{"id":75211,"date":"2020-03-12T20:16:43","date_gmt":"2020-03-12T19:16:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/komisioneri-ankimon-konfirmimin-e-kreut-te-gjykates-se-apelit-gjirokaster\/2020\/03\/12\/"},"modified":"2023-04-07T04:22:43","modified_gmt":"2023-04-07T02:22:43","slug":"komisioneri-ankimon-konfirmimin-e-kreut-te-gjykates-se-apelit-gjirokaster","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/komisioneri-ankimon-konfirmimin-e-kreut-te-gjykates-se-apelit-gjirokaster\/2020\/03\/12\/","title":{"rendered":"Komisioneri ankimon konfirmimin e kreut t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit Gjirokast\u00ebr"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Gjyqtari Dritan Banushi do t\u00eb rikthehet s\u00ebrish n\u00eb veting para Kolegjit t\u00eb Posa\u00e7\u00ebm t\u00eb Apelimit, pasi Komisioneri Publik e konsideroi t\u00eb padrejt\u00eb konfirmimin e tij dhe k\u00ebrkon shkarkimin nga detyra.<!--more--><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_67615\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-67615\" style=\"width: 506px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/Dritan-Banushi.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-large wp-image-67615\" src=\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/Dritan-Banushi-506x400.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"506\" height=\"400\" data-id=\"67615\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-67615\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Kreu i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit Gjirokast\u00ebr, Dritan Baushi, gjat\u00eb seanc\u00ebs d\u00ebgjimore n\u00eb KPK, me 27.01.2020 | Foto : Edmond Hoxhaj<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Komisioneri Publik, Darjel Sina kund\u00ebrshtoi t\u00eb enjten vendimin e Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit p\u00ebr konfirmimin n\u00eb detyr\u00eb t\u00eb kreut t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit t\u00eb Gjirokastr\u00ebs, Dritan Banushi, duke k\u00ebrkuar n\u00eb Kolegj shkarkimin e tij.<\/p>\n<p>Komisioneri \u00e7mon n\u00eb ankim se vendimi i KPK-s\u00eb p\u00ebr Banushin \u00ebsht\u00eb i c\u00ebnuesh\u00ebm n\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsin\u00eb e tij dhe p\u00ebrmban shkaqe t\u00eb mjaftueshme ligjore p\u00ebr t\u2019u paraqitur p\u00ebr shqyrtim n\u00eb Kolegjin e Posa\u00e7\u00ebm t\u00eb Apelimit, KPA.<\/p>\n<p>Sina evidenton munges\u00eb burimesh t\u00eb ligjshme p\u00ebr shpenzimet dhe kursimet e disa viteve nga Banushi si edhe p\u00ebr blerjen e nj\u00eb apartamenti nga prind\u00ebrit e tij, ku jeton familja e gjyqtarit.<\/p>\n<p>Komisioneri nuk e gjen t\u00eb drejt\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin e KPK-s\u00eb se pas kalimit t\u00eb barr\u00ebs s\u00eb prov\u00ebs, gjyqtari Banushi arriti t\u00eb p\u00ebrmbys\u00eb balanc\u00ebn negative p\u00ebr vitet 2008, 2009, 2013, 2014, 2015 dhe 2016 nga 1 milion lek\u00eb n\u00eb 152.670 lek\u00eb minus; p\u00ebr t\u00eb cil\u00ebn u vler\u00ebsua m\u00eb pas mbi parimin e proporcionalitetit.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb ankim identifikohet mosp\u00ebrputhje edhe n\u00eb deklarimin e b\u00ebr\u00eb nga vajza e gjyqtarit n\u00eb vitin 2014 p\u00ebr shumat 3500 euro dhe 100 mij\u00eb lek\u00eb q\u00eb i jan\u00eb dhuruar p\u00ebr fillimin e shkoll\u00ebs. Komisioneri konstaton se shpjegimet e Banushit n\u00eb nivel deklerativ jan\u00eb pranuar si prova prej Komisionit q\u00eb i ka konsideruar k\u00ebto vlera si t\u00eb ardhura t\u00eb ligjshme. \u201c\u2026Rezulton se p\u00ebr vitin 2014, subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit nuk mbulon me burime t\u00eb ligjshme shpenzimet dhe kursimet p\u00ebr nj\u00eb diferenc\u00eb negative prej rreth 503.000 lek\u00eb\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb ankim.