Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit, KPA shpalli t\u00eb m\u00ebrkur\u00ebn m\u00eb 22 maj vendimin p\u00ebr rikthimin n\u00eb detyr\u00eb t\u00eb gjyqtarit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb p\u00ebr Korrupsionin dhe Krimin e Organizuar, Bib Ndreca. Sipas KPA, vendimarrja e Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit, KPK p\u00ebr shkarkimin e Ndrec\u00ebs nuk ishte i bazuar dhe duhej ndryshuar.<\/p>\n
KPK vendosi m\u00eb 18 janar 2021 t\u00eb shkarkoj\u00eb nga detyra gjyqtarin Bib Ndreca, pasi nuk u konsideruan bind\u00ebse shpjegimet subjektit p\u00ebr t\u00eb ardhurat e v\u00ebllait, i cili i kishte dh\u00ebn\u00eb nj\u00eb hua p\u00ebr blerjen e apartamentit. Po ashtu, u konstatuan probleme n\u00eb kontrat\u00ebn p\u00ebr kalimin e t\u00eb drejtave p\u00ebr apartamentin, pasi u konstatuar se n\u00ebnshkrimi i kontrat\u00ebs ishte b\u00ebr\u00eb n\u00eb munges\u00eb t\u00eb pal\u00ebs tjet\u00ebr.<\/p>\n
Ndreca e ankimoi n\u00eb Kolegj vendimarrjen e KPK, duke pretenduar se prej akteve t\u00eb administruara provohej se n\u00ebnshkrimi ishte kryer para noterit nga t\u00eb dy pal\u00ebt n\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin moment.<\/p>\n
Po ashtu, Ndreca e cil\u00ebsoi t\u00eb padrejt\u00eb konstatimin e KPK se kishte ndryshuar deklarime p\u00ebr burimin, duke argumentuar se gjat\u00eb shpjegimeve kishte sqaruar se burim p\u00ebrb\u00ebnte dhe vlera e dividentit t\u00eb shoq\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb t\u00eb v\u00ebllait. Ai n\u00ebnvizoi se kiste deklaruar huan\u00eb e marr\u00eb nga v\u00ebllai, t\u00eb dokumentuar me akt t\u00eb koh\u00ebs, si dhe se huadh\u00ebn\u00ebsi kishte pasur n\u00eb ark\u00ebn e shoq\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb tij vler\u00ebn 5.8 milion\u00eb lek\u00eb q\u00eb mbulonte huan\u00eb 5.5 milion\u00eb lek\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Gjat\u00eb shpalljes s\u00eb vendimit, kryesuesi i trupit gjykues t\u00eb Kolegjit, Sokol \u00c7omo deklaroi se \u00ebsht\u00eb vler\u00ebsuar se Ndreca ka provuar bindsh\u00ebm marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnien e huas\u00eb n\u00eb vler\u00ebn 5.5 milion\u00eb lek\u00eb me t\u00eb v\u00ebllan\u00eb n\u00eb momentin e krijimit t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj pasurise, sikurse dhe kredin\u00eb 37 mij\u00eb euro t\u00eb p\u00ebrdorur p\u00ebr shlyerjen e k\u00ebtij borxhi. \u00c7omo solli n\u00eb v\u00ebmendje kontrat\u00ebn e huas\u00eb t\u00eb vitit 2012, si dhe deklarat\u00ebn periodike e at\u00eb \u201cveting\u201d, n\u00eb t\u00eb cilat \u00ebsht\u00eb pasqyruar marrdh\u00ebniea e huamarrjes nga subjekti.<\/p>\n
Sipas KPA, nga aktet e administruara n\u00eb fashikull rezulton se huadh\u00ebn\u00ebsi ka disponuar sasi t\u00eb konsiderueshme likujditetesh si ortak i vet\u00ebm i shoq\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb tij, si dhe se ka nd\u00ebrthurur interesat financiare individuale me ato t\u00eb kompanis\u00eb.<\/p>\n
\u201cN\u00eb funksion t\u00eb verifikimit t\u00eb burimit t\u00eb huas\u00eb s\u00eb deklaruar n\u00eb deklarat\u00ebn \u2018veting\u2019, trupi gjykues pati n\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb burimet e mundshme financiare n\u00eb dispozicion t\u00eb personit t\u00eb lidhur, n\u00eb nj\u00eb periudh\u00eb t\u00eb af\u00ebrt kohore me dh\u00ebnien e huas\u00eb, p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb k\u00ebtu t\u00ebrheqjen e dividentit n\u00eb vitin 2011, pagat e p\u00ebrfituara si dhe t\u00eb ardhurat e shoq\u00ebris\u00eb, q\u00eb mund\u00ebsojn\u00eb huadh\u00ebnien e vler\u00ebs 5.5 milion\u00eb lek\u00eb n\u00eb dat\u00ebn 29 maj 012, edhe pa p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat individuale t\u00eb v\u00ebllait\u201d, tha nd\u00ebr t\u00eb tjera kryesuesi \u00c7omo.<\/p>\n
