{"id":74548,"date":"2020-10-01T17:02:12","date_gmt":"2020-10-01T15:02:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/gjyqtarja-blerona-hasa-permbysi-barren-e-proves-ne-kpk\/2020\/10\/01\/"},"modified":"2023-04-07T03:14:31","modified_gmt":"2023-04-07T01:14:31","slug":"gjyqtarja-blerona-hasa-permbysi-barren-e-proves-ne-kpk","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/gjyqtarja-blerona-hasa-permbysi-barren-e-proves-ne-kpk\/2020\/10\/01\/","title":{"rendered":"Gjyqtarja Blerona Hasa p\u00ebrmbysi ‘barr\u00ebn e prov\u00ebs’ n\u00eb KPK"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sipas vendimit t\u00eb arsyetuar t\u00eb Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit, gjyqtarja e Apelit Administrativ, Blerona Hasa e bindi Komisionin n\u00eb lidhje me pasurin\u00eb dhe rr\u00ebzoi nj\u00eb raport negativ t\u00eb DSIK-s\u00eb p\u00ebr figur\u00ebn, duke arritur nivel t\u00eb besuesh\u00ebm n\u00eb t\u00eb tre kriteret.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
Gjyqtarja e Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative t\u00eb Apelit, Blerona Hasa pas seanc\u00ebs n\u00eb KPK. Foto: Edmond Hoxhaj<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Gjyqtarja e Apelit Administrativ, Blerona Hasa u konfirmua n\u00eb detyr\u00eb m\u00eb 27 korrik 2020, pasi arriti t\u00eb p\u00ebrmbyste dyshimet e ngritura nga Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit.<\/p>\n

Trupa gjyq\u00ebsore e kryesuar nga Olsi Komici, me relatore Brunilda Bekteshi dhe an\u00ebtare \u00a0Xhensila Pine rr\u00ebzoi gjithashtu si t\u00eb pamb\u00ebshtetur n\u00eb prova nj\u00eb raport \u00a0t\u00eb DSIK, nd\u00ebrsa shpalli moskompetenc\u00ebn p\u00ebr shqyrtimin e nj\u00eb vendimi \u2013i cili ndodhej n\u00eb pritje t\u00eb gjykimit n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn e Lart\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Blerona Hasa ka p\u00ebrfunduar studimet e Magjistratur\u00ebs n\u00eb vitin 2011 dhe \u00ebsht\u00eb em\u00ebruar fillimisht si gjyqtare n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn e Kor\u00e7\u00ebs. N\u00eb vitin 2011, ajo \u00ebsht\u00eb transferuar n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn e Tiran\u00ebs, nd\u00ebrsa n\u00eb vitin 2013 \u00ebsht\u00eb dekretuar si gjyqtare n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Administrative t\u00eb Apelit Tiran\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Sipas vendimit t\u00eb arsyetuar t\u00eb Komisionit, gjyqtares Blerona Hasa i kaloi barra e prov\u00ebs p\u00ebr t\u00eb d\u00ebshmuar koh\u00ebn kur ishte kryer nj\u00eb investim, destinacioni i dy kredive p\u00ebr b\u00ebrjen e banueshme t\u00eb nj\u00eb sht\u00ebpie si dhe p\u00ebr ato q\u00eb u konsideruan \u201cmosp\u00ebrputhje t\u00eb deklarimeve vjetore p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb banes\u00eb me ato veting\u201d.<\/p>\n

Sipas vendimit, Hasa solli nj\u00eb s\u00ebr\u00eb dokumentesh p\u00ebr t\u00eb v\u00ebrtetuar barr\u00ebn e prov\u00ebs sa i p\u00ebrket dyshimeve mbi pasurin\u00eb, duke arritur t\u00eb provonte t\u00eb kund\u00ebrt\u00ebn e dyshimeve t\u00eb ngritura nga KPK.<\/p>\n

Gjyqtarja paraqiti n\u00eb KPK projektin e banes\u00ebs s\u00eb nd\u00ebrtuar fillimisht nga vjehrri, nj\u00eb s\u00ebr\u00eb dokumentesh t\u00eb pushtetit lokal, p\u00ebrfshi v\u00ebrtetime t\u00eb kolaudimit, q\u00eb d\u00ebshmonin koh\u00ebn se kur ishte b\u00ebr\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyrja n\u00eb sht\u00ebpi dhe numrin specifik t\u00eb kateve.<\/p>\n

