Komisioneri Publik k\u00ebmb\u00ebnguli t\u00eb m\u00ebrkur\u00ebn n\u00eb shkaqet e ankimit ndaj vendimit t\u00eb Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit p\u00ebr konfirmimin n\u00eb detyr\u00eb t\u00eb gjyqtarit t\u00eb Tiran\u00ebs Besnik Hoxha. N\u00eb seanc\u00ebn e par\u00eb p\u00ebr shqyrtimin e ankimit n\u00eb Kolegjin e Posa\u00e7\u00ebm t\u00eb Apelimit, Komisioneri Florian Ballhysa k\u00ebrkoi shkarkimin e Hoxh\u00ebs, duke arsyetuar se ai nuk arrinte nivel t\u00eb besuesh\u00ebm.<\/p>\n
\u201cK\u00ebrkojm\u00eb q\u00eb shkaqet parashtruara n\u00eb ankim t\u00eb merren n\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb nga ana e Kolegjit t\u00eb Posa\u00e7\u00ebm t\u00eb Apelimit dhe, n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim t\u00eb gjykimit t\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjes, t\u00eb vendos\u00eb: – Ndryshimin e vendimit nr. 661, dat\u00eb 18.5.2023, t\u00eb Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit, dhe shkarkimin nga detyra t\u00eb subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit, z. Besnik Hoxha\u201d, tha Ballhysa.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb krahun tjet\u00ebr avokatja Romina Zano, e cila lexoi q\u00ebndrimet e Hoxh\u00ebs para Kolegjit, k\u00ebmb\u00ebnguli n\u00eb l\u00ebnien n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb vendimit, duke th\u00ebn\u00eb se pretendimet e\u00a0 Komisionerit Publik nuk bazoheshin n\u00eb fakte dhe prova.<\/p>\n
Duke iu referuar vendimit t\u00eb KPK-s\u00eb Zano tha se ai duhej t\u00eb q\u00ebndronte n\u00eb fuqi. \u201c\u00cbsht\u00eb i drejt\u00eb dhe i bazuar n\u00eb ligj,\u00a0 dhe p\u00ebr k\u0451t\u0451 arsye k\u00ebrkoj nga\u00a0 Kolegji i Pavaruar i Kualifikimit l\u00ebnien n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb k\u0451tij vendimi\u201d, u shpreh avokatja e Hoxh\u00ebs.<\/p>\n
Hoxha, i cili u konfirmua n\u00eb detyr\u00eb me shumic\u00eb votash nj\u00eb vit m\u00eb par\u00eb n\u00eb KPK, \u00ebsht\u00eb i njohur si nj\u00eb nga an\u00ebtar\u00ebt e trup\u00ebs q\u00eb gjykoi \u00e7\u00ebshtjen dhe u dha pafaj\u00ebsi gardist\u00ebve t\u00eb akuzuar p\u00ebr vrasjet n\u00eb protest\u00ebn e 21 janarit. Vendimi i KPK-s\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb konfirmuar Hoxh\u00ebn, u kund\u00ebrshtua nga Operacioni i V\u00ebzhguesve Nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtar dhe m\u00eb pas u ankimua nga Komisioneri Publik, i cili pretendon se vendimi i KPK-s\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb i c\u00ebnuesh\u00ebm n\u00eb t\u00eb tri kriteret e rivler\u00ebsimit.<\/p>\n
Gjat\u00eb leximit t\u00eb parashtrimeve Ballhysa i q\u00ebndroi asaj q\u00eb kishte paraqitur n\u00eb ankim. Ai k\u00ebmb\u00ebnguli se sa i p\u00ebrket pasuris\u00eb Hoxha kishte b\u00ebr\u00eb deklarim t\u00eb pasakt\u00eb, t\u00eb pamjaftuesh\u00ebm dhe se ishte \u201cp\u00ebrpjekur t\u00eb paraqes\u00eb n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb pasakt\u00eb pasurin\u00eb n\u00eb fjal\u00eb dhe interesat e v\u00ebrteta pasurore t\u00eb tij\u201d.<\/p>\n
