Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit, KPA u njoh t\u00eb mart\u00ebn m\u00eb 28 tetor me parashtrimet n\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjen e vetingut t\u00eb prokurorit t\u00eb Tiran\u00ebs, Arben Agovi. Prokurori Klodian Braho i cili p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebson drejtuesin e SPAK n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje, parashtroi shkaqet e ankimit q\u00eb lidhen me kriterin e profesionalizmit. Sipas Brahos, nga verifikimi i \u00e7\u00ebshtjeve profesionale, konstatohet se nga ana e subjektit, n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrs\u00ebritur ka munges\u00eb t\u00eb nd\u00ebrmarrjes s\u00eb hetimeve dhe mbledhjes s\u00eb provave, si edhe munges\u00eb t\u00eb arsyetimit logjik n\u00eb trajtimin e procedimeve penale. Sipas Brahos, shpjegimet e subjektit t\u00eb dh\u00ebna n\u00eb Komision, nuk jan\u00eb bind\u00ebse.<\/p>\n
Ai solli n\u00eb v\u00ebmendje pamund\u00ebsin\u00eb financiare t\u00eb konstatuar n\u00eb KPK, q\u00eb megjith\u00ebse e cil\u00ebsoi t\u00eb pamjaftueshme p\u00ebr t\u00eb sjell\u00eb penalizim, k\u00ebrkoi q\u00eb t\u00eb konsiderohet nga Kolegji n\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin t\u00ebr\u00ebsor t\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjes.<\/p>\n
Braho shtoi se k\u00ebto konstatime do t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsohen pas shqyrtimit t\u00eb provave dhe shpjegimeve t\u00eb subjektit gjat\u00eb procesit n\u00eb Kolegj. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, referuar gjendjes s\u00eb akteve, Braho paraqiti k\u00ebrkimin e drejtuesit t\u00eb SPAK, p\u00ebr ndryshimin e vendimit t\u00eb Komisionit p\u00ebr konfirmimin e prokurorit Agovi dhe shkarkimin e tij nga detyra.<\/p>\n
Prokurori Arben Agovi u paraqit n\u00eb seanc\u00eb publike s\u00eb bashku me avokatin Julian M\u00ebrtiri, i cili paraqiti n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb detajuar gjith\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtit\u00eb p\u00ebr shkaqet e ankimit.<\/p>\n
M\u00ebrtiri i cil\u00ebsoi si formale shkaqet dhe t\u00eb pabazuara n\u00eb aktet e administruara. Ai theksoi se veprimet procedurale dhe hetimore t\u00eb nd\u00ebrmarra nga subjekti i rivler\u00ebsimit gjat\u00eb ushtrimit t\u00eb detyr\u00ebs jan\u00eb t\u00eb rregullta e t\u00eb plota, gj\u00eb q\u00eb sipas tij, v\u00ebrtetohet edhe nga vendimet gjyq\u00ebsore p\u00ebr \u00e7\u00ebshtjet objekt ankimi.<\/p>\n
Sipas M\u00ebrtirit, shpjegimet e subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit p\u00ebr nj\u00eb rast q\u00eb trajtohet n\u00eb ankim, kan\u00eb qen\u00eb jo vet\u00ebm bind\u00ebse por edhe shteruese, duke detajuar me korrektes\u00eb veprimet procedurale t\u00eb nd\u00ebrmarra prej tij. Avokati cil\u00ebsoi si thelb\u00ebsor faktin se n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim t\u00eb hetimeve, gjykata ka pranuar p\u00ebrfundimisht k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn prokurorit Agovi, duke i konsideruar veprimet e tij t\u00eb plota.<\/p>\n
Edhe nj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr shkak ankimi, M\u00ebrtiri e cil\u00ebsoi t\u00eb pabazuar dhe k\u00ebrkoi rivler\u00ebsimin e fakteve nga ana e Drejtuesit t\u00eb SPAK, duke u vler\u00ebsuar se veprimet e subjektit t\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimit Arben Agovi kan\u00eb qen\u00eb determinuese p\u00ebr zgjidhjen p\u00ebrfundimtare t\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjes.<\/p>\n
Avokati M\u00ebrtiri kund\u00ebrshtoi dhe shkakun p\u00ebr kriterin e pasuris\u00eb, duke u shprehur se nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb shkak ankimi i qen\u00ebsish\u00ebm, i bazuar n\u00eb prova.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim, M\u00ebrtiri dhe prokurori Arben Agovi k\u00ebrkuan l\u00ebnien n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb konfirmimit n\u00eb detyr\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Kolegji nuk gjeti element\u00eb t\u00eb mjaftuesh\u00ebm n\u00eb denoncime t\u00eb depozituara s\u00eb fundmi ndaj subjektit dhe vendosi t\u00eb mos \u00e7el\u00eb hetimin e tyre. Seanca p\u00ebr paraqitjen e konkluzioneve p\u00ebrfundimtare do t\u00eb zhvillohet m\u00eb dat\u00eb 4 n\u00ebntor, n\u00eb or\u00ebn 13:30.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kolegji i Posa\u00e7\u00ebm i Apelimit, KPA u njoh t\u00eb mart\u00ebn m\u00eb 28 tetor me parashtrimet n\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjen e vetingut t\u00eb prokurorit t\u00eb Tiran\u00ebs, Arben Agovi. Prokurori Klodian Braho i cili p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebson drejtuesin e SPAK n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje, parashtroi shkaqet e ankimit q\u00eb lidhen me kriterin e profesionalizmit. Sipas Brahos, nga verifikimi i \u00e7\u00ebshtjeve profesionale, konstatohet […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":637,"featured_media":79656,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[114,2,115],"tags":[1269,921,793,112,221,171,1926,359,1927,325,227],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.reporter.al\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/IMG-3815-scaled.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"Avokati Julian M\u00ebrtiri dhe prokurori Arben Agovi pas seanc\u00ebs n\u00eb KPA. Foto; BIRN","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/79655"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/637"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=79655"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/79655\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":79657,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/79655\/revisions\/79657"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/79656"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=79655"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=79655"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reporter.al\/vetingu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=79655"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}