Operacioni Nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtar i Monitorimit, ONM rekomandon Institucionin e Komisioner\u00ebve Publik\u00eb t\u00eb ankimojn\u00eb vendimin e konfirmimit n\u00eb detyr\u00eb t\u00eb Prokurorit t\u00eb Dibr\u00ebs, Urim Buci, duke e konsideruar arsyetimin e Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit, KPK p\u00ebr pasurit\u00eb t\u00eb gabuar dhe t\u00eb pasakt\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Urim Buci u konfirmua me shumic\u00eb votash m\u00eb 27 prill 2023, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb tre \u00e7\u00ebshtje penale t\u00eb hetuara prej tij u transferuan p\u00ebr inspektim pran\u00eb Inspektorit t\u00eb Lart\u00eb t\u00eb Drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb. Gjat\u00eb seanc\u00ebs d\u00ebgjimore m\u00eb 25 prill u relatua se prej hetimit paraprak konstatohej pamund\u00ebsi e Bucit p\u00ebr nd\u00ebrtimin e nj\u00eb banese para fillimit t\u00eb detyr\u00ebs, pasi nuk ishin v\u00ebrtetuar t\u00eb ardhurat nga emigracioni. Buci pretendoi se t\u00eb ardhurat ishin t\u00eb ligjshme dhe k\u00ebrkoi konfirmimin n\u00eb detyr\u00eb.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim t\u00eb procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit t\u00eb k\u00ebtij subjekti, shumica e trup\u00ebs s\u00eb KPK e p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00eb nga kryesuesja Pamela Qirko dhe relatorja Alma Faskaj konkluduan se Buci kishte arritur nivel t\u00eb besuesh\u00ebm p\u00ebr pasurin\u00eb dhe figur\u00ebn, si dhe nivel kualifikues n\u00eb aspektin profesional.<\/p>\n
An\u00ebtarja Xhensila Pine doli n\u00eb pakic\u00eb duke \u00e7muar se subjekti ka munges\u00eb koherence n\u00eb deklarimet \u201cveting\u201d, ato periodike si dhe gjat\u00eb hetimit administrativ lidhur me investimin e kryer n\u00eb nj\u00eb godin\u00eb banimi tre kate + papafingo. Pine e cil\u00ebson k\u00ebt\u00eb situat\u00eb si p\u00ebrpjekje t\u00eb Bucit p\u00ebr t\u00eb deformuar t\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00ebn n\u00eb funksion t\u00eb paraqitjes s\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave lidhur me justifikimin e burimeve t\u00eb ligjshme t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj pasurie t\u00eb tij.<\/p>\n
Ajo shton se \u00ebsht\u00eb provuar se Buci \u00ebsht\u00eb ndodhur n\u00eb kushtet e konfliktit t\u00eb interesit n\u00eb hetimin e dy \u00e7\u00ebshtjeve ku pal\u00eb ka qen\u00eb nj\u00eb shtetas me t\u00eb cilin kishte kryer m\u00eb par\u00eb nj\u00eb udh\u00ebtim si dhe n\u00eb lidhjen e nj\u00eb kontrate qiradh\u00ebnie me Bashkin\u00eb Kam\u00ebz.<\/p>\n
Edhe ONM i gjen t\u00eb pabazuara p\u00ebrfundimet e shumic\u00ebs duke sfiduar konkluzionet n\u00eb lidhje me vler\u00ebsimin e t\u00eb gjith\u00eb pasurive dhe n\u00eb ve\u00e7anti, ato q\u00eb lidhen me mungesat financiare p\u00ebr t\u00eb nd\u00ebrtuar banes\u00ebn me t\u00eb ardhurat nga emigrimi n\u00eb Mbret\u00ebrin\u00eb e Bashkuar.<\/p>\n
Ndryshe nga shumica q\u00eb e ka kryer analiz\u00ebn financiare p\u00ebr nd\u00ebrtimin e banes\u00ebs p\u00ebr periudh\u00ebn 2005-2015, ONM konstaton se \u00ebsht\u00eb v\u00ebrtetuar se nd\u00ebrtimi i k\u00ebsaj banese ka nisur n\u00eb vitin 1996 dhe \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb gjendjen aktuale q\u00eb prej vitit 2015.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb rekomandim konstatohet se Komisioni vler\u00ebson t\u00eb mos konsiderohet se rrethan\u00eb e deklarimit t\u00eb pamjaftuesh\u00ebm mungesa financiare e konstatuar p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb mosp\u00ebrfshirjes s\u00eb t\u00eb ardhurave nga emigracioni.<\/p>\n
ONM thekson se rasti i Bucit nuk mund t\u00eb konsiderohet identik me at\u00eb t\u00eb subjekteve t\u00eb tjer\u00eb t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit, q\u00eb sipas jurispudenc\u00ebs s\u00eb institucioneve t\u00eb vetingut, nuk jan\u00eb penalizuar p\u00ebr t\u00eb ardhurat nga emigracioni.<\/p>\n
