{"id":76728,"date":"2023-06-20T10:43:48","date_gmt":"2023-06-20T08:43:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/si-e-shpetoi-kpk-kreun-e-klp-se-nga-vetingu\/2023\/06\/20\/"},"modified":"2023-06-20T10:45:23","modified_gmt":"2023-06-20T08:45:23","slug":"si-e-shpetoi-kpk-kreun-e-klp-se-nga-vetingu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/si-e-shpetoi-kpk-kreun-e-klp-se-nga-vetingu\/2023\/06\/20\/","title":{"rendered":"Si e \u2018shp\u00ebtoi\u2019 KPK kreun e KLP-s\u00eb nga vetingu"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Kreu i K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Lart\u00eb t\u00eb Prokuroris\u00eb, Alfred Balla ishte sipas legjislacionit n\u00eb fuqi subjekt i vetingut p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb pun\u00ebs s\u00eb tij si ndihm\u00ebs ligjor n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn e Lart\u00eb deri n\u00eb 31 korrik 2017 dhe duhej t\u2019i n\u00ebnshtrohej procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit.<\/p>\n<p>Por pasi nj\u00eb s\u00ebr\u00eb veprimesh, p\u00ebrfshi t\u00ebheqja nga nj\u00eb padi q\u00eb Balla kishte b\u00ebr\u00eb n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Administrative, shumica e trup\u00ebs gjykuese t\u00eb KPK-s\u00eb, p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00eb nga Alma Faskaj dhe Xhensila Pine vler\u00ebsuan se kreu i KLP nuk ishte m\u00eb subjekt rivler\u00ebsimi dhe se procesi ndaj tij mbyllej pa vendim.<\/p>\n<p>Pine dhe Faskaj arsyetuan se Balla nuk kishte dh\u00ebn\u00eb dor\u00ebheqjen dhe se statusin e kishte humbur p\u00ebr shkak se ishte shkarkuar nga kreu i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb n\u00eb korrik 2017, duke e barazuar k\u00ebt\u00eb vendim n\u00eb arsyetimin e Kolegjit t\u00eb Posa\u00e7\u00ebm t\u00eb Apelimit mbi nj\u00eb rast d\u00ebnimi penal p\u00ebr nj\u00eb magjistrat.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb pakic\u00eb, komisionerja Valbona Sanxhaktari iu referua interpretimeve t\u00eb tjera t\u00eb b\u00ebra nga Kolegji n\u00eb raste t\u00eb ngjashme dhe cil\u00ebsoi faktin q\u00eb Balla nuk iu n\u00ebnshtrua procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit si dor\u00ebheqje. Ajo k\u00ebrkoi q\u00eb ndaj tij t\u00eb aplikohej neni G i Kushtetut\u00ebs q\u00eb e largon p\u00ebr 15 vjet nga sistem i drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>Sanxhaktari arsyetoi se p\u00ebrjashtimi i b\u00ebr\u00eb nga Kolegji vlente vet\u00ebm kur konstatohej paaft\u00ebsia p\u00ebr t\u00eb kryer pun\u00eb q\u00eb parashikohen n\u00eb Nenin G t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Arsyetimi i shumic\u00ebs<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb shkurt 2021, KPK hodhi n\u00eb short trup\u00ebn q\u00eb do i b\u00ebnte rivler\u00ebsimin Ball\u00ebs, me relatore Alma Faskaj dhe kryesuese Xhensila Pine dhe an\u00ebtare Valbona Sanxhaktari.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb vitin 2022, Operacioni Nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtar i Monitorimit, q\u00eb p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsohej n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb vendim nga Theo Jacobs, i k\u00ebrkoi KPK-s\u00eb q\u00eb Balla t\u00eb trajtohej si subjekt me prioritet. N\u00eb n\u00ebntor t\u00eb atij viti, me gjas\u00eb pasi kishte marr\u00eb pyet\u00ebsor\u00ebt nga KPK q\u00eb b\u00ebnin me dije fillimin e hetimit, Balla i k\u00ebrkoi Komisionit q\u00eb procesi t\u00eb nd\u00ebrpritej.<\/p>\n<p>Kjo k\u00ebrkes\u00eb u refuzua nga KPK. M\u00eb pas Balla ankimoi k\u00ebt\u00eb vendim, duke i k\u00ebrkuar KPK-s\u00eb t\u2019ia p\u00ebrcillte ankimin Kolegjit.\u00a0 KPK duke marr\u00eb parasysh edhe q\u00ebndrimin e ONM-s\u00eb refuzoi k\u00ebt\u00eb p\u00ebrpjekje t\u00eb Ball\u00ebs.<\/p>\n<p>Deri n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb moment situata ligjore e kreut t\u00eb KLP-s\u00eb ishte ajo e nj\u00eb subjekti rivler\u00ebsimi. Por n\u00eb proces e sip\u00ebr situata ka ndryshuar.