Hasa k\u00ebmb\u00ebnguli q\u00eb kredit\u00eb e marra n\u00eb 2007 ishin p\u00ebrdorur p\u00ebr apartamentin dhe solli si prov\u00eb nd\u00ebr t\u00eb tjera, nj\u00eb padi t\u00eb bashk\u00ebshortit p\u00ebr njohje t\u00eb pron\u00ebsis\u00eb, n\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebn theksohej se i shoqi dhe Hasa kishin investuar n\u00eb katet e mbetur pa p\u00ebrfunduar t\u00eb nd\u00ebrtes\u00ebs n\u00eb vitin 2007, kontratat me uj\u00ebsjell\u00ebsin dhe ato me OSHEE p\u00ebr energjin\u00eb elektrike dhe dokumente t\u00eb tjera t\u00eb ngjashme.<\/p>\n

Pas dokumenteve dhe shpjegimeve t\u00eb Has\u00ebs, KPK ndryshoi q\u00ebndrim mbi k\u00ebt\u00eb pasuri, duke i cil\u00ebsuar t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat e saj t\u00eb sakta dhe arsyetuar se pretendimet e gjyqtares u provuan.<\/p>\n

\u201cTrupi gjykues vler\u00ebson se shpjegimet e subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit jan\u00eb bind\u00ebse dhe nga analiza e dokumentacionit t\u00eb administruar, konkludon se provohet v\u00ebrtet\u00ebsia dhe mjaftueshm\u00ebria p\u00ebr sa i takon deklarimeve t\u00eb subjektit p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb pasuri,\u201d thuhet n\u00eb vendim.<\/p>\n

Raporti i DSIK<\/strong><\/p>\n

Nga vendimi i zbardhur rezulton se nj\u00eb raport i par\u00eb i DSIK-s\u00eb e kishte cil\u00ebsuar gjyqtaren Blerona Hasa t\u00eb p\u00ebrshtatshme, por n\u00eb nj\u00eb raport t\u00eb dyt\u00eb, q\u00ebndrimi kishte ndryshuar, \u00a0bazuar n\u00eb nj\u00eb kall\u00ebzim n\u00eb prokurori n\u00eb lidhje me nj\u00eb vendim gjyq\u00ebsor t\u00eb nj\u00eb trupe t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit Administrativ, n\u00eb t\u00eb cilin Hasa ishte an\u00ebtare.<\/p>\n

Komisioni v\u00eb n\u00eb dukje se pasi kishte marr raportin q\u00eb e cil\u00ebsonte gjyqtaren \u201ct\u00eb pap\u00ebrshtatshme\u201d, kishte kryer hetime t\u00eb pavarura. Nga verifikimet rezultoi se p\u00ebr denoncimin \u00a0n\u00eb prokurori ishte vendosur mosfillimi i hetimeve me arsyetimin se \u201cnuk ka vep\u00ebr penale dhe fakti nuk ekziston\u201d.<\/p>\n

Objekt i denoncimit ishte nj\u00eb vendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative t\u00eb Apelit, p\u00ebrmes s\u00eb cilit konsiderohej i pavlefsh\u00ebm nj\u00eb vendim i Drejtoris\u00eb s\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithshme t\u00eb Tatimeve ndaj nj\u00eb kompanie p\u00ebr detyrime tatimore n\u00eb vler\u00ebn e 7 miliard\u00eb lek\u00ebve.<\/p>\n

Gjyqtarja Hasa pretendoi para KPK-s\u00eb se vendimi nuk fshinte detyrimet tatimore t\u00eb padit\u00ebsit, pasi ato nuk i ishin n\u00ebnshtruar gjykimit. Ajo shpjegoi se vendimi i Drejtoris\u00eb s\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithshme t\u00eb Tatimeve kishte qen\u00eb absolutisht i pavlefsh\u00ebm, pasi delegimi i vendimmarrjes nga drejtori te z\u00ebvend\u00ebsi i tij nuk ishte publikuar si\u00e7 k\u00ebrkohej n\u00eb ligj, n\u00eb Fletoren Zyrtare. Ajo shpjegoi gjithashtu se \u00e7\u00ebshtja ndodhej n\u00eb Gjykat\u00eb t\u00eb Lart\u00eb, nd\u00ebrsa vuri n\u00eb dukje se DPT i kishte dh\u00ebn\u00eb kompanis\u00eb n\u00eb fjal\u00eb mbi 1 miliard lek\u00eb n\u00eb rimbursime TVSH-je.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb vendimin e tij, Komisioni arsyeton se nuk mund t\u00eb shqyrtonte m\u00eb tej k\u00ebt\u00eb vendimmarrje, pasi ndaj saj ishte b\u00ebr\u00eb rekurs dhe pritej t\u00eb shqyrtohej n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn e Lart\u00eb.<\/p>\n

