{"id":75870,"date":"2019-07-17T13:24:00","date_gmt":"2019-07-17T11:24:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/kpa-pranon-kerkesat-e-komisionerit-publik-ne-ceshtjen-ndaj-gjyqtarit-medja\/2019\/07\/17\/"},"modified":"2023-04-07T11:42:07","modified_gmt":"2023-04-07T09:42:07","slug":"kpa-pranon-kerkesat-e-komisionerit-publik-ne-ceshtjen-ndaj-gjyqtarit-medja","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/kpa-pranon-kerkesat-e-komisionerit-publik-ne-ceshtjen-ndaj-gjyqtarit-medja\/2019\/07\/17\/","title":{"rendered":"KPA pranon k\u00ebrkesat e Komisionerit Publik n\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjen ndaj gjyqtarit Medja"},"content":{"rendered":"

Kolegji vendosi t\u00eb pranoj\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e Komisionerit p\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar si prova dosjen personale, mendimin e kryetarit t\u00eb gjykat\u00ebs dhe mendimin me shkrim t\u00eb Shkoll\u00ebs s\u00eb Magjistratur\u00ebs, n\u00eb shqyrtimin e \u00e7\u00ebshtjes ndaj gjyqtarit Gentian Medja.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit n\u00eb seanc\u00ebn e subjektit Gentjan Medja n\u00eb Tiran\u00eb m\u00eb 17 korrik 2019. Foto: Gjergj Erebara\/BIRN<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Komisioneri Publik dhe gjyqtari i Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative t\u00eb Tiran\u00ebs, Gentian Medja mbajt\u00ebn q\u00ebndrime t\u00eb ndryshme mbi projekt-metodologjin\u00eb e propozuar nga Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit p\u00ebr vler\u00ebsimin e aft\u00ebsive profesionale.<\/p>\n

Gjat\u00eb seanc\u00ebs s\u00eb t\u00eb m\u00ebrkurr\u00ebs, n\u00eb vijim t\u00eb gjykimit t\u00eb apelimit t\u00eb Komisionerit Florjan Ballhysa kund\u00ebr konfirmimit t\u00eb Medjas bazuar mbi kriterin e aft\u00ebsive profesionale, gjyqtari kund\u00ebrshtoi n\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsi metodologjin\u00eb e propozuar duke th\u00ebn\u00eb se ajo dilte jasht\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs n\u00eb ankim dhe jasht\u00eb kompetencave t\u00eb KPA.<\/p>\n

Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb Ballhysa vler\u00ebsoi projektin e ngritur mbi propozimin e tij si shum\u00eb t\u00eb mir\u00eb dhe i k\u00ebrkoi trup\u00ebs gjykuese, t\u00eb kryesuar nga Natasha Mulaj, me relator Luan Daci dhe an\u00ebtar\u00eb Ardian Hajdari, Ina Rama dhe Sokol \u00c7omo, q\u00eb t\u00eb k\u00ebrkonte si prova t\u00eb reja dosjen personale t\u00eb Medjas, mendimin e kryetarit t\u00eb gjykat\u00ebs dhe mendimin me shkrim t\u00eb Shkoll\u00ebs s\u00eb Magjistratur\u00ebs mbi gjyqtarin.<\/p>\n

Trupa gjykuese, e cila n\u00eb seanc\u00ebn e kaluar tha<\/a> se do t\u00eb shprehej mbi metodologjin\u00eb e propozuar vet\u00ebm n\u00eb fund t\u00eb procesit, nuk mbajti q\u00ebndrim p\u00ebr k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e Medjas p\u00ebr rr\u00ebzimin n\u00eb ter\u00ebsi t\u00eb projektit, por vendosi t\u00eb pranonte k\u00ebrkesat e Komisionerit Publik p\u00ebr prova.<\/p>\n