Komisioneri renditi nj\u00eb s\u00ebr\u00eb rrethanash q\u00eb sipas tij duhej t\u00eb ishin vler\u00ebsuar ndryshe nga Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit, duke theksuar se subjekti nuk kishte arritur t\u00eb provonte t\u00eb kund\u00ebrt\u00ebn e barr\u00ebs s\u00eb prov\u00ebs.<\/p>\n
P\u00ebr pasurin\u00eb: godin\u00eb banimi 3-kate n\u00eb Shkod\u00ebr Komisioneri arsyeton se zbatimi i parimit t\u00eb proporcionalitetit si\u00e7 ka arsyetuar KPK \u00ebsht\u00eb i pavend. \u201c\u00cbsht\u00eb e qart\u00eb se parimi i proporcionalitetit nuk mund t\u00eb merret dhe\u00a0 interpretohet i shk\u00ebputur p\u00ebr relativizuar pasakt\u00ebsin\u00eb n\u00eb deklarim dhe pamjaftueshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e\u00a0 burimeve t\u00eb ligjshme n\u00eb krijimin e pasuris\u00eb godin\u00eb banimi 3-kate t\u00eb ndodhur n\u00eb Shkod\u00ebr, duke u\u00a0 shmangur k\u00ebshtu, nga detyrimi p\u00ebr deklarim me v\u00ebrtet\u00ebsi t\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsis\u00eb s\u00eb pasuris\u00eb dhe shpjegimit\u00a0 bindsh\u00ebm t\u00eb ligjshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb burimit t\u00eb krijimit t\u00eb saj\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb parashtrime.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me k\u00ebto q\u00ebndrime avokatja e Hoxh\u00ebs parashtroi se subjekti kishte b\u00ebr\u00eb deklarim t\u00eb sakt\u00eb. Zano k\u00ebmb\u00ebnguli n\u00eb fjal\u00ebn e saj se pretendimetet e Komisionerit Publik se nuk mund t\u00eb zbatohej parimi i proporcionalitetit ishin t\u00eb pabazuara. Sipas saj Komisioneri Publik nuk kishte paraqitur nj\u00eb shif\u00ebr se sa ishte diferenca dhe pse kjo nuk mund t\u00eb cil\u00ebsohej proporcionale.<\/p>\n
\u201cN\u00eb fakt Komisioneri Publik nuk paraqet n\u00eb ankimin e tij se sa \u00ebsht\u00eb pamjaftueshm\u00ebria financiare q\u00eb sipas tij nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb as\u00a0 proporcionale.\u00a0 Komisioneri p\u00ebrmend disa shifra, psh p\u00ebr vler\u00ebn e nd\u00ebrtimit\u00a0 n\u00eb ankim po nuk pretendon n\u00eb ankim ndonj\u00eb diferenc\u00eb konkrete n\u00eb mbulimin e kostos s\u00eb k\u00ebsaj pasurie\u201d, tha Zano.<\/p>\n
Q\u00ebndrime t\u00eb ndryshme pal\u00ebt mbajt\u00ebn edhe sa i p\u00ebrket pasuris\u00eb s\u00eb dyt\u00eb. Nj\u00eb apartament n\u00eb Tiran\u00eb i deklaruar si adres\u00eb vendbanimi e subjektit. Komisioneri Publik k\u00ebmb\u00ebnguli n\u00eb fjal\u00ebn e tij se n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast subjekti kishte paraqitur nj\u00eb situat\u00eb t\u00eb ndryshme faktike \u201cnga sa kan\u00eb rrjedhur ngjarjet dhe interesat e tij pasurore me k\u00ebt\u00eb pasuri, si dhe momentit t\u00eb posedimit t\u00eb saj\u201d.<\/p>\n
Zano e kund\u00ebrshtoi k\u00ebt\u00eb pretendim duke k\u00ebmb\u00ebngulur se nuk kishet prova.<\/p>\n
