{"id":74479,"date":"2020-10-13T15:08:20","date_gmt":"2020-10-13T13:08:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/kpa-pasaktesite-e-bene-te-pamundur-kontrollin-e-pasurise-se-artan-bajramit\/2020\/10\/13\/"},"modified":"2023-04-07T03:10:58","modified_gmt":"2023-04-07T01:10:58","slug":"kpa-pasaktesite-e-bene-te-pamundur-kontrollin-e-pasurise-se-artan-bajramit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/kpa-pasaktesite-e-bene-te-pamundur-kontrollin-e-pasurise-se-artan-bajramit\/2020\/10\/13\/","title":{"rendered":"KPA: Pasakt\u00ebsit\u00eb e b\u00ebn\u00eb t\u00eb pamundur kontrollin e pasuris\u00eb s\u00eb Artan Bajramit"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit vler\u00ebson se ish-prokurori Artan Bajrami ka kryer deklarime t\u00eb pasakta dhe t\u00eb pamjaftueshme t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb, por jo deklarim t\u00eb rrem\u00eb si\u00e7 vler\u00ebsonte KPK. Kolegji arsyeton se shkalla e par\u00eb nuk ka argumentuar disa prej gjetjeve, por vendimi i shkarkimit mbeti n\u00eb fuqi.<!--more--><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_65471\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-65471\" style=\"width: 533px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/IMG_2441.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-large wp-image-65471\" src=\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/IMG_2441-533x400.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"533\" height=\"400\" data-id=\"65471\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-65471\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit | Foto : B. Likmeta<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit la n\u00eb fuqi m\u00eb 3 korrik 2020 shkarkimin nga detyra t\u00eb ish-drejtuesit t\u00eb Prokuroris\u00eb s\u00eb Apelit p\u00ebr Krime t\u00eb R\u00ebnda, Artan Bajrami, ndon\u00ebse rr\u00ebzoi disa prej arsyetimeve t\u00eb Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit.<\/p>\n<p>\u00c7\u00ebshtja e Bajramit shkoi p\u00ebrpara Kolegjit pas ankimit t\u00eb tij kund\u00ebr konkluzionit t\u00eb KPK-s\u00eb se kishte kryer deklarim t\u00eb rrem\u00eb n\u00eb lidhje me blerjen e nj\u00eb apartamenti 111 m2 n\u00eb Tiran\u00eb. Bajrami pretendoi gjithashtu se i ishte cenuar e drejta p\u00ebr t\u00eb pasur nj\u00eb proces t\u00eb rregullt ligjor si dhe e konsideroi t\u00eb pasakt\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin e Komisionit mbi nj\u00eb detyrim ndaj nj\u00eb shoq\u00ebrie nd\u00ebrtimi p\u00ebr porositjen e nj\u00eb apartamenti n\u00eb Kavaj\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>Ankimi i ish-prokurorit Artan Bajrami u shqyrtua n\u00eb Kolegj nga trupa e kryesuar nga Rezarta Schuetz, me relator Ardian Hajdarin dhe an\u00ebtar\u00eb Ina Ram\u00ebn, Luan Dacin dhe Sokol \u00c7omon.<\/p>\n<p>Pasi ka shqyrtuar \u00e7\u00ebshtjen, trupa gjykuese e Kolegjit arsyeton se me deklarimet e tij periodike si dhe me deklarat\u00ebn veting, prokurori Bajrami ka krijuar nj\u00eb situat\u00eb kaotike p\u00ebr m\u00ebnyr\u00ebn e krijimit t\u00eb apartamentit n\u00eb Tiran\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>Sipas Kolegjit, \u00ebsht\u00eb e pamundur t\u00eb identifikohet situata faktike lidhur me krijimin e k\u00ebsaj pasurie si dhe identifikimi i burimeve financiare, mbi baz\u00ebn e t\u00eb cilave do mund t\u00eb kryhej kontrolli dhe vler\u00ebsimi.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cPranimi nga ana e subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit n\u00eb shpjegimet e tij ndaj rezultateve t\u00eb hetimit, t\u00eb gjetjeve t\u00eb Komisionit lidhur me pasakt\u00ebsit\u00eb e evidentuara dhe pretendimi se deklarimi n\u00eb deklarat\u00ebn e pasuris\u00eb vetting lidhur me burimin e krijimit t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb objekt analize \u00ebsht\u00eb thjesht nj\u00eb pakujdesi, vler\u00ebsohet nga trupi gjykues si nj\u00eb pretendim i papranuesh\u00ebm,\u201d thuhet n\u00eb vendim.