{"id":74572,"date":"2020-09-28T13:12:24","date_gmt":"2020-09-28T11:12:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/kolegji-u-nda-per-konfirmimin-ne-detyre-te-gjyqtares-alma-kolgjoka\/2020\/09\/28\/"},"modified":"2023-04-07T03:16:09","modified_gmt":"2023-04-07T01:16:09","slug":"kolegji-u-nda-per-konfirmimin-ne-detyre-te-gjyqtares-alma-kolgjoka","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/kolegji-u-nda-per-konfirmimin-ne-detyre-te-gjyqtares-alma-kolgjoka\/2020\/09\/28\/","title":{"rendered":"Kolegji u nda p\u00ebr konfirmimin n\u00eb detyr\u00eb t\u00eb gjyqtares Alma Kolgjoka"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Shumica e trupit gjykues t\u00eb Kolegjit t\u00eb Posa\u00e7\u00ebm t\u00eb Apelimit konkludon se nuk u provua q\u00eb kryetarja e Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Kruj\u00ebs t\u00eb kishte kontribuar n\u00eb blerjen e nj\u00eb apartamenti nga babai i saj, por Mulaj n\u00eb pakic\u00eb arsyetoi t\u00eb kund\u00ebrt\u00ebn.<!--more--><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_68170\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-68170\" style=\"width: 600px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/KPA-Kolgjoka.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-image-68170 size-large\" src=\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/KPA-Kolgjoka-600x387.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"387\" data-id=\"68170\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-68170\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">An\u00ebtar\u00ebt e Kolegjit t\u00eb Posa\u00e7\u00ebm t\u00eb Apelimit n\u00eb seanc\u00ebn e par\u00eb t\u00eb procesit p\u00ebr gjyqtaren Alma Kolgjoka. Foto: LSA<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Pas nj\u00eb maratone t\u00eb gjat\u00eb n\u00eb veting, kryetarja e Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Kruj\u00ebs, Alma Kolgjoka u konfirmua n\u00eb detyr\u00eb nga Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit m\u00eb 25 qershor 2020. Por vendimi i arsyetuar tregon se jo e gjith\u00eb trupa gjyq\u00ebsore ka qen\u00eb dakord me k\u00ebt\u00eb vendim.<\/p>\n<p>Kolgjoka u p\u00ebrball me Kolegjin pas nj\u00eb ankimi t\u00eb Komisionerit Publik, Dariel Sina, p\u00ebrmes s\u00eb cilit ai k\u00ebrkonte q\u00eb gjyqtarja t\u00eb hetohej n\u00ebse kishte kontribuar p\u00ebr blerjen e apartamentit nga ana e saj. Sina k\u00ebrkoi fillimisht q\u00eb babai i subjektit t\u00eb konsiderohej person i lidhur.<\/p>\n<p>Kolgjoka i prap\u00ebsoi shkaqet e ngritura nga Komisioneri, duke argumentuar se nuk ekzistonte asnj\u00eb interes pasuror ose marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnie tjet\u00ebr biznesi nd\u00ebrmjet saj dhe t\u00eb atit apo an\u00ebtar\u00ebve t\u00eb familjes s\u00eb origjin\u00ebs.<\/p>\n<p>Trupa gjykuese e Kolegjit \u00ebsht\u00eb ndar\u00eb 4 me 1 n\u00eb favor t\u00eb konfirmimit t\u00eb kryetares s\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Kruj\u00ebs.<\/p>\n<p>Shumica e trupit gjykues t\u00eb Kolegjit, e p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00eb nga Luan Daci kryesues, Albana Shtylla relatore dhe Ina Rama e Sokol \u00c7omo an\u00ebtar\u00eb, n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim t\u00eb gjykimit i vler\u00ebsuan t\u00eb drejta argumentet e Kolgjok\u00ebs dhe vendos\u00ebn l\u00ebnien n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb vendimit t\u00eb KPK p\u00ebr konfirimin e saj n\u00eb detyr\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>P\u00ebr t\u00eb konkluduar n\u00ebse babai i Kolgjok\u00ebs \u00ebsht\u00eb ose jo person tjet\u00ebr i lidhur me t\u00eb, Kolegji ka vler\u00ebsuar mbi informacionet e d\u00ebrguara nga institucionet publike dhe private lidhur mbi transaksione t\u00eb mundshme mes subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit dhe an\u00ebtar\u00ebve t\u00eb familjes s\u00eb origjin\u00ebs.<\/p>\n<p>KPA ka verifikuar edhe deklaratat e pasuris\u00eb, nga \u00ebsht\u00eb konkluduar se subjekti ka deklaruar vet\u00ebm t\u00eb ardhura nga paga e saj si gjyqtare dhe nuk ka deklaruar kursime n\u00eb asnj\u00eb lloj forme &#8211; as kursime cash dhe as t\u00eb depozituara n\u00eb sistemin bankar.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cEdhe n\u00eb deklarimin e pasuris\u00eb p\u00ebr vitin 2011 dhe 2012, kur subjekti kishte krijuar familjen e saj dhe ishte ndar\u00eb nga familja e origjin\u00ebs, ka deklaruar vet\u00ebm t\u00eb ardhurat nga paga e saj dhe nga paga e bashk\u00ebshortit, dhe nuk ka deklaruar kursime, dh\u00ebnie huaje apo dhurime te persona t\u00eb tjer\u00eb\u201d, konstaton shumica.