Pal\u00ebt po ashtu u p\u00ebrball\u00ebn sa i p\u00ebrket dyshimeve t\u00eb ngritura p\u00ebr kontaktet e subjektit me nj\u00eb s\u00ebr\u00eb personash dhe p\u00ebrdormin e mjeteve t\u00eb tyre, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb kishte gjykuar m\u00eb her\u00ebt \u00e7\u00ebshtje me k\u00ebto pal\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Komisioneri Publik k\u00ebmb\u00ebnguli se k\u00ebto raste duhet t\u00eb vler\u00ebsohen p\u00ebr t\u00eb gjykuar integritetin e magjistratit. \u201cKomisioneri Publik, bazuar n\u00eb Rekomandimin e ONM-s\u00eb t\u00eb dat\u00ebs 19.6.2023, vler\u00ebson se\u00a0 pavar\u00ebsisht natyr\u00ebs s\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjeve t\u00eb gjykuara nga subjekti, \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsi e tij t\u00eb mos gjykoj\u00eb\u00a0 \u00e7\u00ebshtje kur ai ka lidhje t\u00eb natyr\u00ebs personale apo interesi me pal\u00ebt n\u00eb gjykim\u201d, tha Ballhysa.<\/p>\n
Zano k\u00ebmb\u00ebguli n\u00eb vijim t\u00eb fjal\u00ebs s\u00eb saj se b\u00ebhej fjal\u00eb p\u00ebr vendimmarrje deklarative dhe se nuk ishet c\u00ebnuar integriteti i gjykat\u00ebs. Ajo po ashtu vuri theksin te koha e kaluar mes \u00e7\u00ebshtjes n\u00eb gjykat\u00eb dhe kontaktit t\u00eb Hoxh\u00ebs me pal\u00ebt. \u201cKan\u00eb qen\u00eb t\u00eb natyr\u00ebs deklarative, dhe vendimmarrja\u00a0 i subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit nuk ka si t\u00eb ket\u00eb ndikuar n\u00eb veprimet juridike t\u00eb m\u00ebpasme\u201d, tha Zano.<\/p>\n
Pasi d\u00ebgjoi pal\u00ebt, trupa e Kolegjit, me kryesuese Albana Shtylla, relator Sokol \u00c7omo dhe an\u00ebtare Ina Rama, Natasha Mulaj e Mimoza Tasi, vendosi t\u00eb ftoj\u00eb pal\u00ebt p\u00ebr konkluzionet p\u00ebrfundimtare n\u00eb dat\u00ebn 22 korrik.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Komisioneri Publik k\u00ebmb\u00ebnguli t\u00eb m\u00ebrkur\u00ebn n\u00eb shkaqet e ankimit ndaj vendimit t\u00eb Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit p\u00ebr konfirmimin n\u00eb detyr\u00eb t\u00eb gjyqtarit t\u00eb Tiran\u00ebs Besnik Hoxha. N\u00eb seanc\u00ebn e par\u00eb p\u00ebr shqyrtimin e ankimit n\u00eb Kolegjin e Posa\u00e7\u00ebm t\u00eb Apelimit, Komisioneri Florian Ballhysa k\u00ebrkoi shkarkimin e Hoxh\u00ebs, duke arsyetuar se ai nuk arrinte nivel […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":97,"featured_media":78567,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[114,2],"tags":[407,904,427,111,103,789,112,430,674,675,903],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/KPA-besnik-hoxha.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit gjat\u00eb seanc\u00ebs p\u00ebr gjyqtarit Besnik Hoxha. Foto: Vladimir Karaj. ","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78566"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/97"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=78566"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78566\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":78568,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78566\/revisions\/78568"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/78567"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=78566"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=78566"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=78566"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}