<\/p>\n<p>Duke vler\u00ebsuar se deklarimi i subjekteve sh\u00ebrben p\u00ebr baz\u00ebn nga duhet t\u00eb filloj\u00eb procedura e verifikimit p\u00ebr pasurit\u00eb, Kolegji arsyeton se si pasoj\u00eb e deklarimeve kontradiktore t\u00eb subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit dhe pranimit t\u00eb pasakt\u00ebsive nga vet\u00eb ai, ka qen\u00eb e pamundur q\u00eb t\u00eb verifikohet situata faktike e pasuris\u00eb n\u00eb fjal\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>Kolegji vler\u00ebson se n\u00eb k\u00ebto kushte, \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb pamund\u00ebsi objektive p\u00ebr t\u00eb kontrolluar ligjshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e burimeve q\u00eb kan\u00eb sh\u00ebrbyer p\u00ebr blerjen e apartamentit n\u00eb Tiran\u00eb, por ndryshe nga Komisioni, KPA arrin n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin se subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb kushtet e deklarimit t\u00eb rrem\u00eb, por atij t\u00eb pasakt\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>Sipas Kolegjit, Komisioni nuk ka arsyetuar se p\u00ebrse deklarime t\u00eb v\u00ebrteta mund t\u00eb jen\u00eb ato t\u00eb b\u00ebra n\u00eb deklarat\u00ebn fillestare t\u00eb vitit 2003 dhe jo ato n\u00eb deklarat\u00ebn \u201cveting\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cP\u00ebr sa koh\u00eb vet\u00eb subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit ka dh\u00ebn\u00eb shpjegime t\u00eb pasakta dhe kontradiktore, Kolegji vler\u00ebson se institucionet e rivler\u00ebsimit e kan\u00eb t\u00eb pamundur t\u00eb dallojn\u00eb se cili deklarim \u00ebsht\u00eb i v\u00ebrtet\u00eb dhe cili nga deklarimet \u00ebsht\u00eb i pav\u00ebrtet\u00eb,\u201d thuhet n\u00eb vendim.<\/p>\n<p>Gjithashtu, Kolegji vler\u00ebson se \u00ebsht\u00eb e pamundur t\u00eb identifikohet se cili ka qen\u00eb shkaku i v\u00ebrtet\u00eb q\u00eb e ka detyruar subjektin e rivler\u00ebsimit p\u00ebr t\u00eb mos respektuar k\u00ebrkesat urdh\u00ebruese t\u00eb ligjit p\u00ebr t\u00eb deklaruar sakt\u00ebsisht dhe plot\u00ebsisht pasurit\u00eb e tij. Bazuar edhe n\u00eb deklarimet dhe q\u00ebndrimet e Bajramit gjat\u00eb procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit, KPA \u00e7mon se pasakt\u00ebsit\u00eb e b\u00ebjn\u00eb deklarimin e tij t\u00eb pamjaftuesh\u00ebm.<\/p>\n<p>Kolegji ka rr\u00ebzuar pretendimin e Bajramit p\u00ebr c\u00ebnim t\u00eb standardit t\u00eb procesit t\u00eb rregullt ligjor p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb moskalimit t\u00eb barr\u00ebs s\u00eb prov\u00ebs nga ana e Komisionit p\u00ebr deklarimin e rrem\u00eb, edhe pse i jep t\u00eb drejt\u00eb pjes\u00ebrisht.<\/p>\n<p>\u201c\u2026Trupi gjykues \u00e7mon se me t\u00eb drejt\u00eb subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit duhet t\u00eb njihej me \u00e7do kualifikim q\u00eb u ka b\u00ebr\u00eb Komisioni fakteve juridike lidhur me deklarimet, t\u00eb cilat sjellin efekte ligjore n\u00eb t\u00eb drejtat e tij,\u201d argumenton KPA.<\/p>\n<p>Por duke u bazuar n\u00eb konkluzionin e arritur, se Bajrami nuk gjendet n\u00eb kushtet e deklarimit t\u00eb rrem\u00eb, Kolegji \u00e7mon se moskalimi nga Komisioni i barr\u00ebs s\u00eb prov\u00ebs p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb konkluzion nuk e ka c\u00ebnuar procesin e rivler\u00ebsimit. Nisur nga ky arsyetim, trupi gjykues e gjen ankimin t\u00eb pabazuar.