\u201cT\u00eb gjitha pretendimet e pal\u00ebs rekursuese aktualisht jan\u00eb objekt gjykimi n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn e Lart\u00eb. N\u00eb k\u00ebto kushte, \u00e7mohet se Komisioni nuk ka kompetenc\u00eb t\u00eb vler\u00ebsoje m\u00eb tej k\u00ebt\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb vendim.<\/p>\n

Po ashtu, KPK rr\u00ebzoi edhe pretendimet e DSIK-s\u00eb p\u00ebr pap\u00ebrshtatshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e gjyqtares Blerona Hasa.<\/p>\n

\u201cKomisioni, n\u00eb analiz\u00ebn ligjore dhe rrethanat faktike, \u00e7mon se dyshimet e ngritura p\u00ebr veprime korruptive kundrejt subjektit nuk jan\u00eb t\u00eb mb\u00ebshtetura n\u00eb prova dhe p\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb, nuk gjen vend zbatimi i dispozitave ligjore p\u00ebr mas\u00eb penalizuese,\u201d thuhet n\u00eb vendim. \u00a0KPK shprehet n\u00eb vendim se shpjegimet e Has\u00ebs ishin bind\u00ebse.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb vendim vihet n\u00eb dukje se pavar\u00ebsisht prap\u00ebsimeve, gjyqtarja Hasa nuk mundi t\u00eb p\u00ebrmbyste barr\u00ebn e prov\u00ebs p\u00ebr nj\u00eb bilanc negativ prej rreth 550 mij\u00eb lek\u00ebsh, t\u00eb ndar\u00eb n\u00eb kat\u00ebr vite. Shumat minus sipas KPK shkonin nga 49 mij\u00eb lek\u00eb deri n\u00eb 212 mij\u00eb lek\u00eb n\u00eb vit.<\/p>\n

Hasa n\u00eb shpjegime ka pretenduar nd\u00ebr t\u00eb tjera q\u00eb dietat e bashk\u00ebshortit duhej t\u00eb zbriteshin n\u00eb shpenzimet e jetes\u00ebs, nd\u00ebrsa ka provuar se t\u00eb ardhurat e t\u00eb atit dhe vjerrit ishin t\u00eb ligjshme, duke i ulur ndjesh\u00ebm bilancet negative, q\u00eb gjith\u00ebsesi mbet\u00ebn n\u00eb shum\u00ebn 550 mij\u00eb lek\u00eb.<\/p>\n

KPK arsyeton se bilancet negative ishin proporcionalisht t\u00eb par\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme dhe nuk e penalizonin gjyqtaren. \u201cNuk jan\u00eb t\u00eb mjaftueshme p\u00ebr aplikimin e ndonj\u00eb mase disiplinore\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb vendim.<\/p>\n

Disa denoncime, kryesisht p\u00ebr zvarritje t\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjeve n\u00eb gjykat\u00eb, u gjet\u00ebn nga KPK t\u00eb pabazuara. Komisioni arsyetoi n\u00eb disa raste se \u00e7\u00ebshtjet zgjidheshin n\u00eb nj\u00eb gjykat\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb lart\u00eb dhe n\u00eb raste t\u00eb tjera, se denoncimet q\u00eb p\u00ebrmendnin Has\u00ebn, nuk ishin p\u00ebr \u00e7\u00ebshtje t\u00eb gjykuara prej saj. N\u00eb fund, KPK arsyetoi se gjyqtarja kishte arritur nivel t\u00eb besuesh\u00ebm n\u00eb t\u00eb tre kriteret.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sipas vendimit t\u00eb arsyetuar t\u00eb Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit, gjyqtarja e Apelit Administrativ, Blerona Hasa e bindi Komisionin n\u00eb lidhje me pasurin\u00eb dhe rr\u00ebzoi nj\u00eb raport negativ t\u00eb DSIK-s\u00eb p\u00ebr figur\u00ebn, duke arritur nivel t\u00eb besuesh\u00ebm n\u00eb t\u00eb tre kriteret.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":97,"featured_media":74549,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[415,117,2,473],"tags":[145,103,118],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/Blerona-Hasa-pas-seances.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"Gjyqtarja e Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative t\u00eb Apelit, Blerona Hasa pas seanc\u00ebs n\u00eb KPK. Foto: Edmond Hoxhaj","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74548"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/97"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74548"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74548\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":74550,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74548\/revisions\/74550"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74549"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74548"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74548"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74548"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}