<\/p>\n<p>Shumica vler\u00ebson se nuk u provua p\u00ebrfshirja e drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb apo e t\u00ebrthort\u00eb e gjyqtares Kolgjoka n\u00eb krijimin e pasuris\u00eb q\u00eb zot\u00ebron familja e origjin\u00ebs dhe \u00e7mon se provat e administruara n\u00eb gjykim provuan mjaftuesh\u00ebm munges\u00ebn e marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnies s\u00eb interesit t\u00eb subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit me babain e saj.<\/p>\n<p>KPA ka rr\u00ebzuar edhe pretendimin tjet\u00ebr t\u00eb Komisionerit se babai i subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit duhej t\u00eb cil\u00ebsohej nga Komisioni si person tjet\u00ebr i lidhur, pasi Kolgjoka \u00ebsht\u00eb gjendur n\u00eb kushtet e p\u00ebrdorimit t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj pasurie, duke qen\u00eb se edhe ajo vet\u00eb ka deklaruar se ka q\u00ebndruar me dit\u00eb n\u00eb sht\u00ebpin\u00eb e prind\u00ebrve p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb nevojave t\u00eb saj p\u00ebr rritjen e f\u00ebmij\u00ebve.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cKonsiderimi i pasurive t\u00eb paluajtshme t\u00eb prind\u00ebrve t\u00eb subjekteve t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit si pasuri n\u00eb p\u00ebrdorim t\u00eb k\u00ebtyre t\u00eb fundit, thjesht vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr faktin se subjektet shkojn\u00eb t\u00eb vizitojn\u00eb prind\u00ebrit e tyre, qoft\u00eb edhe duke q\u00ebndruar disa dit\u00eb atje, \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb tejkalim t\u00eb parimit t\u00eb objektivitetit dhe proporcionalitetit n\u00eb procesin e rivler\u00ebsimit, i parashikuar nga neni 51, pika 1 e ligjit nr. 84\/2016\u201d, konkludon KPA.<\/p>\n<p>Gjyqtarja Natasha Mulaj n\u00eb pakic\u00eb votoi p\u00ebr shkarkimin e Kolgjok\u00ebs nga detyra. N\u00eb arsyetimin e saj, Mulaj shprehet se babai i Kolgjok\u00ebs duhej t\u00eb ishte konsideruar person i lidhur.<\/p>\n<p>Mulaj vler\u00ebson gjithashtu se Kolgjoka ka kryer shkelje ligjore n\u00eb deklarimin e interesave t\u00eb vitit 2010, pasi ka pasyqruar si an\u00ebtar\u00eb t\u00eb familjes bashk\u00ebshorin dhe vajz\u00ebn, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb martesa \u00ebsht\u00eb lidhur n\u00eb vitin 2011. Sipas Mulajt, subjekti duhej t\u00eb deklaronte p\u00ebrb\u00ebrjen familjare t\u00eb ndryshuar n\u00eb deklarat\u00ebn e vitit 2011 dhe jo n\u00eb 2010, kur duhej t\u00eb kishte deklaruar an\u00ebtar\u00ebt e familjes s\u00eb origjin\u00ebs.<\/p>\n<p>Mulaj konsideron se deklarimi i p\u00ebrb\u00ebrjes familjare t\u00eb ndryshuar nj\u00eb vit para lidhjes s\u00eb martes\u00ebs, \u00ebsht\u00eb kryer me q\u00ebllim shmangien e babait t\u00eb saj nga p\u00ebrb\u00ebrja familjare, q\u00eb do ta b\u00ebnte person t\u00eb lidhur p\u00ebr apartamentin me sip\u00ebrfaqe 141,87 m2 t\u00eb bler\u00eb nga i ati n\u00eb Tiran\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>Duke iu referuar Nenit D, pika 5 e Aneksit t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, ku parashikohet shkarkimi i subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit n\u00eb rastin e mosdor\u00ebzimit n\u00eb koh\u00eb t\u00eb deklarat\u00ebs s\u00eb pasuris\u00eb ose kur p\u00ebrpiqet t\u00eb fsheh\u00eb ose t\u00eb paraqes\u00eb n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb pasakt\u00eb pasurit\u00eb n\u00eb pron\u00ebsi, posedim ose n\u00eb p\u00ebrdorim t\u00eb tij, Mulaj del kund\u00ebr shumic\u00ebs dhe shprehet se gjyqtarja Alma Kolgjoka duhej t\u00eb ishte larguar nga detyra.<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Shumica e trupit gjykues t\u00eb Kolegjit t\u00eb Posa\u00e7\u00ebm t\u00eb Apelimit konkludon se nuk u provua q\u00eb kryetarja e Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Kruj\u00ebs t\u00eb kishte kontribuar n\u00eb blerjen e nj\u00eb apartamenti nga babai i saj, por Mulaj n\u00eb pakic\u00eb arsyetoi t\u00eb kund\u00ebrt\u00ebn.<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":637,"featured_media":74573,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[415,114,2,362],"tags":[327,103,112],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/KPA-Kolgjoka.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"An\u00ebtar\u00ebt e Kolegjit t\u00eb Posa\u00e7\u00ebm t\u00eb Apelimit n\u00eb seanc\u00ebn e par\u00eb t\u00eb procesit p\u00ebr gjyqtaren Alma Kolgjoka. Foto: LSA ","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74572"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/637"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74572"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74572\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":74574,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74572\/revisions\/74574"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74573"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74572"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74572"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74572"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}