ONM \u00ebsht\u00eb e mendimit se n\u00eb rastin e prokurorit Urim Buci, vler\u00ebsimi i provave t\u00eb administruara ve\u00e7 e ve\u00e7 dhe n\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsi, krahasuar dhe me shpjegimet e subjektit, duhet t\u00eb \u00e7oj\u00eb n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin se KPK nuk e ka vler\u00ebsuar drejt gjendjen faktike n\u00eb pranimin e ekzistenc\u00ebs s\u00eb t\u00eb ardhurave t\u00eb ligjshme t\u00eb pretenduara prej tij. Sipas ONM, nuk mund t\u00eb flitet as p\u00ebr zbatimin e parimit t\u00eb proporcionalitetit n\u00eb rastin kur ekzistenca e nj\u00eb t\u00eb ardhure nuk mund t\u00eb konsiderohet e provuar.<\/p>\n
\u201cPasoja p\u00ebrfundimtare befasuese ishte se subjekti u konsiderua se kishte arritur standardet e k\u00ebrkuara p\u00ebr t’u konfirmuar n\u00eb aspektet e vler\u00ebsimit t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb, gj\u00eb q\u00eb nuk duhej t\u00eb ishte k\u00ebshtu\u201d, thekson ONM n\u00eb rekomandim dhe i konsideron pretendimet e subjektit deklarative.<\/p>\n
ONM i cil\u00ebson shpjegimet e Bucit t\u00eb t\u00eb paqarta dhe jo lineare dhe u k\u00ebrkon Komisioner\u00ebve Publik\u00eb t\u00eb vler\u00ebsojn\u00eb n\u00ebse ka nevoj\u00eb p\u00ebr hetime t\u00eb m\u00ebtejshme n\u00eb Kolegjin e Posa\u00e7\u00ebm t\u00eb Apelimit.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb vijim, ONM evidenton pretendimin e subjektit se vlera 10 milion\u00eb lek\u00eb e sh\u00ebnuar n\u00eb delarat\u00ebn e vitit 2005 si e shpenzuar p\u00ebr nd\u00ebrtimin e banes\u00ebs ishte nj\u00eb gabim material, pasi ishte shprehur n\u00eb lek\u00eb t\u00eb vjetra dhe jo t\u00eb reja.<\/p>\n
\u201cKPK e pranoi k\u00ebt\u00eb shpjegim. \u00cbsht\u00eb mjaft interesante se, n\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn deklarat\u00eb vjetore periodike, subjekti I rivler\u00ebsimit ka treguar sakt\u00eb n\u00eb lek\u00eb vler\u00ebn e nj\u00eb automjeti t\u00eb vitit 1987\u201d, shprehet ONM.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb p\u00ebrfudim, ONM vler\u00ebson se bazuar n\u00eb informacionet dhe dokumentet e administruara gjat\u00eb hetimit administrativ, duket se Bucit i mungojn\u00eb burimet e ligjshme p\u00ebr t\u00eb justifikuar pasurin\u00eb e tij. Duke e cil\u00ebsuar vendimin e KPK-s\u00eb t\u00eb pasakt\u00eb dhe jokonsistent n\u00eb argumentimin e \u00e7\u00ebshtjes, ONM k\u00ebrkon ankimin e vendimit t\u00eb Komisionit n\u00eb Kolegj.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Operacioni Nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtar i Monitorimit, ONM rekomandon Institucionin e Komisioner\u00ebve Publik\u00eb t\u00eb ankimojn\u00eb vendimin e konfirmimit n\u00eb detyr\u00eb t\u00eb Prokurorit t\u00eb Dibr\u00ebs, Urim Buci, duke e konsideruar arsyetimin e Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit, KPK p\u00ebr pasurit\u00eb t\u00eb gabuar dhe t\u00eb pasakt\u00eb. Urim Buci u konfirmua me shumic\u00eb votash m\u00eb 27 prill 2023, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb tre […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":637,"featured_media":76591,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[121,2],"tags":[101,133,119,844,972],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/Urim-Buci-pas-seances-degjimore--scaled.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"Prokurori Urim Buci (majtas) pas seanc\u00ebs d\u00ebgjimore n\u00eb KPK. Foto: Edmond Hoxhaj. ","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76590"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/637"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76590"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76590\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":76592,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76590\/revisions\/76592"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/76591"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76590"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76590"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76590"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}