{"id":75193,"date":"2020-03-18T13:52:07","date_gmt":"2020-03-18T12:52:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/si-e-kaloi-gjyqtari-artur-kalaja-e-kaloi-testin-e-vetingut-ne-kpk\/2020\/03\/18\/"},"modified":"2023-04-07T04:19:56","modified_gmt":"2023-04-07T02:19:56","slug":"si-e-kaloi-gjyqtari-artur-kalaja-e-kaloi-testin-e-vetingut-ne-kpk","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/si-e-kaloi-gjyqtari-artur-kalaja-e-kaloi-testin-e-vetingut-ne-kpk\/2020\/03\/18\/","title":{"rendered":"Si e kaloi gjyqtari Artur Kalaja testin e vetingut n\u00eb KPK"},"content":{"rendered":"

Gjyqtari i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit t\u00eb Tiran\u00ebs, Artur Kalaja e bindi Komisionin se nuk kishte pasur trajtim preferencial t\u00eb babait t\u00eb tij n\u00eb nj\u00eb proces civil p\u00ebr p\u00ebrfitimin e kompensimit si ish-pronar, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb pasakt\u00ebsit\u00eb n\u00eb deklarimin e pasurive dhe dy balanca negative nuk jan\u00eb konsideruar si shkaqe shkarkuese.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
Gjyqtari i Apelit t\u00eb Tiran\u00ebs, Artur Kalaja p\u00ebrball\u00eb KPK-s\u00eb. Foto: Malton Dibra\/LSA<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Pavar\u00ebsisht se KPK konstaton se procesi gjyq\u00ebsor ka p\u00ebrfunduar n\u00eb t\u00eb tri shkall\u00ebt n\u00eb nj\u00eb koh\u00eb mjaft t\u00eb shkurt\u00ebr krahasuar me t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtat \u00e7\u00ebshtje, se subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit ka p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsuar t\u00eb atin dhe se koleg\u00ebt e tij e gjykuan dosjen n\u00eb Apel, gjyqtari Artur Kalaja e ka bindur trupin gjykues se ai dhe bashk\u00ebpronar\u00ebt kishin fituar vet\u00ebm nj\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00eb q\u00eb ju ishte mohuar\u00a0 prej 20 vitesh.<\/p>\n

Balancat negative n\u00eb dy vite dhe mosp\u00ebrputhjet e konstatuara nuk jan\u00eb konsideruar n\u00eb at\u00eb shkall\u00eb q\u00eb mund t\u00eb sillnin shkarkimin e subjektit. Kalaja u vler\u00ebsua pozitivisht p\u00ebr figur\u00ebn e profesionalizimin dhe arriti t\u00eb kaloj\u00eb me sukses procesin e rivler\u00ebsimit kalimtar n\u00eb shkall\u00ebn e par\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Trupa gjykuese e p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00eb nga Pamela Qirko kryesuese, Alma Faskaj relatore dhe Firdes Shuli an\u00ebtare, pasi konkluduan se gjyqtari Artur Kalaja kishte arritur nivel t\u00eb besuesh\u00ebm n\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin e pasuris\u00eb e n\u00eb kontrollin e figur\u00ebs dhe nivel kualifikues n\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin e aft\u00ebsive profesionale, vendos\u00ebn m\u00eb dat\u00eb 8 n\u00ebntor 2019 konfirmimin e tij n\u00eb detyr\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Artur Kalaja e ka filluar karrier\u00ebn n\u00eb sistemin e drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb vitin 2000. Ai ka punuar si gjyqtar i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Elbasanit, nd\u00ebrsa n\u00eb vitin 2006 \u00ebsht\u00eb em\u00ebruar an\u00ebtar i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit t\u00eb Tiran\u00ebs, detyr\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebn vazhdon ta kryej\u00eb edhe pas 13 vitesh.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb shkurt t\u00eb vitit 2017, Kalaja u b\u00eb pjes\u00eb e nj\u00eb verifikimi t\u00eb K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Lart\u00eb t\u00eb Drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb s\u00eb bashku me 4 gjyqtar\u00eb t\u00eb tjer\u00eb pas vendimit t\u00eb diskutuesh\u00ebm t\u00eb pafaj\u00ebsis\u00eb p\u00ebr an\u00ebtar\u00ebt e grupit t\u00eb njohur me emrin \u201cHakmarrja p\u00ebr Drejt\u00ebsi\u201d. Rezultatet e verifikimit t\u00eb KLD-s\u00eb mbeten t\u00eb panjohura.<\/p>\n