<\/p>\n<p>Shumica n\u00eb Komision referon nj\u00eb situat\u00eb ligjore sipas t\u00eb cil\u00ebs Balla u shkarkua nga Gjykata e Lart\u00eb n\u00eb vitin 2017. Balla b\u00ebri padi n\u00eb gjykat\u00eb adminstrative p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb vendm dhe k\u00ebrkoi t\u00eb paguhej deri n\u00eb dit\u00ebn e fillimit t\u00eb mandatit t\u00eb tij si an\u00ebtar i KLP-s\u00eb &#8211; ku u zgjodh si p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsues i shoq\u00ebris\u00eb civile.\u00a0 Gjykata Administrative e Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb i dha t\u00eb drejt\u00eb Ball\u00ebs, por procesi u apelua.<\/p>\n<p>Kur kreu i KLP-s\u00eb ndodhej n\u00ebn procedurat e vetingut \u00e7\u00ebshtja ishte n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Administrative t\u00eb Apeli. Kjo e dyta vendosi n\u00eb mars 2023, t\u00eb prish\u00eb vendimin e Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb dhe t\u00eb rr\u00ebzoj\u00eb padin\u00eb. Por nd\u00ebrsa nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb plot\u00ebsisht i qart\u00eb arsyetimi i Apelit, shumica e KPK referon se Balla ishte t\u00ebrhequr nga padia.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSubjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit, Alfred Balla, t\u00ebrhoqi k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e tij n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Administrative dhe ky veprim \u00ebsht\u00eb legjitim, pasi askush nuk mund t\u00eb detyrohet t\u00eb ndjek\u00eb nj\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje n\u00eb gjykat\u00eb\u201d, arsyeton shumica.<\/p>\n<p>Sipas shumic\u00ebs nga ky moment shkarkimi i Ball\u00ebs merrte form\u00eb t\u00eb prer\u00eb dhe e shkarkonte at\u00eb nga detyrimi p\u00ebr t\u2019iu n\u00ebnshtruar vetingut.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cN\u00eb kushtet kur jemi para nj\u00eb akti i cili tashm\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb fuqi, p\u00ebr pasoj\u00eb mund t\u00eb konsiderohet si nj\u00eb nd\u00ebrprerje e marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnies s\u00eb pun\u00ebs p\u00ebr arsye ligjore\u201d, shprehet shumica.<\/p>\n<p>Duke iu referuar jurispudenc\u00ebs s\u00eb KPA-s\u00eb, shumica e konsideron rastin nj\u00eblloj me humbje t\u00eb statusit t\u00eb magjistratit \u201cp\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb daljes n\u00eb pension, vdekj\u00eb apo d\u00ebnimi me nj\u00eb vendim penal t\u00eb form\u00ebs s\u00eb prer\u00eb\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Duke q\u00ebn\u00eb se Balla \u00ebsht\u00eb gjal\u00eb dhe nuk ka dal\u00eb akoma n\u00eb pension, sipas arsyetimit t\u00eb KPK-s\u00eb kreu i K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Lart\u00eb t\u00eb Prokuroris\u00eb ka statusin e nj\u00eb d\u00ebnuari me vendim penal t\u00eb form\u00ebs s\u00eb prer\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>Duke iu referuar rastit konkret shumica arsyeton se p\u00ebrfundimi i statusit n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb shkarkimit \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebr nj\u00eb arsye ligjore, q\u00eb dilte p\u00ebrtej tagrit t\u00eb organeve t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cN\u00ebse \u00ebsht\u00eb ligjor ose jo ky vendim, nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje e juridiksionit dhe kompetenc\u00ebs s\u00eb organeve t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit\u201d, shprehet shumica.<\/p>\n<p>Bazuar mbi k\u00ebt\u00eb vler\u00ebsim shumica cil\u00ebson t\u00eb pamundur vijimin e procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit dhe arsyeton se ai duhej t\u00eb p\u00ebrfundohej pa nj\u00eb vendim.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Arsyetimi i pakic\u00ebs<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Ndryshe nga sa pretendon shumica, komisionerja Valbona Sanxhaktari k\u00ebmb\u00ebngul se vendimmarrja duhej t\u00eb merrte n\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb rastet e shqyrtuara nga KPA dhe ta cil\u00ebsonte si dor\u00ebheqje rastin n\u00eb fjal\u00eb. Sanxhaktari k\u00ebmb\u00ebngul se duhej t\u00eb aplikohej neni G i Kushtetut\u00ebs.