Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit, KPA vendosi m\u00eb 27 korrik t\u00eb ndryshoj\u00eb vendimarrjen e Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit p\u00ebr konfirmimin n\u00eb detyr\u00eb t\u00eb gjyqtarit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative Tiran\u00eb, Erarb\u00ebr Madhi dhe e shkarkoi at\u00eb nga detyra p\u00ebr fshehje n\u00eb em\u00ebr t\u00eb n\u00ebn\u00ebs t\u00eb nj\u00eb apartamenti dhe investimi n\u00eb bono thesari, duke \u00e7muar se \u00ebsht\u00eb gjendur n\u00eb kushtet e deklarimit t\u00eb pamjaftuesh\u00ebm.<\/p>\n
Madhi punoi prej 19 vjet\u00ebsh n\u00eb sistemin gjyq\u00ebsor n\u00eb Fier, Vlor\u00eb dhe n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Administrative t\u00eb Tiran\u00ebs q\u00eb nga viti 2013. Ai u konfirmua m\u00eb 13 shkurt nga Komisioni me shumic\u00eb votash, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb nj\u00eb prej an\u00ebtareve n\u00eb pakic\u00eb \u00e7moi se ai duhej shkarkuar, pasi pasurit\u00eb me vler\u00eb totale prej 20.7 milion\u00eb lek\u00ebsh t\u00eb trash\u00ebguara nga prind\u00ebrit, dyshohej t\u00eb ishin pasuri e fshehur e tij.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb pretendimet p\u00ebrfundimtare n\u00eb KPA, Madhi i q\u00ebndroi mbrojtjes q\u00eb b\u00ebri n\u00eb KPK duke k\u00ebmb\u00ebngulur se babai i ndjer\u00eb kishte v\u00ebn\u00eb m\u00ebnjan\u00eb parat\u00eb p\u00ebrmes pun\u00ebs s\u00eb tij si ekspert i arm\u00ebve kimike n\u00eb sh\u00ebrbim t\u00eb organizmave nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtare, si NATO, nd\u00ebrsa ai gjendej n\u00eb pamund\u00ebsin\u00eb objektive p\u00ebr v\u00ebrtetimin e ligjshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb k\u00ebtyre t\u00eb ardhurave p\u00ebr shkak se NATO nuk kishte kthyer p\u00ebrgjigje.<\/p>\n
Duke iu referuar nj\u00eb rekomandimi t\u00eb Operacionit Nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtar t\u00eb Monitorimit, ONM, Komisionerja Publike, Irena Nino ankimoi konfirmimin e Madhit dhe u q\u00ebndroi shkaqeve t\u00eb ngritura se ky subjekt rivler\u00ebsimi nuk arrin nivel t\u00eb besuesh\u00ebm n\u00eb kriterin e pasuris\u00eb e p\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb duhet shkarkuar.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb vendimin e arsyetuar t\u00eb Kolegjit analizohet fillimisht statusi ligjor i n\u00ebn\u00ebs s\u00eb ndjer\u00eb t\u00eb gjyqtarit Madhi n\u00eb raport me procesin e rivler\u00ebsimit kalimtar, n\u00ebse ajo konsiderohet person i lidhur apo person tjet\u00ebr i lidhur, si dhe se deri n\u00eb \u00e7far\u00eb kufijsh ekzistonte detyrimi p\u00ebr t\u00eb provuar ligjshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e pasuris\u00eb s\u00eb saj.<\/p>\n
Madhi, si n\u00eb Komision, ashtu dhe parashtrimet e paraqitura n\u00eb KPA, ka pretenduar se n\u00ebna e tij nuk mund t\u00eb konsiderohet person i lidhur me t\u00eb apo person tjet\u00ebr i lidhur me t\u00eb, pasi ajo nuk ka rezultuar n\u00eb cil\u00ebsin\u00eb e dhurueses, huadh\u00ebn\u00ebses apo huamarr\u00ebses. Bazuar n\u00eb k\u00ebto rethana, ai ka pretenduar se nuk ka pasur detyrim ligjor p\u00ebr t\u00eb justifikuar ligjshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e apartamentit dhe t\u00eb bonove t\u00eb thesarit t\u00eb p\u00ebrfituara nga d\u00ebshmia e trash\u00ebgimis\u00eb s\u00eb n\u00ebn\u00ebs.<\/p>\n
Kolegji v\u00ebren se nga aktet n\u00eb fashikujt e Komisionit, konstatohet se n\u00ebna e subjektit ka qen\u00eb n\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn certifikat\u00eb familjare vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr periudh\u00ebn 2005 \u2013 2012, para fillimit t\u00eb procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit kalimtar dhe sipas legjislacionit p\u00ebr vetingun e magjistrat\u00ebve, ajo nuk mund t\u00eb konsiderohet si person i lidhur me subjektin.<\/p>\n