\u00c7\u00ebshtja p\u00ebr kompensimin e pron\u00ebs<\/strong><\/p>\n

N\u00eb vendimin e KPK trajtohet nj\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje gjyq\u00ebsore civile me pal\u00eb padit\u00ebse, S.K., t\u00eb atin e gjyqtarit Kalaja, dhe pal\u00eb t\u00eb paditur Agjencin\u00eb e Kthimit dhe Kompensimit t\u00eb Pronave.<\/p>\n

Komisioni shpjegon se m\u00eb dat\u00eb 17 maj 2013, n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn e Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Tiran\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb regjistruar k\u00ebrkes\u00ebpadia e padit\u00ebsit S.K., p\u00ebr kompensimin e truallit me sip\u00ebrfaqe 366 m2, ndodhur n\u00eb Tiran\u00eb, pron\u00eb e babait t\u00eb padit\u00ebsit. Nga verifikimi i dokumentacionit t\u00eb dosjes ka rezultuar se padit\u00ebsi \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsuar nga i biri, gjyqtari Artur Kalaja.<\/p>\n

Komisioni ka analizuar gjith\u00eb ecurin\u00eb e procesit gjyq\u00ebsor, prej nga ka rezultuar se Gjykata e Tiran\u00ebs ka pranuar padin\u00eb dhe detyruar AKKP-n\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u2019i paguar padit\u00ebsit shum\u00ebn 24 milion\u00eb lek\u00eb. Sipas KPK, gjykimi \u00ebsht\u00eb realizuar pa u \u00e7muar paraprakisht vlefshm\u00ebria e p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsimit t\u00eb padit\u00ebsit nga nj\u00eb gjyqtar dhe pa nj\u00eb ekspertiz\u00eb p\u00ebr p\u00ebrllogaritjen e shum\u00ebs s\u00eb kompensimit. Gjithashtu, evidentohet se gjykimi \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrmbyllur me tri seanca brenda 12 dit\u00ebve, q\u00eb rezulton nj\u00eb koh\u00ebzgjatje relativisht e shkurt\u00ebr p\u00ebr \u00e7\u00ebshtje t\u00eb k\u00ebtij lloji nga i nj\u00ebjti gjyqtar.<\/p>\n

Gjykimi n\u00eb Apel \u00ebsht\u00eb kryer nga koleg\u00ebt e Kalas\u00eb, me t\u00eb cil\u00ebt ai gjykonte n\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin trup gjykues n\u00eb periudh\u00ebn p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse, t\u00eb cil\u00ebt e kan\u00eb gjykuar \u00e7\u00ebshtjen gjithashtu brenda nj\u00eb kohe m\u00eb t\u00eb shkurt\u00ebr se t\u00eb tjerat t\u00eb ngjashme. E nj\u00ebjta situat\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb konstatuar edhe n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn e Lart\u00eb, pasi Kolegji Civil nuk e ka pranuar rekursin e pal\u00ebs s\u00eb paditur dhe e ka p\u00ebrfunduar \u00e7\u00ebshtjen n\u00eb nj\u00eb koh\u00eb mjaft t\u00eb shkurt\u00ebr krahasuar me dosjet e tjera.<\/p>\n

P\u00ebr k\u00ebto arsye, Komisioni ka ngritur dyshime se p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje mund t\u00eb kishte ndodhur trajtim preferencial ose p\u00ebrfitim i padrejt\u00eb p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb pozit\u00ebs s\u00eb Kalas\u00eb si gjyqtar.<\/p>\n

Komisioni \u00ebsht\u00eb njohur me q\u00ebndrimin e subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit p\u00ebr k\u00ebto gjetje, i cili ka shpjeguar se Komisioni i Kthimit dhe Kompensimit t\u00eb Pronave Tiran\u00eb, n\u00eb korrik t\u00eb vitit 1994 u ka njohur trash\u00ebgimtar\u00ebve t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e pasuris\u00eb mbi nj\u00eb banes\u00eb dykat\u00ebshe, me 6 dhoma, 2 sallone etj., dhe truall me sip\u00ebrfaqe 935.24 m2, n\u00eb kryeqytet. Gjithashtu, Kalaja ka sqaruar se ju \u00ebsht\u00eb kthyer fizikisht banesa dhe trualli me sip\u00ebrfaqe 569.24 m2 dhe e u \u00ebsht\u00eb njohur e drejta e kompensimit p\u00ebr truallin me sip\u00ebrfaqe 366 m2.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb vendim theksohet se megjith\u00eb k\u00ebrkesat n\u00eb vijim t\u00eb bashk\u00ebpronar\u00ebve p\u00ebr t\u2019u kompensuar sipas vendimit t\u00eb KKKP Tiran\u00eb, p\u00ebr munges\u00eb fondesh, kjo e drejt\u00eb ju ishte mohuar p\u00ebr rreth 20 vjet, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb ish-pronar\u00eb t\u00eb tjer\u00eb jan\u00eb kompensuar.<\/p>\n