<\/p>\n<p>Kolegji evidenton mang\u00ebsi t\u00eb arsyetimit t\u00eb Komisionit edhe lidhur me likujdimin e pjessh\u00ebm t\u00eb nj\u00eb apartamenti n\u00eb Kavaj\u00eb. Subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit pretendon n\u00eb ankim se ka dh\u00ebn\u00eb shpjegime t\u00eb sakta p\u00ebr arsyen e mospagimit t\u00eb shum\u00ebs prej 10 mij\u00eb eurosh, pasi pasuria nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb regjistruar ende n\u00eb pron\u00ebsi t\u00eb tij dhe nuk ka detyrimin t\u00eb paguaj\u00eb \u00e7mimin e plot\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>Lidhur me k\u00ebt\u00eb shkak t\u00eb ankimit, trupi gjykues konstaton se Komisioni n\u00eb arsyetimin e vendimit nuk ka treguar se \u00e7far\u00eb pasoje ligjore sjell n\u00eb procesin e rivler\u00ebsimit kalimtar t\u00eb subjektit Artan Bajrami kjo gjetje. \u201c\u2026P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb fakt, nuk rezulton t\u00eb jet\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb asnj\u00eb analiz\u00eb ligjore, si pasoj\u00eb e s\u00eb cil\u00ebs subjektit t\u2019i atribuohet ndonj\u00eb shkak konkret p\u00ebr dh\u00ebnie ndaj tij t\u00eb mas\u00ebs disiplinore,\u201d konkludon Kolegji.<\/p>\n<p>P\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb versioneve t\u00eb ndryshme t\u00eb dh\u00ebna nga Bajramaj, lidhur me p\u00ebrdorimin e nj\u00eb prej burimeve t\u00eb deklaruara p\u00ebr krijimin e k\u00ebsaj pasurie, Kolegji vler\u00ebson se edhe n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast subjekti \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb kushtet e deklarimit t\u00eb pasakt\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>Ashtu si p\u00ebr apartamentin e bler\u00eb n\u00eb Tiran\u00eb, edhe p\u00ebr banes\u00ebn n\u00eb Kavaj\u00eb, Kolegji \u00e7mon se \u00ebsht\u00eb e pamundur t\u00eb arrihet n\u00eb nj\u00eb konkluzion t\u00eb qart\u00eb dhe bind\u00ebs se cilat jan\u00eb deklarimet e subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit q\u00eb p\u00ebrputhen me situat\u00ebn e v\u00ebrtet\u00eb faktike lidhur me krijimin e k\u00ebsaj pasurie.<\/p>\n<p>Gjithashtu, trupi gjykues vler\u00ebson se deklarimet dhe q\u00ebndrimi i Bajramit gjat\u00eb procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit e b\u00ebjn\u00eb t\u00eb pamundur kryerjen e kontrollit lidhur me k\u00ebt\u00eb pasuri dhe konkludon se subjekti ka kryer deklarimin t\u00eb pamjaftuesh\u00ebm.<\/p>\n<p>Kolegji i ka rr\u00ebzuar edhe shkaqet e tjera t\u00eb ngritura nga subjekti duke i cil\u00ebsuar si pretendime t\u00eb paprovuara.<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit vler\u00ebson se ish-prokurori Artan Bajrami ka kryer deklarime t\u00eb pasakta dhe t\u00eb pamjaftueshme t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb, por jo deklarim t\u00eb rrem\u00eb si\u00e7 vler\u00ebsonte KPK. Kolegji arsyeton se shkalla e par\u00eb nuk ka argumentuar disa prej gjetjeve, por vendimi i shkarkimit mbeti n\u00eb fuqi.<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":637,"featured_media":74480,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[13,415,114,473],"tags":[112,119,579],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/IMG_2441.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit | Foto : B. Likmeta","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74479"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/637"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74479"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74479\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":74481,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74479\/revisions\/74481"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74480"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74479"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74479"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74479"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}