Lidhur me konsiderimin ose jo t\u00eb n\u00ebn\u00ebs si person tjet\u00ebr i lidhur, trupi gjykues sjell n\u00eb v\u00ebmendje se q\u00eb dikush t\u00eb konsiderohet i till\u00eb, duhet t\u00eb provohet nj\u00eb lidhje interesi mes tyre, q\u00eb vjen si pasoj\u00eb e nj\u00eb interesi pasuror ose e \u00e7do marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnieje tjet\u00ebr biznesi.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb rastin konkret, midis Madhit dhe n\u00ebn\u00ebs s\u00eb tij nuk ka pasur asnj\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnie interesi t\u00eb natyr\u00ebs s\u00eb huas\u00eb apo t\u00eb dhurimit, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb interesi pasuror lidhur me dy pasurit\u00eb q\u00eb ai ka p\u00ebrfituar pas vdekjes s\u00eb n\u00ebn\u00ebs n\u00eb vitin 2019, nuk kan\u00eb qen\u00eb pjes\u00eb e deklarat\u00ebs \u201cveting\u201d pasi jan\u00eb poseduar m\u00eb von\u00eb dhe jan\u00eb konstatuar nga KPK n\u00eb kuad\u00ebr t\u00eb procesit t\u00eb vetingut.<\/p>\n
\u201c\u2026Subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit, prima facie, nuk ka pasur detyrimin p\u00ebr t\u00eb provuar gjat\u00eb procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit ligjshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e dy pasurive t\u00eb n\u00ebn\u00ebs, t\u00eb cilat i kan\u00eb kaluar me trash\u00ebgimi, pasi n\u00ebna e tij nuk ka pasur statusin e personit t\u00eb lidhur apo t\u00eb personit tjet\u00ebr t\u00eb lidhur, dhe se, n\u00eb kushtet e munges\u00ebs s\u00eb nj\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnieje interesi, dy pasurit\u00eb e saj nuk mund t\u2019i n\u00ebnshtroheshin hetimit vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr faktin se subjekti i ka trash\u00ebguar ato. Por, trupi gjykues thekson se ky q\u00ebndrim do t\u00eb ishte ezaurues vet\u00ebm n\u00eb rastin kur nuk do t\u00eb kishte pasur dyshime mbi munges\u00ebn e burimeve t\u00eb ligjshme t\u00eb n\u00ebn\u00ebs s\u00eb subjektit p\u00ebr krijimin e k\u00ebtyre dy pasurive, ashtu si\u00e7 dhe ka konstatuar Komisioni gjat\u00eb procesit t\u00eb hetimit, duke ngritur dyshime p\u00ebr pasuri t\u00eb fshehura t\u00eb subjektit\u201d, v\u00ebren KPA.<\/p>\n
Trupi gjykues vler\u00ebson se kontrolli i ligjshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb t\u00eb ardhurave p\u00ebr krijimin e k\u00ebtyre dy pasurive, objekt ankimi, \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me jurisprudenc\u00ebn e Kolegjit lidhur me detyrimin q\u00eb kan\u00eb organet e rivler\u00ebsimit p\u00ebr t\u00eb kryer hetime p\u00ebr \u00e7do pasuri p\u00ebr t\u00eb cil\u00ebn ka t\u00eb dh\u00ebna apo dyshime t\u00eb arsyeshme se \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb pasuri e fshehur e subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit, pavar\u00ebsisht se ajo mbahet n\u00eb em\u00ebr t\u00eb personave t\u00eb lidhur, t\u00eb tjer\u00eb t\u00eb lidhur apo shtetasve t\u00eb tjer\u00eb, t\u00eb cil\u00ebt nuk kan\u00eb asnj\u00eb lidhje me subjektin.<\/p>\n
KPA i gjen t\u00eb pabazuara n\u00eb situat\u00ebn faktike argumentet e Madhit se, \u201cn\u00ebse n\u00ebna e tij nuk do t\u00eb kishte nd\u00ebrruar jet\u00eb p\u00ebrpara p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit, k\u00ebto pasuri nuk do t\u00eb hetoheshin nga Komisioni\u201d. Trupi gjykues sjell n\u00eb v\u00ebmendje se institucionet e rivler\u00ebsimit vler\u00ebsojn\u00eb dhe vendosin n\u00eb zbatim t\u00eb parimeve t\u00eb proporcionalitetit dhe objektivitetit, bazuar n\u00eb rrethanat specifike dhe objektive t\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjes n\u00eb shqyrtim dhe jo n\u00eb baz\u00eb t\u00eb situatave apo sjelljeve hipotetike t\u00eb subjekteve t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit.<\/p>\n
