{"id":74452,"date":"2020-10-19T15:13:47","date_gmt":"2020-10-19T13:13:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/vendimi-per-ana-golloshin-kpa-hetimi-i-pasurise-nuk-kufizohet-te-abuzimi-me-detyren\/2020\/10\/19\/"},"modified":"2023-04-07T03:09:22","modified_gmt":"2023-04-07T01:09:22","slug":"vendimi-per-ana-golloshin-kpa-hetimi-i-pasurise-nuk-kufizohet-te-abuzimi-me-detyren","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/vendimi-per-ana-golloshin-kpa-hetimi-i-pasurise-nuk-kufizohet-te-abuzimi-me-detyren\/2020\/10\/19\/","title":{"rendered":"Vendimi p\u00ebr Ana Golloshin, KPA: Hetimi i pasuris\u00eb nuk kufizohet te abuzimi me detyr\u00ebn"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit arsyetoi kund\u00ebr pretendimeve t\u00eb ish-k\u00ebshilltares ligjore, Ana Golloshi, se hetimi duhej t\u00eb kryhej p\u00ebr koh\u00ebn q\u00eb ajo ishte n\u00eb detyr\u00eb dhe u shpreh se pamjaftueshm\u00ebria e pasuris\u00eb nuk fokusohej posa\u00e7\u00ebrisht te korrupsioni apo abuzimi me detyr\u00ebn.<!--more--><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_56194\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-56194\" style=\"width: 534px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/Ana-Golloshi-KPK.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-image-56194 size-large\" src=\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/Ana-Golloshi-KPK-534x400.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"534\" height=\"400\" data-id=\"56194\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-56194\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">K\u00ebshilltarja ligjore Ana Golloshi gjat\u00eb seanc\u00ebs d\u00ebgjimore n\u00eb Komisionin e Pavarur t\u00eb kualifikimit, KPK, n\u00eb 12.02.2019 | Foto : LSA<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit rr\u00ebzoi pretendimin e ish-k\u00ebshilltares ligjore pran\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative t\u00eb Apelit, Ana Golloshi se hetimi dhe rivler\u00ebsimi nuk duhej t\u00eb kishin shkuar p\u00ebrtej koh\u00ebs q\u00eb subjekti kishte punuar n\u00eb sistem apo se q\u00ebllimi i rivler\u00ebsimit ishte t\u00eb vler\u00ebsonte korrupsionin n\u00eb krye t\u00eb detyr\u00ebs.<\/p>\n<p>KPA shprehet n\u00eb vendimin e arsyetuar se hetimi i pasuris\u00eb \u201cnuk lidhet n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb me ushtrimin e detyr\u00ebs s\u00eb subjektit\u201d dhe se dispozitat ligjore nuk kufizoheshin te korrupsioni apo abuzimi me detyr\u00ebn.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cKolegji v\u00ebren se dispozitat kushtetuese dhe ligjore t\u00eb posa\u00e7me, q\u00eb rregullojn\u00eb procesin e rivler\u00ebsimit p\u00ebr kriterin e pasuris\u00eb, n\u00eb asnj\u00eb rast nuk e lidhin pamjaftueshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e deklarimit me elementet subjektive t\u00eb dashjes apo q\u00ebllimit n\u00eb kuptimin penal t\u00eb k\u00ebtyre instituteve (korrupsionit dhe abuzimit me detyr\u00ebn)\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb vendim.<\/p>\n<p>Ana Kolloshi u shkarkua nga Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit m\u00eb 13 shkurt 2019 pasi u gjet me probleme n\u00eb kriterin e pasuris\u00eb. Sipas KPK, nga analiza financiare rezultoi se Golloshi dhe t\u00eb af\u00ebrmit e saj dispononin m\u00eb shum\u00eb pasuri nga sa mund t\u00eb dokumentonin.<\/p>\n<p>Golloshi ankimoi k\u00ebt\u00eb vendim n\u00eb Kolegj, por trupi gjykues i Kolegjit t\u00eb Posa\u00e7\u00ebm t\u00eb Apelimit, q\u00eb shqyrtoi ankimin e saj i p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00eb nga Sokol \u00c7omo kryesues, Luan Daci relator dhe Albana Shtylla, Ina Rama e Natasha Mulaj an\u00ebtar\u00eb, vendosi n\u00eb korrik 2020 t\u00eb l\u00ebr\u00eb n\u00eb fuqi vendimin e KPK.<\/p>\n<p>Kolegji, si\u00e7 del nga vendimi i zbardhur, ka rr\u00ebzuar t\u00eb gjitha pretendimet e Golloshit mbi shkelje proceduriale t\u00eb Komisionit dhe po ashtu edhe pretendimet e saj p\u00ebr keqllogaritje t\u00eb burimeve financiare.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb vendimin e zbardhur, KPA v\u00eb n\u00eb dukje se disa nga burimet financiare t\u00eb pretenduara prej subjektit, si pensionet e vjehrrit dhe vjehrr\u00ebs apo p\u00ebrfitimi i asistenc\u00ebs s\u00eb papun\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb Greqi, nuk ndryshonin rezultatin p\u00ebrfundimtar.<\/p>\n<p>Kolegji ngjash\u00ebm si Komisioni p\u00ebrdori kund\u00ebr argumenteve t\u00eb Golloshit nj\u00eb analiz\u00eb financiare t\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb prej saj. \u201cKolegji v\u00ebren se sipas aktit t\u00eb ekspertimit t\u00eb paraqitur prej vet\u00eb subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit, znj. Ana Golloshi, rezultojn\u00eb diferenca t\u00eb m\u00ebdha mes asaj q\u00eb subjekti deklaron dhe asaj q\u00eb ajo provon si burim t\u00eb ligjsh\u00ebm t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb vendim.