Q\u00ebndrimi i Komisionerit<\/strong><\/p>\n

N\u00eb fjal\u00ebn e tij Komisioneri Ballhysa u shpreh se n\u00eb projekt-metodologji ishin t\u00eb gjith\u00eb indikator\u00ebt e nevojsh\u00ebm p\u00ebr vler\u00ebsimin profesional t\u00eb gjyqtar\u00ebve dhe prokuror\u00ebve. Ai theksoi se kjo metodologji mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrdorej n\u00eb rastin konkret dhe n\u00eb p\u00ebrgjith\u00ebsi.<\/p>\n

\u201cKomisioneri Publik mendon se \u00ebsht\u00eb e plot\u00eb nga pik\u00ebpamja e struktur\u00ebs\u201d, tha Ballhysa n\u00eb seanc\u00eb. Ai vler\u00ebsoi p\u00ebrfshirjen n\u00eb metodologji t\u00eb burimit t\u00eb vler\u00ebsimit si di\u00e7ka q\u00eb e b\u00ebnte mjaft konkret indikator\u00ebt mbi t\u00eb cil\u00ebt do t\u00eb b\u00ebhej vler\u00ebsimi.<\/p>\n

Ballhysa nd\u00ebr t\u00eb tjera, duke iu referuar ligjit 96\/2016 \u201cMbi statusin e gjyqtar\u00ebve\u201d, k\u00ebrkoi q\u00eb p\u00ebr \u00e7\u00ebshtjen konkrete t\u00eb k\u00ebrkoheshin dhe administroheshin si prova tre burime informacioni sipas tij t\u00eb nevojshme. Dosja personale e magjistratit q\u00eb sipas Komisionerit b\u00ebnte t\u00eb matsh\u00ebm disa indikator\u00eb p\u00ebrfshi pjes\u00ebmarrjen n\u00eb trajnime apo publikimet e magjistratit.<\/p>\n

Mendimi i kryetarit t\u00eb gjykat\u00ebs, n\u00eb rastin konkret t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative Tiran\u00eb, p\u00ebr t\u00eb vler\u00ebsuar etik\u00ebn e magjistratit, sjelljen me koleg\u00ebt, rastet kur ishte k\u00ebrkuar p\u00ebrjashtimi dhe konflikti i mundsh\u00ebm i interesit.<\/p>\n

Dhe po ashtu edhe nj\u00eb mendim me shkrim nga Shkolla e Magjistratur\u00ebs p\u00ebr t\u00eb vler\u00ebsuar angazhimin akademik si udh\u00ebheq\u00ebs p\u00ebr magjistrat\u00ebt e rinj dhe arsimimin e vazhduesh\u00ebm t\u00eb vet\u00eb magjistratit. Komisioneri tha se kjo e b\u00ebnte t\u00eb plot\u00eb hetimin.<\/p>\n

Q\u00ebndrimi i Medjas<\/strong><\/p>\n

Duke u bazuar kryesisht n\u00eb mendimin e Komisionit t\u00eb Venecias mbi reform\u00ebn n\u00eb drejt\u00ebsi gjyqtari i Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative Gentian Medja, i k\u00ebrkoi KPA t\u00eb mos bazohej mbi projekt-metodologjin\u00eb q\u00eb ishte propozuar nga Komisioneri dhe m\u00eb pas nga vet\u00eb Kolegji.<\/p>\n

Medja arsyetoi se Komisioni i Venecias n\u00eb opinionin e tij p\u00ebr reform\u00ebn kishte k\u00ebrkuar q\u00eb puna e KPA dhe Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit nuk mund t\u00eb z\u00ebvend\u00ebsonte organet e reja t\u00eb drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb, konkretisht K\u00ebshillin e Lart\u00eb Gjyq\u00ebsor\u00eb dhe K\u00ebshillin e Lart\u00eb t\u00eb Prokuroris\u00eb, t\u00eb cil\u00ebt b\u00ebjn\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin profesional t\u00eb gjyqtar\u00ebve bazuar n\u00eb ligjin 96\/2016.<\/p>\n

