{"id":74845,"date":"2020-07-20T15:45:48","date_gmt":"2020-07-20T13:45:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/kpk-e-dergoi-prokurorin-gjon-fusha-per-inspektim-pa-shkak\/2020\/07\/20\/"},"modified":"2023-04-07T03:31:54","modified_gmt":"2023-04-07T01:31:54","slug":"kpk-e-dergoi-prokurorin-gjon-fusha-per-inspektim-pa-shkak","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/kpk-e-dergoi-prokurorin-gjon-fusha-per-inspektim-pa-shkak\/2020\/07\/20\/","title":{"rendered":"KPK e d\u00ebrgoi prokurorin Gjon Fusha p\u00ebr inspektim \u2018pa shkak\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"

Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit rr\u00ebzoi konstatimin e DSIK-s\u00eb p\u00ebr dy \u00e7\u00ebshtje ku prokurori Gjon Fusha dyshohej se mund t\u00eb kishte favorizuar dy t\u00eb pandehur, megjithat\u00eb vendosi ta d\u00ebrgoj\u00eb at\u00eb \u201cpa shkak\u201d p\u00ebr inspektim.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
Drejtuesi i Prokuroris\u00eb s\u00eb Apelit t\u00eb Gjirokastr\u00ebs, Gjon Fusha pas vendimit t\u00eb KPK.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Me vendimin e dat\u00ebs 12 qershor 2020, Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit konfirmoi n\u00eb detyr\u00eb prokurorin e Apelit t\u00eb Gjirokastr\u00ebs, Gjon Fusha dhe vendosi t\u00eb transferoj\u00eb p\u00ebr inspektim pran\u00eb Inspektoritatit t\u00eb Lart\u00eb t\u00eb Drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb, ILD dy \u00e7\u00ebshtje t\u00eb p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsuara nga subjekti \u2013ndon\u00ebse KPK thot\u00eb se nuk jan\u00eb gjetur probleme.<\/p>\n

Trupi gjykues i KPK, i p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00eb nga Genta Tafa Bungo kryesuese, Suela Zhegu relatore dhe Pamela Qirko an\u00ebtare, arrijn\u00eb n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin se prokurori Gjon Fusha ka arritur nivel t\u00eb besuesh\u00ebm n\u00eb kriterin e pasuris\u00eb dhe t\u00eb kontrollit t\u00eb figur\u00ebs dhe nivel kualifikues n\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin e aft\u00ebsive profesionale.<\/p>\n

Dy \u00e7\u00ebshtjet e d\u00ebrguara p\u00ebr inspektim jan\u00eb trajtuar n\u00eb nj\u00eb raport t\u00eb dyt\u00eb t\u00eb Drejtoris\u00eb s\u00eb Sigurimit t\u00eb Informacionit t\u00eb Klasifikuar, DSIK.<\/p>\n

Ndryshe nga raporti i par\u00eb, ku DSIK ka konstatuar p\u00ebrshtatshm\u00ebrin\u00eb, n\u00eb vijim i ka referuar Komisionit t\u00eb dh\u00ebna t\u00eb tjera, duke e konsideruar subjektin t\u00eb pap\u00ebrshtatsh\u00ebm.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb vendimin e zbardhur thuhet se Komisioni ka kryer hetim t\u00eb thelluar dhe i ka k\u00ebrkuar informacion Prokuroris\u00eb s\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithshme, n\u00ebse ka pasur ndonj\u00eb procedim penal ndaj Fush\u00ebs. Prokuroria e P\u00ebrgjithshme ka njoftuar se ndaj subjektit nuk ka pasur ndonj\u00eb procedim penal.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb vijim t\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigjes \u00ebsht\u00eb shpjeguar se n\u00eb vitin 2015 \u00ebsht\u00eb kryer nj\u00eb kall\u00ebzim penal nga Policia e Shtetit ndaj Fush\u00ebs dhe se Prokuroria p\u00ebr Krime t\u00eb R\u00ebnda ka nisur procedim penal p\u00ebr \u201ckorrupsion pasiv\u201d, por pa autor konkret. Ky procedim \u00ebsht\u00eb pushuar m\u00eb pas nga Krimet e R\u00ebnda.<\/p>\n