<\/p>\n<p>Kolegji v\u00ebren se edhe n\u00ebse merrej n\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb analiza e sjell\u00eb nga Golloshi, kjo e fundit rezultonte me nj\u00eb pasuri 174 her\u00eb m\u00eb shum\u00eb se ajo p\u00ebr t\u00eb cil\u00ebn kishte burime t\u00eb ligjshme dhe me diferenc\u00eb negative prej 13.6 milion\u00eb lek\u00ebsh.<\/p>\n<p>KPA vler\u00ebsoi se shuma prej 330 mij\u00eb eurosh e pretenduar nga emigracioni nuk provohej dhe se rezultonin \u201cdiferenca t\u00eb m\u00ebdha me t\u00eb ardhurat e provuara e dokumentuara t\u00eb ligjshme\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDuke u bazuar n\u00eb \u201cD\u00ebshmin\u00eb e sigurimeve dhe kontributeve sipas totalit t\u00eb ardhura\u201d, subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit pretendon se t\u00eb ardhurat nga emigracioni n\u00eb Greqi arrinin shum\u00ebn prej 129.439,79 eurosh, q\u00eb jan\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb larta se ato t\u00eb konsideruara nga Komisioni, por Kolegjit i rezulton q\u00eb gjithsesi jan\u00eb me diferenc\u00eb t\u00eb madhe n\u00eb raport me t\u00eb ardhurat q\u00eb ka deklaruar se ka krijuar n\u00eb emigracion (sa m\u00eb lart)\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb vendim.<\/p>\n<p>KPA po ashtu ka rrezuar pretendimin e Golloshit se nuk kishte p\u00ebrdorur sistemin bankar p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb frik\u00ebs n\u00eb sigurin\u00eb dhe q\u00ebndrueshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e tij. KPA e ka cil\u00ebsuar t\u00eb pabazuar edhe pretendimin se \u201cKomisioni, n\u00eb shqyrtimin e \u00e7\u00ebshtjes, nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb udh\u00ebhequr nga parimi i objektivitetit dhe proporcionalitetit, duke cenuar r\u00ebnd\u00eb garancit\u00eb e procesit t\u00eb rregullt ligjor\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Kolegji gjithashtu ka arsyetuar kund\u00ebr pretendimeve t\u00eb Golloshit se duke qen\u00eb k\u00ebshilltare ligjore, nuk kishte pasur t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtat detyrime si gjyqtar\u00ebt. \u201cRivler\u00ebsimi n\u00eb vetvete nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb i diferencuar me baz\u00eb funksionin e subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit, por p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb funksionit, \u00ebsht\u00eb i nj\u00ebjt\u00eb p\u00ebr \u00e7do subjekt rivler\u00ebsimi, dhe pavar\u00ebsisht funksionit t\u00eb subjekteve konkrete t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit\u201d, arsyeton KPA.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb vendim KPA u mb\u00ebshtet mbi precedentin se asnj\u00eb e ardhur p\u00ebr t\u00eb cil\u00ebn nuk dokumentohej pagimi i tatimeve nuk do t\u00eb konsiderohej e ligjshme.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNuk q\u00ebndron pretendimi i subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit, znj. Ana Golloshi, se t\u00eb ardhurat e pambuluara kan\u00eb pasur p\u00ebr burim pun\u00ebsimin e pasiguruar n\u00eb emigracion, pasi k\u00ebto t\u00eb ardhura nuk p\u00ebrmbushin kriterin e pag\u00ebs, si nj\u00eb e ardhur e ligjshme,\u201d thuhet n\u00eb vendim.<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit arsyetoi kund\u00ebr pretendimeve t\u00eb ish-k\u00ebshilltares ligjore, Ana Golloshi, se hetimi duhej t\u00eb kryhej p\u00ebr koh\u00ebn q\u00eb ajo ishte n\u00eb detyr\u00eb dhe u shpreh se pamjaftueshm\u00ebria e pasuris\u00eb nuk fokusohej posa\u00e7\u00ebrisht te korrupsioni apo abuzimi me detyr\u00ebn.<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":97,"featured_media":74453,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[13,415,114,473],"tags":[145,238,112],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/Ana-Golloshi-KPK.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"K\u00ebshilltarja ligjore Ana Golloshi gjat\u00eb seanc\u00ebs d\u00ebgjimore n\u00eb Komisionin e Pavarur t\u00eb kualifikimit, KPK, n\u00eb 12.02.2019 | Foto : LSA","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74452"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/97"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74452"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74452\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":74454,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74452\/revisions\/74454"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74453"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74452"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74452"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74452"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}