Sipas Kolegjit, i nj\u00ebjti hetim apo kontroll mund t\u00eb ushtrohej prej Komisionit edhe n\u00eb rast se n\u00ebna e Madhit do t\u00eb ishte ende n\u00eb jet\u00eb, n\u00ebse do t\u00eb ngriheshin dyshime p\u00ebr pasuri t\u00eb fshehura p\u00ebr rrethana q\u00eb ekzistojn\u00eb dhe q\u00eb nuk lidhen me nd\u00ebrrimin e jet\u00ebs, por me shkaqet e tjera t\u00eb ngritura n\u00eb ankim.<\/p>\n
Shumica e KPK, duke marr\u00eb n\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb shpjegimet e subjektit pas kalimit t\u00eb barr\u00ebs s\u00eb prov\u00ebs, provat indirekte n\u00eb lidhje me t\u00eb ardhurat e mundshme t\u00eb prind\u00ebrve t\u00eb tij, si dhe faktin q\u00eb burimi primar i dy pasurive \u00ebsht\u00eb trash\u00ebgimia, ka konkluduar se apartamenti dhe likujditetet n\u00eb bono thesari n\u00eb shm\u00ebn 4 milion\u00eb lek\u00eb jan\u00eb pasuri t\u00eb krijuara nga n\u00ebna n\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb ligjshme, pasuri q\u00eb Madhi i ka p\u00ebrfituar p\u00ebrmes trash\u00ebgimis\u00eb. Po ashtu, KPK ka vler\u00ebsuar se subjekti nuk mund t\u00eb penalizohet p\u00ebr paqart\u00ebsit\u00eb e mbetura lidhur me kursimet e prind\u00ebrve t\u00eb tij.<\/p>\n
Por, Kolegji konstaton se t\u00eb ardhurat e provuara nga prind\u00ebrit e subjektit n\u00eb mas\u00ebn totale rreth 4.5 milion\u00eb lek\u00eb jan\u00eb duksh\u00ebm shum\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb ul\u00ebta se vlera prej 20.7 milion\u00eb lek\u00ebsh q\u00eb kan\u00eb qen\u00eb investimet e n\u00ebn\u00ebs p\u00ebr bono thesari dhe blerje apartamenti, n\u00eb vitet 2008 dhe 2012.<\/p>\n
Po ashtu, KPA v\u00ebren se Madhi nuk ka b\u00ebr\u00eb asnj\u00eb sh\u00ebnim n\u00eb deklaratat periodike vjetore p\u00ebr kursime cash t\u00eb t\u00eb atit ashtu si ka pretenduar gjat\u00eb procesit t\u00eb \u201cvetingut\u201d. Sipas KPA, pavar\u00ebsisht se ky mosdeklarim nuk e ngarkon me p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsi subjektin n\u00eb kuadrin e procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit, ai ka vler\u00eb n\u00eb drejtim t\u00eb provueshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb deklarimeve t\u00eb tij po n\u00eb kuad\u00ebr t\u00eb vetingut.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb vijim, Kolegji analizon q\u00ebndrimet e subjekit lidhur me marrdh\u00ebniet me n\u00ebn\u00ebn. Trupi gjykues konstaton se Madhi, gjat\u00eb gjith\u00eb procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit n\u00eb t\u00eb dy shkall\u00ebt e vetingut, ka deklaruar vazhdimisht se ka pasur nj\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnie t\u00eb ftoht\u00eb p\u00ebr nj\u00eb periudh\u00eb t\u00eb gjat\u00eb kohore me n\u00ebn\u00ebn, e cila ka jetuar m\u00eb vete. Ai ka pretenduar se nuk ka pasur dijeni mbi t\u00eb ardhurat dhe kursimet e prind\u00ebrve t\u00eb tij apo mbi p\u00ebrfitimet e n\u00ebn\u00ebs nga trash\u00ebgimia nga familja e saj.<\/p>\n
\u201c\u2026Trupi gjykues v\u00ebren se \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me rrethanat faktike t\u00eb evidentuara nga hetimi n\u00eb Komision, si dhe nga aktet, nga t\u00eb cilat rezulton se disa nga veprimet e kryera nga subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit kan\u00eb qen\u00eb t\u00eb lidhura me ato t\u00eb kryera nga n\u00ebna e tij, si\u00e7 \u00ebsht\u00eb rasti i ndarjes nga certifikata familjare disa dit\u00eb pas blerjes s\u00eb apartamentit nga n\u00ebna apo deklarimi prej saj n\u00eb bank\u00eb i s\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebs adres\u00eb banimi me t\u00eb birin\u201d, shprehet trupi gjykues dhe shton se k\u00ebto deklarime kontradiktore dhe t\u00eb paprovuara t\u00eb Madhit jan\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb me q\u00ebllimin e vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr t\u00eb krijuar nj\u00eb distanc\u00eb fiktive dhe nj\u00eb justifikim p\u00ebr mosprovimin prej tij t\u00eb s\u00eb kund\u00ebrt\u00ebs s\u00eb disa prej gjetjeve t\u00eb dala gjat\u00eb hetimit.<\/p>\n