Kolegji vler\u00ebson se parregullsit\u00eb n\u00eb dukje n\u00eb evidentimin e pasqyrimit t\u00eb likujditeteve dhe l\u00ebvizjes mes ortakut dhe shoq\u00ebris\u00eb i atribuohen huadh\u00ebn\u00ebsit.<\/p>\n
Sipas KPA, rezulton se subjekti ka marr\u00eb gjith\u00eb hapat e nevojsh\u00ebm p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrmbushur detyrimin e tij si subjekt deklarues e m\u00eb pas si subjekt rivler\u00ebsimi – n\u00eb kushtet kur transaksionet kan\u00eb l\u00ebn\u00eb gjurm\u00eb dhe jan\u00eb t\u00eb dokumentuara me akte t\u00eb koh\u00ebs.<\/p>\n
P\u00ebr k\u00ebto arsye, vler\u00ebson se dhe n\u00ebse ka pasur mungesa evidentimi apo parregullsi t\u00eb pasqyrimit t\u00eb likujditeteve nga huadh\u00ebn\u00ebsi, ngarkimi p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsis\u00eb p\u00ebr k\u00ebto rrethana gjyqtarit Ndreca, do t\u00eb ishte disporporcional dhe se shkon p\u00ebrtej q\u00ebllimit t\u00eb ligjb\u00ebr\u00ebsit. KPA konkludon se huadh\u00ebn\u00ebsi ka pasur burime t\u00eb ligjshme p\u00ebr shum\u00ebn 5.5 milion\u00eb lek\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Kolegji u shpreh edhe lidhur me kund\u00ebrshtimin e subjektit t\u00eb konstatimit t\u00eb Komisionit p\u00ebr veprime aktive n\u00eb munges\u00eb t\u00eb pal\u00ebs tjet\u00ebr gjat\u00eb n\u00ebnshkrimin t\u00eb kontrat\u00ebs s\u00eb shitblrjes s\u00eb apartamentit. Sipas KPA, Komisioni nuk rezulton ta ket\u00eb shoq\u00ebruar k\u00ebt\u00eb konstatim me nj\u00eb pasoj\u00eb konkrete.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim, Kolegji vler\u00ebsoi se vendimi i KPK p\u00ebr Ndrec\u00ebn nuk ishte i bazuar dhe e ndryshoi, duke e rikthyer n\u00eb detyr\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb subjekt rivler\u00ebsimi.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit, KPA shpalli t\u00eb m\u00ebrkur\u00ebn m\u00eb 22 maj vendimin p\u00ebr rikthimin n\u00eb detyr\u00eb t\u00eb gjyqtarit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb p\u00ebr Korrupsionin dhe Krimin e Organizuar, Bib Ndreca. Sipas KPA, vendimarrja e Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit, KPK p\u00ebr shkarkimin e Ndrec\u00ebs nuk ishte i bazuar dhe duhej ndryshuar. KPK […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":637,"featured_media":78267,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[114,2],"tags":[624,162,103,112,903],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Gjyqtari-Bib-Ndreca-ne-KPK-pas-shpalljes-se-vendimit-1.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"Gjyqtari Bib Ndreca n\u00eb KPK. Foto: BIRN. ","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78266"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/637"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=78266"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78266\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":78268,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78266\/revisions\/78268"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/78267"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=78266"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=78266"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=78266"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}