\u201cNd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, nga publikimet e vendimeve q\u00eb kishin p\u00ebrfituar kompensim n\u00eb shtypin periodik, por edhe buletinet p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse, rezultoi se kompensim kishin marr\u00eb edhe ish-pronar\u00eb me vendime me dat\u00eb shum\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb vonshme se data 31.7.1994. Fakti i m\u00ebsip\u00ebrm tregon se p\u00ebr bashk\u00ebpronar\u00ebt Kalaja, jo vet\u00ebm nuk kishte ndonj\u00eb trajtim preferencial, por n\u00eb shkelje t\u00eb procedurave ligjore po ju zvarritej ekzekutimi i nj\u00eb t\u00eb drejte t\u00eb ligjshme t\u00eb fituar prej 20 vitesh\u201d, citohet n\u00eb vendimin e KPK.<\/p>\n

Aty shpjegohet se sipas kuadrit ligjor t\u00eb koh\u00ebs, AKKP-ja kishte detyrimin q\u00eb p\u00ebr pronar\u00ebt q\u00eb kishin marr\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e kompensimit deri n\u00eb 500 m2 , t\u00eb kompensonte 200 m2 .\u00a0 Sipas KPK, bashk\u00ebpronar\u00ebt Kalaja k\u00ebrkuan n\u00eb gjykat\u00eb q\u00eb kompensimi t\u00eb llogaritej n\u00eb baz\u00eb t\u00eb VKM-s\u00eb, si\u00e7 kishte detyrimin AKKP-ja dhe jo sipas vler\u00ebs s\u00eb tregut q\u00eb realisht ishte m\u00eb e madhe.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim, Komisioni konkludon se nuk rezultuan prova apo indicie q\u00eb t\u00eb \u2019i krijonin bindjen Kalaja mund t\u00eb kishte p\u00ebrfituar ndonj\u00eb trajtim preferencial apo mund t\u00eb kishte ushtruar ndikim n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje, duke shfryt\u00ebzuar pozit\u00ebn e tij si magjistrat, p\u00ebr p\u00ebrfitime t\u00eb padrejta.<\/p>\n

Pasakt\u00ebsi n\u00eb deklarim<\/strong><\/p>\n

Komisioni konstaton pasakt\u00ebsi n\u00eb deklarime dhe pamund\u00ebsi financiare t\u00eb gjyqtarit Kalaja n\u00eb shum\u00ebn -205 mij\u00eb lek\u00eb p\u00ebr blerjen e nj\u00eb automjeti tip \u201cMercedes Benz 280 E\u201d, n\u00eb qershor 2010 p\u00ebr vler\u00ebn 14.000 euro. Si burim p\u00ebr blerjen e k\u00ebsaj makine, Kalaja ka deklaruar kursime familjare, nga paga n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn e Apelit Tiran\u00eb, nga viti 2006.<\/p>\n

KPK konstaton disa mosp\u00ebrputhje mes t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave n\u00eb deklarat\u00ebn periodike vjetore t\u00eb vitit 2010 me deklarat\u00ebn veting, krahasuar me dokumentacionin e DRSHTR-s\u00eb Tiran\u00eb, n\u00eb lidhje me gjetjet. N\u00eb vitin 2010 ai ka deklaruar si burim t\u00eb t\u00eb ardhurave kursimet familjare dhe nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb nga prind\u00ebrit, por pa evidentuar vler\u00ebn q\u00eb i kan\u00eb dh\u00ebn\u00eb dhe n\u00ebse ka qen\u00eb dhurat\u00eb apo hua.<\/p>\n

Nd\u00ebrsa n\u00eb deklarat\u00ebn veting Kalaja ka sh\u00ebnuar se burimi i t\u00eb ardhurave p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb pasuri jan\u00eb kursimet familjare nga paga n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn e Apelit Tiran\u00eb, q\u00eb nga viti 2006, duke mos mos evidentuar ndonj\u00eb burim tjet\u00ebr nga prind\u00ebrit.<\/p>\n

