn elektronike t\u00eb subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit Petraq Dhimitri, {***}, \u00ebsht\u00eb informuar subjekti (i) p\u00ebr shortin e hedhur m\u00eb 12.11.2019 dhe fillimin e procedur\u00ebs s\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit t\u00eb tij; (ii) p\u00ebr ndryshimin e relatorit t\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjes dhe p\u00ebr vendimin nr. 36 t\u00eb KLGj-s\u00eb p\u00ebr mbarimin e statusit t\u00eb tij t\u00eb magjistratit&#8221;, konstaton Kolegji dhe shton se Dhimitri \u00ebsht\u00eb njoftuar edhe p\u00ebr t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr tu d\u00ebgjuar\u00a0 dhe se n\u00ebse nuk e ushtron k\u00ebt\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00eb, procesi i tij i rivler\u00ebsimit do t\u00eb nd\u00ebrpritet pa zhvilluar seanc\u00eb d\u00ebgjimore.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb vendim thuhet se bashk\u00eblidhur\u00a0k\u00ebtij e-mail-i gjendet e administruar edhe p\u00ebrgjigjja automatike e marr\u00eb nga sistemi, se njoftimi te prit\u00ebsi i k\u00ebtij e-mail-i \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrmbushur, por se nuk ka njoftim marrjeje nga serveri i adres\u00ebs. Disa dit\u00eb m\u00eb von\u00eb, nga adresa elektronike e Komisionit, Dhimitrit i \u00ebsht\u00eb d\u00ebrguar nj\u00eb e-mail tjet\u00ebr me t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin tekst si ai i m\u00ebparshmi.<\/p>\n<p>Trupi gjykues i KPA i kryesuar nga Natasha Mulaj, me relatore Ina Ram\u00ebn dhe an\u00ebtar\u00eb Albana Shtyll\u00ebn, Sokol \u00c7omon dhe Rezarta Schuetz, v\u00ebren se nga praktika e p\u00ebrcjell\u00eb Komisionit prej ILDKPKI-s\u00eb, rezulton ndryshe nga sa pretendon Dhimitri, pasi si adres\u00eb elektronike p\u00ebr efekt komunikimi lidhur me procesin kalimtar t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit, ai ka deklaruar adres\u00ebn e-mail-it ku Komisioni ka d\u00ebrguar informacionin.<\/p>\n<p>Sipas KPA,\u00a0mosaksesimi prej subjektit n\u00eb adres\u00ebn elektronike t\u00eb deklaruar n\u00eb deklarat\u00ebn veting, nuk ngarkon me p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsi Komisionin p\u00ebr mosnjoftimin e tij dhe as p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebson veprimtari t\u00eb Komisionit n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me nenin 46 t\u00eb ligjit nr. 84\/2016, ku parashikohen m\u00ebnyrat e njoftimit t\u00eb subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;[\u2026] n\u00eb lidhje me pretendimin e subjektit se Komisioni ka &#8216;d\u00ebshtuar&#8217; t\u00eb p\u00ebrmbush\u00eb kriteret e nenit 46 t\u00eb ligjit nr. 84\/2016, Kolegji konstaton se ky pretendim \u00ebsht\u00eb i pav\u00ebrtet\u00eb&#8221;, vler\u00ebson Kolegji.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;N\u00eb nj\u00eb vler\u00ebsim t\u00ebr\u00ebsor t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj situate faktike, e gjith\u00eb kjo sjellje e subjektit dhe pretendimet e tij p\u00ebr nj\u00eb munges\u00eb komunikimi t\u00eb Komisionit me t\u00eb, p\u00ebrgjat\u00eb procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit jo vet\u00ebm q\u00eb nuk kan\u00eb prodhuar shkeljen e ndonj\u00eb t\u00eb drejte t\u00eb subjektit, por duket se demonstrojn\u00eb nj\u00eb p\u00ebrpjekje t\u00eb subjektit p\u00ebr t\u2019iu shmangur p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsive t\u00eb tij n\u00eb raport me procesin duke v\u00ebshtir\u00ebsuar komunikimin e Komisionit me t\u00eb n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me detyrimin e tij ligjor p\u00ebr bashk\u00ebpunim[&#8230;]&#8221;, vijon trupi gjykues.<\/p>\n<p>Lidhur me elementin tjet\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebtij shkaku ankimi se, mosnjoftimi p\u00ebr fillimin e procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit, p\u00ebr p\u00ebrb\u00ebrjen e trupit gjykues dhe p\u00ebr aktet e administruara, Kolegji sjell n\u00eb v\u00ebmendje se vetingu p\u00ebr Dhimitrin \u00ebsht\u00eb nd\u00ebrprer\u00eb p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb dor\u00ebheqjes s\u00eb tij.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;[&#8230;]\u00ebsht\u00eb evidente se vendimmarrja e Komisionit nuk ka ardhur si pasoj\u00eb e procedurave rivler\u00ebsuese t\u00eb Komisionit n\u00eb drejtim t\u00eb kontrollit t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb, figur\u00ebs dhe aft\u00ebsive profesionale t\u00eb subjektit, procedur\u00eb e cila natyrsh\u00ebm do t\u00eb k\u00ebrkonte p\u00ebrfshirjen e subjektit[..]&#8221;, citohet n\u00eb vendim.<\/p>\n<p>Kolegji v\u00ebren se, edhe n\u00ebse do t\u00eb pranohej q\u00eb Komisioni ka d\u00ebshtuar n\u00eb njoftimin e subjektit p\u00ebr fillimin e procedur\u00ebs s\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit, mbi p\u00ebrb\u00ebrjen e trup\u00ebs gjykuese dhe t\u00eb akteve t\u00eb mbledhura p\u00ebrgjat\u00eb hetimit, nuk rezulton t\u00eb jet\u00eb cenuar asnj\u00eb e drejt\u00eb e subjektit, p\u00ebr sa koh\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat e mbledhura nga Komisioni p\u00ebrgjat\u00eb hetimit administrativ nuk kan\u00eb sh\u00ebrbyer p\u00ebr asnj\u00eb moment p\u00ebr vendimmarrjen p\u00ebr procesin e tij t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit.<\/p>\n<p>KPA v\u00ebren se, pasi Komisoni ka konstatuar se prej subjektit nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb aksesuar adresa elektronike e deklaruar prej tij n\u00eb deklarat\u00ebn veting, e ka informuar at\u00eb n\u00eb adres\u00ebn tjet\u00ebr elektronike t\u00eb konfirmuar me an\u00eb t\u00eb komunikimit telefonik prej vet\u00eb Dhimitrit.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb vendim sqarohet se nga ky komunikim me Komisionin, kuptohet se p\u00ebrpara marrjes s\u00eb vendimit, subjekti \u00ebsht\u00eb informuar n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrmbledhur p\u00ebr t\u00eb gjitha fazat e procedur\u00ebs administrative t\u00eb ndjekur p\u00ebr procesin e tij t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit.\u00a0Gjithashtu, i \u00ebsht\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb e ditur e drejta e tij p\u00ebr t\u2019u d\u00ebgjuar n\u00eb seanc\u00eb d\u00ebgjimore publike dhe madje edhe vendimmarrja e pritshme p\u00ebr t\u2019u marr\u00eb n\u00eb rrethanat faktike n\u00eb t\u00eb cilat gjendej procedimi.<\/p>\n<p>Lidhur me pretendimin e Dhimitrit se Komisioni ka zbatuar n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb ngurt\u00eb parashikimin kushtetues p\u00ebr ndalimin e rikthimit t\u00eb tij n\u00eb sistemin e drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb p\u00ebr nj\u00eb afat 15-vje\u00e7ar dhe se KPA ka detyrimin p\u00ebr interpretimin shterues t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj dispozite, Kolegji arrin n\u00eb konkluzionin se\u00a0ky shkak ankimi nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb i bazuar ligj\u00ebrisht.<\/p>\n<p>[&#8230;]as Komisioni dhe as Kolegji nuk kan\u00eb nj\u00eb kompetenc\u00eb diskrecionale p\u00ebr t\u00eb vler\u00ebsuar ose jo aplikimin e ndalimit q\u00eb parashikon neni G, pika 2 e Aneksit t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, p\u00ebrve\u00e7 se t\u00eb deklarojn\u00eb ndalimin e parashikuar n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb dispozit\u00eb[&#8230;]&#8221;, argumenton trupi gjykues.<\/p>\n<p>Kolegji ka rr\u00ebzuar si t\u00eb pabazuara edhe shkaqet e tjera t\u00eb ngritura n\u00eb ankim nga ish-gjyqtari Dhimitri, i cili ka pretenduar se koha n\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebn ai ka dh\u00ebn\u00eb dor\u00ebheqjen nga detyra ka p\u00ebrkuar me nj\u00eb faz\u00eb t\u00eb procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit n\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebn nuk ishin nd\u00ebrmarr\u00eb hapa procedural e p\u00ebr pasoj\u00eb ajo nuk duhet t\u00eb ndikonte n\u00eb vendimmarrje; se duhej t\u00eb konsideroheshin motivet personale q\u00eb e kan\u00eb shtyr\u00eb drejt dor\u00ebheqjes dhe se n\u00eb momentin e fillimit t\u00eb procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit nga Komisioni, ai nuk ka qen\u00eb gjyqtar efektiv pasi \u00ebsht\u00eb pezulluar nga detyra p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb procesit penal t\u00eb regjistruar nga ish-Prokuroria e Krimeve t\u00eb R\u00ebnda.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim KPA konkludon se\u00a0Komisioni me t\u00eb drejt\u00eb ka vendosur t\u00eb nd\u00ebrpres\u00eb procesin e rivler\u00ebsimit p\u00ebr subjektin e rivler\u00ebsimit Petraq Dhimitri, p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb mbarimit t\u00eb statusit t\u00eb magjistratit si pasoj\u00eb e dor\u00ebheqjes s\u00eb tij. Gjithashtu, i drejt\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb vler\u00ebsuar edhe sanksioni i vendosur ndaj Dhimitrit q\u00eb i ndalon atij rikthimin n\u00eb sistemin e drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb gjat\u00eb 15 viteve t\u00eb ardhshme.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit v\u00ebren se sjellja e ish-gjyqtarit t\u00eb Apelit Durr\u00ebs, Petraq Dhimitri duket se demonstron nj\u00eb p\u00ebrpjekje t\u00eb tij\u00ebn p\u00ebr t\u2019iu shmangur p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsive n\u00eb raport me procesin e vetingut, duke v\u00ebshtir\u00ebsuar komunikimin e Komisionit me t\u00eb, n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me detyrimin ligjor p\u00ebr bashk\u00ebpunim.<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":637,"featured_media":73804,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[13,114,362],"tags":[116,107,112,622],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/20180910_125649_100918008-3_5ip2h61.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit | Foto : LSA","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73803"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/637"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73803"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73803\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":73805,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73803\/revisions\/73805"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/73804"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73803"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73803"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73803"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}