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cVler\u00ebsoj se trupi gjykues duhet t\u00eb kish vijuar me nd\u00ebrprerjen e procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit duke aplikuar nenin \u201cG\u201d t\u00eb Aneksit t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs\u201d, shkruan ajo n\u00eb mendimin paralel.<\/p>\n<p>Sanxhaktari shprehet se p\u00ebrtej vendimit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative, Komisioni duhej t\u00eb bazohej te ndryshimet Kushtetuese dhe statusi i Ball\u00ebs kur k\u00ebto hyn\u00eb n\u00eb fuqi.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cInterpretimi i vendimeve t\u00eb organeve t\u00eb tjera apo marrja e tyre n\u00eb vler\u00ebsim nga Komisioni nuk mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrb\u00ebjn\u00eb nj\u00eb baz\u00eb ligjore p\u00ebr tu vler\u00ebsuar, pasi r\u00ebnd\u00ebsi ka vet\u00ebm statusi ligjor q\u00eb gjendet subjekti n\u00eb momentin e hyrjes n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb ndryshimeve kushtetuese\u201d, shkruan Sanxhaktari.<\/p>\n<p>Ajo shkruan se situata q\u00eb merr parasysh shumica i referohet vet\u00ebm atyre rasteve \u201ckur objekti \u00ebsht\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb i pamundur sepse subjekti rivler\u00ebsues nuk mund t\u00eb ushtroj m\u00eb funksionin ose asnj\u00eb funksion nga ata t\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktuar sipas nenit \u201cG\u201d t\u00eb aneksit t\u00eb kushtetut\u00ebs, p\u00ebr shkak se ka humbur p\u00ebrfundimisht aft\u00ebsin\u00eb p\u00ebr pun\u00eb\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb fakt Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit, n\u00eb vendimin e fundit t\u00eb tij p\u00ebr nj\u00eb rast t\u00eb ngjash\u00ebm, at\u00eb t\u00eb prokurorit Bensik Cengu, cil\u00ebsoi se edhe nj\u00eb largim nga detyra me pension t\u00eb parakohsh\u00ebm, konsiderohej s\u00ebrish si dor\u00ebheqje dhe cil\u00ebsoi t\u00eb aplikuesh\u00ebm nenin G t\u00eb kushtetut\u00ebs.<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kreu i K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Lart\u00eb t\u00eb Prokuroris\u00eb, Alfred Balla ishte sipas legjislacionit n\u00eb fuqi subjekt i vetingut p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb pun\u00ebs s\u00eb tij si ndihm\u00ebs ligjor n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn e Lart\u00eb deri n\u00eb 31 korrik 2017 dhe duhej t\u2019i n\u00ebnshtrohej procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit. Por pasi nj\u00eb s\u00ebr\u00eb veprimesh, p\u00ebrfshi t\u00ebheqja nga nj\u00eb padi q\u00eb Balla kishte [&hellip;]<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":97,"featured_media":76729,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[13,204,117,115],"tags":[1021,364,981,272,996,238,408,112,671,133,316,173,698],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/20230607_190624_070623_5_021-1_V0CBdOD.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"Kryetari i K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Lart\u00eb t\u00eb Prokuroris\u00eb, Alfred Balla duke folur gjat\u00eb nj\u00eb seance t\u00eb komisionit parlamentar per \u00c7\u00ebshtjet Ligjore, Administrat\u00ebn Publike dhe te Drejtat e Njeriut | Foto: LSA","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76728"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/97"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76728"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76728\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":76730,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76728\/revisions\/76730"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/76729"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76728"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76728"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76728"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}