Medja tha se projekti i ngritur kryesisht mbi ligjin p\u00ebr \u201cStatusin e gjyqtar\u00ebve\u201d dilte jasht\u00eb kompetencave t\u00eb Kolegjit, i cili p\u00ebr t\u00eb kryer vler\u00ebsimin duhej t\u00eb bazohej vet\u00ebm n\u00eb ligjin 84\/2016 \u201cP\u00ebr rivler\u00ebsimin kalimtar t\u00eb gjyqtar\u00ebve\u201d.<\/p>\n

Ai tha se k\u00ebrkesat e Komisionerit i tejkalonin kompetencat e parashikuara p\u00ebr organet e vetingut dhe se kjo do t\u00eb zgjaste procesin. Medja k\u00ebrkoi q\u00eb projekt-metodologjia t\u00eb rr\u00ebzohej edhe sepse sipas tij n\u00eb t\u00eb kishte k\u00ebrkesa q\u00eb dilnin jasht\u00eb \u201ck\u00ebrkimeve n\u00eb ankim prej Komisionerit\u201d.<\/p>\n

Medja shtoi se p\u00ebrfshirja n\u00eb gjykim e \u00e7\u00ebshtjeve q\u00eb dilnin jasht\u00eb ankimit c\u00ebnonte procesin. Nd\u00ebrsa pretendoi se kjo po ashtu c\u00ebnonte parimin e propocionalitetit pasi \u00e7\u00ebshtjet n\u00eb ankim nuk ishin aq t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme q\u00eb t\u00eb justifikonin zgjatjen e procesit.<\/p>\n

Medja po ashtu i k\u00ebrkoi KPA q\u00eb t\u00eb mos marr\u00eb parasysh k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e Komisionerit Publik, t\u00eb mbyll\u00eb procesin bazuar n\u00eb pretendimet e paraqitura n\u00eb Apelim, n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb ai t\u00eb mund t\u00eb vijonte pun\u00ebn si gjyqtar\u00eb.<\/p>\n

KPA pasi u t\u00ebrhoq p\u00ebr vendim t\u00eb nd\u00ebrmjet\u00ebm u shpreh vet\u00ebm mbi k\u00ebrkesat e Komisionerit Publik. Kryesuesja Natasha Mulaj njoftoi se trupa kishte vendosur t\u00eb k\u00ebrkonte si prova n\u00eb proces dosjen personale t\u00eb gjyqtarit nga KLGJ, mendimin e kryetarit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative po nga KLGJ dhe nj\u00eb q\u00ebndrim m\u00eb shkrim nga Shkolla e Magjistratur\u00ebs.<\/p>\n

Nj\u00eb seanc\u00eb m\u00eb her\u00ebt KPA e ka l\u00ebn\u00eb t\u00eb hapur mund\u00ebsin\u00eb q\u00eb n\u00eb vendimin p\u00ebrfundimtar t\u00eb rr\u00ebzoj\u00eb ose miratoj\u00eb metodologjin\u00eb, e cila mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrdoret m\u00eb pas edhe n\u00eb raste t\u00eb ngjashme sipas k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs s\u00eb Komisionerit Publik.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Kolegji vendosi t\u00eb pranoj\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e Komisionerit p\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar si prova dosjen personale, mendimin e kryetarit t\u00eb gjykat\u00ebs dhe mendimin me shkrim t\u00eb Shkoll\u00ebs s\u00eb Magjistratur\u00ebs, n\u00eb shqyrtimin e \u00e7\u00ebshtjes ndaj gjyqtarit Gentian Medja.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":97,"featured_media":75871,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[167,114,2,473],"tags":[777,432,107,221],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/KPA-Medja.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit n\u00eb seanc\u00ebn e subjektit Gentjan Medja n\u00eb Tiran\u00eb m\u00eb 17 korrik 2019. Foto: Gjergj Erebara\/BIRN","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75870"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/97"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=75870"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75870\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":75872,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75870\/revisions\/75872"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/75871"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=75870"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=75870"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=75870"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}