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cN\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim, Komisioneri Publik nga analiza financiare e subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit dhe personave t\u00eb lidhur me t\u00eb, p\u00ebr periudh\u00ebn 2003-2016, vler\u00ebson se\u2026subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit nuk mbulon me burime t\u00eb ligjshme shpenzimet e deklaruara dhe kursimet n\u00eb form\u00ebn e likuiditeteve n\u00eb depozitat bankare dhe n\u00eb cash p\u00ebr nj\u00eb diferenc\u00eb totale prej 3.300.000 lek\u00eb (ose rreth 4.200.000 lek\u00eb, n\u00ebse nuk konsiderojm\u00eb si t\u00eb ardhura t\u00eb ligjshme t\u00eb ardhurat e deklaruara si dhurime),\u201d thuhet n\u00eb ankim.<\/p>\n<p>P\u00ebrve\u00e7 analiz\u00ebs financiare, komisioneri Sina kund\u00ebrshtoi edhe vler\u00ebsimin e KPK-s\u00eb p\u00ebr nj\u00eb apartament me sip\u00ebrfaqe 85.5 m2 n\u00eb Gjirokast\u00ebr t\u00eb bler\u00eb nga prind\u00ebrit e gjyqtarit Banushi n\u00eb shtator 2003. Ndryshe nga KPK q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb bindur me provat dhe deklarimet e Banushit lidhur me vler\u00ebn e gjendjen e apartamentit si edhe me mund\u00ebsin\u00eb e financiare t\u00eb prind\u00ebrve p\u00ebr ta bler\u00eb at\u00eb, Sina konstaton se dokumentacioni i paraqitur nga subjekti nuk mund t\u00eb konsiderohet justifikues p\u00ebr ligjshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e burimit t\u00eb t\u00eb ardhurave q\u00eb kan\u00eb sh\u00ebrbyer p\u00ebr krijimin e k\u00ebsaj pasurie.<\/p>\n<p>Sipas Sin\u00ebs, Banushi nuk ka arritur t\u00eb provoj\u00eb me dokumentacion ligjor se apartamenti \u00ebsht\u00eb bler\u00eb n\u00eb gjendje karabina, si\u00e7 ka konkluduar Komisioni.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cKomisioneri Publik konstaton se rezulton e provuar se subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit nuk arriti provoj\u00eb nj\u00eb fakt t\u00eb ndrysh\u00ebm nga p\u00ebrmbajtja e kontrat\u00ebs noteriale t\u00eb shitblerjes s\u00eb pasuris\u00eb s\u00eb paluajtshme nr.*** rep nr.*** kol., dat\u00eb ***.09.2003 dhe akteve t\u00eb tjera zyrtare, t\u00eb cilat n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb ligjit p\u00ebrb\u00ebjn\u00eb prov\u00eb t\u00eb plot\u00eb se babai i subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit ka bler\u00eb pasurin\u00eb \u2018Apartament banimi 85.5 m2\u2019, t\u00eb p\u00ebrfunduar plot\u00ebsisht q\u00eb n\u00eb vitin 2003. Rezulton i pabazuar pretendimi se pasuria \u2018Apartament banimi 85.5 m2\u2019 ishte n\u00eb gjendje karabinaje n\u00eb momentin e blerjes,\u201d konstaton Sina.<\/p>\n<p>Ai shton se KPK nuk ka vler\u00ebsuar drejt as \u00e7mimin e blerjes s\u00eb k\u00ebtij appartamenti, p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilin Banushi ka deklaruar se kostoja e blerjes dhe ato t\u00eb nd\u00ebrtimit kapin vler\u00ebn totale 1.9 milion\u00eb lek\u00eb. Komisioneri shprehet se vlera e tregut p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb apartament, sipas Entit Komb\u00ebtar t\u00eb Banesave n\u00eb vitin 2003 ka qen\u00eb 2.9 milion\u00eb lek\u00eb dhe jo 2 milion\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb ankim analizohet edhe mund\u00ebsia financiare e prind\u00ebrve p\u00ebr t\u00eb mbuluar me burime t\u00eb ligjshme shpenzimet p\u00ebr blerjen e apartamentit. Deklarimet e Banushit se t\u00eb ardhurat e prind\u00ebrve kan\u00eb si burim blegtorin\u00eb, vreshtarin\u00eb dhe bletarin\u00eb p\u00ebr periudh\u00ebn 1991-2002 n\u00eb vler\u00ebn 4.496.120 lek\u00eb nuk kan\u00eb qen\u00eb bind\u00ebse p\u00ebr Komisionerin.