![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/20180910_125649_100918008-3_5ip2h61.jpg\")
<\/a>Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit vendosi m\u00eb 5 shkurt 2019 q\u00eb t\u00eb l\u00ebr\u00eb n\u00eb fuqi vendimin e shkarkimit t\u00eb Artan Zenelit, ish-an\u00ebtar i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb. Vendimi tashm\u00eb i argumentuar u shpall nga trupa gjykuese e p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00eb nga Rezarta Schuez kryesuese, Ardian Hajdari relator dhe an\u00ebtar\u00ebt Albana Shtylla, Ina Rama e Natasha Mulaj.<\/p>\n
Ish-an\u00ebtari i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb pretendoi para Kolegjit se vendimi i Komisonit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit \u00ebsht\u00eb marr\u00eb n\u00eb shkelje t\u00eb parimeve kushtetuese, n\u00eb c\u00ebnim t\u00eb Konvent\u00ebs Evropiane t\u00eb t\u00eb Drejtave t\u00eb Njeriut dhe standardeve t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Strasburgut. Zeneli pretendoi gjithashtu se nuk ishte njohur me relacionin e plot\u00eb t\u00eb KPK-s\u00eb, se nj\u00ebra nga an\u00ebtaret e Komisionit ishte n\u00eb kushtet e konfliktit t\u00eb interesit me t\u00eb dhe se procesi i hetimit administrativ kishte qen\u00eb i parregullt.<\/p>\n
Megjithat\u00eb, dy shtyllat kryesore t\u00eb ankimit t\u00eb Artan Zenelit n\u00eb Kolegj lidhen me raportin e DSIK-s\u00eb me baz\u00eb revokimin e nj\u00eb vize amerikane si dhe kund\u00ebrshtimin si t\u00eb pasakt\u00eb t\u00eb vler\u00ebsimit pasuror.<\/p>\n
Trupa gjyq\u00ebsore e KPA-s\u00eb ka rr\u00ebzuar unanimisht pretendimet e ish-an\u00ebtarit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb p\u00ebr proces t\u00eb parregullt ligjor, por \u00ebsht\u00eb ndar\u00eb 4 me 1 n\u00eb disa prej argumenteve q\u00eb lidheshin me raportin e DSIK-s\u00eb dhe disa prej pasurive.<\/p>\n
Gjyqtari Zeneli pretendon n\u00eb ankim se gjetja e Komisionit p\u00ebr revokimin e viz\u00ebs amerikane<\/p>\n
nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb e sqaruar se n\u00eb \u00e7\u2019m\u00ebnyr\u00eb ka afektuar kriterin e kontrollit t\u00eb figur\u00ebs. Subjekti ankohet gjithashtu se nuk ka mundur t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb nj\u00eb mbrojtje efektive, pasi i \u00ebsht\u00eb njoftuar vet\u00ebm nj\u00eb konkluzion i p\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm dhe i padetajuar nga ana e Komisionit.<\/p>\n
\u201cShumica e trupit gjykues t\u00eb komisionit nuk ka b\u00ebr\u00eb nj\u00eb analiz\u00eb ligjore p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktuar n\u00ebse koncepti i refuzimit t\u00eb hyrjes \u00ebsht\u00eb i nj\u00ebjt\u00eb me konceptin e revokimit t\u00eb viz\u00ebs,\u201d pretendoi Zeneli para KPA-s\u00eb, duke sqaruar se nuk i \u00ebsht\u00eb ndaluar hyrja n\u00eb SHBA dhe se n\u00eb koh\u00ebn e plot\u00ebsimit t\u00eb formularit ai kishte nj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr viz\u00eb amerikane.<\/p>\n
Shumica e trup\u00ebs gjykuese \u00e7mon se Zeneli \u00ebsht\u00eb njoftuar nga Komisioni p\u00ebr gjetjen mbi revokimin e viz\u00ebs dhe i ka k\u00ebrkuar atij t\u00eb jap\u00eb shpjegime p\u00ebr t\u00eb provuar t\u00eb kund\u00ebrt\u00ebn.<\/p>\n
Gjithashtu n\u00eb vendim, shumica e trupit gjykues argumenton se se subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit ka qen\u00eb i qart\u00eb p\u00ebr fatin e viz\u00ebs dhe arsyet e revokimit t\u00eb saj.<\/p>\n