Komisioni konstaton m\u00eb tej se Kalaja ka deklaruar vet\u00ebm \u00e7mimin e kontrat\u00ebs s\u00eb shitblerjes n\u00eb Gjermani, 14 mij\u00eb euro, por pa pasqyruar detyrimet e importit n\u00eb shum\u00ebn 603.784 lek\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, ka rezultuar se n\u00ebnshkrimi i bler\u00ebsit n\u00eb kontrat\u00ebn e shitjes s\u00eb automjetit me shoq\u00ebrin\u00eb tregtare gjermane nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb i Kalas\u00eb, duke konkluduar se kontrata \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00ebnshkruar nga dikush tjet\u00ebr n\u00eb em\u00ebr t\u00eb tij, si edhe nuk evidentohet n\u00ebse pagesa \u00ebsht\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb cash apo me bank\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Kalaja ka shpjeguar se besonte se shtetasi V.Xh., personi q\u00eb i ka shitur makin\u00ebn, e ka kryer blerjen e mjetit n\u00eb Gjermani n\u00eb em\u00ebr t\u00eb gjyqtarit, me q\u00ebllim p\u00ebr t\u00eb eliminuar shpenzimet e nevojshme p\u00ebr t\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb kalimin e pron\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb Shqip\u00ebri.<\/p>\n

Komisioni ka verifikuar n\u00eb Deg\u00ebn Doganore Durr\u00ebs mbi personin q\u00eb ka kryer procedurat doganore p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb mjet, nga ka rezultuar se jan\u00eb kryer n\u00eb em\u00ebr t\u00eb gjyqtarit Artur Kalaja, duke e shoq\u00ebruar p\u00ebrgjigjen me dokumentacionin dhe pasaport\u00ebn e tij, por nga ku \u00ebsht\u00eb konstatuar se n\u00ebnshkrimi n\u00eb mandatpages\u00eb nuk i p\u00ebrkiste subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb vendim thuhet se, n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim t\u00eb hetimit, nuk rezultoi dokumentacion ligjor mbi pages\u00ebn e detyrimit doganor n\u00eb em\u00ebr t\u00eb shtetasit V. Xh., si dhe as p\u00ebr ndonj\u00eb rimbursim t\u00eb ndonj\u00eb shume nga ky i fundit. \u201cPor nuk rezultoi q\u00eb importi i k\u00ebtij automjeti, sikund\u00ebr dhe veprimet dhe pagesa e detyrimeve doganore, t\u00eb jen\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb nga subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit. Vlen t\u00eb theksohet se referuar t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave nga sistemi TIMS n\u00eb administrim t\u00eb Policis\u00eb s\u00eb Shtetit, subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit nuk ka hyrje-dalje nga dhe n\u00eb Republik\u00ebn e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb n\u00eb periudh\u00ebn kur jan\u00eb kryer veprimet p\u00ebr blerjen e automjetit, transportin dhe futjen e tij n\u00eb territorin doganor t\u00eb dogan\u00ebs Durr\u00ebs\u201d, citohet n\u00eb vendim.<\/p>\n

Kalaja ka pohuar para Komisionit se nuk kishte pasur asnj\u00eb njohje apo interes me shtetasin V.Xh., por thjesht kishte bler\u00eb makin\u00ebn. N\u00eb vendim citohet nj\u00eb sqarim i Kalas\u00eb lidhur me gjetjet p\u00ebr tarif\u00ebn e dogan\u00ebs s\u00eb mjetit kur ai ka deklaruar se gjith\u00e7ka e ka m\u00ebsuar gjat\u00eb procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit. \u201cI kam dh\u00ebn\u00eb (shtetasit V. XH.) 14.000 euro. M\u00eb ka dh\u00ebn\u00eb dhe ca letra. I kam marr\u00eb letrat i kam \u00e7uar tek Drejtoria e Sh\u00ebrbimit t\u00eb Transportit Rrugor. Kam marr\u00eb targat dhe lejen e qarkullimit n\u00eb emrin tim dhe 10 vjet nuk di asnj\u00eb gj\u00eb m\u00eb tutje p\u00ebr makin\u00ebn. Un\u00eb kam qen\u00eb n\u00eb rregull me makin\u00ebn, ai ka qen\u00eb n\u00eb rregull me mua, s\u2019e kam takuar kurr\u00eb personin. P\u00ebr efekt t\u00eb k\u00ebtij procesi marr vesh q\u00eb e gjith\u00eb puna \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebr dogan\u00ebn, me t\u00eb drejt\u00eb\u201d, ka shpjeguar Kalaja.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim, KPK konstaton se Kalaja e ka deklaruar sakt\u00eb pasurin\u00eb n\u00eb deklarat\u00ebn veting, por se nuk disponon t\u00eb ardhura t\u00eb mjaftueshme nga burime t\u00eb ligjshme p\u00ebr t\u00eb bler\u00eb n\u00eb qershor t\u00eb vitit 2010, automjetin tip \u201cMercedez Benz 280 E\u201d, pasi ka nj\u00eb munges\u00eb burimesh financiare t\u00eb ligjshme n\u00eb shum\u00ebn – 205.617 lek\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Komisioni evidenton munges\u00eb t\u00eb burimeve t\u00eb ligjshme t\u00eb Kalas\u00eb edhe n\u00eb vitin 2006 n\u00eb vler\u00ebn -350 mij\u00eb lek\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Sipas KPK, Kalaja ka b\u00ebr\u00eb deklarim t\u00eb pasakt\u00eb n\u00eb vitin 2005, vit n\u00eb t\u00eb cilin duhej q\u00eb t\u00eb deklaronte t\u00eb gjitha pasurit\u00eb q\u00eb kishte marr\u00eb n\u00eb zot\u00ebrim. N\u00eb vendim shpjegohet se Kalaja ka pasqyruar n\u00eb deklarimet pararend\u00ebse si pasuri t\u00eb paluajtshme vet\u00ebm apartamentin dhe automjetin e bler\u00eb nga shtetasi S. P., si dhe t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e bashk\u00ebpron\u00ebsis\u00eb s\u00eb bashk\u00ebshortes mbi pasurin\u00eb truall me sip\u00ebrfaqe 800 m2 dhe sht\u00ebpi 2-kat\u00ebshe.<\/p>\n

Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, n\u00eb vitin 2005, pasuria truall ka p\u00ebsuar ndryshime sepse \u00ebsht\u00eb zhvilluar dhe p\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb edhe t\u00eb drejtat e bashk\u00ebshortes kan\u00eb ndryshuar, duke qen\u00eb ka marr\u00eb n\u00eb dor\u00ebzim sip\u00ebrfaqet nd\u00ebrtimore nga shoq\u00ebria nd\u00ebrtuese. \u201cPor, subjekti e deklaron pasurin\u00eb e p\u00ebrfituar nga kontrata e sip\u00ebrmarrjes, aneksin e sip\u00ebrmarrjes dhe shk\u00ebmbimit vet\u00ebm n\u00eb vitin 2013\u201d, theksohet n\u00eb vendim.<\/p>\n

Pasakt\u00ebsi \u00ebsht\u00eb gjetur n\u00eb deklarat\u00ebn periodike t\u00eb vitit 2016, pasi Kalaja nuk ka pasqyruar nj\u00eb gjendje cash n\u00eb vler\u00ebn 600 mij\u00eb lek\u00eb. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, KPK shprehet se ai ka deklaruar sakt\u00eb gjendjen cash n\u00eb vitin 2017 dhe se ka pasur t\u00eb ardhura t\u00eb mjaftueshme nga burime t\u00eb ligjshme p\u00ebr krijimin e k\u00ebsaj vlere n\u00eb fund t\u00eb vitit 2016.<\/p>\n

Lidhur me kriterin e pasuris\u00eb, KPK vler\u00ebson se pasakt\u00ebsit\u00eb dhe vlera e konstatuar n\u00eb munges\u00ebn e burimeve t\u00eb ligjshme, nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb at\u00eb shkall\u00eb sa t\u00eb p\u00ebrb\u00ebj\u00eb shkak p\u00ebr shkarkim. \u201cP\u00ebr sa m\u00eb sip\u00ebr, trupi gjykues vler\u00ebson se subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit, z. Artur Kalaja, ka arritur nj\u00eb nivel t\u00eb besuesh\u00ebm n\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin e pasuris\u00eb\u2026\u201d, citohet n\u00eb vendim.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Gjyqtari i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit t\u00eb Tiran\u00ebs, Artur Kalaja e bindi Komisionin se nuk kishte pasur trajtim preferencial t\u00eb babait t\u00eb tij n\u00eb nj\u00eb proces civil p\u00ebr p\u00ebrfitimin e kompensimit si ish-pronar, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb pasakt\u00ebsit\u00eb n\u00eb deklarimin e pasurive dhe dy balanca negative nuk jan\u00eb konsideruar si shkaqe shkarkuese.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":637,"featured_media":75194,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[13,481,117,473],"tags":[738,125,107,118,171],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/Artur-Kalaja-foto.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"Gjyqtari i Apelit t\u00eb Tiran\u00ebs, Artur Kalaja p\u00ebrball\u00eb KPK-s\u00eb. Foto: Malton Dibra\/LSA ","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75193"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/637"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=75193"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75193\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":75195,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75193\/revisions\/75195"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/75194"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=75193"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=75193"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=75193"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}