Komisioni ka konstatuar se p\u00ebr faktin se subjekti Gjon Fusha nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb marr\u00eb si person n\u00ebn hetim dhe as si i pandehur, nuk ka pasur detyrimin t\u00eb deklaroj\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb fakt as n\u00eb formularin p\u00ebr past\u00ebrtin\u00eb e figur\u00ebs dhe se e ka plot\u00ebsuar k\u00ebt\u00eb formular n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me dispozitat urdh\u00ebruese t\u00eb ligjit.<\/p>\n

Komisioni shprehet se ka kryer hetim t\u00eb thell\u00eb p\u00ebr informacionet e DSIK, sipas s\u00eb cilave prokurori Fusha mund t\u00eb ishte i p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb n\u00eb veprimtari korruptive n\u00eb nj\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje penale gjat\u00eb viteve 2011 dhe 2016, si dhe t\u00eb p\u00ebrfshirjes n\u00eb veprimtari t\u00eb kund\u00ebrligjshme, shfaqur n\u00eb form\u00ebn e shp\u00ebrdorimit t\u00eb detyr\u00ebs dhe nd\u00ebrveprimit korruptiv n\u00eb vitin 2019.<\/p>\n

Bazuar n\u00eb k\u00ebto informacione t\u00eb DSIK, Komisioni ka t\u00ebrhequr nga Prokuroria e Apelit Gjirokast\u00ebr dy dosjet penale t\u00eb regjistruara n\u00eb ngarkim t\u00eb shtetasve L. K., dhe A. L.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb vendim shpjegohet se nga verifikimet rezulton se L.K. n\u00eb prill 2019 \u00ebsht\u00eb proceduar p\u00ebr \u201cprodhim dhe shitje t\u00eb l\u00ebnd\u00ebve narkotike\u201d e kryer n\u00eb bashk\u00ebpunim dhe ndaj tij \u00ebsht\u00eb caktuar masa e siguris\u00eb \u201carrest n\u00eb burg\u201d nga Gjykata e Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb Sarand\u00eb.<\/p>\n

\u201cProkuroria pran\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit Gjirokast\u00ebr, p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsuar nga subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit, prokurori Gjon Fusha, ka konsideruar t\u00eb drejt\u00eb vendimmarrjen e Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Sarand\u00eb (arrest n\u00eb burg) dhe ka k\u00ebrkuar n\u00eb gjykim miratimin e vendimit penal nr. ***, dat\u00eb 3.5.2019, t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Sarand\u00eb\u201d, konstaton trupi gjykues dhe shton se kjo mas\u00eb sigurie \u00ebsht\u00eb l\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb fuqi edhe nga Gjykata e Apelit Gjirokast\u00ebr.<\/p>\n

\u201cKomisioni, pasi verifikoi dhe analizoi aktet e dosjes penale, konkludon se nuk dokumentohet asnj\u00eb veprim nga subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit, i cili t\u00eb konsiderohet si favorizues ndaj t\u00eb pandehurit, shtetasit me inicialet L. K\u201d, citohet n\u00eb vendim.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb vendim shpjegohet gjithashtu se ndaj shtetasit A.L. \u00ebsht\u00eb regjistruar procedim penal n\u00eb janar t\u00eb vitit 2015 dhe se \u00ebsht\u00eb d\u00ebnuar p\u00ebrfundimisht me 8 muaj burg nga Gjykata e Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb Gjirokast\u00ebr p\u00ebr moskall\u00ebzim krimi – lidhur me nj\u00eb ngjarje ku jan\u00eb p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb dy persona t\u00eb tjer\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebt i kan\u00eb vjedhur me dhun\u00eb nj\u00eb gruaje \u00e7ant\u00ebn ku gjendeshin 1000 euro dhe 5 mij\u00eb lek\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Nga verifikimet e dosjes, Komisioni ka gjetur se dy autor\u00ebt e vjedhjes me dhun\u00eb e kan\u00eb apeluar vendimin e shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb, nd\u00ebrsa A.L. i d\u00ebnuar p\u00ebr \u201cmoskall\u00ebzim krimi\u201d nuk ka kryer ankim.<\/p>\n