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cKomisioneri Publik, ndryshe nga sa ka vler\u00ebsuar Komisioni, konstaton se subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit ka p\u00ebrllogaritur vet\u00eb shum\u00ebn e t\u00eb ardhurave t\u00eb sigurura nga aktiviteti bujq\u00ebsor dhe blegtorial i prind\u00ebrve t\u00eb tij, p\u00ebr periudh\u00ebn 1993-2003, mb\u00ebshtetur n\u00eb deklarata me shkrim dore, t\u00eb disa shtetasve, pa dat\u00eb. K\u00ebto t\u00eb ardhura t\u00eb llogaritura nga vet\u00eb subjekti, nuk bazohen n\u00eb dokumentacion justifikues p\u00ebr t\u00eb provuar mas\u00ebn e t\u00eb ardhurave t\u00eb pretenduara t\u00eb realizuara, si dhe faktin n\u00ebse p\u00ebr to jan\u00eb paguar detyrimet tatimore, n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb t\u00eb konsiderohen t\u00eb ardhura t\u00eb ligjshme n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb nenit D pika 3 e Aneksit t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs\u201d, kontsaton Sina n\u00eb ankim.<\/p>\n<p>Ai shton se bazuar n\u00eb dokumentacionin ligjor t\u00eb v\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb dispozicion nga Banushi, totali i t\u00eb ardhurave nga paga minimale \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb vler\u00ebn 1.414.680 lek\u00eb. \u201cK\u00ebto t\u00eb ardhura nuk mbulojn\u00eb shpenzimet p\u00ebr apartamentin, n\u00eb asnj\u00eb nga variantet e vlerave t\u00eb p\u00ebrllogaritura\u2026,\u201d shprehet Sina.<\/p>\n<p>Ai vler\u00ebson se Banushi ka kryer deklarimi t\u00eb pasakt\u00eb e t\u00eb pamjaftuesh\u00ebm dhe se ka munges\u00eb t\u00eb burimeve t\u00eb ligjshme p\u00ebr krijimin e t\u00eb ardhurave q\u00eb kan\u00eb sh\u00ebrbyer p\u00ebr krijimin e k\u00ebsaj pasurie nga ana e prind\u00ebrve t\u00eb subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb fund, Sina i k\u00ebrkon Kolegjit q\u00eb t\u00eb ndryshoj\u00eb vendimin e KPK-s\u00eb p\u00ebr konfirmimin e Banushit dhe t\u00eb vendos\u00eb shkarkimin e tij.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gjyqtari Dritan Banushi do t\u00eb rikthehet s\u00ebrish n\u00eb veting para Kolegjit t\u00eb Posa\u00e7\u00ebm t\u00eb Apelimit, pasi Komisioneri Publik e konsideroi t\u00eb padrejt\u00eb konfirmimin e tij dhe k\u00ebrkon shkarkimin nga detyra.<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":637,"featured_media":75212,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[415,121,2,473],"tags":[214,103,101],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/Dritan-Banushi.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"Kreu i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit Gjirokast\u00ebr, Dritan Baushi, gjat\u00eb seanc\u00ebs d\u00ebgjimore n\u00eb KPK, me 27.01.2020 | Foto : Edmond Hoxhaj ","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75211"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/637"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=75211"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75211\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":75213,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75211\/revisions\/75213"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/75212"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=75211"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=75211"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=75211"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}