{"id":78335,"date":"2024-06-03T14:09:39","date_gmt":"2024-06-03T12:09:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/gjyqtarja-fatime-decolli-perballet-me-vetingun\/2024\/06\/03\/"},"modified":"2024-06-03T14:10:08","modified_gmt":"2024-06-03T12:10:08","slug":"gjyqtarja-fatime-decolli-perballet-me-vetingun","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/gjyqtarja-fatime-decolli-perballet-me-vetingun\/2024\/06\/03\/","title":{"rendered":"Gjyqtarja Fatime De\u00e7olli p\u00ebrballet me vetingun"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit zhvilloi t\u00eb h\u00ebn\u00ebn nj\u00eb seanc\u00eb d\u00ebgjimore me gjyqtaren e Tiran\u00ebs Fatime De\u00e7olli. Gjyqtares, q\u00eb iu n\u00ebnshtrua procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit n\u00eb t\u00eb tri kriteret, \u00a0iu k\u00ebrkuan shpjegime p\u00ebr dy balanca negative t\u00eb shp\u00ebrndara n\u00eb vite dhe q\u00eb n\u00eb total shkonin rreth 500 mij\u00eb lek\u00eb dhe po ashtu u pyet n\u00eb lidhje me q\u00ebndrimet e saj n\u00eb nj\u00eb prej \u00e7\u00ebshtjeve t\u00eb gjykuara prej saj q\u00eb ishte rr\u00ebzuar n\u00eb Apel.<\/p>\n<p>De\u00e7olli n\u00eb fjla\u00ebn e saj fal\u00ebnderoi KPK-n\u00eb p\u00ebr hetimin e thell\u00eb dhe t\u00eb gjithansh\u00ebm dhe ra dakord me konkluzionet, nd\u00ebrsa k\u00ebrkoi t\u00eb merreshin parasysh shpjegimet e dh\u00ebna sa i p\u00ebrket bilanceve negative.<\/p>\n<p>Procesi i vetingut p\u00ebr gjyqtaren De\u00e7olli, u krye nga trupa e p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00eb nga Lulzim Hamitaj kryesues, Etleda \u00c7iftja an\u00ebtare dhe Brunilda Bekteshi relatore.<\/p>\n<p>Fatime De\u00e7olli e ka filluar karrier\u00ebn n\u00eb sistemin e drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb fillim t\u00eb viteve &#8217;90 dhe ka punuar si gjyqtare dhe kryetare gjykate n\u00eb Berat. Prej vitit 2010, De\u00e7olli e ushtron funksionin n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn e Rrethit Tiran\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Bilancet negative<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Relatimi i Bekteshit mbi pasurit\u00eb e De\u00e7ollit ishte i detajuar, por KPK vuri n\u00eb dukje se kishte gjetur probleme dhe kishte k\u00ebrkuar shpjegime vet\u00ebm n\u00eb lidhje me dy momente.<\/p>\n<p>K\u00ebshtu sipas Bekteshit, pas nj\u00eb investimi n\u00eb vitin 2004, De\u00e7olli rezultonte me nj\u00eb bilanc negativ prej 100 mij\u00eb lek\u00ebsh. Si\u00e7 doli nga relatimi, ky bilanc ndikohej nga fakti q\u00eb De\u00e7olli nuk kishte deklaruar ndryshime n\u00eb kursimet cash t\u00eb koh\u00ebs.<\/p>\n<p>Ajo tha se shuma e kursyer n\u00eb vitin 2004 ishte p\u00ebrdorur p\u00ebr investimin, por n\u00eb muajt qershor-dhjetor 2005 kjo shum\u00eb ishte rivendosur si kursim dhe p\u00ebr pasoj\u00eb nuk kishte ndryshim kursimesh n\u00eb vitin pasardh\u00ebs.<\/p>\n<p>Bilanci i dyt\u00eb negativ prej rreth 400 mij\u00eb lek\u00ebsh, i ndar\u00eb n\u00eb vitet 2011, 2014 dhe 2015, ishte krijuar p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb pagesave t\u00eb kredis\u00eb n\u00eb blerjen e nj\u00eb apartamenti dhe shpenzimeve t\u00eb tjera t\u00eb familjes.<\/p>\n<p>KPK tha se nuk kishte marr\u00eb parasysh t\u00eb ardhurat nga nj\u00eb sht\u00ebpi e dh\u00ebn\u00eb me qira n\u00eb Berat, duke shpjeguar se tatimet p\u00ebr k\u00ebto t\u00eb ardhura ishin paguar vet\u00ebm pas hyrjes n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb ligjit p\u00ebr rivler\u00ebsimin.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb pik\u00eb, De\u00e7olli i k\u00ebrkoi Komisionit t\u00eb merrte parasysh t\u00eb ardhurat e vjehrr\u00ebs q\u00eb kishte ndihmuar familjen. Sipas saj n\u00ebse merreshin n\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb edhe k\u00ebto t\u00eb ardhura, ky bilanc negativ ndryshohej.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb vijim u b\u00eb me dije se gjyqtarja dhe bashk\u00ebshorti kishin bler\u00eb nj\u00eb apartament n\u00eb Tiran\u00eb p\u00ebr shum\u00ebn 82 mij\u00eb euro n\u00eb vitin 2009. Pagesat p\u00ebr apartamentin ishin ndar\u00eb n\u00eb tre k\u00ebste. K\u00ebsti i par\u00eb si\u00e7 doli n\u00eb hetim ishte paguar fillimisht me nj\u00eb hua afatshkurt\u00ebr q\u00eb ishte shlyer me kursimet e De\u00e7ollit. Sipas Komisionit, huaja ishte shlyer ne rrug\u00eb bankare dhe nuk u gjet\u00ebn probleme.<\/p>\n<p>K\u00ebsti i dyt\u00eb ishte paguar p\u00ebrmes nj\u00eb kredie, nd\u00ebrsa k\u00ebsti i tret\u00eb pak m\u00eb shum\u00eb se 24 mij\u00eb euro ishte ende i pashlyer pasi sht\u00ebpia nuk ishte regjistruar si pron\u00eb n\u00eb kadast\u00ebr.