Edhe p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje \u00ebsht\u00eb verifikuar q\u00eb prokurori Gjon Fusha ka k\u00ebrkuar l\u00ebnien n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb vendimit t\u00eb shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Pavar\u00ebsisht se Komisioni e shfaj\u00ebson Z.Fusha nga dyshimet e ngritura nga DSIK, ka vendosur gjithsesi q\u00eb dy \u00e7\u00ebshtjet e verifikuara t\u2019i d\u00ebrgoj\u00eb p\u00ebr inspektim t\u00eb m\u00ebtejsh\u00ebm pran\u00eb Inspektorit t\u00eb Lart\u00eb t\u00eb Drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigje t\u00eb nj\u00eb k\u00ebrkese p\u00ebr t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e informimit lidhur me arsyen se p\u00ebrse jan\u00eb d\u00ebrguar p\u00ebr inspektim dy \u00e7\u00ebshtjet e verifikuara, p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilat nuk jan\u00eb evidentuar probleme, KPK rithekson se nuk jan\u00eb gjetur indicie.<\/p>\n

\u201c…Pasi u analizuan me kujdes, Komisioni vler\u00ebsoi se nuk u gjet\u00ebn elemente t\u00eb mjaftueshme p\u00ebr mas\u00eb disiplinore…,\u201d thuhet n\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigjen e KPK.<\/p>\n

Sipas Komisionit, pika 4 e nenit 59 t\u00eb ligjit nr. 84\/2016, \u201cP\u00ebr rivler\u00ebsimin kalimtar t\u00eb gjyqtar\u00ebve dhe prokuror\u00ebve n\u00eb Republik\u00ebn e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb\u201d, i jep t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr t\u00eb adresuar pran\u00eb organit kompetent \u00e7\u00ebshtje t\u00eb ndryshme, t\u00eb cilat mund t\u2019i n\u00ebnshtrohen nj\u00eb inspektimi t\u00eb m\u00ebtejsh\u00ebm nga ky institucion.<\/p>\n

\u201cP\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb, trupa e vler\u00ebsoi t\u00eb arsyeshme q\u00eb t\u2019i d\u00ebrgoj\u00eb k\u00ebto dosje pran\u00eb ILD-s\u00eb, p\u00ebr inspektim t\u00eb m\u00ebtejsh\u00ebm n\u00eb kuad\u00ebr t\u00eb ligjit q\u00eb rregullon statusin e gjyqtar\u00ebve dhe prokuror\u00ebve n\u00eb Republik\u00ebn e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb,\u201d p\u00ebrfundoi KPK.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit rr\u00ebzoi konstatimin e DSIK-s\u00eb p\u00ebr dy \u00e7\u00ebshtje ku prokurori Gjon Fusha dyshohej se mund t\u00eb kishte favorizuar dy t\u00eb pandehur, megjithat\u00eb vendosi ta d\u00ebrgoj\u00eb at\u00eb \u201cpa shkak\u201d p\u00ebr inspektim.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":637,"featured_media":74846,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[415,117,2,473],"tags":[118,119,452],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/Gjon-Fusha-pas-vendimit.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"Drejtuesi i Prokuroris\u00eb s\u00eb Apelit t\u00eb Gjirokastr\u00ebs, Gjon Fusha pas vendimit t\u00eb KPK. ","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74845"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/637"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74845"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74845\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":74847,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74845\/revisions\/74847"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74846"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74845"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74845"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74845"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}