\u201cSi rrjedhoj\u00eb, justifikimi i parashtruar prej subjektit q\u00eb revokimi i viz\u00ebs turistike nuk barazohej me refuzim hyrjeje, pasi ai vazhdonte t\u00eb g\u00ebzonte viz\u00eb zyrtare, nuk mund t\u00eb pranohet pasi sfidon logjik\u00ebn\u201d, citohet n\u00eb vendim.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb konkluzionet e saj, KPA argumenton se Zeneli ka plot\u00ebsuar formularin e deklarimit p\u00ebr kontrollin e figur\u00ebs n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb pav\u00ebrtet\u00eb dhe t\u00eb pasakt\u00eb dhe se \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrpjekur t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb deklarime t\u00eb pasakta, duke p\u00ebrligjur mas\u00ebn e shkarkimit nga detyra.<\/p>\n
Nd\u00ebrsa an\u00ebtarja Ina Rama sqaron p\u00ebrmes nj\u00eb mendimi paralel se ka votuar kund\u00ebr q\u00ebndrimit t\u00eb mbajtur nga shumica n\u00eb lidhje me kriterin e kontrollit t\u00eb figur\u00ebs p\u00ebr subjektin e rivler\u00ebsimit Artan Zeneli.<\/p>\n
\u201c\u2026Instituti i refuzimit t\u00eb hyrjes n\u00eb nj\u00eb shtet nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb i nj\u00ebjt\u00eb me at\u00eb t\u00eb refuzimit\/revokimit t\u00eb viz\u00ebs, por lidhet me penges\u00ebn objektive q\u00eb nj\u00eb subjekt ka pasur p\u00ebr t\u00eb hyr\u00eb n\u00eb territorin e nj\u00eb shteti,\u201d argumenton Rama.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb kushtet kur ky fakt ishte leht\u00ebsisht i verifikuesh\u00ebm, ajo argumenton se \u201csubjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit v\u00ebshtir\u00eb t\u00eb kishte iluzione\u201d se n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet mosdeklarimit do t\u00eb arrinte fshehjen e faktit.<\/p>\n
\u201cAsnj\u00eb rrethan\u00eb nuk provon p\u00ebrpjekjen e tij p\u00ebr ta fshehur k\u00ebt\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebn\u00eb e p\u00ebr pasoj\u00eb nuk provohet se ekziston shkaku kushtetues i shkarkimit nga detyra,\u201d argumenton Rama.<\/p>\n
Ish-an\u00ebtari i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb kontestoi gjithashtu vler\u00ebsimin e Komisionit p\u00ebr pasakt\u00ebsi n\u00eb deklarimin e disa pasurive t\u00eb paluajtshme, por argumentet e tij nuk u pranuan nga shumica n\u00eb KPA. \u00a0N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim t\u00eb shqyrtimit t\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjes, trupi gjykues i Kolegjit e ka gjetur t\u00eb drejt\u00eb vendimin e komisionit p\u00ebr shkarkimin nga detyra t\u00eb gjyqtarit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb, Artan Zeneli.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Trupa gjykuese e Kolegjit t\u00eb Posa\u00e7\u00ebm t\u00eb Apelimit i dha t\u00eb drejt\u00eb Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit p\u00ebr shkarkimin e ish-an\u00ebtarit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb, Artan Zeneli, por u nda 4 me 1 n\u00eb argumentet p\u00ebr mosdeklarimin e revokimit t\u00eb viz\u00ebs amerikane.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":637,"featured_media":76060,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[415,114,2,473],"tags":[830,272,107,112],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/20180910_125649_100918008-3_5ip2h61.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit | Foto : LSA","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76059"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/637"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76059"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76059\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":76061,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76059\/revisions\/76061"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/76060"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76059"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76059"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76059"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}