<\/p>\n<p>An\u00ebtarja e trup\u00ebs Etleda \u00c7iftja pyeti De\u00e7ollin p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb rast. \u00c7iftja k\u00ebrkoi t\u00eb dinte n\u00ebse kishte ndonj\u00eb kontrat\u00eb mes De\u00e7ollit dhe kompanis\u00eb, p\u00ebr shkak se gjyqtarja e shfryt\u00ebzonte banes\u00ebn prej vitesh, por nuk e kishte paguar k\u00ebstin e tret\u00eb. De\u00e7olli k\u00ebmb\u00ebnguli se nuk kishte kontrat\u00eb tjet\u00ebr, p\u00ebrve\u00e7 asaj q\u00eb e lidhte shlyerje e k\u00ebtij detyrime me regjistrimin e pron\u00ebs.<\/p>\n<p>Bekteshi tha se ishin verifikuar pasurit\u00eb e vjehrr\u00ebs dhe djalit t\u00eb gjyqtares dhe nuk ishin gjetur probleme. Po ashtu KPK kishte hetuar p\u00ebr pasuri edhe n\u00eb dy mbiemrat e tjer\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrdorur nga gjyqtarja dhe t\u00eb deklaruara prej saj.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Figura dhe profesionalizmi<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Bekteshi relatoi se Drejtoria p\u00ebr Sigurimin e Informacionit t\u00eb Klasifikuar kishte sjell\u00eb nj\u00eb raport me probleme p\u00ebr De\u00e7ollin, duke v\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb dukje nj\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje dhe ngritur dyshime p\u00ebr gjyqtaren. DSIK megjithat\u00eb nuk kishte dh\u00ebn\u00eb mendim p\u00ebrfundimtare mbi gjyqtaren, por ia linte k\u00ebt\u00eb vler\u00ebsim Komisionit.<\/p>\n<p>Por verifikimet e Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit gjet\u00ebn se \u00e7\u00ebshtja n\u00eb fjal\u00eb, nj\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje divorci, nuk ishte gjykuar prej saj. De\u00e7olli vet\u00eb e cil\u00ebsoi fyes raportin e DSIK-s\u00eb dhe b\u00ebri kritika ndaj pun\u00ebs s\u00eb institucionit, por u nd\u00ebrpre nga kryesuesi Hamitaj q\u00eb i cil\u00ebsoi k\u00ebto jasht\u00eb interesit t\u00eb seanc\u00ebs.<\/p>\n<p>Sa i p\u00ebrket profesionalizmit, De\u00e7ollit iu k\u00ebrkuan shpjegime p\u00ebr nj\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje t\u00eb gjykuar prej saj, em\u00ebrtuar si \u201cDosja num\u00ebr 3\u201d. KPK tha se vendimi n\u00eb fjal\u00eb ishte prishur nga Gjykata e Apelit. Si\u00e7 u kuptua \u00e7\u00ebshtja ishte nj\u00eb padi p\u00ebr konsiderimin si \u201cabsolutisht t\u00eb pavlefshme\u201d t\u00eb nj\u00eb kontrate dhurimi.<\/p>\n<p>De\u00e7olli n\u00eb shpjegimet e saj tha se kishte ndjekur vendimin unifikues t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb. Ajo tha se n\u00ebse padia konsiderohej e plot\u00eb Apeli mund ta kishte shqyrtuar at\u00eb vet\u00eb dhe nuk kishte pse e kthente.<\/p>\n<p>Gjyqtarja dha shpjegime edhe mbi disa denoncime. Ajo fal\u00ebnderoi KPK p\u00ebr hetimin e thelluar dhe k\u00ebrkoi konfirmim n\u00eb detyr\u00eb. Vendimi do t\u00eb shpallet n\u00eb 5 qershor.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit zhvilloi t\u00eb h\u00ebn\u00ebn nj\u00eb seanc\u00eb d\u00ebgjimore me gjyqtaren e Tiran\u00ebs Fatime De\u00e7olli. Gjyqtares, q\u00eb iu n\u00ebnshtrua procesit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit n\u00eb t\u00eb tri kriteret, \u00a0iu k\u00ebrkuan shpjegime p\u00ebr dy balanca negative t\u00eb shp\u00ebrndara n\u00eb vite dhe q\u00eb n\u00eb total shkonin rreth 500 mij\u00eb lek\u00eb dhe po ashtu u pyet n\u00eb lidhje [&hellip;]<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":97,"featured_media":78336,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[117,2],"tags":[365,424,288,1472,111,103,118,172],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Fatime-Decolli-ne-KPK.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"Gjyqtarja Fatime De\u00e7olli gjat\u00eb seanc\u00ebs d\u00ebgjimore n\u00eb KPK. Foto: Vladimir Karaj. ","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78335"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/97"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=78335"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78335\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":78337,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78335\/revisions\/78337"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/78336"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=78335"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=78335"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=78335"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}