Po ashtu, konstatohet se \u00ebsht\u00eb i pabazuar pretendimi se ndarja nga certifikata familjare \u00ebsht\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb me k\u00ebrkes\u00eb t\u00eb n\u00ebn\u00ebs s\u00eb tij, pasi nga dokumentet e administruara ka rezultuar se k\u00ebrkesa \u00ebsht\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb nga vet\u00eb gjyqtari Madhi.<\/p>\n
Megjitht\u00eb, KPA \u00e7mon se n\u00ebse deklarimet kontradiktore t\u00eb subjektit lidhur me vendbanimin e tij dhe t\u00eb n\u00ebn\u00ebs, do t\u00eb ishin e vetmja paqart\u00ebsi n\u00eb deklarime, nuk do t\u00eb p\u00ebrb\u00ebnin indicie t\u00eb mjaftueshme p\u00ebr t\u2019i lidhur me dyshimet p\u00ebr nj\u00eb fshehje t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb prej tij.<\/p>\n
Por, pamund\u00ebsia p\u00ebr t\u00eb provuar se prind\u00ebrit kan\u00eb pasur t\u00eb ardhura e kursime p\u00ebr t\u00eb mbuluar dy pasurit\u00eb q\u00eb ai ka trash\u00ebguar; kujdesi p\u00ebr t\u00eb evidentuar qart\u00eb faktin q\u00eb pagesa e sht\u00ebpis\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb nga n\u00ebna e tij n\u00eb prezenc\u00eb t\u00eb noterit; mosp\u00ebrdorimi asnj\u00ebher\u00eb i apartamentit nga n\u00ebna e subjektit; veprimet e subjektit p\u00ebr ndarjen nga certifikata familjare menj\u00ebher\u00eb pas blerjes s\u00eb apartamentit; deklarimet konsistente p\u00ebr nj\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnie t\u00eb ftoht\u00eb dhe t\u00eb distancuar me n\u00ebn\u00ebn n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me faktet e evidentuara gjat\u00eb procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit – kan\u00eb krijuar tek Kolegji dyshime t\u00eb arsyeshme se t\u00eb gjitha k\u00ebto veprime jan\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb n\u00eb funksion t\u00eb fshehjes s\u00eb pasuris\u00eb.<\/p>\n
M\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim, KPA ka vendosur shkarkimin e gjyqtarit Erarb\u00ebr Madhi p\u00ebr deklarim t\u00eb pamjaftuesh\u00ebm dhe fshehje t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb,<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit, KPA vendosi m\u00eb 27 korrik t\u00eb ndryshoj\u00eb vendimarrjen e Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit p\u00ebr konfirmimin n\u00eb detyr\u00eb t\u00eb gjyqtarit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative Tiran\u00eb, Erarb\u00ebr Madhi dhe e shkarkoi at\u00eb nga detyra p\u00ebr fshehje n\u00eb em\u00ebr t\u00eb n\u00ebn\u00ebs t\u00eb nj\u00eb apartamenti dhe investimi n\u00eb bono thesari, duke \u00e7muar se \u00ebsht\u00eb […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":637,"featured_media":77574,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[13,114],"tags":[138,102,103,892,112,1062],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/Erarber-Madhi-ne-KPA-scaled.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"Gjyqtari Erarb\u00ebr Madhi dhe avokati i tij, Julian M\u00ebrtiri pas seanc\u00ebs n\u00eb KPA. Foto: Vladimir Karaj. ","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77573"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/637"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=77573"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77573\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":77575,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77573\/revisions\/77575"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/77574"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=77573"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=77573"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=77573"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}